舒 涛, 吴 帝, 沈 茂. [Research progress of different minimally invasive spinal decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis].
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2023;
37:895-900. [PMID:
37460188 PMCID:
PMC10352501 DOI:
10.7507/1002-1892.202303110]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
Objective
To review the application and progress of different minimally invasive spinal decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
Methods
The domestic and foreign literature on the application of different minimally invasive spinal decompression in the treatment of LSS was extensively reviewed, and the advantages, disadvantages, and complications of different surgical methods were summarized.
Results
At present, minimally invasive spinal decompression mainly includes microscopic bilateral decompression, microendoscopic decompression, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression, unilateral biportal endoscopy, and so on. Compared with traditional open surgery, different minimally invasive spinal decompression techniques can reduce the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative pain of patients, thereby reducing hospital stay and saving treatment costs.
Conclusion
The indications of different minimally invasive spinal decompression are different, but there are certain advantages and disadvantages. When patients have clear surgical indications, individualized treatment plans should be formulated according to the symptoms and signs of patients, combined with imaging manifestations.
Collapse