Leucovorin and Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE

In a previous study of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, the LV5FU2 regimen, comprising leucovorin (LV) plus bolus and infusional fluorouracil (5FU) every 2 weeks, was superior to the standard North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Mayo Clinic 5-day bolus 5FU/LV regimen. This phase III study investigated the effect of combining oxaliplatin with LV5FU2, with progression-free survival as the primary end point.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred twenty previously untreated patients with measurable disease were randomized to receive a 2-hour infusion of LV (200 mg/m2/d) followed by a 5FU bolus (400 mg/m2/d) and 22-hour infusion (600 mg/m2/d) for 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks, either alone or together with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 1.

RESULTS

Patients allocated to oxaliplatin plus LV5FU2 had significantly longer progression-free survival (median, 9.0 v 6.2 months; P = .0003) and better response rate (50.7% v 22.3%; P = .0001) when compared with the control arm. The improvement in overall survival did not reach significance (median, 16.2 v 14.7 months; P = .12). LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin gave higher frequencies of National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 neutropenia (41.7% v 5.3% of patients), grade 3/4 diarrhea (11.9% v 5.3%), and grade 3 neurosensory toxicity (18.2% v 0%), but this did not result in impairment of quality of life (QoL). Survival without disease progression or deterioration in global health status was longer in patients allocated to oxaliplatin treatment (P = .004).

CONCLUSION

The LV5FU2-oxaliplatin combination seems beneficial as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer, demonstrating a prolonged progression-free survival with acceptable tolerability and maintenance of QoL.

5232Inhibition of platelet aggregation after subcutaneous administration of a single-dose of selatogrel, a novel P2Y12 antagonist, in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised open-label phase 2 study

Background

Oral P2Y12 receptor antagonists exhibit a delayed onset of platelet inhibition in patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Selatogrel is a potent, reversible, and highly selective P2Y12 receptor antagonist with a rapid onset and offset of action when administered subcutaneously.

Purpose

To assess inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) after subcutaneous (s.c.) single-dose administration of selatogrel in patients with AMI receiving standard concomitant therapy.

Methods

Male and postmenopausal female adults (≤85 years) presenting with type 1 AMI (ST-elevation MI [STEMI] or non-STEMI [NSTEMI]) and onset of AMI symptoms >30 min to <6 h were randomised (1:1) to receive a single s.c. dose of either 8 mg or 16 mg selatogrel. Blood samples were collected at baseline and at 15, 30, and 60 min post-dose and evaluated for ADP-induced platelet aggregation (expressed as P2Y12 reaction units [PRU]) using VerifyNow. The primary endpoint was the response to treatment (defined by PRU <100) at 30 min post-dose. Safety was assessed up to 48 h post-dose.

Results

Forty-seven patients (median age 69 y; 72% male; 62% STEMI; 94% Killip class 1) received 8 mg (N=24) or 16 mg (N=23) selatogrel. Study-treatment concomitant medications included acetylsalicylic acid (98%), P2Y12 inhibitors (96%), heparins (94%), statins (94%), nitrates (68%) and morphine (38%). Oral ticagrelor (92%) with corresponding loading doses was only administered after selatogrel. The proportion of patients meeting the primary endpoint (responders) 30 min post-dose was 91% (95% CI: 72, 99) and 95% (95% CI: 77, 100) with 8 and 16 mg, respectively (p<0.001 for both doses). Response rates were independent from STEMI/NSTEMI diagnosis, age and sex. A response was observed as early as 15 min (8 mg: 75% of patients [95% CI: 53, 90]; 16 mg: 91% of patients [95% CI: 72, 99]), and sustained up to 60 min post-dose (8 mg: 75% of patients [95% CI: 53, 90]; 16 mg: 96% of patients [95% CI: 78, 100]). Platelet reactivity was decreased following selatogrel administration (Figure; interquartile range [box], min and max [whiskers], median and mean [horizontal line and symbol, respectively, within the box]). Overall, 43% of patients had ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), which were mainly of mild/moderate intensity. Ventricular tachycardia ([VT] 8 mg: 5/24; 16 mg: 3/23) was the most frequent TEAE. Treatment-emergent serious AEs of VT were reported in two patients receiving 8 mg (one patient also experienced ventricular fibrillation) and one patient receiving 16 mg selatogrel. Post-procedural haemorrhage (mild) occurred in one patient: bleeding at radial access after percutaneous coronary intervention (∼1 h after selatogrel 8 mg).

Conclusion

Single-dose administration of s.c. selatogrel (8 mg and 16 mg) induced a rapid IPA response in patients with AMI at 30 min (as early as 15 min and maintained at 60 min post-dose) and was well-tolerated with no major bleeding events.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Fully funded by Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd

2349Selatogrel, a novel P2Y12 inhibitor for emergency use, achieves rapid, consistent and sustained platelet inhibition following single-dose subcutaneous administration in stable CAD patients

Background

In the setting of AMI, rapid platelet inhibition is desirable but the onset of pharmacodynamic (PD) effect of oral platelet P2Y12 inhibitors is delayed, sometimes for hours. Subcutaneous (s.c) administration of a rapidly-acting P2Y12 inhibitor would overcome many of the limitations of available therapies. Patients with stable CAD were investigated initially.

Purpose

To characterise the inhibition of platelet aggregation and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single dose of selatogrel, a novel s.c P2Y12 inhibitor, in patients with stable CAD.

Methods

Patients with stable CAD receiving oral antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and/or oral P2Y12 inhibitor) were randomized to 1 of 8 groups based on treatment (selatogrel or matching placebo), dose (8 mg or 16 mg) and s.c injection site (thigh or abdomen). Venous blood samples were collected into PPACK anticoagulant tubes. Platelet reactivity was assessed by VerifyNow PRU (P2Y12 reaction units) test before and 15 min, 30 min and 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24 h after injection. Light-transmittance aggregometry (LTA; ADP 20 uM) was also performed. PK samples were collected up to 24 h post-dose. Adverse events occurring within 30 days were recorded. Responders were defined as having PRU <100 at 30 min after injection and lasting ≥3 h.

Results

345 patients (mean age 65 y; 20% female; 31% diabetes) received selatogrel 8 mg (n=114), selatogrel 16 mg (n=115) or placebo (n=116). 97% were on background therapy with aspirin (or its derivative carbasalate) and 35% with oral P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel 23%, prasugrel 4%, ticagrelor 8%). 89% of subjects were responders to selatogrel 8 mg, 90% to selatogrel 16 mg and 16% to placebo (P<0.0001). At 15 min post-dose, PRU values (mean±SD) were 10±25 with selatogrel 8 mg, 5±10 with selatogrel 16 mg and 163±73 with placebo (Figure). PRU levels were maintained at 2 and 4 h for both doses and gradually returned to pre-dose levels by 24 h post-dose (Figure). LTA results were consistent with the VerifyNow results. PD responses were similar for thigh and abdomen injection sites. Selatogrel was well tolerated: mild dyspnoea (or moderate dyspnoea, n=1, with 16 mg) occurred in 5% and 9% with selatogrel 8 mg and 16 mg, respectively, vs 0% with placebo; dizziness occurred in 4% and 4% vs 1%, respectively, without significant haemodynamic or ECG changes. Bleeding events occurred in 9.6% and 4.3% with selatogrel 8 mg and 16 mg, respectively, vs 6.9% with placebo. Pharmacokinetic data will be presented.

Conclusions

Selatogrel has a rapid PD effect following s.c injection in patients with stable CAD, within 15 min in most patients. The consistent and high levels of P2Y12 inhibition with a single 8 mg or 16 mg dose are sustained for over 4 hours, following which platelet reactivity progressively recovers over 24 h. Selatogrel was well tolerated, with mostly mild, transient dyspnoea observed in <10% patients. These data support further studies of selatogrel for emergency treatment of AMI patients.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Fully funded by Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd

FTY720 versus MMF with cyclosporine in de novo renal transplantation: a 1-year, randomized controlled trial in Europe and Australasia

FTY720 is a novel immunomodulator investigated in de novo renal transplantation and other therapeutic areas including multiple sclerosis. This 1-year multicenter, randomized, phase III study in 668 de novo renal transplant patients compared FTY720 2.5 mg plus full-dose cyclosporine (FDC) or FTY720 5.0 mg plus reduced-dose cyclosporine (RDC), with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus FDC. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite incidence of first treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or premature study discontinuation at month 12. Primary efficacy with FTY720 2.5 mg and MMF (32.4% and 30.2%; p = NS), plus mortality and BPAR incidence, were comparable. Patients receiving FTY720 5.0 mg plus RDC were discontinued from treatment due to increased risk of acute rejection (primary endpoint incidence 47.3%). FTY720 was associated with lower creatinine clearance (month 12: 53.1, 56.0 vs. 65.1 mL/min; p < 0.001) and more macular edema cases (2.2% and 1.3% vs. 0%), whereas cytomegalovirus infections were higher with MMF (6.2% and 10.6% vs. 18.1% p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0139, respectively). FTY720 2.5 mg provided comparable rejection prophylaxis over 12 months versus MMF; however, FTY720 5.0 mg did not support a 50% reduction in cyclosporine exposure. The cause of macular edema cases and lower creatinine clearance with FTY720 in de novo transplantation needs further investigation.

Everolimus versus azathioprine in maintenance lung transplant recipients: an international, randomized, double-blind clinical trial

Everolimus is a proliferation signal inhibitor with immunosuppressive activity that may reduce the rate of progression of chronic rejection, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), after lung transplantation. In a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 213 BOS-free maintenance patients received everolimus (3 mg/day) or azathioprine (AZA, 1-3 mg/kg/day) in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. The prospectively defined primary endpoint was the incidence of efficacy failure (decline in FEV1 >15%[deltaFEV1 >15%], graft loss, death or loss to follow-up) at 12 months. Incidence of efficacy failure at 12 months was significantly lower in the everolimus group than AZA (21.8% vs. 33.9%; p = 0.046); at 24 months, rates of efficacy failure became similar between the groups. At 12 months, the everolimus group had significantly reduced incidences of deltaFEV1 >15%, deltaFEV1 >15% with BOS, and acute rejection. At 24 months, only incidence of acute rejection remained significantly less in the everolimus group. Treatment discontinuations (particularly due to adverse events), serious adverse events and high serum creatinine values were more common with everolimus. For the first time, a drug has demonstrated significant slowing of loss in lung function, suggesting that patients kept on prolonged maintenance treatment with everolimus may benefit from replacing AZA with everolimus 3 months after lung transplantation.

Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

In a previous study of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, the LV5FU2 regimen, comprising leucovorin (LV) plus bolus and infusional fluorouracil (5FU) every 2 weeks, was superior to the standard North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Mayo Clinic 5-day bolus 5FU/LV regimen. This phase III study investigated the effect of combining oxaliplatin with LV5FU2, with progression-free survival as the primary end point.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred twenty previously untreated patients with measurable disease were randomized to receive a 2-hour infusion of LV (200 mg/m(2)/d) followed by a 5FU bolus (400 mg/m(2)/d) and 22-hour infusion (600 mg/m(2)/d) for 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks, either alone or together with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 1.

RESULTS

Patients allocated to oxaliplatin plus LV5FU2 had significantly longer progression-free survival (median, 9.0 v 6.2 months; P =.0003) and better response rate (50.7% v 22.3%; P =.0001) when compared with the control arm. The improvement in overall survival did not reach significance (median, 16.2 v 14.7 months; P =. 12). LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin gave higher frequencies of National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 neutropenia (41. 7% v 5.3% of patients), grade 3/4 diarrhea (11.9% v 5.3%), and grade 3 neurosensory toxicity (18.2% v 0%), but this did not result in impairment of quality of life (QoL). Survival without disease progression or deterioration in global health status was longer in patients allocated to oxaliplatin treatment (P =.004).

CONCLUSION

The LV5FU2-oxaliplatin combination seems beneficial as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer, demonstrating a prolonged progression-free survival with acceptable tolerability and maintenance of QoL.