A comparison of emergency department presentations for medically unexplained symptoms in frequent attenders during COVID-19

Acute care pathway assessed through performance indicators during the COVID-19 pandemic in OECD countries (2020-2021): a scoping review

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic severely impacted care for non-COVID patients. Performance indicators to monitor acute care, timely reported and internationally accepted, lacked during the pandemic in OECD countries. This study aims to summarize the performance indicators available in the literature to monitor changes in the quality of acute care in OECD countries during the first year and a half of the pandemic (2020-July 2021) and to assess their trends.

METHODS

Scoping review. Search in Embase and MEDLINE (07-07-2022). Acute care performance indicators and indicators related to acute general surgery were collected and collated following a care pathway approach. Indicators assessing identical clinical measures were grouped under a common indicator title. The trends from each group of indicators were collated (increase/decrease/stable).

RESULTS

A total of 152 studies were included. 2354 indicators regarding general acute care and 301 indicators related to acute general surgery were included. Indicators focusing on pre-hospital services reported a decreasing trend in the volume of patients: from 225 indicators, 110 (49%) reported a decrease. An increasing trend in pre-hospital treatment times was reported by most of the indicators (n = 41;70%) and a decreasing trend in survival rates of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (n = 61;75%). Concerning care provided in the emergency department, most of the indicators (n = 752;71%) showed a decreasing trend in admissions across all levels of urgency. Concerning the mortality rate after admission, most of the indicators (n = 23;53%) reported an increasing trend. The subset of indicators assessing acute general surgery showed a decreasing trend in the volume of patients (n = 50;49%), stability in clinical severity at admission (n = 36;53%), and in the volume of surgeries (n = 14;47%). Most of the indicators (n = 28;65%) reported no change in treatment approach and stable mortality rate (n = 11,69%).

CONCLUSION

This review signals relevant disruptions across the acute care pathway. A subset of general surgery performance indicators showed stability in most of the phases of the care pathway. These results highlight the relevance of assessing this care pathway more regularly and systematically across different clinical entities to monitor disruptions and to improve the resilience of emergency services during a crisis.

Paediatric Major Trauma: A Retrospective Observational Comparison of Mortality in Prehospital Bypass and Secondary Transfer in the East of England

Background More than half of seriously injured children are not initially treated at a major trauma centre (MTC). Children may be transported by private vehicle to a trauma unit (TU). Children may also be transported by emergency medical services (EMS) to the nearest TU with approximately one in five of these undergoing secondary transfer to an MTC. Most trauma networks permit TU bypass to an MTC. However, the evidence on outcomes between transfer and bypass is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the use of the trauma network by comparing outcomes between paediatric major trauma patients by the method of presentation. Methods In this retrospective observational study, a consecutive sample of paediatric (<16 years old) major trauma patients transported to the regional MTC (Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH)) between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2020 was included. Patients were excluded if they arrived at the MTC >24 hours post-injury or were transported to the MTC as the nearest hospital. Patients were divided into four groups: self-presented to MTC, MTC as nearest hospital, bypass and secondary transfer. Results A total of 315 patients (28 'self-presented', 55 'nearest', 58 'bypass' and 174 'secondary transfers') were included. The median age was 9.4 [3.7-13.6] years, and n=209 (66.3%) were male. The median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 16.0 [9.0-25.0] and n=190 (60.3%) had an ISS >15. There was no difference in 30-day mortality between the 'bypass' and 'secondary transfer' groups. There was a significantly longer hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) in the bypass group compared to other groups, both p<0.001. The median time to definitive care was five hours greater in the secondary transfer group compared to 'bypass' (bypass 117.6 minutes [100.8-136.6], secondary transfer 418.8 minutes [315.6-529.8]). Conclusion There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality of paediatric major trauma patients who underwent secondary transfer compared to those transported directly from the scene to the MTC, despite significant time delays in reaching definitive care.

Somatic symptoms associated with mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this article was to systematically review the prevalence of somatic symptoms in patients, healthcare workers and general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. The secondary objectives were to record the association between somatic symptoms and indices of mental distress and to record the qualitative characteristics of such somatic complaints.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA methodology we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar for primary research reporting on somatic symptoms in association with mental distress. We specifically sought papers reporting on bodily distress disorder, somatic symptoms disorder or medically unexplained symptoms.

RESULTS

1569 papers were retrieved, which yielded 36 relevant studies after screening. 15 studies referred to healthcare workers, 13 to general population, 5 to COVID-19 patients, 2 compared medical with non-medical professionals and 1 was studying COVID-19 patients some of which were also healthcare workers. The reported prevalence of somatic symptoms ranged from 7.4% to 67.8%. Commonly seen symptoms were shortness of breath, dyspnea, palpitations and pain in arms, legs and joints.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review suggests that somatic symptoms are very frequent during the pandemic and are often linked to mental distress. All three population groups are affected.