1
|
Reid I, Sharma A, Gogbashian A, Kaur B, Fotopoulou C. Germ cell cancer in pregnancy - Successfully treated with chemotherapy and surgery. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2023; 47:101185. [PMID: 37122439 PMCID: PMC10133652 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
A 31-year-old primigravida, with spontaneous singleton pregnancy, presented in 21 weeks of gestation with abdominal pain. Abdominal ultrasound (USS) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) showed a 12 × 14cm large complex lesion arising from the right ovary suspicious for an ovarian malignancy. The radiological staging demonstrated no further metastatic disease; however, it also revealed a 6 cm lesion in the contralateral ovary, consistent with a dermoid cyst. After tumour board discussion the patient underwent a mid-line laparotomy with right oophorectomy, cytology, and peritoneal and omental staging, under oral tocolysis with indomethacin. The left presumed ovarian dermoid was left in situ to avoid additional surgical and obstetrical morbidity. Histology confirmed a grade 3 immature teratoma with primitive neuroepithelium focally present on the capsular surface and atypical cells in the cytology amounting to a stage 1 C2 disease at least. Due to high-risk disease, she was offered adjuvant treatment. The patient received one cycle of intravenous paclitaxel, etoposide, and cisplatin chemotherapy, in an adjuvant setting. She underwent an elective caesarean section at 36 weeks, with the safe delivery of a healthy baby girl. After 6 weeks of her delivery, she received three further cycles of etoposide, and cisplatin to complete her course of adjuvant chemotherapy. Three months after the last chemotherapy cycle, she underwent a laparoscopic removal of the left ovarian dermoid that had increased in size to 8 cm. Final histology revealed no immature elements. To this point, 2 years after initial diagnosis, both mother and child are healthy with no long-term complications. The patient has resumed her normal menstrual cycle and being in remission, she wishes soon to try for a second child. To our knowledge, this is the only reported case of ovarian immature teratoma in pregnancy treated successfully with surgery and adjuvant iv paclitaxel, etoposide, and cisplatin chemotherapy regime.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I. Reid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood HA6 2RN, United Kingdom
- Corresponding authors at: Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood HA6 2RN, United Kingdom.
| | - A. Sharma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood HA6 2RN, United Kingdom
- Corresponding authors at: Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood HA6 2RN, United Kingdom.
| | - A. Gogbashian
- Department of Radiology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Northwood HA6 2RN, United Kingdom
| | - B. Kaur
- Dept of Histopathology, Imperial College London, NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - C. Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Evans R, Taylor S, Kalasthry J, Sakai N, Miles A, Aboagye A, Agoramoorthy L, Ahmed S, Amadi A, Anand G, Atkin G, Austria A, Ball S, Bazari F, Beable R, Beare S, Beedham H, Beeston T, Bharwani N, Bhatnagar G, Bhowmik A, Blakeway L, Blunt D, Boavida P, Boisfer D, Breen D, Bridgewater J, Burke S, Butawan R, Campbell Y, Chang E, Chao D, Chukundah S, Clarke C, Collins B, Collins C, Conteh V, Couture J, Crosbie J, Curtis H, Daniel A, Davis L, Desai K, Duggan M, Ellis S, Elton C, Engledow A, Everitt C, Ferdous S, Frow A, Furneaux M, Gibbons N, Glynne-Jones R, Gogbashian A, Goh V, Gourtsoyianni S, Green A, Green L, Green L, Groves A, Guthrie A, Hadley E, Halligan S, Hameeduddin A, Hanid G, Hans S, Hans B, Higginson A, Honeyfield L, Hughes H, Hughes J, Hurl L, Isaac E, Jackson M, Jalloh A, Janes S, Jannapureddy R, Jayme A, Johnson A, Johnson E, Julka P, Kalasthry J, Karapanagiotou E, Karp S, Kay C, Kellaway J, Khan S, Koh D, Light T, Limbu P, Lock S, Locke I, Loke T, Lowe A, Lucas N, Maheswaran S, Mallett S, Marwood E, McGowan J, Mckirdy F, Mills-Baldock T, Moon T, Morgan V, Morris S, Morton A, Nasseri S, Navani N, Nichols P, Norman C, Ntala E, Nunes A, Obichere A, O'Donohue J, Olaleye I, Oliver A, Onajobi A, O'Shaughnessy T, Padhani A, Pardoe H, Partridge W, Patel U, Perry K, Piga W, Prezzi D, Prior K, Punwani S, Pyers J, Rafiee H, Rahman F, Rajanpandian I, Ramesh S, Raouf S, Reczko K, Reinhardt A, Robinson D, Rockall A, Russell P, Sargus K, Scurr E, Shahabuddin K, Sharp A, Shepherd B, Shiu K, Sidhu H, Simcock I, Simeon C, Smith A, Smith D, Snell D, Spence J, Srirajaskanthan R, Stachini V, Stegner S, Stirling J, Strickland N, Tarver K, Teague J, Thaha M, Train M, Tulmuntaha S, Tunariu N, van Ree K, Verjee A, Wanstall C, Weir S, Wijeyekoon S, Wilson J, Wilson S, Win T, Woodrow L, Yu D. Patient deprivation and perceived scan burden negatively impact the quality of whole-body MRI. Clin Radiol 2020; 75:308-315. [PMID: 31836179 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the association between the image quality of cancer staging whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) and patient demographics, distress, and perceived scan burden. MATERIALS AND METHODS A sample of patients recruited prospectively to multicentre trials comparing WB-MRI with standard scans for staging lung and colorectal cancer were invited to complete two questionnaires. The baseline questionnaire, administered at recruitment, collated data on demographics, distress and co-morbidity. The follow-up questionnaire, completed after staging investigations, measured perceived WB-MRI scan burden (scored 1 low to 7 high). WB-MRI anatomical coverage, and technical quality was graded by a radiographic technician and grading combined to categorise the scan as "optimal", "sub-optimal" or "degraded". A radiologist categorised 30 scans to test interobserver agreement. Data were analysed using the chi-square, Fisher's exact, t-tests, and multinomial regression. RESULTS One hundred and fourteen patients were included in the study (53 lung, 61 colorectal; average age 65.3 years, SD=11.8; 66 men [57.9%]). Overall, 45.6% (n=52), scans were classified as "optimal" quality, 39.5% (n=45) "sub-optimal", and 14.9% (n=17) as "degraded". In adjusted analyses, greater deprivation level and higher patient-reported scan burden were both associated with a higher likelihood of having a sub-optimal versus an optimal scan (odds ratio [OR]: 4.465, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.454 to 13.709, p=0.009; OR: 1.987, CI: 1.153 to 3.425, p=0.013, respectively). None of the variables predicted the likelihood of having a degraded scan. CONCLUSIONS Deprivation and patients' perceived experience of the WB-MRI are related to image quality. Tailored protocols and individualised patient management before and during WB-MRI may improve image quality.
Collapse
|