Comparative study of non-contrast silent and time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiographic sequences in the evaluation of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula

AIM

To compare the performance of two non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) sequences, silent MRA and time of flight (TOF) MRA, in the evaluation of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty consecutive patients with DAVF were enrolled and evaluated prospectively using silent MRA, TOF MRA, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The location, Cognard classification, arterial feeders, and venous drainage were evaluated. The therapeutic strategy and possible route were predicted on both silent and TOF MRA and these were compared with DSA during subsequent endovascular treatment.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and accuracy of silent and TOF MRA for localisation (96.4% versus 96% and 96% versus 95%, respectively) and classification (96% versus 94% and 96% versus 93.5%, respectively) were high. Silent MRA showed higher sensitivity than TOF MRA for arterial feeders and draining veins (87% versus 79% and 81.6% versus 67%). This improved to a sensitivity of 96.4% and 89% when prominent feeders were considered. The sensitivity and accuracy were 92.6% and 85.8% for immediate draining veins. Both silent and TOF MRA were accurate for therapeutic planning (96% versus 85%), although silent MRA was more accurate.

CONCLUSION

Silent MRA can more reliably evaluate the various angioarchtectural components of DAVF compared to TOF MRA.

Utility of silent magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation and characterisation of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula

AIM

To evaluate the utility of silent magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the diagnosis, characterisation, and therapeutic planning of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients with DAVF were enrolled prospectively and were evaluated using silent MRA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as a part of routine work-up. The diagnosis and location of fistula, Borden and Cognard classification, entire arterial feeders, and venous drainage were analysed. A therapeutic strategy was formulated, and the accessible route and vessel were predicted, which was confirmed on endovascular treatment.

RESULTS

Silent MRA was 100% sensitive and accurate for location and classification of fistulas. Silent MRA showed a sensitivity of 82% and 76.5% for entire arterial feeders and draining veins, which improved to a sensitivity of 90% and 94% when prominent feeders and immediate venous drainage was considered. Among the missed veins, thrombosed sinus, slow sinus flow, small calibre, reduced image quality were the causes. The therapeutic decision matched with DSA in all cases and silent MRA accurately identified the potential accessible feeder in 94% cases.

CONCLUSION

Silent MRA is a promising MR technique that can provide both diagnostic and therapeutic information similar to that obtained from DSA.