Diagnosis and First-Line Treatment of Patients with Lung Cancer in Italian General Hospitals

The quality of diagnostic and therapeutic care was examined in a series of 380 consecutive newly diagnosed cases of primary lung cancer seen in 20 Italian general hospitals between January and June 1987. At diagnosis most patients (78%) had one or more symptoms related to the tumor, and in an additional 9 % symptoms were related to the presence of distant metastases. The median diagnostic time lag between first symptoms and final diagnosis was 50 days with a significantly longer delay in patients first seen by their general practitioner compared with those who sought first care in hospital outpatient departments. The diagnostic process was satisfactorily carried out in fewer than two-thirds of the patients leading to complete ascertainment of disease stage and histology in 58% cases with significantly better performance in more specialized institutions. Analysis of the first-line treatment profile indicated a rather aggressive therapeutic attitude In the case of patients with non-small cell lung cancer – 28% of them had chemotherapy despite the lack of any proof of efficacy in controlled clinical trials – and a failure to identify among the patients with small cell disease those amenable to more aggressive treatment. The lack of progress in the treatment of lung cancer over the last decades seems to have resulted in widely varying practice patterns where a mixture of aggressive and laissez-faire attitudes does not take into account that in the absence of effective therapies a more conservative attitude would at least have some advantage in terms of quality of remaining life for many patients.

Evaluation of the Prognostic Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Microvessel Density in Stages I and II Breast Cancer Patients

In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvessel density (MVD) in 228 and 213 specimens, respectively, from stages I and II breast cancer patients (pts) enrolled in a randomized phase III adjuvant chemotherapy trial comparing epirubicin to CMF, while tamoxifen was given to all postmenopausal pts. The expression of VEGF and MVD was assessed on tissue sections formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded by immunohistochemical staining using anti-VEGF antibody of human origin and anti-CD34 monoclonal antibody. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using chi squared test, log-rank test and Cox's regression model. Sixty four of 228 pts were classified as VEGF positive (28%) with no significant difference in the two treatment arms. In 213 pts evaluated for CD34, 103 pts (48%) were classified as MVD high. No significant association between VEGF and MVD was found, and neither were they correlated with many known prognostic factors such as age, tumor size, nodal status, and histological grade. The only significant correlations observed were between VEGF and estrogen receptor (ER) status (p = 0.013) and between MVD and HER2 overexpression (p = 0.023). At a median follow up of 96 months VEGF and MVD were not correlated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in all pts and in pts assigned to one of the two treatment arms. In conclusion, VEGF and MVD retrospectively evaluated, cannot be considered prognostic factors in node negative (N-) high risk and node positive (N+) breast cancer pts treated with two different regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Epirubicin versus CMF as adjuvant therapy for stage I and II breast cancer: a prospective randomised study

We compared a relatively short regimen of monochemotherapy with epirubicin versus polychemotherapy with CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) as adjuvant treatment for stage I and II breast cancer patients. 348 patients with oestrogen receptor negative (ER-) node negative and ER- or ER+ node-positive with <10 nodes were accrued. CMF was given intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8, every 4 weeks, for six courses; epirubicin was given weekly for 4 months. Postmenopausal patients received tamoxifen for 3 years. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and event-free survival (EFS). Outcome evaluation was performed both in eligible patients and in all randomised patients according to the intention-to-treat principle. 8 randomised patients were considered ineligible. At a median follow-up of 8 years, there was no difference in OS (Hazard Ratio (HR)=1.11, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.77-1.61, P=0.58), EFS (HR=1.14, 95% CI: 0.78-1.64, P=0.48), and RFS (HR=1.14, 95% CI: 0.8-1.64, P=0.48) between the two arms for all of the patients. At 8 years, the RFS percentages (+/-Standard Error (S.E.)) were 65.4% (+/-4%) in the CMF arm and 62.7% (+/-4%) in the epirubicin arm; for EFS these were 64.2% (+/-4%) for CMF and 60.8% (+/-4%) for epirubicin, respectively. A significant difference in RFS (P=0.015) was observed in patients with 4-9 positive nodes in favour of the CMF arm. Toxicity in the two arms was superimposable except for more frequent grade 3 alopecia in the epirubicin-treated patients (P=0.001). Overall, at a median follow-up of 8 years, there were no differences between the two arms in terms of OS, EFS and RFS.

[Cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and platinum (CAP) in the preoperative neoadjuvant phase and the therapy phase]

Forty-two patients with metastasized, and 7 patients with locally advanced forms of carcinoma of the breast were treated with a combination of three drugs: CTX 200-400 mg/sq.m. on days 1, 3 and 5, ADM 40 mg/sq.m. on day 1, and DDP 30 mg/sq.m. on days 1, 3 and 5 (CAP), every 21 days. The 42 patients with metastasized carcinoma had already received substantial pre-treatment by surgery and with adjuvant polychemotherapy +/- chemotherapy on recurrence +/- hormonotherapy +/- radiotherapy. The disease sites were: bone (30%), skin (19%), lymph nodes (13.5%), pleura (12.5%), lung (12%) and liver (11%). The 7 patients with locally advanced carcinoma had not been pre-treated; they received the same chemotherapy in the pre-operative neo-adjuvant phase. Positive responses to CAP in the cases with metastasized carcinoma according to individual disease sites (37 pre-treated patients assessable after at least two courses of therapy) were as follows in percentage terms: 24% bone lesions, 56% skin lesions, 77% lymph node lesions, 30% liver lesions, 56% lung lesions, 22% pleural lesions. 3/37 patients (8%) showed complete remission in all disease sites, while 6/37 showed partial remission. This percentage (8 + 16 = 24%) is encouraging, as CAP, in these patients, represents on average the 3rd to 4th line of therapy. Responses to neo-adjuvant CAP therapy (7 patients assessable after at least two courses of therapy) were as follows: 5 patients showed partial remission after 3-6 courses, 1 complete remission, and 1 objective improvement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Bone scintigraphy in mastectomized patients with and without chemotherapy]

Follow'ups were conducted on 130 mastectomized patients, periodically subjected to bone scintigraphy in addition to conventional tests. 89 of the patients had received chemotherapy and 41 had not. The results obtained show the value of scintigraphy for both accurate staging and follow-up in such patients.