Polytetrafluoroethylene relative isolation for adhesive cementation of dental restorations

Tooth isolation is essential to isolate a prepared tooth from saliva, oral humidity, and gingival fluids and facilitate the removal of excess subgingival cement in adhesive cementation procedures. However, the isolation of prepared teeth can be challenging, especially with vertical preparations. A technique for achieving relative isolation by using polytetrafluoroethylene tape is described for adhesive cementation with vertical tooth preparations.

Prospective study of monolithic zirconia crowns: clinical behavior and survival rate at a 5-year follow-up

Purpose To evaluate the clinical behavior and survival of full coverage monolithic zirconia crowns on posterior teeth over a 5-year follow-up.Methods Fifty patients were recruited and underwent restoration with a Lava Plus monolithic zirconia crown (Lava™ Frame Zirconia, 3M Espe, Germany) on premolars or molars. Patients were monitored over a 5-year follow-up (2014-19), recording any biological and/or mechanical complications; these data were used to estimate the crowns' success rate. Periodontal clinical parameters were recorded (pocket probing depth (PPD), plaque index (PLI), bleeding on probing (BOP), and gingival recession (GR)). Wear to the zirconia crowns and antagonist teeth were also evaluated with Geomagic software (3D Systems, U.S.A.). Patients' satisfaction with treatment was evaluated in a questionnaire.Results For the 50 monolithic zirconia crowns analyzed, the survival rate was 98% after 5 years. Only 6% of the crowns presented some type of complication (two debonding and one root fracture). No fracture or fissures were detected. GR and BOP were the only clinical parameters found to be significantly greater around teeth restored with crowns. The monolithic zirconia crowns suffered less wear than the enamel of antagonist teeth. Patient's general satisfaction with treatment was high.Conclusions Monolithic zirconia crowns on posterior teeth are a highly predictable treatment option, with a high survival rate. The single treatment failure was due to a biological complication arising from root fracture. This treatment may be recommended as a treatment that conserves dental structure, and requires minimal dental preparation.

A tooth whitening and chemical abrasive protocol for the treatment of developmental enamel defects

This clinical report describes a chemical abrasive protocol and whitening techniques to quantify modifications to the color and volume produced when eliminating white spots associated with developmental defects in enamel. Chemical (oxidative-erosive) abrasive treatment (whitening + 6.6% hydrochloric acid) resolves white spots up to a depth of 0.2 mm. At greater depths, infiltration with 16% hydrochloric acid followed by composite resin infiltration is recommended.

Fracture resistance and the mode of failure produced in metal-free crowns cemented onto zirconia abutments in dental implants

The purpose of the investigation was to analyze fracture resistance and mode of failure of zirconium oxide (zirconia) abutments placed on dental implants bearing crowns of different esthetic materials: zirconia, lithium disilicate (LDS), and nano-ceramic resin, for replacing single teeth in the anterior sector. Eighty implant-abutment-crown units were divided into four groups: Group T-MC (control): 20 metal-ceramic crowns cemented onto titanium abutments; Group Z-Z: 20 zirconia crowns on zirconia abutments; Group Z-LD: 20 lithium disilicate crowns on zirconia abutments; and Group Z-NCR: 20 nano-ceramic resin crowns on zirconia abutments. Specimens underwent a fatiguing process (dynamic loading and thermocycling), followed by static loading to evaluate mechanical fracture resistance, and the mode of failure produced. Mean fracture resistance values were: Control Group T-MC, 575.85±120.01 N; Group Z-Z 459.64±66.52 N; Group Z-LD, 531.77±34.10 N; and Group Z-NCR, 587.05±59.27 N. In Group T-MC, fracture occurred in the prosthetic fixing screw in 100% of specimens. In Group Z-Z, 80% of fractures occurred in the fixing screw, 15% in the abutment, and 5% in the abutment and crown. In Group Z-LD, 60% of fractures were produced in the fixing screw and 40% in the abutment. In Group Z-NCR, 70% of fractures were produced in the fixing screw and 30% in the abutment. All the abutments and crowns analyzed have the potential to withstand the physiological occlusal forces to which they would be subject in the anterior region. Lithium disilicate and nano-ceramic resin crowns cemented onto zirconia abutments are a good restoration alternative for single implants in the anterior sector.

Comparative In Vitro Study of Implant-Supported Restorations: Implant-Abutment Complex With and Without Prosthetic Finishing Line

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of implant-supported cemented restorations placed on two types of abutment design, with and without a prosthetic finish line, evaluating fracture resistance and the type of fracture produced in the abutment-crown complex.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty zirconia restorations supported by tapered implants were divided into two groups: group I, with 40 zirconia crowns cemented onto individualized zirconia abutments with a chamfered finish line (1 mm deep); and group II, with 40 zirconia crowns cemented onto individualized zirconia abutments without a finish line. All specimens underwent thermocycling and dynamic loading before static load testing to evaluate their fracture resistance.

RESULTS

Fracture resistance values (N) and the type of fracture were analyzed. The mean fracture resistance was 462.1 ± 66.3 N in group I and 343 ± 40 N in group II. In group I, fractures were produced in the prosthetic fixation screw; in group II, all mechanical failures were produced in the transepithelial abutment's cervical area.

CONCLUSION

Group I specimens showed greater fracture resistance than group II. The fracture type in group I occurred in the prosthetic screw. Group II fractures occurred in the zirconium oxide abutment.

Mechanical behavior of provisional implant prosthetic abutments

INTRODUCTION

Implant-supported prostheses have to overcome a major difficulty presented by the morphology and esthetics of peri-implant tissues in the anterior sector. Diverse therapeutic techniques are used for managing the mucosa adjacent to the implant and the most noteworthy is immediate/deferred fixed provisionalization.

OBJECTIVES

In vitro testing of strength and deformation of implant prosthetic abutments made from different materials (Titanium/PEEK/methacrylate).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty Sweden & Martina® implant prosthetic abutments (n=40) were divided into five groups: Group MP: methacrylate provisional abutments with machined titanium base; Group PP: Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) provisional abutments; Group TP: titanium provisional abutments; Group TAD: titanium anti-rotational definitive abutments; Group TRD: titanium rotational definitive abutments. Their mechanical behavior under static loading was analyzed. Samples were examined under a microscope to determine the type of fracture produced.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Definitive anti-rotational titanium abutments and definitive rotational titanium abutments achieved the best mean compression strength, while PEEK resin provisional abutments obtained the lowest. The group that showed the greatest elastic deformation was the group of titanium provisional abutments.