1
|
Caccialanza R, Da Prat V, De Luca R, Weindelmayer J, Casirati A, De Manzoni G. Nutritional support via feeding jejunostomy in esophago-gastric cancers: proposal of a common working strategy based on the available evidence. Updates Surg 2024:10.1007/s13304-024-02022-y. [PMID: 39482454 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-02022-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 10/16/2024] [Indexed: 11/03/2024]
Abstract
Malnutrition is common in patients affected by esophago-gastric cancers and has a negative impact on both clinical and economic outcomes. Yet not all patients at risk of malnutrition are routinely assessed and receive appropriate support. Further, available research does not provide a mean for standardization of timing, route, and dosage for nutritional support, and this is particularly true for enteral nutrition via feeding jejunostomy. Herein, we provide an overview of the current evidence and use the gathered knowledge as a starting point for a consensus proposal. As a result, we aim to facilitate the development of appropriate and uniformed interventions, thus fulfilling the need for a multimodal therapeutic approach in these set of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Caccialanza
- Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Valentina Da Prat
- Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Raffaele De Luca
- Department of Surgical Oncology, IRCCS-Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy
| | - Jacopo Weindelmayer
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37124, Verona, Italy
| | - Amanda Casirati
- Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giovanni De Manzoni
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37124, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shi G, Nayak R, Malthaner R, Fortin D, Inculet R, Qiabi M. Risk factors contributing to morbidity associated with feeding tubes placed for esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective study. J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 15:1373-1385. [PMID: 39279944 PMCID: PMC11399851 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-23-891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 09/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Perioperative nutritional optimization of patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer is important as this population is prone to malnutrition associated with poor outcomes. Nutritional supplementation has been achieved via enteral nutrition through percutaneous feeding tubes such as gastrostomy (G-tubes) and surgical jejunostomy tubes (J-tubes). While they are often routinely placed for patients undergoing esophagectomy, these are associated with adverse events including infections, dislodgement, increased healthcare visits, among others. The morbidity associated with feeding tubes has not been well characterized. We aim to determine factors associated with adverse outcomes after feeding tube placement to guide appropriate use of feeding tubes in esophageal carcinoma patients. Methods Patients who underwent esophagectomy for carcinoma and had at least one feeding tube placed from November, 2017 to October, 2021 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Subgroup analyses were performed testing for relevant characteristics. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted evaluating outcomes of interest. The primary outcome was the overall rate of tube-related complications. Results A total of 144 patients were included with 212 feeding tubes placed (75 G-tubes; 137 J-tubes). The rate of any adverse event related to feeding tubes was 39%. Of these, 11% were wound infections, 16% required procedural intervention, 11% visited the emergency department (ED), and 2.5% required admission due to feeding tube-related complications. Factors independently associated with adverse events included smoking history [odds ratio (OR), 2.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-6.23], being female (OR, 2.98; 95% CI: 1.36-6.72), induction treatment (OR, 2.65; 95% CI: 1.14-6.55), and J-tubes (OR, 2.07; 95% CI: 1.09-4.03). Laparoscopically placed J-tubes were associated with increased unplanned admissions compared to those placed via laparotomy (9.4% vs. 0%, P=0.01). Though not statistically significant, there was a trend toward more complications in those who were high risk for malnutrition [body mass index (BMI) <18 kg/m2, weight loss >10%] and comorbid (Charlson Comorbidity Index 5-6). Conclusions There is significant morbidity related to feeding tubes. The risk profile of these tubes for individual patients should be carefully weighed against the nutritional benefits prior to placement. Patients should be carefully counselled on the possible adverse events and care requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ge Shi
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Rahul Nayak
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Richard Malthaner
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Dalilah Fortin
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Richard Inculet
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Mehdi Qiabi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Davies SJ, Wheelwright S. The impact of jejunostomy feeding on nutritional outcomes after oesophagectomy. J Hum Nutr Diet 2024; 37:126-136. [PMID: 37789732 DOI: 10.1111/jhn.13235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nutritional status is compromised long-term following oesophagectomy. Controversy surrounds the optimal route for nutrition support postoperatively and there is wide variation in the use of feeding jejunostomy tubes. METHODS A retrospective service evaluation was conducted for all consecutive adults who underwent oesophagectomy for a cancer diagnosis within a specialist centre between April 2016 and July 2019 (n = 165). Nutritional and clinical outcomes were compared for patients who received jejunostomy feeding (n = 24), versus those who did not (n = 141). RESULTS Patients with feeding jejunostomy lost significantly less weight at both 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared to those without jejunostomy (p ≤ 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). This remained statistically significant in multiple regression, controlling for age, gender, preoperative tumour staging and adjuvant treatment (p ≤ 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively). Median length of home enteral feeding was 10 weeks after discharge in the jejunostomy group. We observed minor jejunostomy tube-related complications in four patients (16.7%). Of those readmitted within 90 days of surgery in the non-jejunostomy group, nutritional failure was a factor in 43.2% of these readmissions. "Rescue tube feeding" was required by 8.5% of the non-jejunostomy group within the first postoperative year, including 6.4% within 90 days of surgery. CONCLUSIONS Use of short-term supplementary jejunal feeding in addition to oral intake after hospital discharge is beneficial for maintaining weight after oesophagectomy. We suggest a future randomised-controlled trial to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J Davies
- School of Health Sciences, Southampton, UK
- Department of Nutrition & Dietetics, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK
- Department of Dietitics/SLT, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Sally Wheelwright
- School of Health Sciences, Southampton, UK
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Turner KM, Delman AM, Griffith A, Wima K, Patel SH, Wilson GC, Shah SA, Van Haren RM. Feeding Jejunostomy Tube in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy: Utilization and Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort. World J Surg 2023; 47:2800-2808. [PMID: 37704891 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07157-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Feeding jejunostomy (JT) tubes are often utilized as an adjunct to optimize nutrition for successful esophagectomy; however, their utility has come into question. The aim of this study was to evaluate utilization and outcomes associated with JTs in a nationwide cohort of patients undergoing esophagectomy. METHODS The NSQIP database was queried for patients who underwent elective esophagectomy. JT utilization was assessed between 2010 and 2019. Post-operative outcomes were compared between those with and without a JT on patients with esophagectomy-specific outcomes (2016-2019), with results validated using a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis based on key clinicopathologic factors, including tumor stage. RESULTS Of the 10,117 patients who underwent elective esophagectomy over the past decade, 53.0% had a JT placed concurrently and 47.0% did not. Utilization of JTs decreased over time, accounting for 60.0% of cases in 2010 compared to 41.7% in 2019 (m = - 2.14 95%CI: [- 1.49]-[- 2.80], p < 0.01). Patients who underwent JT had more composite wound complications (17.0% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.02) and a higher rate of all-cause morbidity (40.4% vs. 35.5%, p = 0.01). Following PSM, 1007 pairs were identified. Analysis of perioperative outcomes demonstrated a higher rate of superficial skin infections (6.1% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.01) in the JT group. However, length of stay, reoperation, readmission, anastomotic leak, composite wound complications, all-cause morbidity, and mortality rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing elective esophagectomy, feeding jejunostomy tubes were utilized less frequently over the past decade. Similar perioperative outcomes among matched patients support the safety of esophagectomy without an adjunct feeding jejunostomy tube.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin M Turner
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Aaron M Delman
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Azante Griffith
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Koffi Wima
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Gregory C Wilson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Shimul A Shah
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Robert M Van Haren
- Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee Y, Lu JY, Malhan R, Shargall Y, Finley C, Hanna W, Agzarian J. Effect of Routine Jejunostomy Tube Insertion in Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 164:422-432.e17. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.12.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
6
|
Mei LX, Wang YY, Tan X, Chen Y, Dai L, Chen MW. Is it necessary to routinely perform feeding jejunostomy at the time of esophagectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 2021; 34:6245102. [PMID: 33884417 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Feeding jejunostomy (FJ) is a routine procedure at the time of esophagectomy in some centers. With the widespread popularization of enhanced recovery after surgery, the necessity of FJ has been increasingly questioned. This study aims to analyze the differences in safety and effectiveness between with (FJ group) or without (no-FJ group) performing FJ at the time of esophagectomy. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched for relevant studies, including randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. The primary outcome was the length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were overall postoperative complications, postoperative pneumonia, intestinal obstruction, and weight loss at 3 and 6 months after esophagectomy. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and odds ratios (OR) were calculated for statistical analysis. About 12 studies comprising 2,173 patients were included. The FJ group had a longer LOS (WMD = 2.05, P = 0.01) and a higher incidence of intestinal obstruction (OR = 11.67, P < 0.001) than the no-FJ group. The incidence of overall postoperative complications (OR = 1.24, P = 0.31) and postoperative pneumonia (OR = 1.43, P = 0.13) were not significantly different, nor the weight loss at 3 months (WMD = 0.58, P = 0.24) and 6 months (P > 0.05) after esophagectomy. Current evidence suggests that routinely performing FJ at the time of esophagectomy appears not to generate better postoperative outcomes. FJ may need to be performed selectively rather than routinely. More studies are required to further verify.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Xiang Mei
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Yong-Yong Wang
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Xiang Tan
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Yong Chen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Lei Dai
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Ming-Wu Chen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li XK, Cong ZZ, Wu WJ, Ji SG, Zhou H, Liu KC, Xu Y, Shen Y. Efficacy of 4 wk of home enteral feeding supplementation after esophagectomy on immune function: A randomized controlled trial. Nutrition 2020; 77:110787. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
8
|
Abstract
Esophagectomy is a major operation whereby intraoperative technique and postoperative care must be optimal. Even in expert hands, the complication rate is as high as 59%. Here the authors discuss the role of surgical adjuncts, including enteral access, nasogastric decompression, pyloric drainage procedures, and anastomotic buttressing as adjuncts to esophagectomy and whether they reduce perioperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ammara A Watkins
- Division of Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 185 Pilgrim Road, W/D 201, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Michael S Kent
- Division of Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 185 Pilgrim Road, W/D 201, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Jennifer L Wilson
- Division of Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 185 Pilgrim Road, W/D 201, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|