Patient deprivation and perceived scan burden negatively impact the quality of whole-body MRI

AIM

To evaluate the association between the image quality of cancer staging whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) and patient demographics, distress, and perceived scan burden.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A sample of patients recruited prospectively to multicentre trials comparing WB-MRI with standard scans for staging lung and colorectal cancer were invited to complete two questionnaires. The baseline questionnaire, administered at recruitment, collated data on demographics, distress and co-morbidity. The follow-up questionnaire, completed after staging investigations, measured perceived WB-MRI scan burden (scored 1 low to 7 high). WB-MRI anatomical coverage, and technical quality was graded by a radiographic technician and grading combined to categorise the scan as "optimal", "sub-optimal" or "degraded". A radiologist categorised 30 scans to test interobserver agreement. Data were analysed using the chi-square, Fisher's exact, t-tests, and multinomial regression.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen patients were included in the study (53 lung, 61 colorectal; average age 65.3 years, SD=11.8; 66 men [57.9%]). Overall, 45.6% (n=52), scans were classified as "optimal" quality, 39.5% (n=45) "sub-optimal", and 14.9% (n=17) as "degraded". In adjusted analyses, greater deprivation level and higher patient-reported scan burden were both associated with a higher likelihood of having a sub-optimal versus an optimal scan (odds ratio [OR]: 4.465, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.454 to 13.709, p=0.009; OR: 1.987, CI: 1.153 to 3.425, p=0.013, respectively). None of the variables predicted the likelihood of having a degraded scan.

CONCLUSIONS

Deprivation and patients' perceived experience of the WB-MRI are related to image quality. Tailored protocols and individualised patient management before and during WB-MRI may improve image quality.

DNA quantification of exfoliated colonocytes as a novel screening tool for colorectal cancer

AIMS

Colorectal cancer (CRC) sheds viable cells in the mucocelluar layer overlaying the colonic mucosa which travels distally alongside the faecal stream. These cells can be retrieved from the surface of the rectal mucosa. DNA quantification of these cells may be a marker of CRC, assessment of which was aim of this study.

METHODS

A prospective double-blinded study of 467 consecutive patients referred with symptoms suggestive of CRC. Cells were collected from the surface of the rectal mucosa and total DNA quantified. DNA scores were compared with outcome after subjects had completed bowel investigations. Analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was performed to determine the optimum cut-off point for a positive result.

RESULTS

107 of the 467 patients were excluded due to; excessive faecal contamination of samples (n = 84); declined investigations (n = 17); inappropriate referral (n = 5); unfit (n = 1). 263 patients had lower GI endoscopy; 89 CT colonography and 8 barium enema. The diagnosis were; CRC (n = 23), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (n = 7), adenomatous polyps (AP) (n = 20) and no significant abnormality detected (n = 310). ROC analysis revealed that sensitivities at a specificity of 60% for detecting CRC were 91.3%; for CRC and IBD 86.7%; and for CRC, IBD and AP 72.0%.

CONCLUSION

In symptomatic patients DNA quantification of cells retrieved from the surface of the rectal mucosa is sensitive for the detection of CRC. Although faecal contamination is a limitation of this technique, refinement and application of other molecular tests hold promise for a better non invasive method for the detection of CRC.

Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in England

BACKGROUND

Introduction of organised, population-based, colorectal cancer screening in the United Kingdom using the faecal occult blood test (FOBT) has the potential to reduce overall colorectal cancer mortality. However, socio-economic variation in screening participation could exacerbate existing inequalities in mortality.

METHODS

This study examined FOBT uptake rates in London, England in relation to area-level socio-economic deprivation over the first 30 months of the programme during which 401 197 individuals were sent an FOBT kit. Uptake was defined as return of a completed test kit within 3 months. Area-level deprivation in each postcode sector was indexed with the Townsend Material Deprivation Index. Analyses controlled for area-level household mobility, ethnic diversity and poor health, each of which was associated with lower return rates.

RESULTS

The results showed a strong socio-economic gradient in FOBT uptake, which declined from 49% in the least deprived quintile of postcodes to 38% in the middle quintile and 32% in the most deprived quintile. Variation in socio-economic deprivation between sectors accounted for 62% of the variance in return rates, with little attenuation as a result of controlling for ethnic diversity, household mobility or health status.

CONCLUSION

These results highlight the need to understand the causes of socio-economic gradients in screening participation and address barriers that could otherwise increase disparities in colorectal cancer survival.