1
|
Parker SG, Blake H, Zhao S, van Dellen J, Mohamed S, Albadry W, Akhtar H, Franczak B, Jakkalasaibaba R, Rothnie A, Thomas R. An established abdominal wall multidisciplinary team improves patient care and aids surgical decision making with complex ventral hernia patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2024; 106:29-35. [PMID: 36927113 PMCID: PMC10757872 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is an emerging subspecialty within general surgery. The practice of multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings to aid decision making and improve patient care has been demonstrated, with widespread acceptance. This study presents our initial experience of over 150 cases of complex hernia patients discussed in a newly established MDT setting. METHODS From February 2020 to July 2022 (30-month period), abdominal wall MDTs were held bimonthly. Key stakeholders included upper and lower gastrointestinal surgeons, a gastrointestinal specialist radiologist, a plastic surgeon, a high-risk anaesthetist and two junior doctors integrated into the AWR clinical team. Meetings were held online, where patient history, past medical and surgical history, hernia characteristics and up-to-date computed tomography scans were discussed. RESULTS Some 156 patients were discussed over 18 meetings within the above period. Ninety-five (61%) patients were recommended for surgery, and 61 (39%) patients were recommended for conservative management or referred elsewhere. Seventy-eight (82%) patients were directly waitlisted, whereas seventeen (18%) required preoperative optimisation: three (18%) for smoking cessation, eleven (65%) for weight-loss management and three (18%) for specialist diabetic assessment and management. In total, 92 (59%) patients (including operative and nonoperative management) have been discharged to primary care. DISCUSSION A multidisciplinary forum for complex abdominal wall patients is a safe process that facilitates decision making, promotes education and improves patient care. As the AWR subspecialty evolves, our view is that the "complex hernia MDT" will become commonplace. We present our experience and share advice for others planning to establish an AWR centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SG Parker
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, UK
| | - H Blake
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, UK
| | - S Zhao
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, UK
| | | | - S Mohamed
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, UK
| | - W Albadry
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - H Akhtar
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, UK
| | | | | | - A Rothnie
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, UK
| | - R Thomas
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao S, Rothnie A, Nanda A, Chouari T, Ashraf S, Vig S. Developing Bespoke High Volume Low Complexity (HVLC) Theatre Lists With a Focus on Training to Address the Impact of COVID-19: A Pilot Study. Cureus 2023; 15:e49104. [PMID: 38125225 PMCID: PMC10732092 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on both healthcare delivery and surgical training. There have been significant efforts to manage the growing elective waiting list backlog whilst addressing the training deficit. We outline a successful pilot high volume low complexity (HVLC) program held at the Croydon Elective Centre between 2021-2022 which aimed to amalgamate training and elective recovery. Methods Two pilot HVLC training lists were carried out in June 2021 and March 2022. Three parallel theatre lists on each date were supervised by a single consultant floor trainer. All lists followed a standard pre-defined HVLC protocol. Trainees and trainers were invited to participate and encouraged to utilize these lists to sign off relevant work-based assessments. HVLC cases included hernia repairs and simple lesion excisions. Patient, theatre staff, and trainee experiences were collated via questionnaires. Results A total of one consultant supervisor, six trainers, and eight trainees participated in the pilot with a total of 34 elective procedures performed on 29 patients. The mean patient age was 52.4 years with 8 out of 29 patients being female. Of these patients 41.4% were American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Classification one, 51.72% were ASA two and 6.9% were ASA three. No patients to date were readmitted to the hospital post-operatively or presented with post-operative complications. One hundred percent of trainees felt satisfied with the training and would recommend it to a colleague. Conclusion The training deficit that developed during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave has been compounded by the second and third waves, and trainees are concerned that further waves are anticipated. Returning to operating is vital and our approach has been shown to improve training, whilst maintaining patient safety and accelerating elective waiting list recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Zhao
- General Surgery, Kingston Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, GBR
| | - Alex Rothnie
- General Surgery, University Hospital Lewisham, London, GBR
| | - Akriti Nanda
- General Surgery, Croydon University Hospital, London, GBR
| | - Tarak Chouari
- General Surgery, Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR
| | - Sarah Ashraf
- General Surgery, Croydon University Hospital, London, GBR
| | - Stella Vig
- General Surgery, Croydon University Hospital, London, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pollok JM, Tinguely P, Berenguer M, Niemann CU, Raptis DA, Spiro M, Dominguez B, Muller E, Rando K, Enoch MA, Tamir N, Healy P, Manser T, Briggs T, Chaudhary A, Humar A, Jafarian A, Soin AS, Eghtesad B, Miller C, Cherqui D, Samuel D, Broering D, Pomfret E, Villamil F, Durand F, Berlakovich G, McCaughan G, Auzinger G, Testa G, Klintmalm G, Belghiti J, Findlay J, Lai J, Fung J, Klinck J, Roberts J, Liu L, Cattral M, Ghobrial M, Selzner M, Ramsay M, Rela M, Ascher N, Man NK, Selzner N, Burra P, Friend P, Busuttil R, Hwang S, McCluskey S, Mas V, Vohra V, Vij V, Merritt W, Tokat Y, Kang Y, Chan A, Mazzola A, Hessheimer A, Rammohan A, Hogan B, Vinaixa C, Nasralla D, Victor D, De Martin E, Alconchel F, Roll G, Kabacam G, Sapisochin G, Campos-Varela I, Liu J, Patel MS, Izzy M, Kalisvaart M, Adams M, Goldaracena N, Tinguely P, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Chadha R, Shaker TM, Klair TS, Pan T, Tanaka T, Yoon U, Kirchner V, Hannon V, Cheah YL, Frola C, Morkane C, Milliken D, Lurje G, Potts J, Fernandez T, Badenoch A, Mukhtar A, Zanetto A, Montano-Loza A, Chieh AKW, Shetty A, DeWolf A, Olmos A, Mrzljak A, Blasi A, Berzigotti A, Malik A, Rajakumar A, Davidson B, O'Farrell B, Kotton C, Imber C, Kwon CHD, Wray C, Ahn CS, Morkane C, Krenn C, Quintini C, Maluf D, Mina DS, Sellers D, Balci D, Patel D, Rudow DL, Monbaliu D, Bezinover D, Krzanicki D, Milliken D, Kim DS, Brombosz E, Blumberg E, Weiss E, Wey E, Kaldas F, Saliba F, Pittau G, Wagener G, Song GW, Biancofiore G, Testa G, Crespo G, Rodríguez G, Palli GM, McKenna G, Petrowsky H, Egawa H, Montasser I, Pirenne J, Eason J, Guarrera J, Pomposelli J, Lerut J, Emond J, Boehly J, Towey J, Hillingsø JG, de Jonge J, Potts J, Caicedo J, Heimbach J, Emamaullee JA, Bartoszko J, Ma KW, Kronish K, Forkin KT, Chok KSH, Olthoff K, Reyntjens K, Lee KW, Suh KS, Denehy L, van der Laan LJ, McCormack L, Gorvin L, Ruffolo L, Bhat M, Ramírez MAM, Londoño MC, Gitman M, Levstik M, Selzner M, de Santibañes M, Lindsay M, Parotto M, Armstrong M, Kasahara M, Schofield N, Rizkalla N, Akamatsu N, Scatton O, Keskin O, Imventarza O, Andacoglu O, Muiesan P, Giorgio P, Northup P, Matins P, Abt P, Newsome PN, Dutkowski P, Bhangui P, Bhangui P, Tandon P, Brustia R, Planinsic R, Brown R, Porte R, Barth R, Ciria R, Florman S, Dharancy S, Pai SL, Yagi S, Nadalin S, Chinnakotla S, Forbes SJ, Rahman S, Hong SK, Liying S, Orloff S, Rubman S, Eguchi S, Ikegami T, Reichman T, Settmacher U, Aluvihare V, Xia V, Yoon YI, Soejima Y, Genyk Y, Jalal A, Borakati A, Gustar A, Mohamed A, Ramirez A, Rothnie A, Scott A, Sharma A, Munro A, Mahay A, Liew B, Hidalgo C, Crouch C, Yan CT, Tschuor C, Shaw C, Schizas D, Fritche D, Huda FF, Wells G, Farrer G, Kwok HT, Kostakis I, Mestre-Costa J, Fan KH, Fan KS, Fraser K, Jeilani L, Pang L, Lenti L, Kathirvel M, Zachiotis M, Vailas M, Milan MM, Elnagar M, Alradhawi M, Dimitrokallis N, Machairas N, Morare N, Yeung O, Khanal P, Satish P, Ghani SA, Makhdoom S, Arulrajan S, Bogan S, Pericleous S, Blakemore T, Otti V, Lam W, Jackson W, Abdi Z. Enhanced recovery for liver transplantation: recommendations from the 2022 International Liver Transplantation Society consensus conference. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 8:81-94. [PMID: 36495912 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00268-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
There is much controversy regarding enhanced recovery for recipients of liver transplants from deceased and living donors. The objectives of this Review were to summarise current knowledge on individual enhanced recovery elements on short-term outcomes, identify key components for comprehensive pathways, and create internationally accepted guidelines on enhanced recovery for liver-transplant recipients. The ERAS4OLT.org collaborative partnered by the International Liver Transplantation Society performed systematic literature reviews on the effect of 32 relevant enhanced perioperative recovery elements on short-term outcomes, and global specialists prepared expert statements on deceased and living donor liver transplantation. The Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach was used for rating of quality of evidence and grading of recommendations. A virtual international consensus conference was held in January, 2022, in which results were presented, voted on by the audience, and discussed by an independent international jury of eight members, applying the Danish model of consensus. 273 liver transplantation specialists from 30 countries prepared expert statements on elements of enhanced recovery for liver transplantation based on the systematic literature reviews. The consensus conference yielded 80 final recommendations, covering aspects of enhanced recovery for preoperative assessment and optimisation, intraoperative surgical and anaesthetic conduct, and postoperative management for the recipients of liver transplants from both deceased and living donors, and for the living donor. The recommendations represent a comprehensive overview of the relevant elements and areas of enhanced recovery for liver transplantation. These internationally established guidelines could direct the development of enhanced recovery programmes worldwide, allowing adjustments according to local resources and practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joerg M Pollok
- Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Pascale Tinguely
- Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marina Berenguer
- Liver Unit, CIBERehd, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe-Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Claus U Niemann
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Dimitri A Raptis
- Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Spiro
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Royal Free Perioperative Research Group, Royal Free Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Martin C, Walker J, Rothnie A, Callaghan R. The expression of P-glycoprotein does influence the distribution of novel fluorescent compounds in solid tumour models. Br J Cancer 2003; 89:1581-9. [PMID: 14562035 PMCID: PMC2394330 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Solid tumours display a complex drug resistance phenotype that involves inherent and acquired mechanisms. Multicellular resistance is an inherent feature of solid tumours and is known to present significant barriers to drug permeation in tumours. Given this barrier, do acquired resistance mechanisms such as P-glycoprotein (P-gp) contribute significantly to resistance? To address this question, the multicellular tumour spheroid (MCTS) model was used to examine the influence of P-gp on drug distribution in solid tissue. Tumour spheroids (TS) were generated from either drug-sensitive MCF7(WT) cells or a drug-resistant, P-gp-expressing derivative MCF7(Adr). Confocal microscopy was used to measure time courses and distribution patterns of three fluorescent compounds; calcein-AM, rhodamine123 and BODIPY-taxol. These compounds were chosen because they are all substrates for P-gp-mediated transport, exhibit high fluorescence and are chemically dissimilar. For example, BODIPY-taxol and rhodamine 123 showed high accumulation and distributed extensively throughout the TS(WT), whereas calcein-AM accumulation was restricted to the outermost layers. The presence of P-gp in TS(Adr) resulted in negligible accumulation, regardless of the compound. Moreover, the inhibition of P-gp by nicardipine restored intracellular accumulation and distribution patterns to levels observed in TS(WT). The results demonstrate the effectiveness of P-gp in modulating drug distribution in solid tumour models. However, the penetration of agents throughout the tissue is strongly determined by the physico-chemical properties of the individual compounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Martin
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9OU, UK
| | - J Walker
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9OU, UK
| | - A Rothnie
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9OU, UK
| | - R Callaghan
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9OU, UK
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9OU, UK. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|