BMS-986158, a Small Molecule Inhibitor of the Bromodomain and Extraterminal Domain Proteins, in Patients with Selected Advanced Solid Tumors: Results from a Phase 1/2a Trial

This phase 1/2a, open-label study (NCT02419417) evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of BMS-986158, a selective bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) inhibitor. Dose escalation was performed with 3 BMS-986158 dosing schedules: A (5 days on, 2 days off; range, 0.75–4.5 mg), B (14 days on, 7 days off; 2.0–3.0 mg), and C (7 days on, 14 days off; 2.0–4.5 mg). Eighty-three patients were enrolled and received ≥1 BMS-986158 dose. Diarrhea (43%) and thrombocytopenia (39%) were the most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). A lower incidence of TRAEs was found with schedules A (72%) and C (72%) vs. B (100%). Stable disease was achieved in 12 (26.1%), 3 (37.5%), and 9 (31.0%) patients on schedules A, B, and C, respectively. Two patients on schedule A with a 4.5-mg starting dose (ovarian cancer, n = 1; nuclear protein in testis [NUT] carcinoma, n = 1) experienced a partial response. BMS-986158 demonstrated rapid-to-moderate absorption (median time to maximum observed plasma concentration, 1–4 h). As expected with an epigenetic modifier, expression changes in select BET-regulated genes occurred with BMS-986158 treatment. Schedule A dosing (5 days on, 2 days off) yielded tolerable safety, preliminary antitumor activity, and a dose-proportional PK profile.

Exploratory biomarker analyses of the single-arm, phase 2 study of regorafenib plus nivolumab in patients (pts) with mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR)/microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC)

89

Background: Combination treatment with regorafenib (80–120 mg/day, PO, 3 wks on/1 wk off) plus nivolumab (480 mg IV Q4W) showed manageable safety but modest efficacy in a phase 2 study of 70 pts from North America with pMMR/MSS chemotherapy-resistant metastatic CRC (mCRC). Five pts had a partial response (PR; objective response rate [ORR]: 7%); all did not have liver metastases at baseline (n = 5/23; ORR: 22%). One pt had a confirmed complete response (CR) after the primary completion analysis of the study (ASCO 2021). This retrospective exploratory analysis investigated the potential association between specific biomarkers and anti-tumor activity, and how those biomarkers are modulated by treatment with regorafenib plus nivolumab. Methods: In formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples obtained at baseline and Cycle (C) 2 Day (D) 8, immune-related biomarkers were assessed via immunohistochemistry (IHC), and RNA sequencing was used for gene expression profiling/gene signatures. Pre-/on-treatment blood samples were collected to measure circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and soluble biomarkers. Results: A total of 40 and 27 baseline tumor samples and 14 and 5 paired tumor samples at baseline/C2D8 were available for IHC and RNA sequencing, respectively. Higher baseline protein and mRNA expression of biomarkers for pre-existing immune sensitivity (eg, effector T cells) trended with anti-tumor activity. These biomarkers were expressed at lower levels in pts with liver metastases vs those without liver metastases at baseline. Cytotoxic T cell density was elevated on C2D8 but did not correlate with anti-tumor activity. Increased mean variant allelic frequency in ctDNA at C2D1 predominated in pts with progressive disease (PD), while clearance of ctDNA at C2D1 was only noted for the one pt with a CR. High clonal tumor mutational burden in ctDNA showed a numerical trend with anti-tumor activity (PD vs. SD/PR; P=0.058) and PFS (P = 0.072). Baseline serum levels of select markers related to angiogenesis (eg, vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] D) were associated with inferior anti-tumor activity (P = 0.002). Serum levels of immune-related soluble biomarkers (eg, tumor necrosis factor alpha) increased on treatment (P < 0.005), while levels of soluble VEGF receptor 2 decreased (P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study of pts with MSS mCRC treated with regorafenib plus nivolumab suggests that baseline tumor biomarkers for pre-existing immune sensitivity trended with anti-tumor activity, whereas select baseline peripheral biomarkers related to angiogenesis trended with inferior anti-tumor activity. Pharmacodynamics effects were observed, yet no significant correlation with anti-tumor activity was found. Due to the small sample size and retrospective nature, these analyses are hypothesis-generating. Clinical trial information: NCT04126733.

Nivolumab (NIVO) + 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6)/bevacizumab (BEV) versus mFOLFOX6/BEV for first-line (1L) treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Phase 2 results from CheckMate 9X8

8

Background: Standard 1L therapies for mCRC include a fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan, and a biologic agent. NIVO may enhance antitumor activity in combination with 1L standard therapies within a subset of patients (pts) with mCRC. CheckMate 9X8 evaluated NIVO + mFOLFOX6/BEV vs mFOLFOX6/BEV in 1L mCRC (NCT03414983). Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable, mCRC were randomized 2:1 to NIVO 240 mg + mFOLFOX6/BEV Q2W (NIVO + standard-of-care [SOC]) or mFOLFOX6/BEV Q2W (SOC). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1. Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), time to response (TTR), duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: 195 pts were randomized to NIVO + SOC (n = 127) or SOC (n = 68). Median (range) follow-up was 23.7 (0–33.2) months (mo; NIVO + SOC) vs 23.2 (0–32.3) mo (SOC). Median (range) duration of therapy was 9.9 (0.1–31.8+) mo (NIVO + SOC) and 7.7 (0.1–26.7+) mo (SOC). The HR (95% CI) for PFS was 0.81 (0.53–1.23; P = 0.30), which did not meet the prespecified threshold for statistical significance (median PFS, 11.9 mo in both arms; Table). PFS rates after 12 mo were higher with NIVO + SOC vs SOC (Table). ORR was 60% (NIVO + SOC) and 46% (SOC; odds ratio 1.72 [95% CI 0.96–3.10]) and median (95% CI) DOR was 12.9 (9.0–13.1) mo (NIVO + SOC) and 9.3 (7.5–11.3) mo (SOC; Table). Rates of grade 3−4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were higher with NIVO + SOC; however, no new safety signals were identified (Table). Biomarker analyses, including tumor mutational burden and baseline CD8 levels, will be presented. Conclusions: The primary endpoint of PFS was not met; however, NIVO + SOC showed higher PFS rates after 12 mo, a higher response rate, and more durable responses compared with SOC, along with acceptable safety, in 1L mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03414983. [Table: see text]