Clinical Outcomes for Patients with Brain Metastases from Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Prior studies have reported outcomes for brain metastases from gastrointestinal (GI) primary cancers treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS); however, most include a majority of colorectal cancer. Few studies specifically evaluate SRS treatment response for brain metastases from upper GI cancers. We report our institutional outcomes for patients with upper GI cancers who were treated with SRS for brain metastases.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with an upper GI cancer who underwent SRS for brain metastases between 1991 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed from a single institution IRB-approved database. The primary endpoint was local failure (LF) and secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). LF was estimated using the Cumulative Incidence Function with death as a competing risk. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier Method. Predictors of cumulative incidence of LF were assessed using competing risk regression.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients with 107 brain metastases were analyzed. Forty-two (86%) patients were male. The median follow-up time was 6.7 months (range: 0.4-61.7 months) and median OS was 7.5 months (range: 0.9-61.7 months). The median Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) was 80 (range: 40-100). The primary disease site was esophagus in 87 (81%) lesions, pancreas in 10 (9.3%) lesions, stomach in 5 (4.7%) lesions, liver in 2 (1.9%) lesions, gallbladder in 2 (1.9%) lesions, and small intestine in 1 (0.9%) lesion. The median metastasis size was 1.4 cm (range: 0.3-6.7 cm). The median prescription dose and fraction number were 24 Gy (range: 14-30 Gy) and 1 fraction (range: 1-2 fractions), respectively. The cumulative incidence of LF at 6 and 12 months was 5.6% (95% CI: 2.3-11%) and 12% (95% CI: 6.9-20%), respectively. Overall survival at 6 and 12 months was 59% (95% CI: 50-69%) and 35% (95% CI: 27-46%), respectively. On univariate analysis, female gender (HR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.61, p = 0.005), Black race (HR = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.03-0.23, p = <0.001), and larger tumors (HR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03-1.78, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with local failure.

CONCLUSION

SRS for brain metastases from upper GI cancers is an appropriate treatment option and provides excellent local control. Unlike prior studies that have reported lower local control rates for all GI cancers with brain metastases treated with SRS, our data show that local failure rates in brain metastases from upper GI cancers specifically are more consistent with previously published data from other disease sites. Further studies evaluating SRS treatment response for brain metastases from GI cancers should separate upper GI and lower GI cancers.

Results of a Phase I Trial of Dose Escalation for Preoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with Large Brain Metastases

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Single session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone for brain metastases larger than 2 cm in diameter results in unsatisfactory local control. Surgical resection alone also produces unreliable local control and perioperative radiation is required. We conducted a prospective phase I trial (NCT01891318) for brain metastases greater than 2 cm to determine the safety of preoperative SRS at escalating doses followed by surgical resection.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Radiosurgery dose started at RTOG 9005 dose levels for the 3 cohorts based on maximum tumor diameter of the index lesion: 18 Gy for >2-3 cm, 15 Gy for >3-4 cm, and 12 Gy >4-6 cm. Concurrent SRS alone to other smaller lesions was allowed using standard RTOG dose. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or greater acute toxicity within 3 to 4 months after SRS. Patients underwent surgical resection within 2 weeks and were followed with imaging and neurological evaluations every 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were enrolled into the trial (see Table 1 below). The median age was 63, and median interval between SRS and surgery was 2 days. The most common histology was non-small cell lung cancer (57.1%), followed by breast cancer (14.3%). For tumor size >2-3 cm, patients were enrolled up to the 2nd dose level (21 Gy); for >3-4 cm and >4-6 cm cohorts the 3rd dose level (21 Gy and 18 Gy, respectively) was reached. There was a total of 3 DLTs: 2 in the >3-4 cm cohort and 1 in the >4-6 cm cohort (Table 1). The maximum tolerable dose (MTD) was 18 Gy (2nd dose level) for >3-4 cm, and 18 Gy (3rd dose level) for >4-6 cm. With a median follow-up of 64 months, the 6- and 12-month local control rates were 88.8% and 79.1%, respectively. The 6- and 12-month distant brain control was 63.1% and 55.3%, respectively. Overall survival at 6 and 12 months was 82.9% and 59.0%. The rate of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) at 2 years was 0%.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative SRS with dose escalation followed by surgical resection for brain metastases greater than 2 cm in size results in local control comparable to postoperative SRS or whole-brain radiation therapy and demonstrates acceptable acute toxicity. The Phase II portion of the trial will be conducted at the maximum tolerated SRS doses.

Development of an RPA for Prediction of Radiation Necrosis Following Single Fraction Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Radiation necrosis (RN) is a potential complication following treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Several risk factors for RN have been reported, but to our knowledge there are no recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) models to identify patients at highest risk for RN. We therefore sought to develop a predictive tool to identify patients at highest risk for the development of RN following single fraction SRS.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients who underwent single fraction SRS for brain metastases from 2017-2021 were identified from a single institutional IRB-approved database. Patients with concern for RN were discussed in a multi-disciplinary setting and a diagnosis of RN was made based on pathologic or radiographic findings. Cox proportional hazards regression was done to identify factors associated with RN. RPA was performed to categorize patients into distinct risk groups for RN. Variables with p<0.1 on univariate analysis from the Cox regression analysis were included in the RPA. Patients with staged SRS, incomplete treatment records, or < 3 months radiographic follow-up were excluded from the analysis.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 1,011 lesions from 283 patients with a median follow-up of 9.7 months. The majority of lesions had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (49%) as the primary site followed by breast (12%) and melanoma (11%). The median prescription dose was 24 Gy (range: 12-24 Gy). RN was diagnosed in 12.2% of lesions, of which 28% (35/123) were symptomatic RN. The median time to RN was 4.9 months. Variables identified for inclusion in the RPA included primary tumor site, use of targeted therapy, tumor location, pre-SRS hemorrhage, post-SRS hemorrhage, prior SRS to other lesions, number of SRS targets, maximum dose, maximum lesion diameter, 70% isodose line, heterogeneity index, conformality index, and gradient index. RPA identified four distinct groups. Group 1 was defined as maximum lesion diameter (MLD) <0.8 cm with primary tumor site other than breast, colorectal (CRC) or NSCLC (n = 174); group 2 was MLD <0.8 cm with breast, CRC, or NSCLC (n = 372). Group 3 was defined as MLD ≥ 0.8 cm without post-SRS hemorrhage (n = 336) and group 4 was MLD ≥0.8 cm with post-SRS hemorrhage (n = 129). Two-year RN free survival for all lesions was 82%, 100% for group 1, 89% for group 2, 76% for group 3, and 58% for group 4.

CONCLUSION

We created the first RPA predictive model for RN following single fraction SRS and identified a subgroup of patients at highest risk. This RPA can help guide clinicians when educating patients on RN risk for brain metastases.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Brain Metastases from Colorectal Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Prior studies have demonstrated that brain metastases from gastrointestinal (GI) primary cancers have a poorer response to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) when compared to patients with other primary sites, with reported local control of 62-74%. We report our institutional outcomes for patients with colorectal primary cancer who were treated with SRS for brain metastases.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with colorectal primary cancer who underwent SRS for brain metastases between 1989 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed from a single institutional IRB-approved database. The primary endpoint was local failure (LF) and secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). LF was estimated using the Cumulative Incidence Function with death as a competing risk. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier Method. Predictors of cumulative incidence of LF were assessed using competing risk regression.

RESULTS

The study population comprised of 109 patients with primary colorectal adenocarcinoma with 207 brain metastases. The median follow-up was 5.2 months (range: 0.4-124 months) and median OS was 5.8 months (range: 0.5-71.2 months). Fifty-two patients (48%) were male and median Karnofsky Performance Status at the time of treatment was 80 (range: 40-100). The median tumor diameter was 1.55 cm (range: 0.17-5.48 cm). The median prescription dose and number of fractions were 24 Gy (range: 11-36 Gy) and 1 fraction (range: 1-3 fractions), respectively. The cumulative incidence of LF at 3, 6, and 12 months was 9.7% (95% CI: 6.1-14%), 22% (95% CI: 16-28%), and 25% (95% CI: 20-31%), respectively. Overall survival at 3, 6, and 12 months was 81% (95% CI: 76-87%), 49% (95% CI: 42-56%) and 24% (95% CI: 18-31%), respectively. On univariate analysis, age was a significant predictor (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94-0.98), p < 0.001) of LF. Tumor size (HR = 0.80, p = 0.13) and prescription dose (HR = 1.02, p = 0.54) did not predict for LF.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest series of patients with brain metastases from colorectal primary cancer treated with SRS. Compared to historical data, LF and OS in our cohort of patients was favorable. Our data confirms relatively higher rates of LF when compared to brain metastases from other primary disease sites. Further studies are warranted to identify factors that predict for LF following SRS and to develop models that predict which patients with colorectal brain metastases may be at higher risk of failure.

Frameless Fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: An Institutional Series of 145 Cases

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Cobalt-60 stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) typically involves single fraction treatment with frame immobilization. However, large tumor size, proximity to critical structures, and prior radiation treatment sometimes necessitate fractionated SRS with mask immobilization. We present a large institutional experience with fractionated mask-based SRS for brain metastases.

MATERIALS/METHODS

In this single-institution, IRB-approved study, all patients treated with mask-based fractionated SRS for brain metastases from March 2017 to January 2023 were identified. The primary outcomes were 1- and 2-year local control (LC) by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients with a total of 145 metastases were treated. The median follow-up time was seven months. The median age at treatment was 64.1 years (range: 26-95 years). 55.9% of patients were female. The most common primary tumors were breast (25.5%), non-small cell lung (23.4%), small-cell lung (8.3%), and melanoma (8.3%). For most cases (59.3%), the indication for fractionation was retreatment. Large size (28.3%), critical location (9.7%), and medical comorbidity (2.1%) were other indications. For all cases, the mean maximal linear size was 34.9 mm and mean target volume was 15.6 cc. For cases fractionated due to size, the mean size was 43.9 mm and mean target volume was 23.8 cc. Median total dose was 2,700 cGy (range: 1,620-3,000), and median dose per fraction (fx) was 600 cGy (range: 405-900). The most common prescriptions were 3,000 cGy/5 fx (40.0% of patients) and 2500 cGy in 500 cGy per fraction (37.2% of patients). Mean maximum dose was 4,833 cGy (range: 2,920-7,500). For 75.2% of treatments, the prescription isodose line was 50 to 59% (mean, 56.9%). Target coverage was 100% in all but one case (99%). For lesions near the brainstem, mean brainstem maximum point dose (MPD) was 9.3 Gy ± 9.8 Gy and brainstem mean dose was 3.3 Gy ± 3.3 Gy. For lesions near the optic pathway, mean optic nerve MPD was 14.4 Gy ± 9.2, optic nerve mean dose was 6.4 Gy ± 5.4 Gy, mean optic chiasm MPD was 11.7 Gy ± 7.9 Gy, and optic chiasm mean dose was 5.4 Gy ± 4.7 Gy. 1-year LC was 88.2% and 2-year LC was 80.4%. When retreatments were excluded, 1-year LC was 98.0% and 2-year LC was 98.0%. 18% of patients had acute grade 1-2 toxicities (fatigue, headache, nausea, and/or alopecia), and one patient had acute grade 3 fatigue. There was no other grade 3+ acute toxicities. 14% of patients had grade 1-2 radiation necrosis (RN); there were no cases of grade 3+ RN.

CONCLUSION

Cobalt-60 frameless fractionated SRS for brain metastases offers excellent local control, rigorous sparing of critical structures, and minimal toxicity. Frameless fractionated SRS should be considered for large, retreated, or critically located metastases.

P15.11.A 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumour progression in brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: results of a prospective pilot study

Background

Amino acid PET radiopharmaceutical, 18F-fluciclovine, shows increased uptake in brain tumors relative to normal tissue and may be a useful tool for detecting recurrent brain metastases. Here, we report results from a prospective pilot study evaluating the use of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumour progression among patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

Material and Methods

The primary objective was to estimate the accuracy of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT in distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumour progression. The trial included adults with brain metastases who underwent SRS and presented with a follow up MRI brain (with DSC MR perfusion) which was equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumour progression. Within 30 days of equivocal MRI brain, patients underwent an 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT (Siemens mCT) acquired 5-15 min post-injection with images generated by PSF reconstruction. Quantitative metrics for each lesion were documented and lesion to normal brain SUVmean ratios were calculated. The reference standard for diagnosis of radiation necrosis vs tumour progression was clinical follow up with MRI brain every 2-4 months until multidisciplinary consensus or tissue confirmation.

Results

Of 16 patients enrolled between 7/2019-11/2020, 1 patient died prior to diagnosis, allowing 15 evaluable subjects with 20 lesions. Primary histology was NSCLC in 9 (45%) lesions, breast in 7 (35%), melanoma in 3 (15%), and endometrial in 1 (5%). The final diagnosis was radiation necrosis in 16 (80%) lesions and tumour progression in 4 (20%). SUVmax was a statistically significant predictor of tumour progression (P = 0.011), with higher SUVmax values indicative of tumour progression. The area under the ROC curve was 0.833 (95% CI: 0.590, 1.0). A cutoff of 4.3 provided a sensitivity to identify tumour progression of 1.0 (4/4) and specificity to rule out tumour progression of 0.63 (10/16). SUVmean (P = 0.018), SUVpeak (P = 0.007), and SUVpeak/normal (P = 0.002) also reached statistical significance as predictors of tumour progression, with higher SUVmax values indicative of tumour progression. SUVmax/normal (P = 0.1) and SUVmean/normal (P = 0.5) were not statistically significant. The AUC for SUVmax was not significantly higher than the AUCs for the other quantitative variables (P-values &gt; 0.2).

Conclusion

In this prospective pilot study, 18F Fluciclovine PET/CT demonstrated promising accuracy to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumour progression among patients with brain metastases previously treated with SRS. Using SUVmax, a cutpoint of 4.3 provided a sensitivity of 1.0 and specificity of 0.63. Confirmatory phase II and III studies are ongoing.

Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) and its soluble receptor type 1 (sTNFR I) in human active and healed leishmaniases

The role of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) is not fully understood in human leishmaniasis. We analysed the alterations in the levels of TNF-α, soluble TNF receptor type 1 (sTNFR I), IL-17 and IL-22 productions in active and healed leishmaniases. Blood samples were collected from volunteers with active cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL), the same subjects after lesion healing (healed CL = HCL), volunteers with active visceral leishmaniasis (AVL), healed VL (HVL) and healthy controls. Levels of cytokines were titrated on Leishmania Ag-stimulated PBMC culture. The mean level of TNF-α production from stimulated cells was significantly higher in ACL than controls (P < 0·001) and significantly reduced after treatment in HCL volunteers (P < 0·05). The mean level of sTNFR I production was significantly higher in ACL than controls (P < 0·001) and significantly reduced after treatment in HCL volunteers (P < 0·05). The mean level of IL-22 production in AVL was significantly higher than controls (P < 0·05) and was significantly lower in HVL compared with AVL (P < 0·001) and controls (P < 0·05). The levels of TNF-α (P = 0·0025) and sTNFR I (P < 0·01) productions from PBMCs showed significant decreasing trend after treatment in each CL volunteer. Reduction in TNF-α is associated with clinical response to treatment and healing of CL lesions due to L. major.

Leishmania surface protein gp63 binds directly to human natural killer cells and inhibits proliferation

Natural killer (NK) cells contribute to immunity as the first line of defence in numerous infections by early cytokine secretion and cytotoxicity. In Leishmania infection, NK cells contribute with interferon-gamma and may assist in directing the immune response towards T helper type 1, which is essential for successful control of the parasites. Thus, NK cells may play an important role in both resistance and control of the infection. However, during Leishmania infection NK cells show signs of suppression. To explore the reason for this suppression, we exposed naive and interleukin (IL)-2 activated NK cells directly to promastigotes of Leishmania major in vitro. As a rapid consequence of contact between naive NK cells and promastigotes, expression of NK cell receptors show significant changes. We identify one of the major surface molecules of promastigotes, glycoprotein (gp) 63, as an important agent for these suppressive effects by using promastigotes of a gp63ko strain of L. major. Furthermore, proliferation of IL-2-activated purified NK cells is suppressed after exposure to the wild-type but not to gp63ko promastigotes. However, gp63ko L. major induced no NK cell proliferation when NK cells were co-cultured with peripheral blood mononuclear cells populations such as CD14(+) monocytes or T cells.

CD26 expression on CD4+T cells in patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis

Surrogate marker(s) of protection in human leishmaniasis is not well defined. In this study, T helper 1 (Th1) and Th2 cytokine profiles and CD26 expression on CD4(+) T cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with healing or non-healing forms of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) stimulated with Leishmania antigens were assessed. The level of interferon (IFN)-gamma production was significantly higher in patients with healing or non-healing forms of CL than in healthy controls, but it was not significantly different between the two patient groups. The level of interleukin-5 production was significantly higher in patients with the non-healing form of CL than in the two other groups. There was a significant increase in the level of CD26 expression on CD4(+) T cells in patients with healing (P < 0.001) or non-healing (P = 0.025) forms of CL compared with the control group, but no significant difference was seen between the two patient groups. A weak positive correlation was seen between IFN-gamma production and CD26 expression on CD4(+) T cells of patients with the healing form of lesion (r = 0.54, P = 0.008), but this correlation was not observed in patients with the non-healing form of CL (r = 0.53, P = 0.078). Surface CD26 is not correlated with the clinical manifestation of CL or IFN-gamma production. Therefore, CD26 is not a surrogate marker for IFN-gamma production in CL.