1
|
Friebel-Klingner TM, Alvarez GG, Lappen H, Pace LE, Huang KY, Fernández ME, Shelley D, Rositch AF. State of the Science of Scale-Up of Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2300238. [PMID: 38237096 PMCID: PMC10805431 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer deaths in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) will nearly double by 2040. Available evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for cancer prevention and early detection can reduce cancer-related mortality, yet there is a lack of evidence on effectively scaling these EBIs in LMIC settings. METHODS We conducted a scoping review to identify published literature from six databases between 2012 and 2022 that described efforts for scaling cancer prevention and early detection EBIs in LMICs. Included studies met one of two definitions of scale-up: (1) deliberate efforts to increase the impact of effective intervention to benefit more people or (2) an intervention shown to be efficacious on a small scale expanded under real-world conditions to reach a greater proportion of eligible population. Study characteristics, including EBIs, implementation strategies, and outcomes used, were summarized using frameworks from the field of implementation science. RESULTS This search yielded 3,076 abstracts, with 24 studies eligible for inclusion. Included studies focused on a number of cancer sites including cervical (67%), breast (13%), breast and cervical (13%), liver (4%), and colon (4%). Commonly reported scale-up strategies included developing stakeholder inter-relationships, training and education, and changing infrastructure. Barriers to scale-up were reported at individual, health facility, and community levels. Few studies reported applying conceptual frameworks to guide strategy selection and evaluation. CONCLUSION Although there were relatively few published reports, this scoping review offers insight into the approaches used by LMICs to scale up cancer EBIs, including common strategies and barriers. More importantly, it illustrates the urgent need to fill gaps in research to guide best practices for bringing the implementation of cancer EBIs to scale in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gloria Guevara Alvarez
- Department Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY
| | - Hope Lappen
- Division of Libraries, New York University, New York, NY
| | - Lydia E. Pace
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Keng-Yen Huang
- Department of Population Health, Center for Early Childhood Health & Development (CEHD), New York, NY
| | - Maria E. Fernández
- Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, School of Public Health Houston, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX
| | - Donna Shelley
- Department Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY
| | - Anne F. Rositch
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kabukye JK, Namugga J, Mpamani CJ, Katumba A, Nakatumba-Nabende J, Nabuuma H, Musoke SS, Nankya E, Soomre E, Nakisige C, Orem J. Implementing Smartphone-Based Telemedicine for Cervical Cancer Screening in Uganda: Qualitative Study of Stakeholders' Perceptions. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e45132. [PMID: 37782541 PMCID: PMC10580134 DOI: 10.2196/45132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Uganda, cervical cancer (CaCx) is the commonest cancer, accounting for 35.7% of all cancer cases in women. The rates of human papillomavirus vaccination and CaCx screening remain low. Digital health tools and interventions have the potential to improve different aspects of CaCx screening and control in Uganda. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to describe stakeholders' perceptions of the telemedicine system we developed to improve CaCx screening in Uganda. METHODS We developed and implemented a smartphone-based telemedicine system for capturing and sharing cervical images and other clinical data, as well as an artificial intelligence model for automatic analysis of images. We conducted focus group discussions with health workers at the screening clinics (n=27) and women undergoing screening (n=15) to explore their perceptions of the system. The focus group discussions were supplemented with field observations and an evaluation survey of the health workers on system usability and the overall project. RESULTS In general, both patients and health workers had positive opinions about the system. Highlighted benefits included better cervical visualization, the ability to obtain a second opinion, improved communication between nurses and patients (to explain screening findings), improved clinical data management, performance monitoring and feedback, and modernization of screening service. However, there were also some negative perceptions. For example, some health workers felt the system is time-consuming, especially when it had just been introduced, while some patients were apprehensive about cervical image capture and sharing. Finally, commonplace challenges in digital health (eg, lack of interoperability and problems with sustainability) and challenges in cancer screening in general (eg, arduous referrals, inadequate monitoring and quality control) also resurfaced. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the feasibility and value of digital health tools in CaCx screening in Uganda, particularly with regard to improving patient experience and the quality of screening services. It also provides examples of potential limitations that must be addressed for successful implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnblack K Kabukye
- SPIDER - The Swedish Program for ICT in Developing Regions, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Uganda Cancer Institute, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Jane Namugga
- Uganda Cancer Institute, Kampala, Uganda
- Mulago Specialised Women and Neonatal Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Andrew Katumba
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Hanifa Nabuuma
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Stephen Senkomago Musoke
- Global Programs for Research and Training, University of California San Francisco, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Edna Soomre
- SPIDER - The Swedish Program for ICT in Developing Regions, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Petersen Z, Jaca A, Ginindza TG, Maseko G, Takatshana S, Ndlovu P, Zondi N, Zungu N, Varghese C, Hunting G, Parham G, Simelela P, Moyo S. Barriers to uptake of cervical cancer screening services in low-and-middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22:486. [PMID: 36461001 PMCID: PMC9716693 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-02043-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) bear a disproportionate burden of cervical cancer mortality. We aimed to identify what is currently known about barriers to cervical cancer screening among women in LMICs and propose remedial actions. DESIGN This was a systematic review using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms in Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. We also contacted medical associations and universities for grey literature and checked reference lists of eligible articles for relevant literature published in English between 2010 and 2020. We summarized the findings using a descriptive narrative based on themes identified as levels of the social ecological model. SETTING We included studies conducted in LMICs published in English between 2010 and 2020. PARTICIPANTS We included studies that reported on barriers to cervical cancer screening among women 15 years and older, eligible for cervical cancer screening. RESULTS Seventy-nine articles met the inclusion criteria. We identified individual, cultural/traditional and religious, societal, health system, and structural barriers to screening. Lack of knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer in general and of screening were the most frequent individual level barriers. Cultural/traditional and religious barriers included prohibition of screening and unsupportive partners and families, while social barriers were largely driven by community misconceptions. Health system barriers included policy and programmatic factors, and structural barriers were related to geography, education and cost. Underlying reasons for these barriers included limited information about cervical cancer and screening as a preventive strategy, poorly resourced health systems that lacked policies or implemented them poorly, generalised limited access to health services, and gender norms that deprioritize the health needs of women. CONCLUSION A wide range of barriers to screening were identified across most LMICs. Urgent implementation of clear policies supported by health system capacity for implementation, community wide advocacy and information dissemination, strengthening of policies that support women's health and gender equality, and targeted further research are needed to effectively address the inequitable burden of cervical cancer in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z. Petersen
- grid.417715.10000 0001 0071 1142Human & Social Capabilities (HSC), Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - A. Jaca
- grid.415021.30000 0000 9155 0024Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - T. G. Ginindza
- grid.16463.360000 0001 0723 4123Public Health Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), Durban, South Africa ,Cancer & Infectious Diseases Epidemiology Research Unit (CIDERU), Durban, South Africa
| | - G. Maseko
- grid.417715.10000 0001 0071 1142Human & Social Capabilities (HSC), Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - S. Takatshana
- grid.417715.10000 0001 0071 1142Human & Social Capabilities (HSC), Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - P. Ndlovu
- grid.417715.10000 0001 0071 1142Human & Social Capabilities (HSC), Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - N. Zondi
- grid.417715.10000 0001 0071 1142Human & Social Capabilities (HSC), Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - N. Zungu
- grid.417715.10000 0001 0071 1142Human & Social Capabilities (HSC), Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa ,grid.16463.360000 0001 0723 4123Public Health Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), Durban, South Africa
| | - C. Varghese
- grid.3575.40000000121633745Cervical Cancer Elimination Initiative, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - G. Hunting
- grid.3575.40000000121633745Cervical Cancer Elimination Initiative, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - G. Parham
- grid.3575.40000000121633745Cervical Cancer Elimination Initiative, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - P. Simelela
- grid.3575.40000000121633745Cervical Cancer Elimination Initiative, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - S. Moyo
- grid.417715.10000 0001 0071 1142Human & Social Capabilities (HSC), Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa ,grid.7836.a0000 0004 1937 1151School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Goel B, Desouza A, Sehgal A, Dubey S. Looking Beyond VIA to Improve Cervical Cancer Screening in Low Resource Settings. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2022; 72:503-508. [PMID: 36506901 PMCID: PMC9732159 DOI: 10.1007/s13224-022-01674-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The two prongs for cervical cancer prevention are vaccination for primary prevention and effective screening for preinvasive and early invasive disease. Until human papilloma virus DNA testing can be provided in low resource settings, screening with VIA is the most feasible option. Various innovative methods have been used to improve the diagnostic accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA). This study explores one such option. Method We modified VIA (VIA-Md) by using a magnifying lens mounted with battery operated light emitting devices (LEDs) to study the acetowhite areas on the cervix. The peak wavelength of the light from the LEDs was in the bluish white range. The results of VIA and VIA-Md were compared using colposcopy directed biopsy as the reference standard. Result The study was conducted in 273 eligible women. The sensitivity of VIA and VIA-Md for detecting CIN2 + lesions were 57.1% and 100% respectively. The specificity of VIA and VIA-Md were 99.2% and 89.5%; and p values using the colposcopy directed biopsy as the reference standard were 0.000 and 0.018 respectively. However, VIA-Md was also effective in identifying 21 out of the total 32 cases of chronic cervicitis identified by colposcopy directed biopsy. Conclusion VIA-Md appears to be a highly sensitive test for detection of CIN2 + lesions. However, because of concerns regarding lower specificity, VIA-Md can be used simultaneously with VIA as an effective tool for triaging women who need to be kept under close surveillance or who might benefit from local ablative therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bharti Goel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College and Hospital (GMCH), Sector - 32, Chandigarh, India
| | - Argyia Desouza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, K.S Hegde Medical Academy, Mangaluru, India
| | - Alka Sehgal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College and Hospital (GMCH), Sector - 32, Chandigarh, India
| | - Sunita Dubey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College and Hospital (GMCH), Sector - 32, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hategeka C, Adu P, Desloge A, Marten R, Shao R, Tian M, Wei T, Kruk ME. Implementation research on noncommunicable disease prevention and control interventions in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. PLoS Med 2022; 19:e1004055. [PMID: 35877677 PMCID: PMC9359585 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of most noncommunicable disease (NCD) prevention and treatment interventions is well established, care delivery models and means of scaling these up in a variety of resource-constrained health systems are not. The objective of this review was to synthesize evidence on the current state of implementation research on priority NCD prevention and control interventions provided by health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS AND FINDINGS On January 20, 2021, we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from 1990 through 2020 to identify implementation research studies that focused on the World Health Organization (WHO) priority NCD prevention and control interventions targeting cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, and chronic respiratory disease and provided within health systems in LMICs. Any empirical and peer-reviewed studies that focused on these interventions and reported implementation outcomes were eligible for inclusion. Given the focus on this review and the heterogeneity in aims and methodologies of included studies, risk of bias assessment to understand how effect size may have been compromised by bias is not applicable. We instead commented on the distribution of research designs and discussed about stronger/weaker designs. We synthesized extracted data using descriptive statistics and following the review protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021252969). Of 9,683 potential studies and 7,419 unique records screened for inclusion, 222 eligible studies evaluated 265 priority NCD prevention and control interventions implemented in 62 countries (6% in low-income countries and 90% in middle-income countries). The number of studies published has been increasing over time. Nearly 40% of all the studies were on cervical cancer. With regards to intervention type, screening accounted for 49%, treatment for 39%, while prevention for 12% (with 80% of the latter focusing on prevention of the NCD behavior risk factors). Feasibility (38%) was the most studied implementation outcome followed by adoption (23%); few studies addressed sustainability. The implementation strategies were not specified well enough. Most studies used quantitative methods (86%). The weakest study design, preexperimental, and the strongest study design, experimental, were respectively employed in 25% and 24% of included studies. Approximately 72% of studies reported funding, with international funding being the predominant source. The majority of studies were proof of concept or pilot (88%) and targeted the micro level of health system (79%). Less than 5% of studies report using implementation research framework. CONCLUSIONS Despite growth in implementation research on NCDs in LMICs, we found major gaps in the science. Future studies should prioritize implementation at scale, target higher levels health systems (meso and macro levels), and test sustainability of NCD programs. They should employ designs with stronger internal validity, be more conceptually driven, and use mixed methods to understand mechanisms. To maximize impact of the research under limited resources, adding implementation science outcomes to effectiveness research and regional collaborations are promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celestin Hategeka
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Prince Adu
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Allissa Desloge
- School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Robert Marten
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Maoyi Tian
- The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Ting Wei
- The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Margaret E. Kruk
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bevilacqua KG, Gottschlich A, Murchland AR, Alvarez CS, Rivera-Andrade A, Meza R. Cervical cancer knowledge and barriers and facilitators to screening among women in two rural communities in Guatemala: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22:197. [PMID: 35643497 PMCID: PMC9148459 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01778-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Approximately 80% of deaths due to cervical cancer occur in low- and middle-income countries. In Guatemala, limited access to effective screening and treatment has resulted in alarmingly high cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates. Despite access to free-of-cost screening, women continue to face significant barriers in obtaining screening for cervical cancer.
Methods In-depth interviews (N = 21) were conducted among women in two rural communities in Guatemala. Interviews followed a semi-structured guide to explore knowledge related to cervical cancer and barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening. Results Cervical cancer knowledge was variable across sites and across women. Women reported barriers to screening including ancillary costs, control by male partners, poor provider communication and systems-level resource constraints. Facilitators to screening included a desire to know one’s own health status, conversations with other women, including community health workers, and extra-governmental health campaigns. Conclusions Findings speak to the many challenges women face in obtaining screening for cervical cancer in their communities as well as existing facilitators. Future interventions must focus on improving cervical cancer-related knowledge as well as mitigating barriers and leveraging facilitators to promote screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin G Bevilacqua
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| | - Anna Gottschlich
- BC Women's Hospital and Health Service, Women's Health Research Institute, 4500 Oak St, Vancouver, BC, V6H N9, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 31702194 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Audrey R Murchland
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Christian S Alvarez
- Instituto de Nutrición de Centro América y Panamá,, Calzada Roosevelt 6-25 Zona 11, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Alvaro Rivera-Andrade
- Instituto de Nutrición de Centro América y Panamá,, Calzada Roosevelt 6-25 Zona 11, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Rafael Meza
- School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Akinyemiju T, Ogunsina K, Gupta A, Liu I, Braithwaite D, Hiatt RA. A Socio-Ecological Framework for Cancer Prevention in Low and Middle-Income Countries. Front Public Health 2022; 10:884678. [PMID: 35719678 PMCID: PMC9204349 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.884678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer incidence and mortality rates continue to rise globally, a trend mostly driven by preventable cancers occurring in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is growing concern that many LMICs are ill-equipped to cope with markedly increased burden of cancer due to lack of comprehensive cancer control programs that incorporate primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention strategies. Notably, few countries have allocated budgets to implement such programs. In this review, we utilize a socio-ecological framework to summarize primary (risk reduction), secondary (early detection), and tertiary (treatment and survivorship) strategies to reduce the cancer burden in these countries across the individual, organizational, community, and policy levels. We highlight strategies that center on promoting health behaviors and reducing cancer risk, including diet, tobacco, alcohol, and vaccine uptake, approaches to promote routine cancer screenings, and policies to support comprehensive cancer treatment. Consistent with goals promulgated by the United Nations General Assembly on Noncommunicable Disease Prevention and Control, our review supports the development and implementation of sustainable national comprehensive cancer control plans in partnership with local communities to enhance cultural relevance and adoption, incorporating strategies across the socio-ecological framework. Such a concerted commitment will be necessary to curtail the rising cancer and chronic disease burden in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomi Akinyemiju
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States,Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States,*Correspondence: Tomi Akinyemiju
| | - Kemi Ogunsina
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Anjali Gupta
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Iris Liu
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Dejana Braithwaite
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States,University of Florida Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Robert A. Hiatt
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States,UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moucheraud C, Kawale P, Kafwafwa S, Bastani R, Hoffman RM. Health care workers' experiences with implementation of "screen and treat" for cervical cancer prevention in Malawi: A qualitative study. Implement Sci Commun 2020; 1:112. [PMID: 33317633 PMCID: PMC7734769 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-020-00097-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity in low- and middle-income countries, despite the availability of effective prevention approaches. "Screen and treat" (a single-visit strategy to identify and remove abnormal cervical cells) is the recommended secondary prevention approach in low-resource settings, but there has been relatively scarce robust implementation science evidence on barriers and facilitators to providing "screen and treat" from the provider perspective, or about thermocoagulation as a lesion removal technique. METHODS Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted interviews with ten experienced "screen and treat" providers in Malawi. We asked questions based on the CFIR Guide, used the CFIR Guide codebook for a descriptive analysis in NVivo, and added recommended modifications for studies in low-income settings. RESULTS Seven CFIR constructs were identified as positively influencing implementation, and six as negatively influencing implementation. The two strong positive influences were the relative advantage of thermocoagulation versus cryotherapy (Innovation Characteristics) and respondents' knowledge and beliefs about providing "screen and treat" (Individual Characteristics). The two strong negative influences were the availability of ongoing refresher trainings to stay up-to-date on skills (Inner Setting, Implementation Climate) and insufficient resources (staffing, infrastructure, supplies) to provide "screen and treat" to all women who need it (Inner Setting, Readiness for Implementation). Weak positive factors included perceived scalability and access to knowledge/information, as well as compatibility, leadership engagement, and team characteristics, but these latter three were mixed in valence. Weak negative influences were structural characteristics and donor priorities; and mixed but weakly negative influences were relative priority and engaging clients. Cross-cutting themes included the importance of broad buy-in (including different cadres of health workers and leadership at the facility and in the government) and the opportunities and challenges of offering integrated care (screening plus other services). CONCLUSIONS Although "screen and treat" is viewed as effective and important, many implementation barriers remain. Our findings suggest that implementation strategies will need to be multi-level, include a diverse set of stakeholders, and explicitly address both screening and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corrina Moucheraud
- University of California Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Paul Kawale
- African Institute for Development Policy, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | | | - Roshan Bastani
- University of California Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Risa M. Hoffman
- University of California Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gottschlich A, Rivera-Andrade A, Bevilacqua K, Murchland AR, Isak E, Alvarez CS, Ogilvie G, Carey TE, Prince M, Dean M, Mendoza-Montano C, Meza R. Using self-collection HPV testing to increase engagement in cervical cancer screening programs in rural Guatemala: a longitudinal analysis. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1406. [PMID: 32933512 PMCID: PMC7493167 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09478-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cervical cancer is a leading cause of death in low- and middle-income countries. Self-collection testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) is an alternative form of cervical cancer screening that can be completed privately and at home. Understanding how the use of HPV testing influences follow-up care in low-resourced settings is crucial before broad implementation. This study aimed to identify if access to self-collection HPV testing impacts participation in established cervical cancer screening programs among women in two rural communities in Guatemala. Methods A cohort of 956 women was recruited in 2016 and followed for 2 years for the HPV Multiethnic Study (HPV MES). At baseline, women answered a questionnaire assessing cervical cancer screening history and were offered self-collection HPV testing. Women were re-contacted yearly to determine receipt of additional screening. Statistical changes in screening behavior before and throughout study participation, stratified by self-collection status, were assessed using McNemar pair tests for proportions. Alluvial plots were constructed to depict changes in individual screening behavior. The odds of changes in Pap-compliance (screened in past 3 years), given collection status, were assessed using multivariate logistic regressions. Results Reported screening rates increased 2 years after enrollment compared to rates reported for the 3 years before study entry among women who collected a sample (19.1% increase, p < 0.05), received results of their test (22.1% increase, p < 0.05), and received positive (24.2% increase, p < 0.1) or negative results (21.7% increase, p < 0.05). However, most increases came from one community, with minimal changes in the other. The adjusted odds of becoming Pap compliant were higher for women who collected a sample vs. did not (OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 0.64, 3.40), received their result vs. did not (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.52, 3.02), and received a positive result vs. negative (OR: 2.43, 95% CI: 0.63, 16.10). Conclusions Participation in self-collection HPV testing campaigns may increase likelihood of involvement in screening programs. However, results varied between communities, and reporting of screening histories was inconsistent. Future work should identify what community-specific factors promote success in HPV testing programs and focus on improving education on existing cervical cancer interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Gottschlich
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. .,, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Alvaro Rivera-Andrade
- Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama-INCAP, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Kristin Bevilacqua
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Audrey R Murchland
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ergest Isak
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Christian S Alvarez
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Gina Ogilvie
- Clinical Prevention Services, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Thomas E Carey
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mark Prince
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michael Dean
- Laboratory of Translational Genomics, Division of Cancer, Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | | | - Rafael Meza
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Obol JH, Harrison R, Lin S, Obwolo MJ, Richmond R. Perceptions of key informants on the provision of cervical cancer prevention and control programme in Uganda: implication for cervical cancer policy. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1396. [PMID: 32928155 PMCID: PMC7488649 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09482-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Uganda has one of the highest burdens of cervical cancer globally. In 2010 the Ugandan Ministry of Health launched the Strategic Plan for Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control with the hope of developing cervical cancer policy in Uganda. This study explored the beliefs of senior key informants in Uganda about cervical cancer prevention, the control programme, and the relevance of cervical cancer policy. Methods We conducted 15 key informant interviews with participants from six organisations across Northern and Central Uganda. Participants were drawn from district local government health departments, St. Mary’s Hospital Lacor, Uganda Nurses and Midwifery Council, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and Ministry of Health in Kampala, Uganda. The interview recordings were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Results Seven themes emerged relating to the cervical cancer prevention and control programmes in Uganda: (1) policy frameworks for cervical cancer, (2) operationalising cervical cancer prevention and control, (3) financial allocation and alignment, (4) human resources and capability, (5) essential supplies and vaccines, (6) administrative data and resource distribution, and (7) cervical cancer services. Conclusions The key informants perceive that the lack of a cervical cancer policy in Uganda is hindering cervical cancer prevention and control programmes. Therefore, the Ministry of Health and stakeholders need to work together in coming up with an effective policy framework that will accelerate efforts towards cervical cancer prevention and control in Uganda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Henry Obol
- University of New South Wales School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Kensington, NSW, 2033, Australia. .,Gulu University, Faculty of Medicine, P. O Box 166, Gulu, Uganda.
| | - Reema Harrison
- University of New South Wales School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Kensington, NSW, 2033, Australia
| | - Sophia Lin
- University of New South Wales School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Kensington, NSW, 2033, Australia
| | | | - Robyn Richmond
- University of New South Wales School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Kensington, NSW, 2033, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dykens JA, Smith JS, Demment M, Marshall E, Schuh T, Peters K, Irwin T, McIntosh S, Sy A, Dye T. Evaluating the implementation of cervical cancer screening programs in low-resource settings globally: a systematized review. Cancer Causes Control 2020; 31:417-429. [PMID: 32185604 PMCID: PMC7105425 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-020-01290-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cervical cancer disproportionately burdens low-resource populations where access to quality screening services is limited. A greater understanding of sustainable approaches to implement cervical cancer screening services is needed. METHODS We conducted a systematized literature review of evaluations from cervical cancer screening programs implemented in resource-limited settings globally that included a formal evaluation and intention of program sustainment over time. We categorized the included studies using the continuum of implementation research framework which categorizes studies progressively from "implementation light" to more implementation intensive. RESULTS Fifty-one of 13,330 initially identified papers were reviewed with most study sites in low-resource settings of middle-income countries (94.1%) ,while 9.8% were in low-income countries. Across all studies, visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (58.8%) was the most prevalent screening method followed by cytology testing (39.2%). Demand-side (client and community) considerations were reported in 86.3% of the articles, while 68.6% focused scientific inquiry on the supply side (health service). Eighteen articles (35.3%) were categorized as "Informing Scale-up" along the continuum of implementation research. CONCLUSIONS The number of cervical cancer screening implementation reports is limited globally, especially in low-income countries. The 18 papers we classified as Informing Scale-up provide critical insights for developing programs relevant to implementation outcomes. We recommend that program managers report lessons learnt to build collective implementation knowledge for cervical cancer screening services, globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Andrew Dykens
- University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Jennifer S. Smith
- University of North Carolina School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Margaret Demment
- University of Rochester Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rochester, NY USA
| | - E. Marshall
- University of Illinois at Chicago Institute for Health Research and Policy, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Tina Schuh
- University of Illinois at Chicago Institute for Health Research and Policy, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Karen Peters
- University of Illinois at Chicago Institute for Health Research and Policy, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Tracy Irwin
- University of Washington Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Scott McIntosh
- University of Rochester Department of Public Health Sciences, Rochester, NY USA
| | - Angela Sy
- University of Hawaii John A Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI USA
| | - Timothy Dye
- University of Rochester Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rochester, NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Johnson LG, Ramogola-Masire D, Teitelman AM, Jemmott JB, Buttenheim AM. Assessing Nurses' Adherence to the See-and-Treat Guidelines of Botswana's National Cervical Cancer Prevention Programme. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2019; 13:329-336. [PMID: 31852663 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-19-0348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
The see-and-treat approach for cervical cancer screening [visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) followed by immediate cryotherapy] was first pilot tested in Botswana in 2009. Botswana's Ministry of Health and the Botswana-UPenn Partnership collaborated to expand see-and-treat to five additional sites throughout the country in 2014. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether nurses' adherence to guideline-based screening was maintained during scale-up. Therefore, we compared nurses' adherence between the pilot and scaled-up sites and determined main drivers of nonadherence across all sites. We conducted a retrospective review of 6,644 medical charts from Botswana's National Cervical Cancer Prevention Programme between February 2014 and October 2015. Using multivariable regression modeled with generalized estimating equations, we determined whether nurses' adherence to the see-and-treat guideline differed between the pilot and scale-up sites after controlling for significant covariates. Overall, adherence to the guideline was high (88.4%). Although the scaled-up sites had higher adherence compared with the pilot site (90.9% vs. 80.2%, respectively), the difference between sites was not statistically significant in the multivariable model (P = 0.221). Of the nonadherent clinical encounters, the three most frequent visit types were VIA not performed (178, 23.3%), VIA negative: HIV unknown (163, 21.3%), and VIA negative: HIV negative (144, 18.9%). The most common reason for nonadherence was misspecification of follow-up times. Despite known challenges of scaling-up health innovations in resource-limited settings, our study shows that nurses maintained guideline-adherent care in Botswana's national see-and-treat program. The successful scale-up may have been attributable to the program's intensive quality assurance monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren G Johnson
- School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York. .,Office of Nursing Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Doreen Ramogola-Masire
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana
| | - Anne M Teitelman
- School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John B Jemmott
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alison M Buttenheim
- School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gottschlich A, Ochoa P, Rivera-Andrade A, Alvarez CS, Mendoza Montano C, Camel C, Meza R. Barriers to cervical cancer screening in Guatemala: a quantitative analysis using data from the Guatemala Demographic and Health Surveys. Int J Public Health 2019; 65:217-226. [PMID: 31838575 PMCID: PMC7049547 DOI: 10.1007/s00038-019-01319-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Revised: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Examine the association between commonly reported barriers to health care, including discordant spoken languages between patients and providers, and reported previous cervical cancer screening. METHODS Data from the nationally representative Guatemala National Maternal and Child Health Survey from the Demographic and Health Surveys Program were used to explore associations between barriers and screening rates nationwide and in high-risk populations, such as rural and indigenous communities. Negative binomial regressions were run accounting for survey sample weights to calculate prevalence ratios. RESULTS 64.0%, 57.5% and 47.5% of women reported ever screening, in the overall, indigenous, and rural populations, respectively. Overall, never screened for cervical cancer was associated with the following health barriers: needing permission, cost, distance, not wanting to go alone, and primary language not spoken by health providers, even after adjustment for age, ethnicity, and literacy. CONCLUSIONS Offering screening programs alone is not enough to reduce the burden of cervical cancer in Guatemala. Measures need to be taken to reduce barriers to health care, particularly in rural areas, where screening rates are lowest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Gottschlich
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Alvaro Rivera-Andrade
- Research Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases, Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama-INCAP, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Christian S Alvarez
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Carlos Mendoza Montano
- Research Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases, Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama-INCAP, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Claudia Camel
- Guatemala Ministry of Health and Social Assistance (MSPAS), Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Rafael Meza
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cervical Cancer Screening in HIV-Positive Farmers in South Africa: Mixed-Method Assessment. Ann Glob Health 2019; 85. [PMID: 30993957 PMCID: PMC6634387 DOI: 10.5334/aogh.37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In 2015, a See and Treat cervical cancer screening program was implemented at a local HIV clinic in Limpopo, South Africa, where infrastructure limited adequate Pap smear usability. Objectives: The purpose of this evaluation was to determine the quality and sustainability of the implemented program. Methods: A mixed-methods program analysis was conducted at 18-months post implementation. Data collection techniques included in-depth interviews of staff and patients, observation of healthcare workers delivering screening, and review of charts and patient logs. Findings: Eighteen in-depth interviews revealed improved cervical cancer screening understanding and awareness. Privacy concerns and negative perceptions of medical care were barriers to screening. Informal observations revealed continued clinical competence among healthcare workers who had been previously trained. Review of charts demonstrated positive correlation between VIA and Pap smear results. In evaluating loss to attrition, about half of the first cohort of patients were lost to follow-up. VIAs and Pap smears were offered on an ongoing basis, and month-over-month change for overlapping four months of programming between 2015 and 2016 showed a 4.4% negative change in number of Pap smears and a 57% negative change in VIAs. Conclusion: Our evaluation reveals successful integration of See and Treat into current clinic services in rural South Africa and increased awareness of cervical cancer among health workers and participants. Program sustainability was challenging to assess as many patients were lost to follow-up, given the migrant and transient population attending this clinic. Acceptance by health workers and patients alike is vital for the long-term impact on cervical cancer incidence in this region.
Collapse
|
15
|
Ouedraogo Y, Furlane G, Fruhauf T, Badolo O, Bonkoungou M, Pleah T, Lankoande J, Bicaba I, Bazant ES. Expanding the Single-Visit Approach for Cervical Cancer Prevention: Successes and Lessons From Burkina Faso. GLOBAL HEALTH: SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2018; 6:288-298. [PMID: 29959272 PMCID: PMC6024624 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-17-00326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The single-visit approach was implemented with strong attention to systems in 14 health facilities. In the 2 largest facilities, nearly 14,000 women screened for cervical cancer over 4 years. Of approximately 9% who screened positive, about 66% received same-day cryotherapy. Attention is needed to ensure local technicians can repair cryotherapy equipment, supplies are consistently in stock, and user fees are not prohibitive to accessing care. Background: Cervical cancer accounts for 23% of cancer incidence and 22% of cancer mortality among women in Burkina Faso. These proportions are more than 2 and 5 times higher than those of developed countries, respectively. Before 2010, cervical cancer prevention (CECAP) services in Burkina Faso were limited to temporary screening campaigns. Program Description: Between September 2010 and August 2014, program implementers collaborated with the Ministry of Health and professional associations to implement a CECAP program focused on coupling visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) for screening with same-day cryotherapy treatment for eligible women in 14 facilities. Women with larger lesions or lesions suspect for cancer were referred for loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). The program trained providers, raised awareness through demand generation activities, and strengthened monitoring capacity. Methods: Data on program activities, service provision, and programmatic lessons were analyzed. Three data collection tools, an individual client form, a client registry, and a monthly summary sheet, were used to track 3 key CECAP service indicators: number of women screened using VIA, proportion of women who screened VIA positive, and proportion of women screening VIA positive who received same-day cryotherapy. Results: Over 4 years, the program screened 13,999 women for cervical cancer using VIA; 8.9% screened positive; and 65.9% received cryotherapy in a single visit. The proportion receiving cryotherapy on the same day started at a high of 82% to 93% when services were provided free of charge, but dropped to 51% when a user fee of $10 was applied to cover the cost of supplies. After reducing the fee to $4 in November 2012, the proportion increased again to 78%. Implementation challenges included difficulties tracking referred patients, stock-outs of key supplies, difficulties with machine maintenance, and prohibitive user fees. Providers were trained to independently monitor services, identify gaps, and take corrective actions. Conclusions: Following dissemination of the results that demonstrated the acceptability and feasibility of the CECAP program, the Burkina Faso Ministry of Health included CECAP services in its minimum service delivery package in 2016. Essential components for such programs include provider training on VIA, cryotherapy, and LEEP; provider and patient demand generation; local equipment maintenance; consistent supply stocks; referral system for LEEP; non-prohibitive fees; and a monitoring data collection system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jean Lankoande
- Société de Gynécologues et Obstétriciens du Burkina, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Isabelle Bicaba
- Ministère de la Santé du Burkina Faso, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
White HL, Meglioli A, Chowdhury R, Nuccio O. Integrating cervical cancer screening and preventive treatment with family planning and HIV-related services. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017; 138 Suppl 1:41-46. [PMID: 28691337 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Cervical cancer is a leading cause of mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa-in large part because of inadequate coverage of screening and preventive treatment services. A number of programs have begun integrating cervical cancer prevention services into existing family planning or HIV/AIDS service delivery platforms, to rapidly expand "screen and treat" programs and mitigate cervical cancer burden. Drawing upon a review of literature and our experiences, we consider benefits and challenges associated with such programs in Sub-Saharan Africa. We then outline steps that can optimize uptake and sustainability of integrated sexual and reproductive health services. These include increasing coordination among implementing organizations for efficient use of resources; task shifting for services that can be provided by nonphysicians; mobilizing communities via trusted frontline health workers; strengthening management information systems to allow for monitoring of multiple services; and prioritizing an operational research agenda to provide further evidence on the cost-effectiveness and benefits of integrated service delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather L White
- Department of Reproductive Health and Family Planning, Population Services International, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Raveena Chowdhury
- Strategy and Development and Health Systems Departments, Marie Stopes International, London, UK
| | - Olivia Nuccio
- Strategy and Development and Health Systems Departments, Marie Stopes International, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Public-non-governmental organisation partnerships for health: an exploratory study with case studies from recent Ghanaian experience. BMC Public Health 2016; 16:963. [PMID: 27618964 PMCID: PMC5020518 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3636-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2015] [Accepted: 09/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The last few decades have seen a dramatic increase in public-non-governmental organisation (NGO) partnerships in the health sector of many low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) as a means of improving the public’s health. However, little research has focused to date on the nature, facilitators and barriers of these partnerships. Methods In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 17 participants from five different NGOs and their collaboration with state partners in the Ghanaian health sector at the national and local levels in four regions of the country (Northern, Upper East, Greater Accra, and Eastern) to explore the drivers and nature of these partnerships and their advantages and disadvantages in the effort to improve the public’s health. Results Major findings reveal that: 1) each collaboration between civil society organisations (CSOs) and the state in the health sector demands different partnerships; 2) partnership types can range from equal, formal contractual, decentralized to advocacy ones; 3) commitment by the state and NGOs to work in collaboration lead to improved service delivery, reduced health inequities and disparities; 4) added value of NGOs lies in their knowledge, expertise, community legitimacy, ability to attract donor funding and implementation capacity to address health needs in geographical areas or communities where the government does not reach and for services, which it does not provide and 5) success factors and challenges to be considered, moving forward to promote such partnerships in other LMICs. Conclusions Recommendations are offered for NGOs, governments, donors, and future research including studying the organisational effectiveness and sustainability of these partnerships to deliver effective and efficient health outcomes to recommend universal best practices in health care. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3636-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
18
|
Frey MK, Roselli N, Gertz E, Cuc JC, Boyd L, Shirazian T. Cervical cancer screening in Santiago Atitlán, Guatemala. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2016; 135:119. [PMID: 27451397 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2016] [Revised: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 06/22/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa K Frey
- New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Nicole Roselli
- New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erin Gertz
- Icahn school of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Leslie Boyd
- New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Taraneh Shirazian
- Icahn school of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Saving Mothers, a 501c3 medical non-profit organization, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Negulescu RA, Catarino R, De Vuyst H, Undurraga-Malinverno M, Meyer-Hamme U, Alec M, Campana A, Vassilakos P, Petignat P. Web-based instrument to assess skills in visual inspection of the cervix among healthcare providers. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2016; 134:107-13. [PMID: 27126908 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2015] [Revised: 11/15/2015] [Accepted: 03/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To validate a web-based instrument for assessing healthcare providers' skills in visual inspection with acetic acid or Lugol iodine (VIA/VILI) for the diagnosis and management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. METHODS An observational cross-sectional study enrolled healthcare providers in a web-based assessment of VIA/VILI skills between August and November 2014. Participants participated in a four-module training course, followed by a multiple-choice test with 70 questions based on cervical photographs of HPV-positive women participating in cervical screening. Logistic regression was used to identify relationships between independent variables and success on the test. RESULTS Overall, 255 participants completed the test and 99 (38.8%) passed. No correlation was found between age or sex and test performance. Compared with other healthcare workers, physicians (odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-3.63; P=0.048), and participants with more colposcopy experience (OR 3.62, 95% CI 1.91-6.85; P<0.001) and postgraduate VIA/VILI training (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.16-3.29; P=0.012) were more likely to pass the test. Participants who repeated the test (31/255 [12.2%]) were five times more likely to succeed on their second repeat (OR 5.89, 95% CI 1.46-23.73; P=0.013). CONCLUSION Web-based training for VIA/VILI is feasible and can identify healthcare workers who are proficient in this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raluca-Anca Negulescu
- Division of Gynecology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Rosa Catarino
- Division of Gynecology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Hugo De Vuyst
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Manuela Undurraga-Malinverno
- Division of Gynecology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ulrike Meyer-Hamme
- Division of Gynecology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Milena Alec
- Division of Gynecology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aldo Campana
- Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Pierre Vassilakos
- Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Petignat
- Division of Gynecology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yeates KE, Sleeth J, Hopman W, Ginsburg O, Heus K, Andrews L, Giattas MR, Yuma S, Macheku G, Msuya A, Oneko O. Evaluation of a Smartphone-Based Training Strategy Among Health Care Workers Screening for Cervical Cancer in Northern Tanzania: The Kilimanjaro Method. J Glob Oncol 2016; 2:356-364. [PMID: 28717721 PMCID: PMC5493243 DOI: 10.1200/jgo.2015.001768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Almost nine of 10 deaths resulting from cervical cancer occur in low-income countries. Visual inspection under acetic acid (VIA) is an evidence-based, cost-effective approach to cervical cancer screening (CCS), but challenges to effective implementation include health provider training costs, provider turnover, and skills retention. We hypothesized that a smartphone camera and use of cervical image transfer for real-time mentorship by experts located distantly across a closed user group through a commercially available smartphone application would be both feasible and effective in enhancing VIA skills among CCS providers in Tanzania. Methods We trained five nonphysician providers in semirural Tanzania to perform VIA enhanced by smartphone cervicography with real-time trainee support from regional experts. Deidentified images were sent through a free smartphone application on the available mobile telephone networks. Our primary outcomes were feasibility of using a smartphone camera to perform smartphone-enhanced VIA and level of agreement in diagnosis between the trainee and expert reviewer over time. Results Trainees screened 1,072 eligible women using our methodology. Within 1 month of training, the agreement rate between trainees and expert reviewers was 96.8%. Providers received a response from expert reviewers within 1 to 5 minutes 48.4% of the time, and more than 60% of the time, feedback was provided by regional expert reviewers in less than 10 minutes. Conclusion Our method was found to be feasible and effective in increasing health care workers’ skills and accuracy. This method holds promise for improved quality of VIA-based CCS programs among health care providers in low-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen E Yeates
- , , and , Queen's University, Kingston; , University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; , Pamoja Tunaweza Women's Centre; , International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs Tanzania; , Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics; , Tanzanian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Dar es Salaam; , Mawenzi Government Hospital; , Arumeru District Hospital, Arumeru; and , Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Jessica Sleeth
- , , and , Queen's University, Kingston; , University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; , Pamoja Tunaweza Women's Centre; , International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs Tanzania; , Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics; , Tanzanian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Dar es Salaam; , Mawenzi Government Hospital; , Arumeru District Hospital, Arumeru; and , Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Wilma Hopman
- , , and , Queen's University, Kingston; , University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; , Pamoja Tunaweza Women's Centre; , International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs Tanzania; , Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics; , Tanzanian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Dar es Salaam; , Mawenzi Government Hospital; , Arumeru District Hospital, Arumeru; and , Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Ophira Ginsburg
- , , and , Queen's University, Kingston; , University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; , Pamoja Tunaweza Women's Centre; , International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs Tanzania; , Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics; , Tanzanian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Dar es Salaam; , Mawenzi Government Hospital; , Arumeru District Hospital, Arumeru; and , Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Katharine Heus
- , , and , Queen's University, Kingston; , University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; , Pamoja Tunaweza Women's Centre; , International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs Tanzania; , Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics; , Tanzanian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Dar es Salaam; , Mawenzi Government Hospital; , Arumeru District Hospital, Arumeru; and , Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Linda Andrews
- , , and , Queen's University, Kingston; , University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; , Pamoja Tunaweza Women's Centre; , International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs Tanzania; , Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics; , Tanzanian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Dar es Salaam; , Mawenzi Government Hospital; , Arumeru District Hospital, Arumeru; and , Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Mary Rose Giattas
- , , and , Queen's University, Kingston; , University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; , Pamoja Tunaweza Women's Centre; , International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs Tanzania; , Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics; , Tanzanian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Dar es Salaam; , Mawenzi Government Hospital; , Arumeru District Hospital, Arumeru; and , Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Safina Yuma
- , , and , Queen's University, Kingston; , University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; , Pamoja Tunaweza Women's Centre; , International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs Tanzania; , Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics; , Tanzanian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Dar es Salaam; , Mawenzi Government Hospital; , Arumeru District Hospital, Arumeru; and , Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Godwin Macheku
- , , and , Queen's University, Kingston; , University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; , Pamoja Tunaweza Women's Centre; , International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs Tanzania; , Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics; , Tanzanian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Dar es Salaam; , Mawenzi Government Hospital; , Arumeru District Hospital, Arumeru; and , Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Aziz Msuya
- , , and , Queen's University, Kingston; , University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; , Pamoja Tunaweza Women's Centre; , International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs Tanzania; , Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics; , Tanzanian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Dar es Salaam; , Mawenzi Government Hospital; , Arumeru District Hospital, Arumeru; and , Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Olola Oneko
- , , and , Queen's University, Kingston; , University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; , Pamoja Tunaweza Women's Centre; , International Center for AIDS Care and Treatment Programs Tanzania; , Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics; , Tanzanian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Dar es Salaam; , Mawenzi Government Hospital; , Arumeru District Hospital, Arumeru; and , Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College, Moshi, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Strasser-Weippl K, Chavarri-Guerra Y, Villarreal-Garza C, Bychkovsky BL, Debiasi M, Liedke PER, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Dizon D, Cazap E, de Lima Lopes G, Touya D, Nunes JS, St Louis J, Vail C, Bukowski A, Ramos-Elias P, Unger-Saldaña K, Brandao DF, Ferreyra ME, Luciani S, Nogueira-Rodrigues A, de Carvalho Calabrich AF, Del Carmen MG, Rauh-Hain JA, Schmeler K, Sala R, Goss PE. Progress and remaining challenges for cancer control in Latin America and the Caribbean. Lancet Oncol 2016; 16:1405-38. [PMID: 26522157 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00218-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Revised: 08/03/2015] [Accepted: 08/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, and an increasing threat in low-income and middle-income countries. Our findings in the 2013 Commission in The Lancet Oncology showed several discrepancies between the cancer landscape in Latin America and more developed countries. We reported that funding for health care was a small percentage of national gross domestic product and the percentage of health-care funds diverted to cancer care was even lower. Funds, insurance coverage, doctors, health-care workers, resources, and equipment were also very inequitably distributed between and within countries. We reported that a scarcity of cancer registries hampered the design of credible cancer plans, including initiatives for primary prevention. When we were commissioned by The Lancet Oncology to write an update to our report, we were sceptical that we would uncover much change. To our surprise and gratification much progress has been made in this short time. We are pleased to highlight structural reforms in health-care systems, new programmes for disenfranchised populations, expansion of cancer registries and cancer plans, and implementation of policies to improve primary cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Strasser-Weippl
- Centre for Oncology and Hematology, Wilhelminen Hospital, Vienna, Austria; The Global Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yanin Chavarri-Guerra
- The Global Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Hemato-Oncology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición, Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico; Avon International Breast Cancer Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Instituto de Cancerología, Centro de Cáncer de Mama, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico; Departmento de Investigación y de Tumores Mamarios, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Brittany L Bychkovsky
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marcio Debiasi
- Hospital Mae de Deus, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Hospital Sao Lucas da PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Pedro E R Liedke
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Instituto do Câncer Mãe de Deus, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
- Department of Geriatrics, Cancer Care in the Elderly Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición, Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Don Dizon
- Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eduardo Cazap
- Sociedad Latinoamericana y del Caribe de Oncología Médica, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Gilberto de Lima Lopes
- Medical Oncology, Centro Paulista de Oncologia and Oncoclinicas do Brasil Group, São Paulo, Brazil; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Diego Touya
- Department of Oncology, University of the Republic, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | | | - Jessica St Louis
- The Global Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Avon International Breast Cancer Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Caroline Vail
- The Global Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Avon International Breast Cancer Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexandra Bukowski
- The Global Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Avon International Breast Cancer Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pier Ramos-Elias
- Instituto de Cancerología, Centro de Cáncer de Mama, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - Karla Unger-Saldaña
- Cátedra CONACYT, Unidad de Epidemiología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Mayra E Ferreyra
- Oncology Department, Maria Curie Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Silvana Luciani
- Department of Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Angelica Nogueira-Rodrigues
- Federal University, Minas Gerais, Brazil; EVA-Group Brasileiro de Tumores Ginecológicos, Brazilian Gynecologic Oncology Group, Bahia, Brazil
| | | | - Marcela G Del Carmen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Raúl Sala
- Grupo Argentino de Investigación Clínica en Oncología-GAICO, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Paul E Goss
- The Global Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Avon International Breast Cancer Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|