Opioid Use after Pediatric Urologic Surgery: Is It Really Needed?

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors associated with opioid use after pediatric urologic surgery, use this data to educate our patients and colleagues on decreasing post-operative opioid use, and assess the effectiveness of this approach.

METHODS

From 1/2018 - 12/2019, a written questionnaire asking which pain medications were used after surgery was given to patients' families before routine post-operative appointments. A retrospective review of the surveys and patient charts was performed. Demographic factors were compared between patients who did and did not use opioids with Fisher's exact and t tests. Midway through the study, the results were presented to the urology department in an attempt to reduce opioid use over the next year. The number of opioid prescriptions and patients who used opioids after surgery in 2018 versus 2019 was compared.

RESULTS

1001 patients were included with a mean age of 5 years, 96% male. Patients used a mean of 4.5 doses of opioids and 83% had leftover opioids. Factors significantly associated with not using opioids included age less than 3, penile, and endoscopic surgery. Between 2018 and 2019-despite no significant difference in patient age, gender, or procedure type-the number of patients who were prescribed (61% vs 34%, P < .0001) and who used opioids (55 vs 28%, P < .0001) was significantly decreased.

CONCLUSION

After pediatric urologic surgery, many patients do not need opioid prescriptions. Reviewing our own opioid use practices and providing education within our department allowed us to significantly decrease the number of opioids prescribed and used after surgery.

Multi-Institutional Outcomes of Endoscopic Management of Stricture Recurrence after Bulbar Urethroplasty

PURPOSE

Approximately 10% to 20% of patients will have a recurrence after urethroplasty. Initial management of these recurrences is often by urethral dilation or direct vision internal urethrotomy. In the current study we describe the outcomes of endoscopic management of stricture recurrence after bulbar urethroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed bulbar urethroplasty data from 5 surgeons in the TURNS (Trauma and Urologic Reconstruction Network of Surgeons). Men who underwent urethral dilation or direct vision internal urethrotomy for urethroplasty recurrence were identified. Recurrence was defined as the inability to pass a 17Fr cystoscope through the area of reconstruction. The primary outcome was the success rate of recurrence management. Comparisons were made between urethral dilation and direct vision internal urethrotomy, and then between endoscopic management of recurrences after excision and primary anastomosis urethroplasty vs substitutional repairs using time to event statistics.

RESULTS

In 53 men recurrence was initially managed endoscopically. Median time to urethral stricture recurrence after urethroplasty was 5 months. At a median followup of 5 months the overall success rate was 42%. Success after urethral dilation was significantly less than after direct vision internal urethrotomy (1 of 10 patients or 10% vs 21 of 43 or 49%, p <0.001) with a failure HR of 3.15 (p = 0.03). Direct vision internal urethrotomy was more effective after substitutional failure than after excision and primary anastomosis urethroplasty (53% vs 13%, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Direct vision internal urethrotomy was more successful than urethral dilation in the management of stricture recurrence after bulbar urethroplasty. Direct vision internal urethrotomy was more successful in patients with recurrence after substitution urethroplasty compared to after excision and primary anastomosis urethroplasty. Perhaps this indicates a different mechanism of recurrence for excision and primary anastomosis urethroplasty (ischemic) vs substitution urethroplasty (nonischemic).