Coronary artery bypass grafting in octogenarians--outcome with and without extracorporeal circulation

Octogenarians are increasingly considered for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), but still represent a high-risk patient group with increased mortality and morbidity. In recent years off-pump surgery has been successfully established in CABG. The avoidance of extracorporeal circulation (ECC) seems to be of particular benefit for this patient group. We retrospectively analyzed our experience with CABG surgery with and without ECC in octogenarians to define the potential benefit of these different approaches in this high-risk group of patients. We analyzed the outcome after isolated CABG of 344 consecutive patients (219 male, 125 female, age: 82 +/- 2.4 years) who were aged 80 or older. Patients were divided into two groups according to the use of ECC. The on-pump group consisted of 237 patients (151 male, 86 female, 82 +/- 2.8 years) and the off-pump group consisted of 107 patients (68 male, 39 female, 82 +/- 1.9 years). The predicted EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE mortality risk were similar for both patient groups. The overall hospital mortality rate was 5.5 % (n = 17): 14 patients (5.9 %) in the on-pump group (n = 237, 100 %) and five patients (4.6 %) in the off-pump group (n = 107, 100 %). The average number of grafts in the on-pump group was 2.8 +/- 0.4 and it was 2.4 +/- 0.6 in the off-pump group ( P = 0.05). Morbidity was comparable in both groups. Significant variables in multivariate regression were preoperative atrial fibrillation ( P = 0.03; RR = 2.7), COPD ( P = 0.0001; RR = 6.5) and prolonged intubation ( P = 0.005; RR = 4.1). Isolated CABG in octogenarians can be performed with good clinical results, although a substantial mortality remains. The results of coronary surgery in this patient group with and without ECC are comparable with respect to mortality and morbidity.

Early outcomes of coronary artery bypass with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in octogenarians

BACKGROUND

Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery has been successfully used in diverse patient populations and has been postulated to be safer than conventional coronary artery bypass (CCAB) surgery in some high-risk patients, including the elderly.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety of OPCAB surgery versus CCAB surgery in the octogenarian population of two large southwestern Ontario cardiac surgical units.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-six consecutive octogenarians underwent primary isolated coronary artery bypass surgery from November 2000 to March 2005. Patients undergoing OPCAB surgery tended to have higher Parsonnet scores, while patients undergoing CCAB surgery had a greater number of emergent operations. The Canadian Cardiovascular Network predicted that mortality risk was similar in both groups. In-hospital mortality was similar between groups, as was postoperative myocardial infarction and new onset of renal dysfunction. However, in the OPCAB group, there was a decreased incidence of postoperative neurological dysfunction (2.3% in the OPCAB group versus 10.5% in the CCAB group, P=0.01), in particular cerebrovascular accidents (1.5% in the OPCAB group versus 7.6% in the CCAB group, P=0.05), and a decreased incidence of prolonged intubation (5.3% in the OPCAB group versus 13.3% in the CCAB group, P=0.04). Multivariable analysis found that cardiopulmonary bypass had no significant impact on mortality or length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

In octogenarian patients, OPCAB surgery is as safe as CCAB surgery in terms of mortality and major morbidity. Furthermore, a significant reduction in neurological dysfunction and prolonged intubation was seen in the OPCAB group compared with the CCAB group.