2
|
Lang M, Tabari A, Polak D, Ford J, Clifford B, Lo WC, Manzoor K, Splitthoff DN, Wald LL, Rapalino O, Schaefer P, Conklin J, Cauley S, Huang SY. Clinical Evaluation of Scout Accelerated Motion Estimation and Reduction Technique for 3D MR Imaging in the Inpatient and Emergency Department Settings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023; 44:125-133. [PMID: 36702502 PMCID: PMC9891324 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A scout accelerated motion estimation and reduction (SAMER) framework has been developed for efficient retrospective motion correction. The goal of this study was to perform an initial evaluation of SAMER in a series of clinical brain MR imaging examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety-seven patients who underwent MR imaging in the inpatient and emergency department settings were included in the study. SAMER motion correction was retrospectively applied to an accelerated T1-weighted MPRAGE sequence that was included in brain MR imaging examinations performed with and without contrast. Two blinded neuroradiologists graded images with and without SAMER motion correction on a 5-tier motion severity scale (none = 1, minimal = 2, mild = 3, moderate = 4, severe = 5). RESULTS The median SAMER reconstruction time was 1 minute 47 seconds. SAMER motion correction significantly improved overall motion grades across all examinations (P < .005). Motion artifacts were reduced in 28% of cases, unchanged in 64% of cases, and increased in 8% of cases. SAMER improved motion grades in 100% of moderate motion cases and 75% of severe motion cases. Sixty-nine percent of nondiagnostic motion cases (grades 4 and 5) were considered diagnostic after SAMER motion correction. For cases with minimal or no motion, SAMER had negligible impact on the overall motion grade. For cases with mild, moderate, and severe motion, SAMER improved the motion grade by an average of 0.3 (SD, 0.5), 1.1 (SD, 0.3), and 1.1 (SD, 0.8) grades, respectively. CONCLUSIONS SAMER improved the diagnostic image quality of clinical brain MR imaging examinations with motion artifacts. The improvement was most pronounced for cases with moderate or severe motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lang
- From the Department of Radiology (M.L., A.T., D.P., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School (M.L., A.T., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Boston, Massachusetts
| | - A Tabari
- From the Department of Radiology (M.L., A.T., D.P., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School (M.L., A.T., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Boston, Massachusetts
| | - D Polak
- From the Department of Radiology (M.L., A.T., D.P., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts
- Siemens Healthcare GmbH (D.P., D.N.S.), Erlangen, Germany
| | - J Ford
- From the Department of Radiology (M.L., A.T., D.P., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School (M.L., A.T., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Boston, Massachusetts
| | - B Clifford
- Siemens Medical Solutions (B.C., W.-C.L.), Boston, Massachusetts
| | - W-C Lo
- Siemens Medical Solutions (B.C., W.-C.L.), Boston, Massachusetts
| | - K Manzoor
- From the Department of Radiology (M.L., A.T., D.P., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School (M.L., A.T., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Boston, Massachusetts
| | - D N Splitthoff
- Siemens Healthcare GmbH (D.P., D.N.S.), Erlangen, Germany
| | - L L Wald
- From the Department of Radiology (M.L., A.T., D.P., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School (M.L., A.T., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology (L.L.W.), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - O Rapalino
- From the Department of Radiology (M.L., A.T., D.P., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School (M.L., A.T., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Boston, Massachusetts
| | - P Schaefer
- From the Department of Radiology (M.L., A.T., D.P., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School (M.L., A.T., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Boston, Massachusetts
| | - J Conklin
- From the Department of Radiology (M.L., A.T., D.P., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School (M.L., A.T., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Boston, Massachusetts
| | - S Cauley
- From the Department of Radiology (M.L., A.T., D.P., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School (M.L., A.T., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Boston, Massachusetts
| | - S Y Huang
- From the Department of Radiology (M.L., A.T., D.P., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School (M.L., A.T., J.F., K.M., L.L.W., O.R., P.S., J.C., S.C., S.Y.H.), Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tabari A, Patino M, Westra SJ, Shailam R, Sagar P, Sahani DV, Nimkin K, Gee MS. Initial clinical experience with high-pitch dual-source CT as a rapid technique for thoraco-abdominal evaluation in awake infants and young children. Clin Radiol 2019; 74:977.e9-977.e15. [PMID: 31561835 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate dual-source high-pitch computed tomography (HPCT) imaging of the chest and abdomen as a rapid scanning technique to obtain diagnostic-quality imaging evaluation of infants and young children without sedation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-three paediatric patients (age 24.1±2 months) who underwent chest or abdomen HPCT (≥1.5) and standard pitch CT (SPCT, <1.5) on a dual-source 128-row multidetector CT system were included in the study. Image quality assessment was performed by two paediatric radiologists for diagnostic confidence, image artefacts, and image noise. Objective image noise was measured. RESULTS Most of the CT examinations were performed in children who were >1 year old (n=15 and n=20) followed by ≤1 year old (n=8 and n=10) in SPCT and HPCT, respectively. The mean radiation dose (SSDE) from HPCT was 1.96±1 mGy compared to 2.2±1 mGy for SPCT (p=0.3). No major artefacts were reported and overall image quality of all HPCT examinations was acceptable diagnostically. In addition, objective image noise values were not significantly different between HPCT compared with SPCT (11±3 versus 11±5, p=0.7). CONCLUSION Ultra-fast, HPCT can be performed without the need for sedation as a potential alternative to anaesthetised magnetic resonance imaging in infants and young children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Tabari
- Division of Pediatric Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - M Patino
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - S J Westra
- Division of Pediatric Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - R Shailam
- Division of Pediatric Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - P Sagar
- Division of Pediatric Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - D V Sahani
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - K Nimkin
- Division of Pediatric Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M S Gee
- Division of Pediatric Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|