A cross-sectional audit of the risk of burnout among senior medical staff in a UK district general hospital

Do Women and Minority Orthopaedic Residents Report Experiencing Worse Well-being and More Mistreatment Than Their Peers?

BACKGROUND

Despite the increased risk of attrition for women and minority residents during orthopaedic residency, there is currently a paucity of research examining the training environment of these residents. To address this, we examined how well-being constructs may differ for women or minority residents compared with their peers, and whether these residents report experiencing more mistreatment during residency.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) How does the psychologic wellbeing of women and minority residents compare with that of their peers regarding the constructs of burnout, lifestyle satisfaction, social belonging, and stereotype threat? (2) Do reported mistreatment experiences during residency differ among women and minority residents compared with their peers? (3) Is there a difference in the proportion of women and minority orthopaedic residents with thoughts of leaving residency compared with their peers?

METHODS

Seventeen orthopaedic residency programs in the 91 programs comprising the Collaborative Orthopaedic Educational Research Group agreed to participate in the study. Program directors sent an anonymous one-time survey with two reminders to all orthopaedic residents at their respective institutions. The survey instrument comprised validated and previously used instruments with face validity designed to measure burnout, satisfaction, duty-hour violations, belonging, stereotype threat, mistreatment, and thoughts of leaving residency, in addition to demographic information. Forty-three percent (211 of 491) of residents responded to the survey. Race or ethnicity data were combined into "White" and "underrepresented in orthopaedics" (URiO), which included residents who self-identified as Asian, African American, Hispanic or Latino, Native American, or other, given that these groups are all underrepresented racial and ethnic groups in orthopaedics. The demographic makeup of our study, 81% men and 75% White, is roughly comparable to the current demographic makeup of orthopaedic residency programs, which is 82% men and 74% White. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests, Fisher exact tests, and t-tests as appropriate. For comparisons of Likert scale measures, we used an anchor-based approach to determining the minimum detectable change (MDC) and set the MDC as a 1-point difference on a 5-point scale and a 1.5-point difference on a 7-point scale. Stereotype threat is reported as the mean ▵ from the neutral response, and ▵ of 1.5 or greater was considered significant.

RESULTS

Women residents were more likely than men to report experiencing emotional exhaustion (odds ratio 2.18 [95% confidence interval 1.1 to 4.5]; p = 0.03). Women reported experiencing stereotype threat regarding their identity as women surgeons (mean ▵ 1.5 ± 1.0). We did not identify a difference in men's and women's overall burnout (OR 1.4 [95% CI 0.7 to 3.0]; p = 0.3), lifestyle satisfaction across multiple domains, or sense of social belonging (men: 4.3, women 3.6; mean difference 0.7 [95% CI 0.4 to 0.9]; p < 0.001). We did not identify differences in overall burnout (OR 1.5 [95% CI 0.8 to 3.0]; p = 0.2), lifestyle satisfaction across multiple domains, sense of social belonging (White: 4.2, URiO: 3.9; mean difference 0.3 [95% CI 0.17 to 0.61]; p < 0.001), or stereotype threat (mean ▵ 0.8 ± 0.9) between White and URiO surgeons. Women were more likely than men to report experiencing mistreatment, with 84% (32 of 38) of women and 43% (70 of 164) of men reporting mistreatment at least a few times per year (OR 7.2 [95% CI 2.8 to 18.1]; p < 0.001). URiO residents were more likely than White residents to report experiencing mistreatment overall, with 65% (32 of 49) of URiO residents and 45% (66 of 148) of White residents reporting occurrences at least a few times per year (OR 2.3 [95% CI 1.2 to 4.6]; p = 0.01). Women were more likely than men to report experiencing gender discrimination (OR 52.6 [95% CI 18.9 to 146.1]; p < 0.001), discrimination based on pregnancy or childcare status (OR 4.3 [95% CI 1.4 to 12.8]; p = 0.005), and sexual harassment (OR 11.8 [95% CI 4.1 to 34.3]; p < 0.001). URiO residents were more likely than White residents to report experiencing racial discrimination (OR 7.8 [95% CI 3.4 to 18.2]; p < 0.001). More women than men had thoughts of leaving residency (OR 4.5 [95% CI 1.5 to 13.5]; p = 0.003), whereas URiO residents were not more likely to have thoughts of leaving than White residents (OR 2.2 [95% CI 0.7 to 6.6]; p = 0.1).

CONCLUSION

Although we did not detect meaningful differences in some measures of well-being, we identified that women report experiencing more emotional exhaustion and report stereotype threat regarding their identity as women surgeons. Women and URiO residents report more mistreatment than their peers, and women have more thoughts of leaving residency than men. These findings raise concern about some aspects of the training environment for women and URiO residents that could contribute to attrition during training.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding how well-being and mistreatment affect underrepresented residents helps in developing strategies to better support women and URiO residents during training. We recommend that orthopaedic governing bodies consider gathering national data on resident well-being and mistreatment to identify specific issues and track data over time. Additionally, departments should examine their internal practices and organizational culture to address specific gaps in inclusivity, well-being, and mechanisms for resident support.

Efficacy of Transcendental Meditation to Reduce Stress Among Health Care Workers: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Health care workers (HCWs) have been experiencing substantial stress and burnout, and evidence-based mitigation strategies are needed. Transcendental Meditation (TM) is a mantra meditation practice with potential efficacy in reducing stress.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of TM practice in reducing stress among HCWs over a 3-month period.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This single-center open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted among HCWs at an academic medical center from November 19, 2020, to August 31, 2021. Inclusion criteria comprised a score of 6 points or greater on the Subjective Units of Distress Scale and an increase of 5% or greater in baseline heart rate or an increase of 33% or greater in galvanic skin response after exposure to a stressful script. Exclusion criteria included the use of antipsychotic or β blocker medications, current suicidal ideation, or previous TM training. Of 213 HCWs who participated in prescreening, 95 attended in-person visits, resulting in 80 eligible participants who were randomized to receive a TM intervention (TM group) or usual treatment (control group).

INTERVENTIONS

The TM group practiced TM for 20 minutes twice daily over a 3-month period. The control group received usual treatment, which consisted of access to wellness resources.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was change in acute psychological distress measured by the Global Severity Index. Secondary outcomes included changes in burnout (measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory), insomnia (measured by the Insomnia Severity Index), and anxiety (measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale).

RESULTS

Among 80 participants, 66 (82.5%) were women, with a mean (SD) age of 40 (11) years. One participant (1.3%) was American Indian or Alaska Native, 5 (6.3%) were Asian, 12 (15.0%) were Black, 59 (73.8%) were White, and 3 (3.8%) were of unknown or unreported race; 4 participants (5.0%) were Hispanic, and 76 (95.0%) were non-Hispanic. A total of 41 participants were randomized to the TM group, and 39 were randomized to the control group. Participants in the TM group did not show a statistically significant decrease in psychological distress on the Global Severity Index compared with those in the control group (-5.6 points vs -3.8 points; between-group difference, -1.8 points; 95% CI, -4.2 to 0.6 points; P = .13). Compared with the control group, the TM group had significantly greater reductions in the secondary end points of emotional exhaustion (Maslach Burnout Inventory subscore: -8.0 points vs -2.6 points; between-group difference, -5.4 points; 95% CI, -9.2 to -1.6 points; P = .006), insomnia (Insomnia Severity Scale score: -4.1 points vs -1.9 points; between-group difference, -2.2 points; 95% CI, -4.4 to 0 points; P = .05), and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score: -3.1 points vs -0.9 points; between-group difference, -2.2 points; 95% CI, -3.8 to -0.5; P = .01) at 3 months. A total of 38 participants (92.7%) in the TM group adhered to home practice.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, TM practice among HCWs over a 3-month period did not result in a statistically significant reduction in the primary outcome of acute psychological distress compared with usual treatment but significantly improved the secondary outcomes of burnout, anxiety, and insomnia. These findings suggest that TM may be a safe and effective strategy to alleviate chronic stress among HCWs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04632368.

Evaluating burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic among physicians in a large health system in New York

PURPOSE

The COVID-19 pandemic has generated significant psychological distress among health care workers worldwide. New York State, particularly New York City and surrounding counties, were especially affected, and experienced over 430,000 COVID-19 cases and 25,000 deaths by mid-August 2020. We hypothesized that physicians and trainees (residents/fellows) who were redeployed outside of their specialty to treat COVID-19 inpatients would have higher burnout.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey to assess burnout among attending and trainee physicians who provided patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic between March-May 2020 across a diverse health care system in New York. Separate multivariable logistic regressions were performed to determine the association between redeployment and measures of burnout: Emotional Exhaustion (EE) and Depersonalization. Burnout measures were also compared by physician vs trainee status. The differential association between redeployment and outcomes with respect to trainee status was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Redeployment was significantly associated with increased odds of EE {OR =1.53, 95% CI: 1.01-2.31} after adjusting for gender and Epidemic-Pandemic Impacts Inventory (EPII) score. Similarly, being a trainee, especially a junior level trainee, was associated with increased odds of EE {OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.01-2.51} after adjusting for gender and EPII scores. However, neither redeployment nor trainee status were significantly associated with Depersonalization. Interactions between redeployment and trainee status were not significant for any of the outcomes (p>.05).

CONCLUSION

Physicians who were redeployed to treat COVID-19 patients had higher reported measures of EE. Trainees, irrespective of redeployment status, had higher EE as compared with attendings. Additional research is needed to understand the long-term impact of redeployment on burnout among redeployed physicians. Programs to identify and address potential burnout among physicians, particularly trainees, during pandemics may be beneficial.

'It's like juggling fire daily': Well-being, workload and burnout in the British NHS - A survey of 721 physicians

BACKGROUND

Physicians are at higher risk for burnout than workers in other fields. Burnout negatively impacts physician health, care delivery and healthcare cost. Existing studies quantify the workforce affected by burnout whilst qualitative studies use specific specialty groups limiting generalisability of solutions. This is important given increased stress during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to understand the causes of work-related burnout, identify what supportive resources physicians utilise, and to propose solutions.

METHODS

A questionnaire was circulated between March and May 2019 via the 'Doctors' Association UK' website and social media.

RESULTS

721 responses were received. 94%of respondents worked in the NHS, with over half being either general practitioners (GPs) or consultants. One in two (53%) respondents felt unable to raise workplace concerns regarding wellbeing, stress or workload. Almost all respondents (97%) felt the NHS has a culture of viewing excessive stress and workload as the norm. Three themes emerged from qualitative analysis: negative workplace culture; high workload and lack of resources; and generational change.

CONCLUSIONS

Respondents described system-level factors which negatively impacted their wellbeing whilst organisations focused on physician-level factors. The research literature supports multi-level change beyond the individual tackling work unit and organisational factors. These include providing infrastructure to allow delegation of administrative work and physical space for relaxation and flexible work with time for leave. At a national level, there is greater urgency for an increase in healthcare funding and resourcing especially during increased clinician workloads during a pandemic where burnout rates will increase.