Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2021: Guideline from the Association of Anaesthetists

This guideline updates and replaces the 5th edition of the Standards of Monitoring published in 2015. The aim of this document is to provide guidance on the minimum standards for monitoring of any patient undergoing anaesthesia or sedation under the care of an anaesthetist. The recommendations are primarily aimed at anaesthetists practising in the UK and Ireland, but it is recognised that these guidelines may also be of use in other areas of the world. Minimum standards for monitoring patients during anaesthesia and in the recovery phase are included. There is also guidance on monitoring patients undergoing sedation and during transfer. There are new sections specifically discussing capnography, sedation and regional anaesthesia. In addition, the indications for processed electroencephalogram and neuromuscular monitoring have been updated.

The 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: summary of main findings and risk factors

We present the main findings of the 5th National Audit Project on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia. Incidences were estimated using reports of accidental awareness as the numerator, and a parallel national anaesthetic activity survey to provide denominator data. The incidence of certain/probable and possible accidental awareness cases was ~1:19 600 anaesthetics (95% CI 1:16 700-23 450). However, there was considerable variation across subtypes of techniques or subspecialties. The incidence with neuromuscular blockade was ~1:8200 (1:7030-9700), and without it was ~1:135 900 (1:78 600-299 000). The cases of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia reported to 5th National Audit Project were overwhelmingly cases of unintended awareness during neuromuscular blockade. The incidence of accidental awareness during caesarean section was ~1:670 (1:380-1300). Two thirds (82, 66%) of cases of accidental awareness experiences arose in the dynamic phases of anaesthesia, namely induction of and emergence from anaesthesia. During induction of anaesthesia, contributory factors included: use of thiopental; rapid sequence induction; obesity; difficult airway management; neuromuscular blockade; and interruptions of anaesthetic delivery during movement from anaesthetic room to theatre. During emergence from anaesthesia, residual paralysis was perceived by patients as accidental awareness, and commonly related to a failure to ensure full return of motor capacity. One third (43, 33%) of accidental awareness events arose during the maintenance phase of anaesthesia, most due to problems at induction or towards the end of anaesthesia. Factors increasing the risk of accidental awareness included: female sex; age (younger adults, but not children); obesity; anaesthetist seniority (junior trainees); previous awareness; out-of-hours operating; emergencies; type of surgery (obstetric, cardiac, thoracic); and use of neuromuscular blockade. The following factors were not risk factors for accidental awareness: ASA physical status; race; and use or omission of nitrous oxide. We recommend that an anaesthetic checklist, to be an integral part of the World Health Organization Safer Surgery checklist, is introduced as an aid to preventing accidental awareness. This paper is a shortened version describing the main findings from 5th National Audit Project - the full report can be found at http://www.nationalauditprojects.org.uk/NAP5_home#pt.

5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: summary of main findings and risk factors

We present the main findings of the 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia (AAGA). Incidences were estimated using reports of accidental awareness as the numerator, and a parallel national anaesthetic activity survey to provide denominator data. The incidence of certain/probable and possible accidental awareness cases was ~1:19,600 anaesthetics (95% confidence interval 1:16,700-23,450). However, there was considerable variation across subtypes of techniques or subspecialities. The incidence with neuromuscular block (NMB) was ~1:8200 (1:7030-9700), and without, it was ~1:135,900 (1:78,600-299,000). The cases of AAGA reported to NAP5 were overwhelmingly cases of unintended awareness during NMB. The incidence of accidental awareness during Caesarean section was ~1:670 (1:380-1300). Two-thirds (82, 66%) of cases of accidental awareness experiences arose in the dynamic phases of anaesthesia, namely induction of and emergence from anaesthesia. During induction of anaesthesia, contributory factors included: use of thiopental, rapid sequence induction, obesity, difficult airway management, NMB, and interruptions of anaesthetic delivery during movement from anaesthetic room to theatre. During emergence from anaesthesia, residual paralysis was perceived by patients as accidental awareness, and commonly related to a failure to ensure full return of motor capacity. One-third (43, 33%) of accidental awareness events arose during the maintenance phase of anaesthesia, mostly due to problems at induction or towards the end of anaesthesia. Factors increasing the risk of accidental awareness included: female sex, age (younger adults, but not children), obesity, anaesthetist seniority (junior trainees), previous awareness, out-of-hours operating, emergencies, type of surgery (obstetric, cardiac, thoracic), and use of NMB. The following factors were not risk factors for accidental awareness: ASA physical status, race, and use or omission of nitrous oxide. We recommend that an anaesthetic checklist, to be an integral part of the World Health Organization Safer Surgery checklist, is introduced as an aid to preventing accidental awareness. This paper is a shortened version describing the main findings from NAP5--the full report can be found at http://www.nationalauditprojects.org.uk/NAP5_home.

5th National Audit Project (NAP5) on accidental awareness during general anaesthesia: patient experiences, human factors, sedation, consent, and medicolegal issues

The 5th National Audit Project (NAP5) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland into accidental awareness during general anaesthesia (AAGA) yielded data related to psychological aspects from the patient, and the anaesthetist, perspectives; patients' experiences ranged from isolated auditory or tactile sensations to complete awareness. A striking finding was that 75% of experiences were for <5 min, yet 51% of patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 43-60%] experienced distress and 41% (95% CI 33-50%) suffered longer term adverse effect. Distress and longer term harm occurred across the full range of experiences but were particularly likely when the patient experienced paralysis (with or without pain). The patient's interpretation of what is happening at the time of the awareness seemed central to later impact; explanation and reassurance during suspected AAGA or at the time of report seemed beneficial. Quality of care before the event was judged good in 26%, poor in 39%, and mixed in 31%. Three-quarters of cases of AAGA (75%) were judged preventable. In 12%, AAGA care was judged good and the episode not preventable. The contributory and human factors in the genesis of the majority of cases of AAGA included medication, patient, and education/training. The findings have implications for national guidance, institutional organization, and individual practice. The incidence of 'accidental awareness' during sedation (~1:15,000) was similar to that during general anaesthesia (~1:19,000). The project raises significant issues about information giving and consent for both sedation and anaesthesia. We propose a novel approach to describing sedation from the patient's perspective which could be used in communication and consent. Eight (6%) of the patients had resorted to legal action (12, 11%, to formal complaint) at the time of reporting. NAP5 methodology provides a standardized template that might usefully inform the investigation of claims or serious incidents related to AAGA.

The effect of anaesthesia and aortic clamping on cardiac output measurement using arterial pulse power analysis during aortic aneurysm repair

The LiDCO plus monitor (LiDCO Ltd, Cambridge, UK) uses pulse contour analysis of the arterial pressure waveform to indicate changes in stroke volume and cardiac output. Calibration against a lithium indicator dilution method is required to permit display of absolute values in addition to trends. The effect of haemodynamic changes during anaesthesia and surgery on this calibration factor has not previously been studied. Therefore, we investigated whether it remained constant during elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in 15 patients. Comparison between the calibration factor values at different time points was made by repeated recalibration throughout the peri-operative period. Calibration factor increased by a mean of 53% after anaesthesia (epidural plus general) (p = 0.03) and decreased by a mean of 40% after aortic clamping (p = 0.0001). Recalibration should be undertaken after induction of anaesthesia and after aortic clamping if absolute values of cardiac output and stroke volume are required.

Contemporary results for open repair of suprarenal and type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

Background

Endovascular and hybrid procedures are not yet widely established in the management of type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). Open surgery remains the treatment of choice until the long-term outcomes of these novel techniques are known.

Methods

This study reviewed a 10-year experience of open repair of non-ruptured type IV and suprarenal TAAA. All procedures were performed using a totally abdominal approach with supracoeliac clamping of the aorta.

Results

There were 53 patients (31 men; 58 per cent) of median age 69 (range 54–82) years. Forty-four patients had a type IV TAAA and nine a suprarenal aneurysm. Three patients (6 per cent) died within 30 days and the 12-month mortality rate for patients followed for at least 1 year was 6 per cent (three of 49). Ten patients (19 per cent) had a cardiac complication, 20 (38 percent) a respiratory complication, three (6 percent) required early reoperation, and one patient (2 percent) developed permanent paraplegia. There was one late death resulting from an aneurysm-related complication.

Conclusion

Open repair of suprarenal aneurysms and type IV TAAA may be undertaken using a totally abdominal approach with acceptable levels of morbidity and mortality.

Evaluation of a new method of assessing depth of sedation using two-choice visual reaction time testing on a mobile phone

The utility of two-choice visual reaction time testing using a specially programmed mobile telephone as a measure of sedation level was investigated in 20 healthy patients sedated with target controlled infusions of propofol. At gradually increasing target concentrations visual reaction time was compared with patient-assessed visual analogue scale sedation scores and an observer-rated scale. Propofol sedation caused dose-dependent increases in visual reaction time and visual analogue scale scores that were statistically significant when the calculated effect-site concentration reached 0.9 microg.ml(-1) (p < 0.05) and 0.5 microg.ml(-1) (p < 0.01) respectively. While visual analogue scale scores were more sensitive at lower levels of sedation than visual reaction time, the latter demonstrated marked increase in values at higher levels of sedation. Visual reaction time may be useful for identifying impending over-sedation.

A simple presurgical necrotizing enterocolitis-mortality scoring system

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship between early laboratory parameters, disease severity, type of management (surgical or conservative) and outcome in necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective collection and analysis of data from infants treated in a single tertiary care center (1980 to 2002). Data were collected on disease severity (Bell stage), birth weight (BW), gestational age (GA) and pre-intervention laboratory parameters (leukocyte and platelet counts, hemoglobin, lactate, C-reactive protein).

RESULTS

Data from 128 infants were sufficient for analysis. Factors significantly associated with survival were Bell stage (P<0.05), lactate (P<0.05), BW and GA (P<0.01, P<0.001, respectively). From receiver operating characteristics curves, the highest predictive value resulted from a score with 0 to 8 points combining BW, Bell stage, lactate and platelet count (P<0.001). At a cutoff level of 4.5 sensitivity and specificity for predicting survival were 0.71 and 0.72, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Some single parameters were associated with poor outcome in NEC. Optimal risk stratification was achieved by combining several parameters in a score.

Regional versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: impact of change in practice

BACKGROUND

Local anaesthesia (LA) for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may offer advantages over general anaesthesia (GA).

AIM

Our aim was to compare outcome from CEA before and after changing our anaesthetic technique from GA to LA.

METHODS

Sequential patients who underwent CEA between January 1997 and December 2001 were identified from a prospectively collected database. GA was used during the first two years of this period and LA was used exclusively over the last three years. Differences in the incidence of intraoperative shunting, perioperative stroke and transient ischaemic attack (TIA), cranial nerve injury, neck haematoma, perioperative death and duration of hospital stay were assessed.

RESULTS

Three hundred and seventy one CEAs were carried out in 363 patients, 179 under GA and 192 under LA. Indications were TIAs (140), stroke with recovery (134), amaurosis fugax (85) and asymptomatic high-grade stenosis (12). Intraoperative shunting was used in 66 (37%) GA operations and 36 (18.8%) LA operations (p<0.01). There were nine strokes and four transient neurological events; 10 (5.5%) patients developed such problems with GA and three (1.6%) with LA (p<0.05). There were four deaths, three (1.7%) after GA and one (0.5%) after LA (p=NS). Duration of hospital stay was less in the LA group at a median (range) of three days (2-10) compared with 4.5 (3-14) days in the GA group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Employing LA rather than GA for CEA has been associated with a reduction in intraoperative shunting and perioperative stroke, and the duration of hospital stay. LA appears to offer clinical and possible cost advantages over GA.

Relationship between perioperative troponin elevation and other indicators of myocardial injury in vascular surgery patients

BACKGROUND

In 2000 the European Society of Cardiology and the American College of Cardiology published a consensus document revising the definition of myocardial infarction. The usefulness of this revised definition has been challenged. It has been suggested that, rather than any release of cardiac troponin being potentially diagnostic of myocardial infarction, a diagnostic threshold consistent with significant myocardial injury should be defined.

METHODS

We studied 65 patients undergoing elective major vascular surgery to examine the relationship between the magnitude of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and creatine kinase MB fraction (CK-MB) release and clinical signs or symptoms of myocardial injury. cTnI and CK-MB concentrations were measured preoperatively and on the first 4 postoperative days using the ACCESS assay (Beckmann). Patients were considered to have suffered a perioperative myocardial infarction if they had either symptoms or ECG changes consistent with this diagnosis, together with cTnI release.

RESULTS

Peak postoperative cTnI concentrations above the lower detection limit of the ACCESS assay (0.06 microg litre(-1)) occurred in 26 patients. Eight of these patients displayed symptoms or ECG changes consistent with myocardial injury. A cTnI level greater than 0.68 microg litre(-1) was found to be consistent with the clinical diagnosis of myocardial infarction. The optimal cut-off for the diagnosis of MI using CK-MB was 40.4 microg litre(-1).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that further studies are required to define the optimal cardiac troponin diagnostic threshold for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in the non-cardiac surgery population.

Thoracic impedance used for measuring chest wall movement in postoperative patients

Thoracic impedance (TTI) and rib cage inductance band (IB) signals were measured in 10 patients during the first night after abdominal surgery, and compared by successive correlation of the change in each signal. Poor matching of the signals occurred, on average, for 94 min either because of movement of differences in the waveform. There were frequent episodes of transient poor correlation, generally associated with transient respiratory disturbance, predominantly airway obstruction (58%). Thoracic impedance measurements are simpler than inductance band methods for detecting rib cage movement and may be useful for large studies of respiratory abnormalities in patients after operation.

Respiratory mechanics after abdominal surgery measured with continuous analysis of pressure, flow and volume signals

We studied 10 patients during the first night after upper abdominal surgery to assess the effect of airway obstruction on chest wall mechanics, by recording nasal gas flow and carbon dioxide concentration, rib cage and abdominal dimensions, abdominal muscle activity, and oesophageal and gastric pressures. The mean duration of study of each subject was 5.8 h, and 5.2 h were analysed. The median proportion of time spent breathing with normal mechanics was 29% (interquartile values 0-57%). Abnormal abdominal mechanical events were common and associated with airway obstruction (P < 0.001). Two common patterns of abnormal pressure and movement were found. In the first, abdominal pressure decreased at the onset of inspiration and there was a phase lag in abdominal movement. The incidence was 33 (14-50)%. In the second pattern, abdominal pressure decreased and in addition the abdominal wall moved inwards at the onset of inspiration. This occurred for 34 (0-52)% of the time. Both patterns were associated with evidence of increased activation of the abdominal muscles during expiration, changing the relationship of abdominal and pleural pressure changes and chest wall movements. Such changes have been interpreted previously as evidence of diaphragm dysfunction.

Pethidine has a local anaesthetic action on peripheral nerves in vivo. Addition to prilocaine 0.25% for intravenous regional anaesthesia in volunteers

In a double-blind, randomised study, we have examined the effects of the addition of pethidine 100 mg to 40 ml prilocaine 0.25% for intravenous regional anaesthesia in healthy volunteers. During intravenous regional anaesthesia the hand and forearm are isolated from the rest of the circulation and pethidine interaction with central opiate receptors does not occur. Pethidine increased the speed of onset and extent of sensory and motor block, reduced tourniquet and forearm pain, and subjectively improved the quality of the block. Pethidine has local anaesthetic action on peripheral nerves in vivo.