Determining the optimal pacing intervention rate for vasovagal syncope

INTRODUCTION

In this study, patients with rate hysteresis pacemakers implanted for vasovagal syncope were re-studied using serial tilt testing to determine whether, once triggered, pacing was more effective if the intervention rate was higher than the standard rate.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty patients (mean age 55.4 years, range 23-81, 14 male) were studied, with randomisation to either initial standard rate (80-90 beats/min) intervention, or to initial high rate (120 beats/min) intervention. Although 18 of the 20 reported complete abolition of syncope since pacing, only 8 patients could be objectively assessed. The respective mean time to tilt down after symptom onset with standard and high rate intervention was 193+/-234s and 185+/-143s, (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Repeat tilt testing was only of limited value in assessing the benefit of pacing. There was no advantage with high rate intervention in delaying the loss of consciousness (or intolerable symptoms) after the initial onset of symptoms.

Cardioinhibition during tilt testing identifies patients who may benefit from pacing

This study examined whether the various hemodynamic collapse patterns observed during tilt testing in patients with suspected neurocardiogenic syncope are relevant when planning therapy, particularly whether a predominantly cardioinhibitory response predicts a beneficial response from pacing.

METHODS

The effects of temporary atrioventricular (A-V) sequential pacing were studied during tilt testing in 34 patients 48.2 +/- 18.5 years of age. The patient population was divided into a cardioinhibitory group (VASIS classes 2A and 2B) or mixed group (VASIS classes 1 and 3) according to their response to baseline tilt testing. The test was then repeated during A-V pacing with rate hysteresis. A positive response to A-V pacing was defined as a > or = 30-second increase between onset of symptoms and syncope, or mitigation of symptoms compared with the baseline tilt test.

RESULTS

The study protocol was not successfully completed in three patients. Among the remaining 31 patients, a baseline cardioinhibitory response was observed in 17, and a mixed response in 14 patients. A-V sequential pacing was successful in 13 of 17 patients with a cardioinhibitory response versus 5 of 14 patients with a mixed response (P = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

The presence of a predominantly cardioinhibitory collapse pattern (VASIS 2A and 2B) during baseline tilt testing doubled the likelihood of successful temporary A-V sequential pacing, and may identify patients with neurocardiogenic syncope most likely to benefit from permanent dual chamber pacing.

Respiratory changes in vasovagal syncope

INTRODUCTION

Respiratory changes accompany the cardiovascular changes during head-up, tilt test-induced vasovagal syncope.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the 45-minute 60 degrees head-up Westminster protocol, 29 patients were studied (mean age 53.9+/-20.0 years; 19 females). Two groups resulted: tilt-induced vasovagal syncope positive and negative. The cardiorespiratory parameters blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), tidal volume, and minute volume were measured. Comparisons of the cardiorespiratory parameters were made within the positive group and negative group, and then between the two groups. There were 14 in the positive group and 15 in the negative group. Baseline measurements were normalized to 1.0. Comparing the late tilt periods between the positive and negative groups, there were differences in BP (P < 0.002), HR (P < 0.002), tidal volume (P < 0.05), and minute volume (P < 0.002). In the positive group comparing early with late intervals: BP 1.11+/-0.09 versus 0.49+/-0.17, P < 0.0001; HR 1.18+/-0.12 versus 0.85+/-0.35, P < 0.009; tidal volume 1.39+/-0.34 versus 2.17+/-1.00, P < 0.015; and minute volume 1.24+/-0.26 versus 3.3+/-2.03, P < 0.0025. There were no comparable cardiorespiratory changes in the negative group.

CONCLUSION

There were significant differences in the respiratory and cardiovascular parameters measured between those who were positive and those who were negative for tilt-induced vasovagal syncope. Within the positive group, in addition to the falls in HR and BP, there were significant increases in minute volume and tidal volume during late tilt. This suggests that there may be a role for respiratory sensors in vasovagal syncope that may permit earlier and hence possibly more effective therapy for selected patients.

Usefulness of tilt test-induced patterns of heart rate and blood pressure using a two-stage protocol with glyceryl trinitrate provocation in patients with syncope of unknown origin

This study assesses the vasovagal collapse pattern changes, i.e, heart rate (HR) and arterial blood pressure (BP) with a 2-stage tilt-test protocol using glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) provocation. With use of the 45-minute 60 degrees head-up Westminster protocol, 102 consecutive patients were studied. Sublingual GTN 300 microg was given to those with a negative passive tilt. Heart rate and BP patterns were classified according to the Vasovagal International Study classification (VASIS) and then compared between those with a positive passive tilt and those with a positive tilt after having been given GTN. Twelve patients did not tolerate tilt testing, and 16 had a negative response despite taking GTN. Thirty-five patients (20 women and 15 men, mean age 45 +/- 21 years [mean +/- SD]) did not take GTN and 38 (26 women and 12 men, mean age 53 +/- 22 years) had positive passive test results. When comparing the VASIS classification between the 2 groups, results showed: type 1, mixed BP and HR decreased without severe bradycardia (31% [passive] vs 54% [with GTN], p = NS); type 2A, BP decreased before HR decreased (20% vs 22%, p = NS); type 2B, HR decreased before or coincident with BP (34% vs 8%, p = 0.003); type 3, BP decreased without HR decrease (9% vs 0%, p = NS); exception 1, chronotropic incompetence (0% vs 13%, p = 0.026); and exception 2, excessive HR increase (6% vs 3%, p = NS). Thus, GTN use increases frequency of positive results from 34% to 73%. Older people with chronotropic incompetence, who may benefit from pacing, were identified. In younger people there was an increase in those with cardioinhibition.