1
|
Andrade LF, Abdi P, Kooner A, Eldaboush AM, Dhami RK, Natarelli N, Yosipovitch G. Treatment of post-burn pruritus - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns 2024; 50:293-301. [PMID: 38097439 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2023.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-burn pruritus is one of the most common complaints reported by patients with limited evidence for a gold-standard treatment. OBJECTIVE To review the literature and assess the efficacy of various interventions in treating post-burn pruritus. METHODS PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Sciences, Ovid Databases, and ClinicalTrials.Gov were searched. The articles were scored by two assessors for inclusion with a third independent assessor resolving conflicting scores. RESULTS The present systematic review and meta-analysis synthesised findings from a total of nine studies, representing a pool of 323 patients. The standardized mean effect size for the various categories of interventions was: naltrexone at 1.47 (95 % CI of 0.75-2.20, p < 0.0000), coverings at 0.94 (95 % CI of 0.40-1.48, p = 0.006), topical ozonated oil at 2.64 (95 % CI of 1.94-3.34, p < 0.00001), lasers at 2.34 (95 % CI of 1.60-3.09, p < 0.00001), current stimulation at 1.03 (95 % CI of -0.04 to 2.10, p = 0.06), and lemon balm tea at 0.54 (95% CI of 0.12-0.96, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Current evidence suggests that current modalities have a statistically significant, but not clinically significant, reduction in pruritus. This review highlights the limited quality of evidence in the literature and the poor quality of reporting among excluded studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis F Andrade
- Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Parsa Abdi
- Memorial University Faculty of Medicine, St. Johns, NL, Canada
| | - Amritpal Kooner
- Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Downers Grove, IL, USA
| | | | - Ramneek K Dhami
- University of Nevada, Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, USA
| | | | - Gil Yosipovitch
- Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Allam AR, Elsayed MA, Daghash IT, Abdelaziz AM, Mostafa OM, Sabra HK, Eldaboush AM, Ahmed NMB, Elweza RT, Adwy ES, Hammad AE, Kabbash IA, Allam AH, Bahbah AA, Ewis MI, Mohamed Shawqi M, Behery MB, Mohamed El-Said Y, Radwan AE, KhallafAllah MT, Aboshady OA, Gouda MA. Colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer in Egypt: a nationwide cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:131. [PMID: 38273265 PMCID: PMC10809530 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11828-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current guidelines advocate for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in adults who are at risk by using direct visualization methods such as colonoscopy. However, in Egypt, there is a paucity of data regarding the current practice of colonoscopy screening. Moreover, more information is needed about the knowledge and attitudes of potential participants regarding the procedure and possible barriers that can limit their participation. METHODS We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study using an interview-based survey of patients aged 45 years or above who presented to outpatient clinics of nine university hospitals throughout Egypt. Participants were surveyed to assess their compliance with CRC colonoscopy screening guidelines, their knowledge of and attitude towards colonoscopy screening, and their perspective on potential barriers to colonoscopy screening. RESULTS A total of 1,453 participants responded to our survey in the nine study centers. Only a minority of participants (2.3%) were referred for CRC screening. Referral rates were higher among those who knew someone with a history of CRC (5.3% vs 1.5%, p < 0.001) or had a discussion with their physician about CRC (25.8% vs 0.7%, p < 0.001). Few responders (3.2%) had good knowledge regarding CRC screening. After introducing the concept of CRC screening to all participants, most patients (66.7%) showed a positive attitude towards having the procedure. Financial burden and fear of results were the two most frequently cited barriers to undergoing CRC screening (81.1%; and 60.1%, respecteively). CONCLUSIONS Despite the positive attitude, there is insufficient knowledge about CRC screening among eligible participants in Egypt. This has probably contributed to low compliance with current CRC screening guidelines and needs to be addressed at the national level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ali M Abdelaziz
- Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Omar Ali Aboshady
- Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
- College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|