Geographic and facility-level variation in the use of peritoneal dialysis in Canada: a cohort study

Early as compared to late initiation of twice-weekly hemodialysis and short-term survival among end-stage renal disease patients

INTRODUCTION

The impact of timing of hemodialysis (HD) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients treated with twice-weekly HD remains unclear. We aimed to determine the effects of late initiation of HD on short-term mortality and hospitalization.

METHODS

A multicenter cohort study was conducted in 11 HD centers in Northeastern Thailand (HEmodialysis Network of the NorthEastern Thailand study group). We recruited adult ESRD patients who were treated with twice-weekly HD for more than 3 months and had data on eGFR at HD initiation. Clinical and laboratory values at the time of recruitment were recorded. Late and early (eGFR at start <5 and >5 ml/min/1.73 m² ) initiations were defined. Outcomes were disease-related death (excluding any accidental deaths) and first hospitalization. Data analysis was performed by multivariable cox-regression analysis.

FINDINGS

A total of 407 patients who had data on eGFR at HD initiation (303 in late group and 104 in early group) were included for analysis. There were 56.8% male with a mean age of 55 years. During the 15.1 months of follow-up, there were 27 (6.6%) disease-related deaths. The 1-year survival rate was similar among late and early initiation groups. The incidence density of first hospitalization in the late group was significantly lower than those in the early group (HR adjusted, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-0.99, p = 0.047). Among 303 patients who were in the late start group, patients with diabetes had a higher mortality rate (HR, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.40-8.70, p = 0.007) when compared to non-diabetic patients.

DISCUSSION

Early initiation of HD at eGFR >5 ml/min/1.73 m² had no short-term survival benefit compared to the late group in ESRD patients treated with twice-weekly HD for at least 3 months in a resource-limited setting. A survival benefit from an early start of HD was found among diabetic patients.

Program Report: Nîsohkamâtowak-Helping Patients and Families Living With Kidney Disease in Northern Saskatchewan

Purpose of the Program:

Nîsohkamâtowak, the Cree word for Helping Each Other, is an initiative to close gaps in kidney health care for First Nations and Métis patients, their families, and communities in northern Saskatchewan. Nîsohkamâtowak emerged from a collaboration between the Kidney Health Community Program and First Nations and Métis Health Services to find ways to deliver better care and education to First Nations and Métis people living with kidney disease while acknowledging Truth and Reconciliation and the Calls to Action.

Sources of Information:

This article describes how traditional Indigenous protocols and storytelling were woven into the Nîsohkamâtowak events, gathering of patient and family voices in writing and video format, and how this work led to a collaborative co-designed process that incorporates the Truth and Reconciliation: Calls to Action into kidney care and the benefits we have seen so far. The teachings of the 4 Rs—respect, reciprocity, responsibility, and relevance, were critical to ensuring that Nîsohkamâtowak reports and learning were shared with participants and the communities represented in this initiative.

Methods:

Group discussions and sharing circles were facilitated in several locations throughout northern and central Saskatchewan. Main topics of discussion were traditional medicines, residential schools impact, community and peer supports for kidney disease patients, and cultural safety education for health care providers.

Key Findings:

The general themes selected for improvement were education, support within the local community, traditional practices and cultural competency, and delivery of services. To address these gaps in kidney care, the following objectives were co-created with First Nations and Métis patients, families, and communities for Kidney Health to provide culturally appropriate education and resources, to ensure appropriate follow-up support to include strengthening connections to communities and other health authorities, to incorporate traditional practices into program design, and to ensure appropriate service delivery across the spectrum of care with a focus on screening and referral, which is strongly linked to coordination of care with local health centers.

Implications:

As a result of this work, the Kidney Health Community Program restructured the delivery of services and continues to work with Nîsohkamâtowak advisors on safety initiatives and chronic kidney disease awareness, prevention, and management in their respective communities. The Truth and Reconciliation and Calls to Action are honored to close the gaps in kidney care.

Limitations:

Nîsohkamâtowak is a local Kidney Health initiative that has the good fortune of having dedicated funding and staff to carry out this work. The findings may be unique to the First Nations and Métis communities and people who shared their stories. Truth and Reconciliation is an ongoing commitment that must be nurtured. Although not part of this publication, the effects of COVID-19 have made it difficult to further advance the Calls to Action, with more limited staff resources and the inability to meet in person as in the past.

Neobladder creation is still a conduit to peritoneal dialysis - Successful use of peritoneal dialysis after invasive bladder cancer

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is as safe and more cost-effective than haemodialysis (HD). It also allows patients to undergo renal replacement therapy (RRT) from home. However, PD remains underutilised in many parts of the world. This is true in part because of many perceived relative contraindications to PD, including a history of prior major abdominal surgery. Prior major abdominal surgery is a concern for standard bedside or surgical catheter placement since these patients are at risk of having adhesions, which can complicate catheter placement. However, with laparoscopic advancements, prior major abdominal surgery is no longer even a relative contraindication to PD for skilled and experienced surgeons. We report the case of a male in his 70s with a history of cystoprostatectomy which was curative for a muscle invasive bladder carcinoma 5 years prior to his RRT. The patient had longstanding chronic kidney disease which worsened gradually. After receiving RRT education, the patient favoured PD. The catheter was placed despite the surgeon noting abdominal adhesions and the patient successfully underwent 12 months of PD which had a positive impact on his quality of life. He transferred to HD after contracting a complex PD-associated peritonitis. Thus, new research should be conducted to better understand the real impact of prior abdominal surgeries as a contraindication to PD, especially in centres where the surgeons have experience with advanced laparoscopy.

Barriers to Peritoneal Dialysis in Saskatchewan Canada: Results From a Province-Wide Survey

Background:

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an underutilized, therapeutic option to in-center hemodialysis (HD), given its similar survival and clinical efficacy but provides lifestyle benefits and cost savings. Despite these advantages, PD prevalence rates remains below 20% in many Canadian jurisdictions.

Objectives:

The primary objective of this study was to identify and assess patient-perceived barriers to PD implementation in Saskatchewan. The secondary objectives were to examine variations in patient-perceived barriers to PD by dialysis units (main dialysis units vs satellite dialysis units) and specific challenges faced by First Nation patients residing on reserves.

Design:

A cross-sectional observational survey study.

Setting:

Two major centers (Regina and Saskatoon) and 5 associated satellite units attached to each center across the province of Saskatchewan.

Patients:

We approached all prevalent in-center HD patients across Saskatchewan, 366 (49%) agreed to participate in the study.

Measurements:

Self-reported barriers to PD were assessed using a 26-question survey which was created after engagement of our multidisciplinary team.

Methods:

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 740 prevalent in-center HD patients within the province of Saskatchewan, Canada, from June 2018 to January 2019. Around 366 (49%) patients agreed to participate in the study. The questionnaire was designed to capture patients’ perceived barriers to PD. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compare the patients’ responses (main dialysis units vs satellite dialysis units, and First Nation reserves vs nonreserves).

Results:

Of the 366 patients who completed the survey, 284 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. Patient-reported satisfaction with current in-center HD care was the most common barrier to PD uptake (92%), followed by proximity to their HD unit (61%). A lack of understanding of the benefits/risks of PD, fear of family burden (54% each), and unwillingness to dialyze daily and to learn a new technique (51% each) were additional factors. Patients residing on reserves compared to nonreserve residents felt PD had a higher risk of infection compared to HD (54% vs 34%, P = .005), and felt PD led to suboptimal care (47% vs 31%, P = .021).

Limitations:

We used a nonstandardized locally derived questionnaire to quantify barriers, and this prevents inclusion of additional barriers than individual patients may consider important. Cross-sectional data can only be used as a snapshot. Only 366 patients agreed to participate, and the results cannot be generalized to 740 prevalent HD patients. We did not capture data on demographics (age, income, and literacy level), comorbidities, and dialysis vintage, which would have been helpful in interpretation of the results. We did not involve patients, carers, or patients of First Nations heritage, in the design of the survey and the study.

Conclusions:

The results of our survey indicate that the major patient-reported barrier to PD uptake in our province is clinical inertia in patients defaulted to in-center HD at the onset of dialysis. Lack of patient awareness and knowledge of PD as a viable treatment modality also figured prominently, as did fears/concerns surrounding the safety, efficacy, and perceived family burden with PD compared with in-center HD.

Trial Registration:

The study was not registered on a publicly accessible registry because it did not involve any health care intervention on human participants.

Association between change in physician remuneration and use of peritoneal dialysis: a population-based cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Health care payers are interested in policy-level interventions to increase peritoneal dialysis use in end-stage renal disease. We examined whether increases in physician remuneration for peritoneal dialysis were associated with greater peritoneal dialysis use.

METHODS

We studied a cohort of patients in Alberta who started long-term dialysis with at least 90 days of preceding nephrologist care between Jan. 1, 2001, and Dec. 31, 2014. We compared peritoneal dialysis use 90 days after dialysis initiation in patients cared for by fee-for-service nephrologists and those cared for by salaried nephrologists before and after weekly peritoneal dialysis remuneration increased from $0 to $32 (fee change 1, Apr. 1, 2002), $49 to $71 (fee change 2, Apr. 1, 2007), and $71 to $135 (fee change 3, Apr. 1, 2009). Remuneration for peritoneal dialysis remained less than hemodialysis until fee change 3. We performed a patient-level differences-in-differences logistic regression, adjusted for demographic characteristics and comorbidities, as well as an unadjusted interrupted time-series analysis of monthly outcome data.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 4262 patients. There was no statistical evidence of a difference in the adjusted differences-indifferences estimator following fee change 1 (0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-1.81), 2 (1.15, 95% CI 0.73-1.83), or 3 (1.52, 95% CI 0.96-2.40). There was no significant difference in the immediate change or the trend over time in peritoneal dialysis use between fee-for-service and salaried groups following any of the fee changes in the interrupted time-series analysis.

INTERPRETATION

We identified no statistical evidence of an increase in peritoneal dialysis use following increased fee-for-service remuneration for peritoneal dialysis. It remains unclear what role, if any, physician payment plays in selection of dialysis modality.

Facility Variation and Predictors of Do Not Resuscitate Orders of Hemodialysis Patients in Canada: DOPPS

BACKGROUND

Life expectancy in patients with end-stage kidney disease treated with hemodialysis (HD) is limited, and as such, the presence of an advanced care directive (ACD) may improve the quality of death as experienced for patients and families. Strategies to discuss and implement ACDs are limited with little being known about the status of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders in the Canadian HD population.

OBJECTIVES

Using data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS), we set out to (1) examine the variability in DNR orders across Canada and its largest province, Ontario and (2) identify clinical and functional status measures associated with a DNR order.

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the DOPPS Canada Phase 4 to 6 from 2009 to 2017.

SETTING

DOPPS facilities in Canada.

PATIENTS

All adults (>18 years) who initiated chronic HD with a documented ACD were included.

MEASUREMENTS

ACD and DNR orders.

METHODS

Descriptive statistics were compared for baseline characteristics (demographics, comorbidities, medications, facility characteristics, and patient functional status) and DNR status. The crude proportion of patients per facility with a DNR order was calculated across Canada and Ontario. Functional status was determined by activities of daily living and components of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL)-validated questionnaire. We used generalized estimating equations (GEEs) to create sequential multivariable models (demographics, comorbidities, and functional status) of variables associated with DNR status.

RESULTS

A total of 1556 (96% of total) patients treated with HD had a documented ACD and were included. A total of 10% of patients had a DNR order. The crude variation of DNR status differed considerably across facilities within Canada, between Ontario and non-Ontario, and within Ontario (interprovince variation = 6.3%-17.1%, Ontario vs non-Ontario = 8.2% vs 11.7%, intraprovincial variation [Ontario] = 1%-26%). Patients with a DNR order were more commonly older, white, with cardiac comorbidities, with less or shorter predialysis care compared with those without a DNR order. Patients with a DNR order reported lower energy, more difficulty with transfers, meal preparation, household tasks, and financial management. In a multivariate model, age, cardiac disease, stroke, dialysis duration, and intradialytic weight gain were associated with DNR status.

LIMITATIONS

Relatively small number of events or measures in certain categories.

CONCLUSIONS

A large inter- and intraprovincial (Ontario) variation was observed regarding DNR orders across Canada highlighting areas for potential quality improvement. While functional status did not appear to have a bearing on the presence of a DNR order, the presence of various comorbidities was associated with the presence of a DNR order.

Multidimensional analysis of factors responsible for the low prevalence of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Germany (MAU-PD): a cross-sectional Mixed-Methods Study Protocol

INTRODUCTION

Patients with end-stage kidney failure can be treated either by transplant or by dialysis, which can be administered as haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). Although they are equivalent therapeutic options in terms of mortality, the percentage of patients in Germany treated with PD is currently very low (∼6%) compared with other countries. The aim of our study is to analyse the factors behind this percentage and their relevance to the choice of dialysis treatment in Germany. This includes analyses of regional disparities in the provision of care for dialysis patients as well as the evaluations of costs and the influence of reimbursement structures. This approach should provide further insights to explain the variation in the usage of PD and HD and will help to define starting points for future interventions.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A mixed-methods approach will be applied to several data sources, including administrative data (ambulatory physicians' claim data, statutory health insurance claim data), quality assurance data from one of the largest German dialysis providers Kuratorium für Dialyse (KfH) and qualitative and quantitative survey data (patients, nephrologists and dialysis nurses). Qualitative data will be analysed content-analytically. Based on the quantitative data, multivariable analyses will be performed and, where possible, hierarchical models will be tested. This multidimensional approach will enable us to account for the different factors influencing the penetration of PD in Germany.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval (17-299) has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne on 25 April 2018. National and international dissemination will be accomplished by informing healthcare practitioners, patients and professional organisations and other stakeholders via conferences, scientific and non-scientific publications and seminars.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00012555; Pre-Results.

End-Stage Kidney Disease in Patients With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A 12-Year Study Based on the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry

Background:

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary kidney disease, with afflicted patients often progressing to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). As the timelines to ESKD are predictable over decades, it follows that ADPKD patients should be optimized regarding kidney transplantation, home dialysis therapies, and vascular access.

Objectives:

To examine the association of kidney transplantation, dialysis modalities, and vascular access in ADPKD patients compared with a matched, non-ADPKD cohort.

Setting:

Canadian patients from 2001-2012 excluding Quebec.

Patients:

All adult incident ESKD patients who received dialysis or a kidney transplant.

Measurements:

ADPKD as defined by the treating physician.

Methods:

ADPKD and non-ADPKD patients were propensity score (PS) matched (1:4) using demographics, comorbidities, and lab values. Conditional logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine associations with kidney transplantation (preemptive or any), dialysis modality (peritoneal, short daily, home, or in-center hemodialysis [HD]), vascular access (arteriovenous fistula [AVF], permanent or temporary central venous catheter [CVC]), and dialysis survival.

Results:

We matched 2120 ADPKD (99.9%) with 8283 non-ADPKD with no significant imbalances between the groups. ADPKD was significantly associated with preemptive kidney transplantation (odds ratio [OR] = 7.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.74-8.87), any kidney transplant (OR = 2.37, 95% CI = 2.14-2.63), and initial therapy of nocturnal daily HD (OR = 2.74, 95% CI = 1.38-5.44), whereas in-center intermittent HD was significantly less likely in the ADPKD population (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.54-0.65). There was no difference in peritoneal dialysis (PD) as initial RRT but lower use of any PD among the ADPKD group (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.77-0.95). ADPKD patients were significantly more likely to have an AVF (OR = 3.25, 95% CI = 2.79-3.79) and less likely to have either a permanent (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.59-0.78) or temporary (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.41-0.59) CVC as compared with the non-ADPKD cohort. Survival on either in-center HD or PD was better for ADPKD patients (HD: hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.44-0.53; PD: HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.88).

Limitations:

Conservative care patients were not captured; despite PS matching, the possibility of residual confounding remains.

Conclusions:

ADPKD patients were more likely to receive a kidney transplant, use home HD, dialyze with an AVF, and have better survival relative to non-ADPKD patients. Conversely, they were less likely to receive PD either as initial therapy or anytime during ESKD. This may be attributed to higher transplantation or clinical decision-making processes susceptible to education and intervention.

Reducing intra-abdominal pressure in peritoneal dialysis patients to avoid transient hemodialysis

Patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) are often required to switch to hemodialysis (HD) temporarily when they develop abdominal wall hernias and dialysate leaks, peritonitis or undergo thoracic or abdominal surgeries. There are significant risks associated with incident hemodialysis including possible central venous catheter infections, thrombosis, and need for invasive procedures. Therefore, strategies to avoid temporary transfer to hemodialysis are desirable. The increased intra-abdominal pressure associated with PD is largely responsible for the issues requiring withholding PD. However, the high intra-abdominal pressure, due to dialysate and body position, can be minimized by making changes to the peritoneal dialysis prescription. The lower intra-abdominal pressure may allow dialysate leaks, hernia repairs, and abdominal incisions time to heal as well as to facilitate earlier resumption of PD after catheter replacement. These strategies help to decrease morbidity and minimize cost to the health care system associated with modality switches and its complications.

Geographical Variation in Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion and Initiation within the United States

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an effective but underutilized renal replacement therapy modality. There are limited data regarding geographical variation in PD catheter insertion and utilization of PD as a first renal replacement therapy in the United States. We explored the variation in catheter insertion and initiation of PD utilizing 2 large, nationally representative databases. The incidence of catheter insertion differed significantly by geographical region, being highest in the South (7.30/100 end-stage renal disease [ESRD] patients; 95% confidence [CI] interval 6.78 - 7.81) and lowest in the West (5.91/100 ESRD patients; 95% CI 5.43 - 6.38). Peritoneal dialysis initiation also differed by region, being highest in the West (7.10/100 ESRD patients; 95% CI 6.83 - 7.30) and lowest in the Northeast (5.12/100 ESRD patients; 95% CI 4.87 - 5.30). Interestingly, the Northeast region, with the lowest rate of PD utilization, had the highest number of nephrologists per population (3.95/100,000 persons), and the West, with the highest PD utilization, had the lowest number of nephrologists (2.54/100,000 persons). Reasons for this variation should be explored further and efforts should be made to standardize PD implementation throughout the United States.

Geographic and facility variation in initial use of non-tunneled catheters for incident maintenance hemodialysis patients

Background

Non-tunneled (temporary) hemodialysis catheters (NTHCs) are the least-optimal initial vascular access for incident maintenance hemodialysis patients yet little is known about factors associated with NTHC use in this context. We sought to determine factors associated with NTHC use and examine regional and facility-level variation in NTHC use for incident maintenance hemodialysis patients.

Methods

We analyzed registry data collected between January 2001 and December 2010 from 61 dialysis facilities within 12 geographic regions in Canada. Multi-level models and intra-class correlation coefficients were used to evaluate variation in NTHC use as initial hemodialysis access across facilities and geographic regions. Facility and patient characteristics associated with the lowest and highest quartiles of NTHC use were compared.

Results

During the study period, 21,052 patients initiated maintenance hemodialysis using a central venous catheter (CVC). This included 10,183 patients (48.3 %) in whom the initial CVC was a NTHC, as opposed to a tunneled CVC. Crude variation in NTHC use across facilities ranged from 3.7 to 99.4 % and across geographic regions from 32.4 to 85.1 %. In an adjusted multi-level logistic regression model, the proportion of total variation in NTHC use explained by facility-level and regional variation was 40.0 % and 34.1 %, respectively. Similar results were observed for the subgroup of patients who received greater than 12 months of pre-dialysis nephrology care. Patient-level factors associated with increased NTHC use were male gender, history of angina, pulmonary edema, COPD, hypertension, increasing distance from dialysis facility, higher serum phosphate, lower serum albumin and later calendar year.

Conclusions

There is wide variation in NTHC use as initial vascular access for incident maintenance hemodialysis patients across facilities and geographic regions in Canada. Identifying modifiable factors that explain this variation could facilitate a reduction of NTHC use in favor of more optimal initial vascular access.

Trends in Arteriovenous Fistula Use at Dialysis Initiation After Automated eGFR Reporting

The purpose of this study was to examine trends in the presence of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) at dialysis initiation before and after eGFR reporting. All incident dialysis patients from four Canadian provinces that implemented province-wide, automated laboratory reporting of eGFR with known vascular access at dialysis initiation were included in the study (N = 25,201) from 2001 to 2010. The primary outcome was the change in proportion of patients with an AVF at dialysis initiation using an interrupted time series and adjusted multilevel logistic regression models. AVF usage at dialysis initiation decreased gradually over the study period from 19.0% to 14.6%. After implementation of automated eGFR reporting, there was attenuation in the decline in AVF usage in models adjusted for case-mix, facility, and the downward trajectory in AVF use over time. The adjusted odds ratio for initiating dialysis with an AVF 1 year post-eGFR reporting compared to pre-eGFR reporting was more pronounced in older patients (age tertile >73; OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.04-1.90). Laboratory-based eGFR reporting was associated with a possible attenuation in the decline of AVF at dialysis initiation and this was more pronounced in older patients.