1
|
Lane SA, Slater JM, Yang GY. Image-Guided Proton Therapy: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092555. [PMID: 37174022 PMCID: PMC10177085 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Image guidance for radiation therapy can improve the accuracy of the delivery of radiation, leading to an improved therapeutic ratio. Proton radiation is able to deliver a highly conformal dose to a target due to its advantageous dosimetric properties, including the Bragg peak. Proton therapy established the standard for daily image guidance as a means of minimizing uncertainties associated with proton treatment. With the increasing adoption of the use of proton therapy over time, image guidance systems for this modality have been changing. The unique properties of proton radiation present a number of differences in image guidance from photon therapy. This paper describes CT and MRI-based simulation and methods of daily image guidance. Developments in dose-guided radiation, upright treatment, and FLASH RT are discussed as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelby A Lane
- James M. Slater, MD Proton Treatment and Research Center, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA
| | - Jason M Slater
- James M. Slater, MD Proton Treatment and Research Center, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA
| | - Gary Y Yang
- James M. Slater, MD Proton Treatment and Research Center, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fattori G, Zhang Y, Meer D, Weber DC, Lomax AJ, Safai S. The potential of Gantry beamline large momentum acceptance for real time tumour tracking in pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Sci Rep 2020; 10:15325. [PMID: 32948790 PMCID: PMC7501279 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71821-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumour tracking is an advanced radiotherapy technique for precise treatment of tumours subject to organ motion. In this work, we addressed crucial aspects of dose delivery for its realisation in pencil beam scanning proton therapy, exploring the momentum acceptance and global achromaticity of a Gantry beamline to perform continuous energy regulation with a standard upstream degrader. This novel approach is validated on simulation data from three geometric phantoms of increasing complexity and one liver cancer patient using 4D dose calculations. Results from a standard high-to-low beamline ramping scheme were compared to alternative energy meandering schemes including combinations with rescanning. Target coverage and dose conformity were generally well recovered with tumour tracking even though for particularly small targets, large variations are reported for the different approaches. Meandering in energy while rescanning has a positive impact on target homogeneity and similarly, hot spots outside the targets are mitigated with a relatively fast convergence rate for most tracking scenarios, halving the volume of hot spots after as little as 3 rescans. This work investigates the yet unexplored potential of having a large momentum acceptance in medical beam line, and provides an alternative to take tumour tracking with particle therapy closer to clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Fattori
- Center for Proton Therapy, WMSA/C14, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland.
| | - Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, WMSA/C14, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - David Meer
- Center for Proton Therapy, WMSA/C14, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Damien Charles Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, WMSA/C14, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, 3000, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antony John Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, WMSA/C14, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sairos Safai
- Center for Proton Therapy, WMSA/C14, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fattori G, Hrbacek J, Regele H, Bula C, Mayor A, Danuser S, Oxley DC, Rechsteiner U, Grossmann M, Via R, Böhlen TT, Bolsi A, Walser M, Togno M, Colvill E, Lempen D, Weber DC, Lomax AJ, Safai S. Commissioning and quality assurance of a novel solution for respiratory-gated PBS proton therapy based on optical tracking of surface markers. Z Med Phys 2020; 32:52-62. [PMID: 32830006 PMCID: PMC9948868 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
We present the commissioning and quality assurance of our clinical protocol for respiratory gating in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for cancer patients with moving targets. In a novel approach, optical tracking has been integrated in the therapy workflow and used to monitor respiratory motion from multiple surrogates, applied on the patients' chest. The gating system was tested under a variety of experimental conditions, specific to proton therapy, to evaluate reaction time and reproducibility of dose delivery control. The system proved to be precise in the application of beam gating and allowed the mitigation of dose distortions even for large (1.4cm) motion amplitudes, provided that adequate treatment windows were selected. The total delivered dose was not affected by the use of gating, with measured integral error within 0.15cGy. Analysing high-resolution images of proton transmission, we observed negligible discrepancies in the geometric location of the dose as a function of the treatment window, with gamma pass rate greater than 95% (2%/2mm) compared to stationary conditions. Similarly, pass rate for the latter metric at the 3%/3mm level was observed above 97% for clinical treatment fields, limiting residual movement to 3mm at end-exhale. These results were confirmed in realistic clinical conditions using an anthropomorphic breathing phantom, reporting a similarly high 3%/3mm pass rate, above 98% and 94%, for regular and irregular breathing, respectively. Finally, early results from periodic QA tests of the optical tracker have shown a reliable system, with small variance observed in static and dynamic measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Fattori
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland.
| | - Jan Hrbacek
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Harald Regele
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Christian Bula
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Alexandre Mayor
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Danuser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - David C. Oxley
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Urs Rechsteiner
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Martin Grossmann
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Riccardo Via
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Till T. Böhlen
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Alessandra Bolsi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Marc Walser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Michele Togno
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Emma Colvill
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Lempen
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Damien C. Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, 3000 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antony J. Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland,Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sairos Safai
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ricotti R, Pella A, Tagaste B, Elisei G, Fontana G, Bonora M, Ciocca M, Valvo F, Orecchia R, Baroni G. Long-time clinical experience in patient setup for several particle therapy clinical indications: management of patient positioning and evaluation of setup reproducibility and stability. Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190595. [PMID: 31687833 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Accurate patient positioning is crucial in particle therapy due to the geometrical selectivity of particles. We report and discuss the National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO) experience in positioning accuracy and stability achieved with solid thermoplastic masks fixed on index base plates and assessed by daily orthogonal X-ray imaging. METHODS Positioning data were retrospectively collected (between 2012 and 2018) and grouped according to the treated anatomical site. 19696 fractions of 1325 patients were evaluated.The study was designed to assess:(i) the number of fractions in which a single correction vector was applied(SCV);(ii) the number of fractions in which further setup verification was performed (SV);(iii) the number of fractions in which SV lead to an additional correction within (MCV<5min) or after (MCV>5min) 5 minutes from the first setup correction;(iv) the systematic (Σ) and random (σ) error components of the correction vectors applied. RESULTS A SCV was applied in 71.5% of fractions, otherwise SV was required. In 30.6% of fractions with SV, patient position was not further revised. In the remaining fractions, MCV<5min and MCV>5min were applied mainly in extracranial and cranial sites respectively.Interfraction Σ was ≤ 1.7 mm/0.7° and σ was ≤ 1.2 mm/0.6° in cranial sites while in extracranial sites Σ was ≤ 5.5 mm/0.9° and σ was ≤4.4 mm/0.9°. Setup residuals were submillimetric in all sites. In cranial patients, maximum intrafractional Σ was 0.8 mm/0.4°. CONCLUSION This report extensively quantifies inter- and intrafraction setup accuracy on an institutional basis and confirms the need of image guidance to fully benefit from the geometrical selectivity of particles. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The reported analysis provides a board institutional data set on the evaluation of patient immobilization and bony anatomy alignment for several particle therapy clinical indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalinda Ricotti
- Bioengineering Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Andrea Pella
- Bioengineering Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Barbara Tagaste
- Bioengineering Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Elisei
- Bioengineering Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giulia Fontana
- Bioengineering Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Bonora
- Radiotherapy Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Mario Ciocca
- Medical Physics Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Valvo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy.,European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Bioengineering Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy.,Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pötter R, Balosso J, Baumann M, Bert C, Davies J, Enghardt W, Fossati P, Harris S, Jones B, Krämer M, Mayer R, Mock U, Pullia M, Schreiner T, Dosanjh M, Debus J, Orecchia R, Georg D. Union of light ion therapy centers in Europe (ULICE EC FP7) – Objectives and achievements of joint research activities. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:83-100. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2018] [Accepted: 04/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
6
|
Fassi A, Ivaldi GB, de Fatis PT, Liotta M, Meaglia I, Porcu P, Regolo L, Riboldi M, Baroni G. Target position reproducibility in left-breast irradiation with deep inspiration breath-hold using multiple optical surface control points. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:35-43. [PMID: 29740971 PMCID: PMC6036357 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Revised: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the use of 3D optical localization of multiple surface control points for deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) guidance in left-breast radiotherapy treatments. Ten left-breast cancer patients underwent whole-breast DIBH radiotherapy controlled by the Real-time Position Management (RPM) system. The reproducibility of the tumor bed (i.e., target) was assessed by the position of implanted clips, acquired through in-room kV imaging. Six to eight passive fiducials were positioned on the patients' thoraco-abdominal surface and localized intrafractionally by means of an infrared 3D optical tracking system. The point-based registration between treatment and planning fiducials coordinates was applied to estimate the interfraction variations in patients' breathing baseline and to improve target reproducibility. The RPM-based DIBH control resulted in a 3D error in target reproducibility of 5.8 ± 3.4 mm (median value ± interquartile range) across all patients. The reproducibility errors proved correlated with the interfraction baseline variations, which reached 7.7 mm for the single patient. The contribution of surface fiducials registration allowed a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.05) in target localization errors, measuring 3.4 ± 1.7 mm in 3D. The 3D optical monitoring of multiple surface control points may help to optimize the use of the RPM system for improving target reproducibility in left-breast DIBH irradiation, providing insights on breathing baseline variations and increasing the robustness of external surrogates for DIBH guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurora Fassi
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Giovanni B Ivaldi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Marco Liotta
- Division of Medical Physics, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ilaria Meaglia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
| | - Patrizia Porcu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
| | - Lea Regolo
- Division of Breast Surgery, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Riboldi
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.,Bioengineering Unit, Clinical Division, CNAO Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang Y, Huth I, Wegner M, Weber DC, Lomax AJ. Surface as a motion surrogate for gated re-scanned pencil beam proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62:4046-4061. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa66c5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
8
|
Fattori G, Safai S, Carmona PF, Peroni M, Perrin R, Weber DC, Lomax AJ. Monitoring of breathing motion in image-guided PBS proton therapy: comparative analysis of optical and electromagnetic technologies. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:63. [PMID: 28359341 PMCID: PMC5374699 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0797-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2016] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Motion monitoring is essential when treating non-static tumours with pencil beam scanned protons. 4D medical imaging typically relies on the detected body surface displacement, considered as a surrogate of the patient's anatomical changes, a concept similarly applied by most motion mitigation techniques. In this study, we investigate benefits and pitfalls of optical and electromagnetic tracking, key technologies for non-invasive surface motion monitoring, in the specific environment of image-guided, gantry-based proton therapy. Methods Polaris SPECTRA optical tracking system and the Aurora V3 electromagnetic tracking system from Northern Digital Inc. (NDI, Waterloo, CA) have been compared both technically, by measuring tracking errors and system latencies under laboratory conditions, and clinically, by assessing their practicalities and sensitivities when used with imaging devices and PBS treatment gantries. Additionally, we investigated the impact of using different surrogate signals, from different systems, on the reconstructed 4D CT images. Results Even though in controlled laboratory conditions both technologies allow for the localization of static fiducials with sub-millimetre jitter and low latency (31.6 ± 1 msec worst case), significant dynamic and environmental distortions limit the potential of the electromagnetic approach in a clinical setting. The measurement error in case of close proximity to a CT scanner is up to 10.5 mm and precludes its use for the monitoring of respiratory motion during 4DCT acquisitions. Similarly, the motion of the treatment gantry distorts up to 22 mm the tracking result. Conclusions Despite the line of sight requirement, the optical solution offers the best potential, being the most robust against environmental factors and providing the highest spatial accuracy. The significant difference in the temporal location of the reconstructed phase points is used to speculate on the need to apply the same monitoring system for imaging and treatment to ensure the consistency of detected phases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Fattori
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232, Villigen, PSI, Switzerland
| | - Sairos Safai
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232, Villigen, PSI, Switzerland
| | | | - Marta Peroni
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232, Villigen, PSI, Switzerland
| | - Rosalind Perrin
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232, Villigen, PSI, Switzerland
| | - Damien Charles Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232, Villigen, PSI, Switzerland.,Radiation Oncology Department, Inselspital Universitätsspital Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antony John Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232, Villigen, PSI, Switzerland. .,Department of Physics, ETH-Hönggerberg, 8093, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Via R, Fassi A, Fattori G, Fontana G, Pella A, Tagaste B, Riboldi M, Ciocca M, Orecchia R, Baroni G. Optical eye tracking system for real-time noninvasive tumor localization in external beam radiotherapy. Med Phys 2016; 42:2194-202. [PMID: 25979013 DOI: 10.1118/1.4915921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE External beam radiotherapy currently represents an important therapeutic strategy for the treatment of intraocular tumors. Accurate target localization and efficient compensation of involuntary eye movements are crucial to avoid deviations in dose distribution with respect to the treatment plan. This paper describes an eye tracking system (ETS) based on noninvasive infrared video imaging. The system was designed for capturing the tridimensional (3D) ocular motion and provides an on-line estimation of intraocular lesions position based on a priori knowledge coming from volumetric imaging. METHODS Eye tracking is performed by localizing cornea and pupil centers on stereo images captured by two calibrated video cameras, exploiting eye reflections produced by infrared illumination. Additionally, torsional eye movements are detected by template matching in the iris region of eye images. This information allows estimating the 3D position and orientation of the eye by means of an eye local reference system. By combining ETS measurements with volumetric imaging for treatment planning [computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR)], one is able to map the position of the lesion to be treated in local eye coordinates, thus enabling real-time tumor referencing during treatment setup and irradiation. Experimental tests on an eye phantom and seven healthy subjects were performed to assess ETS tracking accuracy. RESULTS Measurements on phantom showed an overall median accuracy within 0.16 mm and 0.40° for translations and rotations, respectively. Torsional movements were affected by 0.28° median uncertainty. On healthy subjects, the gaze direction error ranged between 0.19° and 0.82° at a median working distance of 29 cm. The median processing time of the eye tracking algorithm was 18.60 ms, thus allowing eye monitoring up to 50 Hz. CONCLUSIONS A noninvasive ETS prototype was designed to perform real-time target localization and eye movement monitoring during ocular radiotherapy treatments. The device aims at improving state-of-the-art invasive procedures based on surgical implantation of radiopaque clips and repeated acquisition of X-ray images, with expected positive effects on treatment quality and patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Via
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano 20133, Italy
| | - Aurora Fassi
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano 20133, Italy
| | - Giovanni Fattori
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano 20133, Italy
| | - Giulia Fontana
- CNAO Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Pavia 27100, Italy
| | - Andrea Pella
- CNAO Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Pavia 27100, Italy
| | - Barbara Tagaste
- CNAO Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Pavia 27100, Italy
| | - Marco Riboldi
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano 20133, Italy and CNAO Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Pavia 27100, Italy
| | - Mario Ciocca
- CNAO Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Pavia 27100, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- CNAO Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Pavia 27100, Italy and European Institute of Oncology, Milano 20141, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano 20133, Italy and CNAO Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Pavia 27100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rossi S. The National Centre for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO): Status and perspectives. Phys Med 2015; 31:333-51. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2015] [Revised: 02/05/2015] [Accepted: 03/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
11
|
Fattori G, Riboldi M, Pella A, Peroni M, Cerveri P, Desplanques M, Fontana G, Tagaste B, Valvo F, Orecchia R, Baroni G. Image guided particle therapy in CNAO room 2: Implementation and clinical validation. Phys Med 2015; 31:9-15. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.10.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2014] [Revised: 10/10/2014] [Accepted: 10/11/2014] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
|
12
|
Knopf A, Nill S, Yohannes I, Graeff C, Dowdell S, Kurz C, Sonke JJ, Biegun AK, Lang S, McClelland J, Champion B, Fast M, Wölfelschneider J, Gianoli C, Rucinski A, Baroni G, Richter C, van de Water S, Grassberger C, Weber D, Poulsen P, Shimizu S, Bert C. Challenges of radiotherapy: report on the 4D treatment planning workshop 2013. Phys Med 2014; 30:809-15. [PMID: 25172392 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.07.341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2014] [Revised: 07/23/2014] [Accepted: 07/28/2014] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
This report, compiled by experts on the treatment of mobile targets with advanced radiotherapy, summarizes the main conclusions and innovations achieved during the 4D treatment planning workshop 2013. This annual workshop focuses on research aiming to advance 4D radiotherapy treatments, including all critical aspects of time resolved delivery, such as in-room imaging, motion detection, motion managing, beam application, and quality assurance techniques. The report aims to revise achievements in the field and to discuss remaining challenges and potential solutions. As main achievements advances in the development of a standardized 4D phantom and in the area of 4D-treatment plan optimization were identified. Furthermore, it was noticed that MR imaging gains importance and high interest for sequential 4DCT/MR data sets was expressed, which represents a general trend of the field towards data covering a longer time period of motion. A new point of attention was work related to dose reconstructions, which may play a major role in verification of 4D treatment deliveries. The experimental validation of results achieved by 4D treatment planning and the systematic evaluation of different deformable image registration methods especially for inter-modality fusions were identified as major remaining challenges. A challenge that was also suggested as focus for future 4D workshops was the adaptation of image guidance approaches from conventional radiotherapy into particle therapy. Besides summarizing the last workshop, the authors also want to point out new evolving demands and give an outlook on the focus of the next workshop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Aleksandra K Biegun
- KVI-Center for Advanced Radiation Technology, University of Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Chiara Gianoli
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Antoni Rucinski
- Radiation Oncology Department, SLK-Klinik Heilbronn, Germany
| | - Guido Baroni
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano and Bioengineering Unit, CNAO Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Christian Richter
- Oncoray - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital C.G. Carus, TU Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, DKTK, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|