Safety of percutaneous versus transjugular liver biopsy: A propensity score matched analysis

PURPOSE

This study sought to identify the complication, mortality, and readmission rates of patients undergoing either percutaneous (PCLB) or transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) when propensity matched for demographics and hepatic comorbidities.

METHODS

A retrospective review of New York's Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System ICD9 coded database from the years 2009-2013 was conducted. Patients over the age of 18 undergoing either PCLB or TJLB were included. Patients with hepatic neoplasm or metastasis were excluded. 2:1 PCLB:TJLB propensity match for age, race, payment, coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia/purpura, hypercoagulability, ascites, acute liver failure, chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and bone marrow disease was conducted. Univariate analysis compared demographics, complications, readmissions, and mortality.

RESULTS

1467 patients met inclusion criteria (PCLB = 978, TJLB = 489). Propensity match was successful in that there were no significant differences in demographics or hepatic comorbidities. TJLB had significantly lower rates of hematoma (0.20 % vs 1.20 %, p = 0.049) and higher rates of cardiac complications (0.40 % vs 0.00 %, p = 0.045). Other complication, readmission, and mortality rates did not differ significantly. Logistic regression found no significant predictors of readmission within 7 days or any complication within 5 days.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective, multi-center database review of adult patients undergoing PCLB or TJLB propensity matched for demographics and hepatic comorbidities found that TJLB patients had a significantly higher rate of cardiac complications while PCLB patients had a significantly higher rate of hematoma. These findings support prior literature suggesting a trend towards safety of TJLB compared to PCLB in patients with hemostatic disorders and/or advanced liver disease.

A systematic review of automated feeder detection software for locoregional treatment of hepatic tumors

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of current literature describing the efficacy and technical outcomes of transarterial liver therapies using automated feeder detection (AFD) software.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A structured search was performed in the PubMed, SCOPUS, and Embase databases of patients undergoing locoregional therapy of liver tumors utilizing AFD software. Demographic data, procedure data (including radiometrics) and tumor response rate were recorded. Where available, performance of AFD was compared to conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) without AFD.

RESULTS

A total of 14 full-text manuscripts met inclusion criteria, comprising 1042 tumors in 604 patients (305 men, 156 women; mean age, 68.6±6.0 [SD] years), including 537 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, 8 with metastases from neuroendocrine tumors, and 59 patients without reported etiology. Reported sensitivity of AFD ranged between 86% and 98.5%, compared to DSA alone (38% - 64%) or DSA in combination with CBCT (69% - 81%). Three studies reported tumor response by modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) guidelines, with complete response in the range of 60% - 69%.

CONCLUSION

AFD is a promising new technology for the identification of intrahepatic and extrahepatic tumor-feeding arteries and should be considered a useful adjunct to conventional DSA and CBCT in the treatment of liver tumors.