In young patients with stroke of undetermined etiology, large vessel occlusions are less frequent in the group with high-risk patent foramen ovale

INTRODUCTION

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is present in a significant proportion of young patients with stroke of undetermined etiology, but is not always causal. Therefore, classifications (RoPE, PASCAL) have been developed to determine the probability that PFO is the stroke cause. However, the presence of an initial arterial occlusion as a prediction factor was not studied when these classifications were built. Our aim was to evaluate the presence of arterial occlusion in young patients with stroke of undetermined etiology with/without high-risk PFO.

METHODS

From a prospectively-built monocentric database, we identified patients aged≥18 to<60-years with strokes of undetermined etiology and complete etiological work-up, including transesophageal echocardiography. We divided patients in two groups: (i) with high-risk PFO [i.e. PFO with large interatrial shunt (>30 microbubbles) or associated with atrial septal aneurysm] and (ii) with low-risk/without PFO. We recorded the presence of arterial occlusion and large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the acute phase.

RESULTS

We included 96 patients; 55 (57%) had high-risk PFO. Their median age was 48 (40-52) years, and 28 (29%) were women. The percentages of patients with arterial occlusion and with LVO were lower in the high-risk PFO group than in the low-risk/without PFO group: 11 (20%) versus 19 (46%) (P=0.008), and 5 (9%) versus 15 (37%) (P=0.002), respectively. There was no difference in the median RoPE score between groups (P=0.30).

CONCLUSION

The presence of LVO could represent a "red flag" of PFO causality in stroke of undetermined etiology, and could be implemented in future PFO-related stroke classifications.

A comparative study of the accuracy of Ranawat's and Pierchon's methods to determine the centre of rotation in bilateral coxopathy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare two methods (Ranawat's and Pierchon's) used to determine the centre of rotation of the hip and establish which method calculates a position nearer to the real centre of rotation.

PATIENTS AND DESIGN

We selected 24 patients with unilateral osteoarthritis of the hip. The centre of rotation of the healthy hip was determined in two consecutive radiographic studies by superimposing a template of circles and using two axes as the reference lines (X-axis=teardrop line; Y-axis=a line perpendicular to the X-axis, drawn from the intersection of the ilio-ischiatic line and the teardrop line). After ensuring the stability of these references, both methods were applied to the same radiograph to determine which one established a centre of rotation nearer to the anatomical centre identified by the template of circles.

RESULTS

When the values for the healthy hip are compared with those obtained using Ranawat's method, highly significant differences are observed for both X (P<0.0001) and Y (P<0.0001). When the results for the healthy hip are compared with the values obtained using Pierchon's method, neither the X (P=0.722 ) nor the Y values (P=0.112) show any significant differences. It would be advisable to use Pierchon's method to determine the centre of rotation during the preoperative planning for a total hip arthroplasty when the anatomical alteration is bilateral.