Peiró Morant JF, Ramírez Torres JM, Pérez Vázquez E, Lozano Bouzón VM, Parra Valderrama A, Frías Vargas M. [Knowledge of chronic venous disease among healthcare professionals in Spain].
Semergen 2023;
49:102063. [PMID:
37619267 DOI:
10.1016/j.semerg.2023.102063]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Chronic venous disease (CVD) is classified as the most prevalent vascular disease in humans. It has been associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular diseases and is a strong predictor of all-cause mortality, representing a public health problem of the first magnitude. The objective of this study was to analyze the actions in the management of CVD in the daily clinical practice of health professionals in Spain.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study with data collection through an opinion survey of 22 questions completed electronically through a Google® form for professionals involved in chronic venous disease care. Three hundred surveys were analyzed. The quantitative variables were represented with means and standard deviation and the qualitative ones with percentages and confidence intervals.
RESULTS
Three hundred surveys analyzed. 65.3% were women. The most participatory age group was over 55 years of age. 85% of those surveyed considered that CVD is an underdiagnosed and undertreated disease, with an added negative impact in terms of follow-up during the Covid-19 pandemic, since 91.7% considered that it had not been adequate. 47% of the participants did not know the CEAP classification and 56.3% did not know the venous clinical severity scale (VCSS). 92.7% of physicians prescribed compression stockings and 74.7% phlebotonic drugs. Hidrosmine was the best known and most prescribed venoactive drug (51.7%). 73% of the doctors recognized that they did not use any algorithm or protocol for the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of CVD in their usual clinical practice and 91% stated that they were not trained in their workplaces. 54.3% of the physicians believed that one of the main limitations that made follow-up of the disease difficult was the lack of coordination with the vascular surgeons.
CONCLUSIONS
Updating and responding to the training needs of professionals regarding CVD is essential to guarantee quality care continuity in the care of our patients.
Collapse