1
|
Subiela JD, Krajewski W, González-Padilla DA, Laszkiewicz J, Taborda J, Aumatell J, Sanchez Encinas M, Basile G, Moschini M, Caño-Velasco J, Lopez Perez E, Del Olmo Durán P, Gallioli A, Tukiendorf A, D'Andrea D, Yuen-Chun Teoh J, Serna Céspedes A, Pichler R, Afferi L, Del Giudice F, Gomez Rivas J, Albisinni S, Soria F, Ploussard G, Mertens LS, Rajwa P, Laukhtina E, Pradere B, Tully K, Guerrero-Ramos F, Rodríguez-Faba Ó, Alvarez-Maestro M, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Szydełko T, Gomez Dos Santos V, Jiménez Cidre MÁ, Burgos Revilla FJ. Unlocking the Potential of Adequate Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Immunotherapy in Very-high-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Carcinoma: A Multicenter Analysis of Oncological Outcomes and Risk Dynamics. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00043-9. [PMID: 38355375 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Association of Urology (EAU) recommends discussing upfront radical cystectomy for all patients with very high risk (VHR) non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC), but the role of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treatment remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To analyze oncological outcomes in VHR NMIBC patients (EAU risk groups) treated with adequate BCG. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A multi-institutional retrospective study involving patients with VHR NMIBC who received adequate BCG therapy from 2007 to 2020 was conducted. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS A survival analysis estimated recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the cumulative incidence of cancer-specific mortality (CSM) after accounting for other causes of mortality as competing risk events and of the overall mortality (OM). Conditional survival probabilities for 0-4 yr without events were computed. Cox regression assessed the predictors of oncological outcomes. RESULTS AND LIMITATION A total of 640 patients, with a median 47 (32-67) mo follow-up for event-free individuals, were analyzed. High-grade RFS and PFS at 5 yr were 53% (49-57%) and 78% (74-82%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of CSM and OM at 5 yr was 13% (10-16%) and 16% (13-19%), respectively. Conditional RFS, PFS, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival at 4 yr were 91%, 96%, 87%, and 94%, respectively. Cox regression identified tumor grade (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.54; 1.1-2) and size (HR: 1.3; 1.1-1.7) as RFS predictors. Tumor multiplicity predicted RFS (HR: 1.6; 1.3-2), PFS (HR: 2; 1.2-3.3), and CSM (HR: 2; 1.2-3.2), while age predicted OM (HR: 1.48; 1.1-2). CONCLUSIONS Patients with VHR NMIBC who receive adequate BCG therapy have a more favorable prognosis than predicted by EAU risk groups, especially among those with a sustained response, in whom continuing maintenance therapy emerges as a viable alternative to radical cystectomy. PATIENT SUMMARY Our research shows that a sustained response to bacillus Calmette-Guérin in patients can lead to favorable outcomes, serving as a viable alternative to cystectomy for select cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Daniel Subiela
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcala, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology, Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | | | - Jan Laszkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology, Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Javier Taborda
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcala, Madrid, Spain
| | - Júlia Aumatell
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Sanchez Encinas
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Basile
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Jorge Caño-Velasco
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Lopez Perez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcala, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pedro Del Olmo Durán
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcala, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundaciò Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrzej Tukiendorf
- Institute of Health Sciences, Opole University, Opole, Poland; University Clinical Hospital in Opole, Opole, Poland
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Alejandra Serna Céspedes
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcala, Madrid, Spain
| | - Renate Pichler
- Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck (CCCI), Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Juan Gomez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences Molinette Hospital University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paweł Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Karl Tully
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Félix Guerrero-Ramos
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; ROC Clinic, Madrid, Spain; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Óscar Rodríguez-Faba
- Department of Urology, Fundaciò Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Tomasz Szydełko
- Department of Minimally Invasive Robotic Urology, Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Victoria Gomez Dos Santos
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcala, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Ángel Jiménez Cidre
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcala, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guerrero-Ramos F, Subiela JD, Rodríguez-Faba Ó, Aumatell J, Manfredi C, Bozzini G, Romero-Otero J, Couñago-Lorenzo F. Predicting Recurrence and Progression in Patients with Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Systematic Review on the Performance of Risk Stratification Models. Bladder Cancer 2022. [DOI: 10.3233/blc-220055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several classifications have been reported to stratify non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in risk groups according to the probability of recurrence and progression. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the current evidence regarding risk stratification of NMIBC. METHODS: The systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Studies providing data on development and/or external validation cohorts of models and risk stratification tables for recurrence and/or progression for patients with NMIBC, reporting at least one discrimination measure (AUC or C-Index) were included. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies involving 22,737 patients were included. Six classifications were identified, three of them were predictive models (EORTC, CUETO, EAU 2021) and three were based on expert opinion (EAU 2020, AUA, NCCN). A high risk of bias was present in the majority of the studies. Certain heterogenicity was found among the studies regarding adjuvant therapy, postoperative instillation or second resection. The definition of oncological outcomes was not standardized in the included studies. CUETO and EORTC scoring systems are the most validated. In general, validations showed a poor discrimination capability to predict recurrence, slightly better for progression. The EAU 2021 model overestimates the risk of progression in patients treated with BCG. Carcinoma in situ is underrepresented in all the studies analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: The existing classifications show poor discrimination capability for recurrence and possibly helpful discrimination capability for progression in NMIBC patients. These results highlight the unmet need to develop novel accurate risk models for patients with NMIBC, which could be improved with the combination of clinicopathological and molecular information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Félix Guerrero-Ramos
- ROC Clinic, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Daniel Subiela
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Julia Aumatell
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Giorgio Bozzini
- Department of Urology, ASST Lariana Ospedale Sant’Anna, Como, Italy
| | - Javier Romero-Otero
- ROC Clinic, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Territo A, Piana A, Fontana M, Diana P, Gallioli A, Gaya JM, Huguet J, Gavrilov P, Rodríguez-Faba Ó, Facundo C, Guirado L, Palou J, Mottrie A, Breda A. Step-by-step Development of a Cold Ischemia Device for Open and Robotic-assisted Renal Transplantation. Eur Urol 2021; 80:738-745. [PMID: 34059396 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best renal replacement treatment. The rewarming time is associated with ischemia/reperfusion damage. In both the open (open KT [OKT]) and the robotic (robotic-assisted KT [RAKT]) approaches, ice slush is used to maintain graft temperature (T°) below 20 °C. This may result in nonhomogeneous graft T° maintenance and, particularly during RAKT where the graft is completely inside the abdominal cavity, rises concerns regarding systemic hypothermia. OBJECTIVE To design a cold ischemia device (CID) to maintain a constant and homogeneous low graft T° during surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In IDEAL phase 0, a CID was developed and tested to determine its cooling effect on the kidney inside a closed system at 37.5 °C, by comparing it with kidney alone versus a gauze-jacket filled with ice slush. The CID was evaluated in pigs undergoing OKT and RAKT, assessing feasibility and adverse reactions. In IDEAL phase 1, the CID was tested in human OKT and RAKT. SURGICAL PROCEDURE OKT and RAKT. MEASUREMENTS In all phases, T° was evaluated at scheduled time points. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS In the preliminary tests of IDEAL phase 0, the CID was able to maintain a low graft T° and superiority to other groups (p = 0.002). In the in vivo animal model, the CID maintained a low and constant graft T° in OKT (n = 3) and RAKT (n = 3), with a mean T° at 50 min of 10.8 °C and 14.9 °C, respectively. IDEAL phase 1 demonstrated feasibility of both approaches (OKT, n = 2 and RAKT, n = 3) using the CID, and graft T° never exceeded 20 °C (mean T°: OKT 15.7 °C vs RAKT 18.3 °C). No complications were recorded. The main limitation consists in the low number of participants. CONCLUSIONS The CID assured a constant low graft T° during rewarming time, in both OKT and RAKT. PATIENT SUMMARY A cold ischemia device (CID) is the first step toward a feasible, safe, and reproducible method to maintain a low graft temperature during surgery. The employment of a CID may optimize the functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Territo
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Piana
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Matteo Fontana
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pietro Diana
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Maria Gaya
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Huguet
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pavel Gavrilov
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Óscar Rodríguez-Faba
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Facundo
- Department of Nephrology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lluis Guirado
- Department of Nephrology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|