Uptake and Discontinuation of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Uninsured Transgender and Cisgender Women: A Public-Private Partnership Model in North Carolina

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remains underutilized among cis and trans women. The PrEP Initiative Program (PIP) is a novel public-private partnership implemented at 12 local clinics in North Carolina. PIP provides HIV/sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and clinical and laboratory monitoring for PrEP to uninsured/underinsured clients. We sought to understand service-related differences among both cis and trans women enrolled in PIP, including STIs diagnoses, clinic type, sources of referral, services needed, and reasons for PrEP discontinuation. The Kaplan-Meier curves display retention on PrEP over the duration of the program. Since 2018, 142 women (cis n = 113; trans n = 29) enrolled, and 136 started PrEP. The majority were ages 25-34 years (31.7%) or 18-24 years (29.6%), Black (57.8%) or Latinx (24.7%). Approximately 20.6% of recipients reported at least one STI while enrolled. Overall, trans women requested fewer services than cis women. After accounting for the amount of time each patient was taking PrEP, there were higher rates of trans women diagnosed with syphilis than cis women. Rates of persons with other STIs were not notably different between trans and cis women. Clinic access varied by gender: 69% of trans women were enrolled at only one site. Trans women were retained significantly longer: The Kaplan-Meier adjusted median time to discontinuation was 560 and 238 days for trans and cis women, respectively. PIP successfully reached historically marginalized and uninsured cis and trans women who may benefit from PrEP. Further investigations into factors contributing to recruitment and retention of women in HIV prevention programs are needed.

Understanding chaperone specificity: evidence for a 'client code'

The interactions of molecular chaperones with clients can be regulated by chaperone post-translational modification (PTMs) collectively known as the 'chaperone code'. What is less understood is how PTMs on client proteins may impact chaperone-client interactions. In this forum, we discuss the possibility of a 'client code'.