OS9.5 Evidence that adult glioblastoma adapts to standard therapy though chromatin remodeling

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) tumours recur following standard treatment in almost all cases. We use ‘omics technologies to simultaneously profile pairs of primary and matched recurrent GBM to specifically identify and characterise the cells that resisted treatment, with the aim of determining how to more effectively kill them.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We have analysed high coverage RNAseq data from pairs of GBM tumours: primary de novo tumour and matched local recurrence from patients that underwent standard therapy. Our original cohort constituted 23 pairs and our validation cohort was an additional 22 pairs. We also cultured two plates of spheroids directly from a patient’s GBM, treating one with radiation and temozolomide. We monitored growth and captured and sequenced RNA from single cells at two time-points: one week post-treatment when the deviation between untreated and treated spheroid growth curves was most pronounced; and three weeks post-treatment when the growth rate of treated spheroids had recovered. We investigated differential gene expression between primary and recurrent pairs, and single cells pre- and post-treatment, and performed a bespoke per patient gene set enrichment analysis.

RESULTS

Differential gene expression analysis in 23 tumour pairs indicated a treatment-induced shift in cell states linked to normal neurogenesis and prompted us to develop a novel gene set enrichment analysis approach to identify gene regulatory factors that may orchestrate such a shift. This revealed the significant and universal dysregulation of genes, through therapy, that are targeted by a specific chromatin remodeling machinery. This finding was validated in an independent cohort of 22 further GBM pairs. To understand the therapeutic potential of this finding we must determine whether genes are dysregulated through therapy owing to a) their fixed expression in inherently treatment resistance cells in the primary tumour which get selected during therapy to increase the signal of that profile, or b) changes in expression during the process of cells acquiring treatment resistance. To inspect this, we analysed single cell gene expression data from GBM spheroids pre- and post-treatment. We found that there was significant dysregulation of the genes associated with the chromatin remodeling complex but only at the three-week post-treatment time-point.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that GBM cells are being transcriptionally reprogrammed in response to treatment; the mechanism of which may represent a therapeutic opportunity.

Indolinones and anilinophthalazines differentially target VEGF-A- and basic fibroblast growth factor-mediated responses in primary human endothelial cells

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The potent pro-angiogenic growth factors VEGF-A and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) exert their effects by binding VEGF receptor 2 and FGF receptor tyrosine kinases, respectively. Indolinones (e.g. SU5416 and Sutent) and anilinophthalazines (e.g. PTK787) are potent small molecule inhibitors of VEGFR2 and other tyrosine kinases, but their effects on VEGF-A- and bFGF-stimulated endothelial responses are unclear. Here we assess the ability of these compounds to inhibit pro-angiogenic responses through perturbation of receptor activity and endothelial function(s).

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We used in silico modelling, in vitro tyrosine kinase assays, biochemistry and microscopy to evaluate the effects of small molecules on receptor tyrosine kinase activation and intracellular signalling. Primary human endothelial cells were used to assess intracellular signalling, cell migration, proliferation and tubulogenesis.

KEY RESULTS

We predicted that the anilinophthalazine PTK787 binds the tyrosine kinase activation loop whereas indolinones are predicted to bind within the hinge region of the split kinase domain. Sutent is a potent inhibitor of both VEGFR2 and FGFR1 tyrosine kinase activity in vitro. The compounds inhibit both ligand-dependent and -independent VEGFR2 trafficking events, are not selective for endothelial cell responses and inhibit both VEGF-A- and bFGF-mediated migration, wound healing and tubulogenesis at low concentrations. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS; We propose that these compounds have novel properties including inhibition of bFGF-mediated endothelial responses and perturbation of VEGFR2 trafficking. Differential inhibitor binding to receptor tyrosine kinases translates into more potent inhibition of bFGF- and VEGF-A-mediated intracellular signalling, cell migration and tubulogenesis. Indolinones and anilinophthalazines thus belong to a class of multi-kinase inhibitors that show clinical efficacy in disease therapy.