1
|
Lazzerini K, Gutierrez-Quintana R, José-López R, McConnell F, Gonçalves R, McMurrough J, De Decker S, Muir C, Priestnall SL, Mari L, Stabile F, De Risio L, Loeffler C, Tauro A, Rusbridge C, Rodenas S, Añor S, de la Fuente C, Fischer A, Bruehschwein A, Penderis J, Guevar J. Clinical Features, Imaging Characteristics, and Long-term Outcome of Dogs with Cranial Meningocele or Meningoencephalocele. J Vet Intern Med 2017; 31:505-512. [PMID: 28247440 PMCID: PMC5354015 DOI: 10.1111/jvim.14638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2016] [Revised: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 11/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The term meningoencephalocele (MEC) describes a herniation of cerebral tissue and meninges through a defect in the cranium, whereas a meningocele (MC) is a herniation of the meninges alone. Hypothesis/Objectives To describe the clinical features, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics, and outcomes of dogs with cranial MC and MEC. Animals Twenty‐two client‐owned dogs diagnosed with cranial MC or MEC. Methods Multicentric retrospective descriptive study. Clinical records of 13 institutions were reviewed. Signalment, clinical history, neurologic findings and MRI characteristics as well as treatment and outcome were recorded and evaluated. Results Most affected dogs were presented at a young age (median, 6.5 months; range, 1 month – 8 years). The most common presenting complaints were seizures and behavioral abnormalities. Intranasal MEC was more common than parietal MC. Magnetic resonance imaging identified meningeal enhancement of the protruded tissue in 77% of the cases. Porencephaly was seen in all cases with parietal MC. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis identified mild abnormalities in 4 of 11 cases. Surgery was not performed in any affected dog. Seventeen patients were treated medically, and seizures were adequately controlled with anti‐epileptic drugs in 10 dogs. Dogs with intranasal MEC and mild neurologic signs had a fair prognosis with medical treatment. Conclusion and clinical importance Although uncommon, MC and MEC should be considered as a differential diagnosis in young dogs presenting with seizures or alterations in behavior. Medical treatment is a valid option with a fair prognosis when the neurologic signs are mild.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Lazzerini
- Small Animal Hospital, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - R José-López
- Small Animal Hospital, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - F McConnell
- Small Animal Teaching Hospital, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - R Gonçalves
- Small Animal Teaching Hospital, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - S De Decker
- Queen Mother Hospital for Animals, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK
| | - C Muir
- Pathology and Pathogen Biology, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL9 7TA, UK
| | - S L Priestnall
- Pathology and Pathogen Biology, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL9 7TA, UK
| | - L Mari
- Animal Health Trust, Newmarket, UK
| | | | | | - C Loeffler
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - A Tauro
- Fitzpatrick Referrals, Eashing, Surrey, UK
| | | | - S Rodenas
- Hospital Veterinario Valencia Sur, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Añor
- Fundació Hospital Clínic Veterinari, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C de la Fuente
- Fundació Hospital Clínic Veterinari, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Fischer
- Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Munchen, Germany
| | | | - J Penderis
- Vet Extra Neurology, Broadleys Veterinary Hospital, Stirling, UK
| | - J Guevar
- Small Animal Hospital, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|