1
|
Eaton-Williams P, Williams J. 'Family members screaming for help makes it very difficult to don PPE'. A qualitative study on UK ambulance staff experiences of infection prevention and control practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Infect Prev 2024; 25:17-23. [PMID: 38362117 PMCID: PMC10866121 DOI: 10.1177/17571774231209494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Background During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK, ambulance staff continued to deliver direct patient care whilst simultaneously adapting to a considerable escalation in evolving infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. Aim To enable learning to benefit future planning, this qualitative article aims to describe ambulance staff's experiences of this rapid escalation of IPC practices. Method Three online surveys were presented during the acceleration, peak, and deceleration phases of the pandemic's first wave in the UK (2020). Overall, 18 questions contributed 14,237 free text responses that were examined using inductive thematic analysis at both descriptive and interpretive levels. Findings Many participants lacked confidence in policies related to the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) because of perceived inadequate supporting evidence, confusing communication, and low familiarity with items. Compliance with policy and confidence in PPE use were further influenced by discomfort, urgency, and perceptions of risk. Various suggestions were made to improve IPC practices within the work environment, including reducing unnecessary exposure through public education and remote triage improvements. Discussion Some participants' poor experiences of escalating IPC practices were shared with health care workers studied in other environments and in previous epidemics, emphasising the need for lessons to be learnt. PPE should be developed with consideration of ambulance staff's unique working environment and regular familiarisation training could be beneficial. Pragmatic, evidence-based, clearly communicated policies implemented with sufficient resources may protect staff and facilitate them to maintain standards of care delivery during a pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Eaton-Williams
- Senior Research Paramedic, South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Crawley, UK
| | - Julia Williams
- Professor of Paramedic Science, School of Health & Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- Head of Research, College of Paramedics, Bridgwater, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hung TY, Wen CS, Yu SH, Chen YC, Chen HL, Chen WL, Wu CC, Su YC, Lin CL, Hu SC, Lin T. A comparative analysis of aerosol exposure and prevention strategies in bystander, pre-hospital, and inpatient cardiopulmonary resuscitation using simulation manikins. Sci Rep 2023; 13:12552. [PMID: 37532861 PMCID: PMC10397338 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39726-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
To evaluate aerosol exposure risk and prevention strategies during bystander, pre-hospital, and inpatient cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This study compared hands-only CPR, CPR with a surgical or N95 mask, and CPR with a non-rebreather mask at 15 L/min. 30:2 compression-ventilation ratio CPR was tested with face-mask ventilation (FMV), FMV with a high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter; supraglottic airway (SGA), SGA with a surgical mask, SGA with a HEPA filter, or SGA with both. Continuous CPR was tested with an endotracheal tube (ET), ET with a surgical mask, a HEPA filter, or both. Aerosol concentration at the head, trunk, and feet of the mannequin were measured to evaluate exposure to CPR personnel. Hands-only CPR with a surgical or N95 face mask coverings and ET tube ventilation CPR with filters showed the lowest aerosol exposure among all study groups, including CPR with NRM oxygenation, FMV, and SGA ventilation. NRM had a mask effect and reduced aerosol exposure at the head, trunk, and feet of the mannequin. FMV with filters during 30:2 CPR reduced aerosol exposure at the head and trunk, but increased at the feet of the mannequin. A tightly-sealed SGA when used with a HEPA filter, reduced aerosol exposure by 21.00-63.14% compared with a loose-fitting one. Hands-only CPR with a proper fit surgical or N95 face mask coverings is as safe as ET tube ventilation CPR with filters, compared with CPR with NRM, FMV, and SGA. FMV or tight-sealed SGA ventilation with filters prolonged the duration to achieve estimated infective dose of SARS-CoV-2 2.4-2.5 times longer than hands-on CPR only. However, a loose-fitting SGA is not protective at all to chest compressor or health workers standing at the foot side of the victim, so should be used with caution even when using with HEPA filters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tzu-Yao Hung
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Zhong-Xing Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- CrazyatLAB (Critical Airway Training Laboratory), Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Shiung Wen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Zhong-Xing Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Sheng-Han Yu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Zhong-Xing Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chang Chen
- Department of Energy and Refrigerating Air-Conditioning Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Ling Chen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Zhong-Xing Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Lun Chen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Zhong-Xing Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chieh Wu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Zhong-Xing Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Cheng Su
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien County, Taiwan.
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, No.539, Zhongxiao Rd., East Dist., Chiayi City, 600566, Taiwan.
| | - Chun-Lung Lin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Zhong-Xing Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Cheng Hu
- Department of Energy and Refrigerating Air-Conditioning Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tee Lin
- Department of Energy and Refrigerating Air-Conditioning Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Evrin T, Dabkowski M, Pruc M, Hernik J, Wieczorek W, Chabowski L, Wieczorek P, Chmielewski J, Feduniw S, Szarpak L. ETView SL versus Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation Amid Simulated COVID-19 Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Crossover Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5074. [PMID: 37568476 PMCID: PMC10419956 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12155074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Airway management procedures, such as endotracheal intubation (ETI), pose a significant risk of aerosol generation, requiring robust personal protective equipment (PPE) against aerosol-generating procedures (AGP). This study aimed to assess the impact of PPE-AGP on intubation success rates, time to intubation, and glottic visualization using ETView and a standard Macintosh laryngoscope (MAC). A total of 52 physicians participated in this prospective, observational, randomized crossover study conducted in a medical simulation setting. Participants included COVID-19 patients with cardiac arrest scenarios with and without PPE-AGP who were intubated with ETView and MAC. During intubation without PPE-AGP, ETView showed a similar first-pass success rate (FPS) but had a shorter intubation time and better glottal hydration compared to MAC. In scenario B (with PPE-AGP), ETView outperformed MAC in FPS, initiation time, and glottic visualization. The use of PPE-AGP had little impact on ETView's performance. However, it negatively affected the Macintosh laryngoscope, reducing FPS and glottic visibility. Participants found intubation with ETView easier in both scenarios. In conclusion, as compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope, ETView demonstrated higher performance under the circumstances of the simulation, especially when PPE-AGP was used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Togay Evrin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical Faculty, Ufuk University, 06510 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Miroslaw Dabkowski
- Research Unit, Polish Society of Disaster Medicine, 05-806 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michal Pruc
- Research Unit, Polish Society of Disaster Medicine, 05-806 Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Public Health, International Academy of Ecology and Medicine, 02000 Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Jacek Hernik
- Institute of Outcomes Research, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Medical Academy, 00-136 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Wojciech Wieczorek
- Research Unit, Polish Society of Disaster Medicine, 05-806 Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-013 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Lukasz Chabowski
- Research Unit, Polish Society of Disaster Medicine, 05-806 Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Public Health, Odessa International Medical University, 12042 Odessa, Ukraine
| | - Pawel Wieczorek
- Research Unit, Polish Society of Disaster Medicine, 05-806 Warsaw, Poland
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), John Paul II Upper Silesian Health Centre in Katowice, 40-752 Katowice, Poland
| | - Jaroslaw Chmielewski
- Institute of Environmental Protection—National Research Institute (IEP-NRI), 02-170 Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Public Health, International European University, 03187 Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Stepan Feduniw
- Department of Obstetrics, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lukasz Szarpak
- Henry JN Taub Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Research Unit, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Bialystok Oncology Center, 15-027 Bialystok, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Woo CC. COVID-19-specific adult basic life support guideline strategies for chiropractors and other healthcare providers to maximize the safety and efficacy of resuscitation: a commentary. Chiropr Man Therap 2023; 31:16. [PMID: 37277875 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00488-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The emergence of an unprecedented novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-C0V-2), which causes the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has created new scenarios in basic life support (BLS) management. According to current evidence, SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted airborne in aerosol particles during resuscitation. Research evidence found an alarming global increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare providers are legally obliged to respond to cardiac arrest as soon as possible. Chiropractors will likely encounter potential exercise-related and non-exercise-related cardiac emergencies at some point in their professional lives. They have a duty of care to respond to emergencies such as cardiac arrest. Chiropractors are increasingly involved in providing care, including emergency care, for athletes and spectators at sporting events. Also, exercise-related cardiac arrest in adult patients may occur during exercise testing or rehabilitation with exercise prescriptions in chiropractic and other healthcare settings. Little is known about the COVID-19 BLS guidelines for chiropractors. Knowledge of the current COVID-19-specific adult BLS guidelines is essential to developing an emergency response plan for the on-field and sideline management of exercise-related cardiac arrest and non-athletic, non-exercise-related cardiac arrest. MAIN TEXT Seven peer-reviewed articles on the COVID-19-specific BLS guidelines, including two updates, were reviewed for this commentary. Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, the national and international resuscitation organizations recommended interim COVID-19-specific BLS guidelines with precaution, resuscitation, and education strategies. BLS safety is paramount. A precautionary approach with the bare minimum of appropriate personal protective equipment for resuscitation is recommended. There was disagreement among the COVID-19 BLS guidelines on the level of personal protective equipment. All healthcare professionals should also undergo self-directed BLS e-learning and virtual skill e-training. The summarized COVID-19-specific adult BLS guideline strategies and protocols are tabled, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This commentary provides a practical overview and highlights current evidence-based intervention strategies of the COVID-19-specific adult BLS guidelines that may help chiropractors and other healthcare providers reduce BLS-related exposures to SARS-CoV-2 and the risks of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and maximize the efficacy of resuscitation. This study is relevant to and impacts future COVID-19-related research in areas such as infection prevention and control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Cheung Woo
- CC Woo Chiropractic Clinic, Chatswood, NSW, 2057, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Scholz SS, Linder S, Latka E, Bartnick T, Karla D, Thaemel D, Wolff M, Sauzet O, Rehberg SW, Thies KC, Jansen G. Impact of COVID-19-adapted guidelines using different airway management strategies on resuscitation quality in out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest - a randomised manikin study. BMC Emerg Med 2023; 23:48. [PMID: 37189061 PMCID: PMC10184619 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-023-00820-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although airway management for paramedics has moved away from endotracheal intubation towards extraglottic airway devices in recent years, in the context of COVID-19, endotracheal intubation has seen a revival. Endotracheal intubation has been recommended again under the assumption that it provides better protection against aerosol liberation and infection risk for care providers than extraglottic airway devices accepting an increase in no-flow time and possibly worsen patient outcomes. METHODS In this manikin study paramedics performed advanced cardiac life support with non-shockable (Non-VF) and shockable rhythms (VF) in four settings: ERC guidelines 2021 (control), COVID-19-guidelines using videolaryngoscopic intubation (COVID-19-intubation), laryngeal mask (COVID-19-Laryngeal-Mask) or a modified laryngeal mask modified with a shower cap (COVID-19-showercap) to reduce aerosol liberation simulated by a fog machine. Primary endpoint was no-flow-time, secondary endpoints included data on airway management as well as the participants' subjective assessment of aerosol release using a Likert-scale (0 = no release-10 = maximum release) were collected and statistically compared. Continuous Data was presented as mean ± standard deviation. Interval-scaled Data were presented as median and Q1 and Q3. RESULTS A total of 120 resuscitation scenarios were completed. Compared to control (Non-VF:11 ± 3 s, VF:12 ± 3 s) application of COVID-19-adapted guidelines lead to prolonged no-flow times in all groups (COVID-19-Intubation: Non-VF:17 ± 11 s, VF:19 ± 5 s;p ≤ 0.001; COVID-19-laryngeal-mask: VF:15 ± 5 s,p ≤ 0.01; COVID-19-showercap: VF:15 ± 3 s,p ≤ 0.01). Compared to COVID-19-Intubation, the use of the laryngeal mask and its modification with a showercap both led to a reduction of no-flow-time(COVID-19-laryngeal-mask: Non-VF:p = 0.002;VF:p ≤ 0.001; COVID-19-Showercap: Non-VF:p ≤ 0.001;VF:p = 0.002) due to a reduced duration of intubation (COVID-19-Intubation: Non-VF:40 ± 19 s;VF:33 ± 17 s; both p ≤ 0.01 vs. control, COVID-19-Laryngeal-Mask (Non-VF:15 ± 7 s;VF:13 ± 5 s;p > 0.05) and COVID-19-Shower-cap (Non-VF:15 ± 5 s;VF:17 ± 5 s;p > 0.05). The participants rated aerosol liberation lowest in COVID-19-intubation (median:0;Q1:0,Q3:2;p < 0.001vs.COVID-19-laryngeal-mask and COVID-19-showercap) compared to COVID-19-shower-cap (median:3;Q1:1,Q3:3 p < 0.001vs.COVID-19-laryngeal-mask) or COVID-19-laryngeal-mask (median:9;Q1:6,Q3:8). CONCLUSIONS COVID-19-adapted guidelines using videolaryngoscopic intubation lead to a prolongation of no-flow time. The use of a modified laryngeal mask with a shower cap seems to be a suitable compromise combining minimal impact on no-flowtime and reduced aerosol exposure for the involved providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean S Scholz
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine, Transfusion Medicine, and Pain Therapy, University Hospital OWL, Protestant Hospital of the Bethel Foundation, University of Bielefeld, Burgsteig 13, 33617, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Sissy Linder
- Skillslab, Medical School East Westphalia-Lippe, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Eugen Latka
- Department of Medical and Emergency Services, Study Institute Westfalen-Lippe, Remterweg 44, D-33617, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Tobias Bartnick
- Department of Medical and Emergency Services, Study Institute Westfalen-Lippe, Remterweg 44, D-33617, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Daniel Karla
- Department of Medical and Emergency Services, Study Institute Westfalen-Lippe, Remterweg 44, D-33617, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Daniel Thaemel
- Department of Medical and Emergency Services, Study Institute Westfalen-Lippe, Remterweg 44, D-33617, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Marlena Wolff
- Department of Medical and Emergency Services, Study Institute Westfalen-Lippe, Remterweg 44, D-33617, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Odile Sauzet
- Epidemiology and International Public Health, Bielefeld School of Public Health & Center for Statistics, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Sebastian W Rehberg
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine, Transfusion Medicine, and Pain Therapy, University Hospital OWL, Protestant Hospital of the Bethel Foundation, University of Bielefeld, Burgsteig 13, 33617, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Karl-Christian Thies
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine, Transfusion Medicine, and Pain Therapy, University Hospital OWL, Protestant Hospital of the Bethel Foundation, University of Bielefeld, Burgsteig 13, 33617, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Gerrit Jansen
- Department of Medical and Emergency Services, Study Institute Westfalen-Lippe, Remterweg 44, D-33617, Bielefeld, Germany.
- Medical School, Bielefeld University, University Medical Center East Westphalia-Lippe, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
- University Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, Ruhr University Bochum, Hans-Nolte-Straße 1, 32429, Minden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11020189. [PMID: 36673557 PMCID: PMC9858873 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11020189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a prominent cause of death worldwide. As indicated by the high proportion of COVID-19 suspicion or diagnosis among patients who had OHCA, this issue could have resulted in multiple fatalities from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occurring at home and being counted as OHCA. Methods: We used the MeSH term "heart arrest" as well as non-MeSH terms "out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, sudden cardiac death, OHCA, cardiac arrest, coronavirus pandemic, COVID-19, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)." We conducted a literature search using these search keywords in the Science Direct and PubMed databases and Google Scholar until 25 April 2022. Results: A systematic review of observational studies revealed OHCA and mortality rates increased considerably during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the same period of the previous year. A temporary two-fold rise in OHCA incidence was detected along with a drop in survival. During the pandemic, the community's response to OHCA changed, with fewer bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitations (CPRs), longer emergency medical service (EMS) response times, and worse OHCA survival rates. Conclusions: This study's limitations include a lack of a centralised data-gathering method and OHCA registry system. If the chain of survival is maintained and effective emergency ambulance services with a qualified emergency medical team are given, the outcome for OHCA survivors can be improved even more.
Collapse
|
7
|
Martins MS, Lourenção DCDA, Pimentel RRDS, de Oliveira JM, Manganoti LTDCN, Modesto RC, Silva MSDS, Dos Santos MJ. Recommendations for the safety of hospitalised patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060182. [PMID: 36123068 PMCID: PMC9485646 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To map the recommendations for hospitalised patient safety in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN Scoping review using the method recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute. DATA SOURCES Databases: Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, LILACS, CINAHL and IBECS; grey literature platform: Google Scholar; and 11 official websites of leading healthcare institutions were searched on 27 April 2021 and updated on 11 April 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included documents that present recommendations for the safety of hospitalised patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, published in any language, from 2020 onwards. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data extraction was performed in pairs with consensus rounds. A descriptive analysis was carried out to present the main characteristics of the articles. Qualitative data from the extraction of recommendations were analysed through content analysis. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-five documents were included. Most papers were identified as expert consensus (n=56, 44.8%). Forty-six recommendations were identified for the safety of hospitalised patients: 17 relating to the reorganisation of health services related to the flow of patients, the management of human and material resources and the reorganisation of the hospital environment; 11 on the approach to the airways and the prevention of the spread of aerosols; 11 related to sanitary and hygiene issues; 4 about proper use of personal protective equipment and 3 for effective communication. CONCLUSIONS The recommendations mapped in this scoping review present the best practices produced so far and serve as a basis for planning and implementing good practices to ensure safe hospital care, during and after COVID-19. The engagement of everyone involved in the care of hospitalised patients is essential to consolidate the mapped recommendations and provide dignified, safe and quality care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Janine Melo de Oliveira
- Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceio, Brazil
- Curso de Enfermagem, Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Maceio, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Marcelo José Dos Santos
- Career Guidance Department, Universidade de São Paulo Escola de Enfermagem, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Eaton-Williams PJ, Williams J. “See us as humans. Speak to us with respect. Listen to us.” A qualitative study on UK ambulance staff requirements of leadership while working during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ LEADER 2022:leader-2022-000622. [DOI: 10.1136/leader-2022-000622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 Ambulance Response Assessment (CARA) study aimed to enable the experiences of UK frontline ambulance staff working during the first wave of the pandemic to be heard. Specifically, CARA aimed to assess feelings of preparedness and well-being and to collect suggestions for beneficial leadership support.MethodsThree online surveys were sequentially presented between April and October 2020. Overall, 18 questions elicited free-text responses that were analysed qualitatively using an inductive thematic approach.FindingsAnalysis of 14 237 responses revealed participants’ goals and their requirements of leadership to enable those goals to be achieved. A large number of participants expressed low confidence and anxiety resulting from disagreement, inconsistency and an absence of transparency related to policy implementation. Some staff struggled with large quantities of written correspondence and many desired more face-to-face training and an opportunity to communicate with policymakers. Suggestions were made on how best to allocate resources to reduce operational demands and maintain service delivery, and a need to learn from current events in order to plan for the future was stressed. To further support well-being, staff wanted leadership to understand and empathise with their working conditions, to work to reduce the risks and if required, to facilitate access to appropriate therapeutic interventions.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that ambulance staff desire both inclusive and compassionate leadership. Leadership should aim to engage in honest dialogue and attentive listening. Resultant learning can then inform policy development and resource allocation to effectively support both service delivery and staff well-being.
Collapse
|
9
|
Goodarzi A, Khodaveisi M, Abdi A, Salimi R, Oshvandi K. Healthcare providers' experiences in hospital resuscitation of patients with COVID-19: a qualitative study. BMC Nurs 2022; 21:238. [PMID: 36008836 PMCID: PMC9406244 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-01020-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 epidemic has globally challenged medical practices, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Numerous challenges affect healthcare providers (HCPs) who are members of the resuscitation team and the resuscitation process in COVID-19 patients. As a result, HCPs may experience different dilemmas about CPR. Failure to recognize these experiences can harm both HCPs and patients. This study aimed to explore the HCP’s experiences of CPR in patients with COVID-19. Methods A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 26 participants in the emergency departments of Besat, Golestan, and Imam Reza hospitals (in the west of Iran) using the hermeneutic phenomenology approach. The data were analyzed using the 6-step Smith interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) method. Results The mean age of the participants was 38 years. Most of them (61.5%) were male and had a Bachelor’s degree in nursing (46.1%).The data analysis resulted in extracting four super-ordinate and nine sub-ordinate themes. “Human aspects of Care”, “Perceived Psychological Effects of Resuscitation in COVID-19”, “HCP’s perceptions of factors affecting the resuscitation process in COVID-19”, and “Perceived differences in COVID-19 resuscitation compared to non-COVID patients” were super-ordinate themes. Conclusions The participants experienced a wide range of difficult feelings and emotions while resuscitating the patients with COVID-19, suggesting the effect of the COVID-19 epidemic on HCPs and the resuscitation process. They experienced stress and fear, and the resuscitation process was influenced by their compassion, underlying patient conditions, resuscitation futility, and participants’ fatigue or lack of oxygen due to the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afshin Goodarzi
- Department of medical emergency, Faculty of Paramedics, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Masoud Khodaveisi
- Chronic Diseases (Home Care) Research Center, Department of Community Health Nursing, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
| | - Alireza Abdi
- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Rasoul Salimi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Besat Hospital, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
| | - Khodayar Oshvandi
- Mother and Child Care Research Center, Nursing and Midwifery School, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nishiyama C, Kiyohara K, Kitamura T, Hayashida S, Maeda T, Kiguchi T, Shimamoto T, Iwami T. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prehospital Intervention and Survival of Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Osaka City, Japan. Circ J 2022; 86:1579-1585. [DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-22-0040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chika Nishiyama
- Department of Critical Care Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
| | | | - Tetsuhisa Kitamura
- Division of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University
| | | | | | | | - Tomonari Shimamoto
- Department of Preventive Services, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
| | - Taku Iwami
- Department of Preventive Services, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brady WJ, Chavez S, Gottlieb M, Liang SY, Carius B, Koyfman A, Long B. Clinical update on COVID-19 for the emergency clinician: Cardiac arrest in the out-of-hospital and in-hospital settings. Am J Emerg Med 2022; 57:114-123. [PMID: 35561501 PMCID: PMC9045864 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.04.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in millions of cases worldwide. As the pandemic has progressed, the understanding of this disease has evolved. Its impact on the health and welfare of the human population is significant; its impact on the delivery of healthcare is also considerable. Objective This article is another paper in a series addressing COVID-19-related updates to emergency clinicians on the management of COVID-19 patients with cardiac arrest. Discussion COVID-19 has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. From a global perspective, as of February 23, 2022, 435 million infections have been noted with 5.9 million deaths (1.4%). Current data suggest an increase in the occurrence of cardiac arrest, both in the outpatient and inpatient settings, with corresponding reductions in most survival metrics. The frequency of out-of-hospital lay provider initial care has decreased while non-shockable initial cardiac arrest rhythms have increased. While many interventions, including chest compressions, are aerosol-generating procedures, the risk of contagion to healthcare personnel is low, assuming appropriate personal protective equipment is used; vaccination with boosting provides further protection against contagion for the healthcare personnel involved in cardiac arrest resuscitation. The burden of the COVID-19 pandemic on the delivery of cardiac arrest care is considerable and, despite multiple efforts, has adversely impacted the chain of survival. Conclusion This review provides a focused update of cardiac arrest in the setting of COVID-19 for emergency clinicians.
Collapse
|
12
|
Cui Y, Jiang S. Influence of Personal Protective Equipment on the Quality of Chest Compressions: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:733724. [PMID: 34901055 PMCID: PMC8662528 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.733724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the influence of personal protective equipment (PPE) on quality of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) showed inconsistent results. Accordingly, a meta-analysis was performed to provide an overview. Methods: Relevant studies were obtained by search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane's Library databases. A random-effect model incorporating the potential heterogeneity was used to pool the results. Results: Six simulation-based RCTs were included. Overall, pooled results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the rate [mean difference (MD): −1.70 time/min, 95% confidence interval (CI): −5.77 to 2.36, P = 0.41, I2 = 80%] or the depth [MD: −1.84 mm, 95% CI: −3.93 to 0.24, P = 0.11, I2 = 73%] of chest compressions performed by medical personnel with and without PPE. Subgroup analyses showed that use of PPE was associated with reduced rate of chest compressions in studies before COVID-19 (MD: −7.02 time/min, 95% CI: −10.46 to −3.57, P < 0.001), but not in studies after COVID-19 (MD: 0.14 time/min, 95% CI: −5.77 to 2.36, P = 0.95). In addition, PPE was not associated with significantly reduced depth of chest compressions in studies before (MD: −3.34 mm, 95% CI: −10.29 to −3.62, P = 0.35) or after (MD: −0.97 mm, 95% CI: −2.62 to 0.68, P = 0.25) COVID-19. No significant difference was found between parallel-group and crossover RCTs (P for subgroup difference both > 0.05). Conclusions: Evidence from simulation-based RCTs showed that use of PPE was not associated with reduced rate or depth of chest compressions in CPR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Cui
- Intensive Care Unit, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China
| | - Siyi Jiang
- Intensive Care Unit, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jafari D, Cohen AL, Monsieurs K, Becker LB. Changing resuscitation strategies during a pandemic: lessons from the consecutive surges in New York and global challenges. Curr Opin Crit Care 2021; 27:656-662. [PMID: 34581299 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000000895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide a framework for resuscitation of COVID-19 critical illness for emergency and intensive care clinicians with the most up to date evidence and recommendations in the care of COVID-19 patients in cardiac arrest or in extremis. RECENT FINDINGS Performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on COVID-19 patients requires the clinicians to adopt infection mitigation strategies such as full personal protective equipment, mechanical chest compression devices, and restricting the number of people present during the resuscitation. The time of intubation is a subject of ongoing research and clinicians should use their best judgment for each patient. Clinicians should prepare for CPR in prone position. Particular attention should be given to the psychological well-being of the staff. Point of care ultrasound has proved to be an invaluable diagnostic tool in assessing ventricular dysfunction and parenchymal lung disease. Although novel therapies to supplant the function of diseased lungs have shown promise in select patients the evidence is still being collected. The end-of-life discussions have been negatively impacted by prognostic uncertainty as well as barriers to in person meetings with families. SUMMARY The resuscitation of critically ill COVID-19 patients poses new challenges, but the principles remain largely unchanged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Jafari
- Department of Emergency Medicine.,Department of Surgery, North Shore University Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, Hofstra Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | | | - Koen Monsieurs
- Emergency Department, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an emergency lifesaving endeavor, performed in either the hospital or outpatient settings, that significantly improves outcomes and survival rates when performed in a timely fashion. As with any other medical procedure, CPR can bear potential risks not only for the patient but also for the rescuer. Among those risks, transmission of an infectious agent has been one of the most compelling triggers of reluctance to perform CPR among providers. The concern for transmission of an infection from the resuscitated subject may impede prompt initiation and implementation of CPR, compromising survival rates and neurological outcomes of the patients. Infections during CPR can be potentially acquired through airborne, droplet, contact, or hematogenous transmission. However, only a few cases of infection transmission have been actually reported globally. In this review, we present the available epidemiological findings on transmission of different pathogens during CPR and data on reluctance of health care workers to perform CPR. We also outline the levels of personal protective equipment and other protective measures according to potential infectious hazards that providers are potentially exposed to during CPR and summarize current guidelines on protection of CPR providers from international societies and stakeholders.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Purpose of review The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus, which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), led to the declaration of a global pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. As of February 6, 2021, over 105 million persons have been infected in 223 countries and there have been 2,290,488 deaths. As a result, emergency medical services and hospital systems have undergone unprecedented healthcare delivery reconfigurations. Here, we review the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) epidemiology and systems of care. Recent findings Areas severely affected by the pandemic have reported increased incidence of OHCA, lower rates of successful resuscitation, and increased mortality. COVID-19 has significantly impacted patient outcomes through increased disease severity, decreased access to care, and the reshaping of emergency medical response and hospital-based healthcare systems and policies. The pandemic has negatively influenced attitudes toward resuscitation and challenged providers with novel ethical dilemmas provoked by the scarcity of healthcare resources. Summary The COVID-19 pandemic has had direct, indirect, psychosocial, and ethical impacts on the cardiac arrest chain of survival.
Collapse
|
16
|
Griswold DP, Gempeler A, Kolias A, Hutchinson PJ, Rubiano AM. Personal protective equipment for reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection among health care workers involved in emergency trauma surgery during the pandemic: An umbrella review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021; 90:e72-e80. [PMID: 33433175 PMCID: PMC7996059 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care facilities in low- and middle-income countries are inadequately resourced to adhere to current COVID-19 prevention recommendations. Recommendations for surgical emergency trauma care measures need to be adequately informed by available evidence and adapt to particular settings. To inform future recommendations, we set to summarize the effects of different personal protective equipment (PPE) on the risk of COVID-19 infection in health personnel caring for trauma surgery patients. METHODS We conducted an umbrella review using Living Overview of Evidence platform for COVID-19, which performs regular automated searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and more than 30 other sources. Systematic reviews of experimental and observational studies assessing the efficacy of PPE were included. Indirect evidence from other health care settings was also considered. Risk of bias was assessed with the AMSTAR II tool (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews, Ottawa, ON, Canada), and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach for grading the certainty of the evidence is reported (registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42020198267). RESULTS Eighteen studies that fulfilled the selection criteria were included. There is high certainty that the use of N95 respirators and surgical masks is associated with a reduced risk of COVID-19 when compared with no mask use. In moderate- to high-risk environments, N95 respirators are associated with a further reduction in risk of COVID-19 infection compared with surgical masks. Eye protection also reduces the risk of contagion in this setting. Decontamination of masks and respirators with ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, vaporous hydrogen peroxide, or dry heat is effective and does not affect PPE performance or fit. CONCLUSION The use of PPE drastically reduces the risk of COVID-19 compared with no mask use in health care workers. N95 and equivalent respirators provide more protection than surgical masks. Decontamination and reuse appear feasible to overcome PPE shortages and enhance the allocation of limited resources. These effects are applicable to emergency trauma care and should inform future recommendations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Review, level II.
Collapse
|
17
|
Borkowska MJ, Jaguszewski MJ, Koda M, Gasecka A, Szarpak A, Gilis-Malinowska N, Safiejko K, Szarpak L, Filipiak KJ, Smereka J. Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival Rate: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10:1209. [PMID: 33803944 PMCID: PMC8001432 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10061209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a challenge for medical staff, especially in the COVID-19 period. The COVID-19 disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is highly infectious, thus requiring additional measures during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Since CPR is a highly aerosol-generating procedure, it carries a substantial risk of viral transmission. We hypothesized that patients with diagnosed or suspected COVID-19 might have worse outcomes following OHCA outcomes compared to non-COVID-19 patients. To raise awareness of this potential problem, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that reported OHCA in the pandemic period, comparing COVID-19 suspected or diagnosed patients vs. COVID-19 not suspected or diagnosed group. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge (SHD). Secondary outcomes were the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital admission or survival with favorable neurological outcomes. Data including 4210 patients included in five studies were analyzed. SHD in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients were 0.5% and 2.6%, respectively (odds ratio, OR = 0.25; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.12, 0.53; p < 0.001). Bystander CPR rate was comparable in the COVID-19 vs. not COVID-19 group (OR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.63, 1.22; p = 0.43). Shockable rhythms were observed in 5.7% in COVID-19 patients compared with 37.4% in the non-COVID-19 group (OR = 0.19; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.96; p = 0.04; I2 = 95%). ROSC in the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients were 13.3% vs. 26.5%, respectively (OR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.81; p < 0.001). SHD with favorable neurological outcome was observed in 0% in COVID-19 vs. 3.1% in non-COVID-19 patients (OR = 1.35; 95% CI: 0.07, 26.19; p = 0.84). Our meta-analysis suggests that suspected or diagnosed COVID-19 reduces the SHD rate after OHCA, which seems to be due to the lower rate of shockable rhythms in COVID-19 patients, but not due to reluctance to bystander CPR. Future trials are needed to confirm these preliminary results and determine the optimal procedures to increase survival after OHCA in COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena J. Borkowska
- Department of Research Outcomes, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Białystok Oncology Centre, 15-027 Białystok, Poland; (M.J.B.); (M.K.); (K.S.); (L.S.)
| | - Miłosz J. Jaguszewski
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-952 Gdansk, Poland; (M.J.J.); (N.G.-M.)
| | - Mariusz Koda
- Department of Research Outcomes, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Białystok Oncology Centre, 15-027 Białystok, Poland; (M.J.B.); (M.K.); (K.S.); (L.S.)
- Department of General Pathomorphology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-089 Bialystok, Poland;
| | - Aleksandra Gasecka
- 1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Szarpak
- Department of Research Outcomes, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Medical Academy in Warsaw, 03-411 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Natasza Gilis-Malinowska
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-952 Gdansk, Poland; (M.J.J.); (N.G.-M.)
| | - Kamil Safiejko
- Department of Research Outcomes, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Białystok Oncology Centre, 15-027 Białystok, Poland; (M.J.B.); (M.K.); (K.S.); (L.S.)
| | - Lukasz Szarpak
- Department of Research Outcomes, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Białystok Oncology Centre, 15-027 Białystok, Poland; (M.J.B.); (M.K.); (K.S.); (L.S.)
- Department of Research Outcomes, Polish Society of Disaster Medicine, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland;
| | - Krzysztof J. Filipiak
- Department of General Pathomorphology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-089 Bialystok, Poland;
| | - Jacek Smereka
- Department of Research Outcomes, Polish Society of Disaster Medicine, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland;
- Department of Emergency Medical Service, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|