1
|
Crestani A, Le Gac M, de Labrouhe É, Touboul C, Bendifallah S, Ferrier C, Dabi Y, Darai E. Outcomes of discoid excision and segmental resection for colorectal endometriosis: robotic versus conventional laparoscopy. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:87. [PMID: 38386205 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01854-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
Surgery for deep endometriosis with colorectal involvement is an option after medical treatment failure. Over the past decade, robotic laparoscopy has emerged as an alternative to conventional laparoscopy. We aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopy for discoid excision and segmental resection. From 2019 to 2023, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 152 consecutive patients with colorectal endometriosis who underwent robotic or conventional laparoscopy for discoid excision and colorectal resection. Ninety of the patients 152 underwent robotic surgery and 62 conventional laparoscopy. The mean total surgical room occupancy and operating times were longer in the robotic group: 270 ± 81 min vs 240 ± 79 min, p = 0.010, and 216 ± 78 min vs 190 ± 76, p = 0.027, respectively. The mean intraoperative blood loss, and the incidence of intra- and postoperative complications (according to Clavien-Dindo classification) were similar in the two groups. The mean hospital stay was greater after conventional laparoscopy (8 ± 5 vs 7 ± 4 days; p = 0.03), and the rate of persistent voiding dysfunction was higher in the conventional group (9/11, 25% vs 2/11, 5%; p = 0.01). A higher incidence of persistent voiding dysfunction was also observed after segmental resection by conventional laparoscopy (25% vs 4.8%, p = 0.01). Our results support the use of robotic surgery as an alternative to conventional laparoscopy for discoid excision and segmental resection for colorectal endometriosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Crestani
- Franco-European Multidisciplinary Endometriosis Institute (IFEMEndo), Clinique Tivoli-Ducos, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Marjolaine Le Gac
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France
| | - Éric de Labrouhe
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France
| | - Cyril Touboul
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France
- Clinical Research Group (GRC) Paris 6, Centre Expert Endométriose (C3E), Sorbonne University (GRC6 C3E SU), Paris, France
| | - Sofiane Bendifallah
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France
- Clinical Research Group (GRC) Paris 6, Centre Expert Endométriose (C3E), Sorbonne University (GRC6 C3E SU), Paris, France
| | - Clément Ferrier
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France
- Clinical Research Group (GRC) Paris 6, Centre Expert Endométriose (C3E), Sorbonne University (GRC6 C3E SU), Paris, France
| | - Yohann Dabi
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France
- Clinical Research Group (GRC) Paris 6, Centre Expert Endométriose (C3E), Sorbonne University (GRC6 C3E SU), Paris, France
| | - Emile Darai
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Sorbonne University, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France
- Clinical Research Group (GRC) Paris 6, Centre Expert Endométriose (C3E), Sorbonne University (GRC6 C3E SU), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|