Assessing the appropriateness of community-based antibiotic prescribing in Alberta, Canada, 2017-2020, using ICD-9-CM codes: a cross-sectional study

Prevalence and correlates of oral antibiotic use in Canada

Background

Antimicrobial use (AMU) is a known driver of antimicrobial resistance. Insight into prevalence and correlates of AMU can help identify health inequities and areas for targeted action. To better understand sociodemographic and medical dimensions of AMU in Canada, the Public Health Agency of Canada, in partnership with Statistics Canada, developed a Rapid Response Module questionnaire on self-reported oral antibiotic use, to be administered as part of the 2018 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS).

Objective

To provide data on the proportion of people in Canada that self-report the use of antibiotics and sociodemographic and health factors associated with use.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used data from the CCHS, a national survey of 24,176 people with a clustered multi-stage stratified random sampling design. In 2018, an antibiotic use module was administered to CCHS participants.

Results

Among respondents 18 years and older, 26% reported receipt of at least one oral antibiotic over the past year. Several sociodemographic and health factors had higher adjusted odds of receiving an antibiotic prescription, including those aged 18 years compared to aged 48 years (mean), women compared to men, immigrants compared to non-immigrants (excluding Indigenous), current and former smokers compared to those who have never smoked, and those with comorbidities (asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, arthritis, heart disease, cancer, bowel disorder and urinary incontinence).

Conclusion

Variations in AMU across different key populations and sociodemographic groups highlight the need to improve our understanding of different drivers of AMU and for tailored interventions to reduce inequitable risks of antimicrobial resistance.

The good, the bad, and the ugly of metals as antimicrobials

We are now moving into the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) era where more antibiotic resistant bacteria are now the majority, a problem brought on by both misuse and over use of antibiotics. Unfortunately, the antibiotic development pipeline dwindled away over the past decades as they are not very profitable compounds for companies to develop. Regardless researchers over the past decade have made strides to explore alternative options and out of this we see revisiting historical infection control agents such as toxic metals. From this we now see a field of research exploring the efficacy of metal ions and metal complexes as antimicrobials. Such antimicrobials are delivered in a variety of forms from metal salts, alloys, metal complexes, organometallic compounds, and metal based nanomaterials and gives us the broad term metalloantimicrobials. We now see many effective formulations applied for various applications using metals as antimicrobials that are effective against drug resistant strains. The purpose of the document here is to step aside and begin a conversation on the issues of use of such toxic metal compounds against microbes. This critical opinion mini-review in no way aims to be comprehensive. The goal here is to understand the benefits of metalloantimicrobials, but also to consider strongly the disadvantages of using metals, and what are the potential consequences of misuse and overuse. We need to be conscious of the issues, to see the entire system and affect through a OneHealth vision.