Assessment of Radiological Hazard of Radioactive Waste Using Effective or Organ Doses: How This May Affect Final Waste Disposal

ABSTRACT

The radiological hazard of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste slows down further development of nuclear energy systems. The authors evaluate timescales required to reduce the radiological hazard of accumulated waste to the reference level of natural uranium that had been consumed by the nuclear energy system. The estimate of this time scale depends on the radiological hazard metric used in the calculations. In this study, two metrics are compared: (1) the committed effective dose based on ICRP Publication 72 and (2) the lifetime radiation risk calculated with use of organ doses and recent radiation risk models recommended by ICRP. The effective dose of the waste reaches the reference level 300 y after the accumulation of waste, while lifetime attributable risk of waste converges to natural uranium in 100 y. Thus, the lifetime attributable risk (LAR) metric is more appropriate to estimate the time requirements for radioactive waste storage and disposal. The effective dose metric significantly overestimates this timescale as it is not intended for quantifying radiation-related risks.

Evaluation of Migration Radiological Equivalence for Dual Component Nuclear Waste in a Deep Geological Repository

ABSTRACT

The paper is concerned with the issue of achieving the radiological equivalence (the equivalence of radiation risks) of radioactive waste of nuclear reactors and corresponding mass of natural uranium, taking into account the different migration ability of radionuclides in geological formations and soil. This migration radiological equivalence is being investigated for the deep burial of radioactive waste in the case of the development of a two-component nuclear power system with the concurrent use of thermal neutron reactors and fast neutron reactors. Calculations were performed of radiation doses and radiation risks of cancer death arising from consumption of drinking water from a well above a disposal site. The radiation risk relating to a two-component nuclear power system is lower than that from natural uranium; i.e., after reaching the radiological equivalence (100 y of storage) over the timescale of 109 y, the principle of migration radiological equivalence is satisfied. It would take 106 y after radioactive waste disposal to reach the migration radiological equivalence if only thermal reactors were operated. As regards consumption of well drinking water, the radiation risk does not exceed 10-5 y-1 for a two-component nuclear power system, while being 10-3 y-1 (socially unacceptable level) for a power system using only thermal reactors. Radionuclides 241Am, 239Pu, and 240Pu in drinking water make the main contribution to the doses and radiation risks of people for 104 y after the disposal of radioactive waste.