Hepatic Vein Arrival Time for Diagnosis of Liver Cirrhosis: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience With Contrast-Enhanced Sonography

Diagnostic accuracy of hepatic vein arrival time performed with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for HCV liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has increased considerably the use of ultrasound for hemodynamical analyses and quantification. Bolus injection of microbubble agents is used to evaluate transit times. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of arrival time (seconds) to the hepatic artery (HAAT), hepatic vein (HVAT), and portal vein (PVAT), based on CEUS used for the diagnosis of cirrhosis, and to correlate these arrival times with the liver stiffness and disease severity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study evaluated 29 HCV cirrhotic and 19 chronic hepatitis C patients. History, clinical examination, laboratory investigations, abdominal ultrasonography, point shear-wave elastography (pSWE), and CEUS were conducted.

RESULTS

The mean liver stiffness increased significantly in cirrhotic versus chronic HCV (22.7 versus 5.1; p-value < 0.001). The mean HAAT (p-value = 0.001), PVAT (p-value = 0.002), and HVAT values (p-value: 0.001) were significantly prolonged in cirrhotic compared with chronic HCV. The HVAT cut-off point of cirrhotic patients was 18 s with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 96.6%, 63.2%, and 83.3%, respectively (area under curve: 0.801). Significant positive correlation was found between liver stiffness (kPa) and HVAT (s) (r = 0.585; p-value = 0.005). No significant correlation was detected between HVAT (s) and the severity of liver disease, as assessed by the Child or MELD scores in cirrhotic patients.

CONCLUSION

Measuring HVAT by CEUS yielded high-accuracy and correlation outcomes for cirrhosis detection. It could be a valuable noninvasive method for the diagnosis of cirrhosis.

What is the difference in ablation zone of multi-bipolar radiofrequency ablation between liver cirrhosis and normal liver background? - a prospective clinical study

PURPOSE

To explore the differences in ablation zone between liver cirrhosis and normal liver background and investigate the effect of hepatic blood flow on ablation zone of RFA.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2019, 203 patients who had liver malignancies and underwent percutaneous RFA with Celon bipolar electrodes enrolled into this study. There were 90 patients had liver cirrhosis and 113 patients had normal liver background. They were 63 females and 140 males with average age of 59.0 ± 10.9 years old. Contrast-enhanced CT/MRI was used to evaluate the ablation zone in one month after RFA. The hepatic flow measurements on CDFI and CEUS were performed before RFA. Correlations between ablation zone versus hepatic flow were assessed using multiple linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

The average ablation zone in cirrhotic liver was significantly larger than those in normal liver background with 3 cm tip of RF electrodes (length 3.5 ± 0.5 vs 3.1 ± 0.4 cm, p = 0.001; width 2.6 ± 0.3 vs 2.2 ± 0.3 cm, p < 0.001; thickness 2.5 ± 0.3 vs 2.0 ± 0.2 cm, p < 0.001). The similar result was found with three 4 cm tip of RF electrodes (width 3.6 ± 0.5 vs 3.1 ± 0.5 cm, p = 0.019; thickness 3.3 ± 0.5 vs 2.7 ± 0.5 cm, p = 0.002). The multiple linear regression analysis showed arrive time of hepatic vein and portal vein was statistically associated with ablation zone with 3 cm electrodes (p < 0.001, p = 0.001), but explained part of the variance (Adjusted R²=0.294, adjusted R²=0.212).

CONCLUSION

The ablation zones of RFA with multi-bipolar electrodes in liver cirrhosis were significantly larger than those in normal liver background, being up to 6 mm in thickness. The hepatic flow parameters partly contributed to the ablation zone.

Application of Hepatic Transit Time and Shear Wave Velocity in Assessing Portal Pressure in Patients with Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension

The aim of the study described here was to explore the value of hepatic transit time (HTT) and shear wave velocity (SWV) in diagnosing cirrhotic portal hypertension. Fifty-seven patients had undergone esophagogastric varicose vein embolization (group OBS) and 50 healthy controls (group CON) were retrospectively compared with respect to HTT (arterial-hepatic vein [HA-HVTT], portal vein-hepatic vein [PV-HVTT], liver parenchyma-hepatic vein [PA-HVTT]) and SWV to analyze their efficacy in diagnosing cirrhotic portal hypertension. The correlations between SWV/HTT and free portal pressure (FPP) in group OBS were also analyzed. Compared with group CON, group OBS had a shorter HTT and faster SWV. The area under the curve (AUC) of PV-HVTT (0.93) was higher than those of HA-HVTT (0.75) and PA-HVTT (0.64), the AUCs of PV-HVTT (0.93, threshold 7.9 s) and SWV (0.91, threshold 2.0 cm/s) did not statistically differ (z = 0.35, p = 0.73). HTT and FPP in group OBS had a negative correlation. In conclusion, HTT and SWV can be used to diagnose cirrhotic portal hypertension without difference in diagnostic efficacy, and HTT is more meaningful for assessing the changes in portal pressure.

Application of the Hepatic Transit Time (HTT) in Evaluation of Portal Vein Pressure in Gastroesophageal Varices Patients

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the clinical significance of using hepatic transit time (HTT) to evaluate portal vein pressure in gastroesophageal varices patients.

METHODS

For the observation group, we enrolled 50 gastroesophageal varices patients who had received esophagogastric variceal embolization in our hospital between January 2015 and February 2018. Patients without liver disease populated the control group and were recruited during the same time period. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced sonography. In the observation group, free portal pressure (FPP) was detected during esophagogastric variceal embolization with ultrasound guidance. Differences in hepatic artery-hepatic vein transit time (HA-HVTT), portal vein-hepatic vein transit time (PV-HVTT), and parenchyma-hepatic vein transit time (PA-HVTT) were compared between groups. Correlations between HA-HVTT, PV-HVTT, PA-HVTT, and FPP in the observation group were analyzed using the Pearson coefficient and linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

HA-HVTT (t = 5.078; P < .001), PV-HVTT (t = 12.163; P < .001), and PA-HVTT (t = 2.649; P = .009) within the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group. The areas under the curve of HTT were 0.771 (HA-HVTT), 0.951 (PV-HVTT), and 0.652 (PA-HVTT), and the sensitivity and specificity of PV-HVTT at 7.99 seconds were 86.0% and 88.0%, respectively. The HA-HVTT (r = -0.799; P < .001), PV-HVTT (r = -0.554; P < .001), and PA-HVTT (r = -0.735; P < .001) negatively correlated to FPP in the observation group. Linear regression analysis showed y = -0.410x + 7.254 (HA-HVTT and FPP), y = -0.335x + 4.983 (PV-HVTT and FPP), and y = -0.566x + 4.997 (PA-HVTT and FPP) in the observation group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the control patients, the HTT of patients with portal hypertension-esophagogastric varices was significantly shorter, and showed an inverse relationship with FPP.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the liver using SonoVue

This review focuses on the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) with SonoVue (Bracco Imaging) for the diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLLs), guidance during ablative treatment, and follow-up of liver tumors. Multicenter trials have shown that the performance of CEUS for the characterization of FLLs is similar to that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. CEUS with SonoVue has been effectively used for guiding the percutaneous treatment of malignant liver tumors that are invisible or poorly visualized in traditional gray-scale ultrasonography. Postprocedural CEUS may be used to detect and retreat residual viable tissue in the same ablative session. The use of CEUS for the assessment of diffuse liver disease is also discussed.