1
|
Milosevich E, Kusec A, Pendlebury ST, Demeyere N. Domain-specific cognitive impairments, mood and quality of life 6 months after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2024:1-10. [PMID: 38623852 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2340121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify which acute and 6-month domain-specific cognitive impairments impact mood, participation, and stroke-related quality of life 6 months post-stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective cohort of 430 stroke survivors completed the Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS) acutely and 6 months post-stroke. Participants completed the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) and Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale (HADS) at 6 months. Multivariable regression analyses assessed whether severity of, and domain-specific, cognitive impairment acutely and at 6 months was associated with composite 6-month SIS scores, each SIS subscale, and HADS scores. RESULTS Increased severity of acute and 6-month cognitive impairment was associated with lower 6-month SIS composite scores independent of age, sex, education years, and stroke severity (both p < 0.001). Domain-specific impairments in memory (p < 0.001) and attention (p = 0.002) acutely, and language (p < 0.001), memory (p = 0.001) and number processing (p = 0.006) at 6 months showed the strongest associations with worse SIS composite scores. Severity of acute and 6-month cognitive impairment was associated with poorer functioning in each SIS subscale, and greater levels of depression (acute p = 0.021, 6-months p < 0.001), but not anxiety (p = 0.174, p = 0.129). CONCLUSIONS Both acute and 6-month domain-specific cognitive impairments, particularly in memory, were found to negatively impact overall functional and mood outcomes 6 months post-stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea Kusec
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah T Pendlebury
- Wolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and Departments of General Medicine and Geratology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Nele Demeyere
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kusec A, Milosevich E, Williams OA, Chiu EG, Watson P, Carrick C, Drozdowska BA, Dillon A, Jennings T, Anderson B, Dawes H, Thomas S, Kuppuswamy A, Pendlebury ST, Quinn TJ, Demeyere N. Long-term psychological outcomes following stroke: the OX-CHRONIC study. BMC Neurol 2023; 23:426. [PMID: 38036966 PMCID: PMC10688008 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03463-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stroke survivors rate longer-term (> 2 years) psychological recovery as their top priority, but data on how frequently psychological consequences occur is lacking. Prevalence of cognitive impairment, depression/anxiety, fatigue, apathy and related psychological outcomes, and whether rates are stable in long-term stroke, is unknown. METHODS N = 105 long-term stroke survivors (M [SD] age = 72.92 [13.01]; M [SD] acute NIH Stroke Severity Score = 7.39 [6.25]; 59.0% Male; M [SD] years post-stroke = 4.57 [2.12]) were recruited (potential N = 208). Participants completed 3 remote assessments, including a comprehensive set of standardized cognitive neuropsychological tests comprising domains of memory, attention, language, and executive function, and questionnaires on emotional distress, fatigue, apathy and other psychological outcomes. Ninety participants were re-assessed one year later. Stability of outcomes was assessed by Cohen's d effect size estimates and percent Minimal Clinically Important Difference changes between time points. RESULTS On the Montreal Cognitive Assessment 65.3% scored < 26. On the Oxford Cognitive Screen 45.9% had at least one cognitive impairment. Attention (27.1%) and executive function (40%) were most frequently impaired. 23.5% and 22.5% had elevated depression/anxiety respectively. Fatigue (51.4%) and apathy (40.5%) rates remained high, comparable to estimates in the first-year post-stroke. Attention (d = -0.12; 85.8% stable) and depression (d = 0.09, 77.1% stable) were the most stable outcomes. Following alpha-adjustments, only perceptuomotor abilities (d = 0.69; 40.4% decline) and fatigue (d = -0.33; 45.3% decline) worsened over one year. Cognitive impairment, depression/anxiety, fatigue and apathy all correlated with worse quality of life. CONCLUSION Nearly half of participants > 2 years post-event exhibited psychological difficulties including domains of cognition, mood, and fatigue, which impact long-term quality of life. Stroke is a chronic condition with highly prevalent psychological needs, which require monitoring and intervention development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Kusec
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Anna Watts Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| | - Elise Milosevich
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Anna Watts Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| | - Owen A Williams
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Anna Watts Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| | - Evangeline G Chiu
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Anna Watts Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| | - Pippa Watson
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Anna Watts Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| | - Chloe Carrick
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Anna Watts Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| | - Bogna A Drozdowska
- School of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Avril Dillon
- Department of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Bloo Anderson
- Patient and Public Involvement Representative, Oxford, UK
| | - Helen Dawes
- NIHR Exeter Biomedical Research Centre, University of Exeter, Medical School Building, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, UK
| | - Shirley Thomas
- School of Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Annapoorna Kuppuswamy
- Institute of Neurology Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, 33 Queen Square, London, UK
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah T Pendlebury
- Wolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Terence J Quinn
- School of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nele Demeyere
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Anna Watts Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK.
- Wolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kusec A, Murphy FC, Peers PV, Bennett R, Carmona E, Korbacz A, Lawrence C, Cameron E, Bateman A, Watson P, Allanson J, duToit P, Manly T. Mood, Activity Participation, and Leisure Engagement Satisfaction (MAPLES): results from a randomised controlled pilot feasibility trial for low mood in acquired brain injury. BMC Med 2023; 21:445. [PMID: 37974189 PMCID: PMC10655452 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03128-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acquired brain injury (ABI) is linked to increased depression risk. Existing therapies for depression in ABI (e.g., cognitive behavioural therapy) have mixed efficacy. Behavioural activation (BA), an intervention that encourages engaging in positively reinforcing activities, shows promise. The primary aims were to assess feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of two 8-week BA groups. METHODS Adults (≥ 18 years) recruited from local ABI services, charities, and self-referral via social media were randomised to condition. The Activity Planning group (AP; "traditional" BA) trained participants to plan reinforcing activities over 8 weeks. The Activity Engagement group (AE; "experiential" BA) encouraged engagement in positive activities within session only. Both BA groups were compared to an 8-week Waitlist group (WL). The primary outcomes, feasibility and acceptability, were assessed via recruitment, retention, attendance, and qualitative feedback on groups. The secondary outcome, potential efficacy, was assessed via blinded assessments of self-reported activity levels, depression, and anxiety (at pre- and post-intervention and 1 month follow-up) and were compared across trial arms. Data were collected in-person and remotely due to COVID-19. RESULTS N = 60 participants were randomised to AP (randomised n = 22; total n = 29), AE (randomised n = 22; total n = 28), or re-randomised following WL (total n = 16). Whether in-person or remote, AP and AE were rated as similarly enjoyable and helpful. In exploring efficacy, 58.33% of AP members had clinically meaningful activity level improvements, relative to 50% AE and 38.5% WL. Both AP and AE groups had depression reductions relative to WL, but only AP participants demonstrated anxiety reductions relative to AE and WL. AP participants noted benefits of learning strategies to increase activities and learning from other group members. AE participants valued social discussion and choice in selecting in-session activities. CONCLUSIONS Both in-person and remote group BA were feasible and acceptable in ABI. Though both traditional and experiential BA may be effective, these may have different mechanisms. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03874650. Protocol version 2.3, May 26 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Kusec
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Fionnuala C Murphy
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Polly V Peers
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ron Bennett
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Patient and Public Involvement Representative, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Estela Carmona
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Aleksandra Korbacz
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Cara Lawrence
- School of Allied Health, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Emma Cameron
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Bateman
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
| | - Peter Watson
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Judith Allanson
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Pieter duToit
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
- The Disabilities Trust, Fen House, Ely, UK
| | - Tom Manly
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kusec A, Methley A, Murphy FC, Peers PV, Carmona E, Manly T. Developing behavioural activation for people with acquired brain injury: a qualitative interpretive description study of barriers and facilitators to activity engagement. BMC Psychol 2023; 11:207. [PMID: 37443147 PMCID: PMC10339630 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-023-01230-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acquired brain injuries (ABI) from stroke, head injury, or resected brain tumours are associated with poor emotional wellbeing and heightened risk of mood disorder. Common sequalae of ABI, such as poor attention and memory, can create barriers to the efficacy of cognitively demanding mood interventions, such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT). Behavioural Activation (BA), where individuals plan and engage in reinforcing activities, is a promising alternative due to lower cognitive demands. However, BA was initially developed in clinical populations without ABI where the primary barriers to activity engagement were low mood and anxious avoidance. Additionally, BA can incorporate a range of techniques (e.g., mood monitoring, activity scheduling, targeting avoidance, contingency management) and psychoeducational topics (e.g., mindfulness, managing uncertainty; social/communication skills). Exploring barriers and facilitators to adopting specific BA components in ABI is an important aim. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively selected ABI survivors (N = 16) with both low and high depressive symptoms, and family members (N = 7). Questions focused on routine and enjoyable activities, and feedback on 10 different BA techniques and associated psychoeducational topics. Transcripts were analysed using an interpretive description framework. Analysis was informed by field notes, reflexivity diaries, and peer debriefing. RESULTS The final constructed framework, Creating Sustainable Engagement, comprises a two-tier hierarchy. Higher-level themes concerned core perspectives of BA, regardless of BA component discussed. This included identifying optimal time windows for different BA components (Right Tool at the Right Time), that BA components should, at least initially, not be burdensome or fatiguing (Perceived Effort), that emotional readiness to confront activity-mood relationships should be addressed (Emotional Impact), and that planned BA activities be consistent with individual values (Relation to Values). Lower-level themes concerned specific BA components: Of these, activity scheduling, procedures targeting avoidance, managing uncertainty and social/communication skills were generally well-received, while mood monitoring, contingency management, and mindfulness had mixed feedback. CONCLUSIONS BA is a widely scalable intervention that can be adapted for ABI. This study provides a novel framework on implementing a range of BA components in ABI and adds to the limited evidence on which components may be particularly suitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Kusec
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Anna Watts Building, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Abigail Methley
- Innovative Clinical Psychology Solutions Ltd, London, W1W 5PF, UK
| | - Fionnuala C Murphy
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
| | - Polly V Peers
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
| | - Estela Carmona
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
| | - Tom Manly
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kusec A, Murphy FC, Peers PV, Manly T. Measuring Intolerance of Uncertainty After Acquired Brain Injury: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-12. Assessment 2023:10731911231182693. [PMID: 37357954 DOI: 10.1177/10731911231182693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) is a risk factor for poor mental health. Acquired brain injury (ABI; for example, stroke, traumatic brain injury) often brings considerable uncertainty and increased mood disorder vulnerability. The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-Short Form (IUS-12) is a brief, well-validated IU measure in non-ABI samples, comprising two subscales, namely, Prospective Anxiety and Inhibitory Anxiety. Here, for the first time, we investigated its reliability and validity (N = 118), and factor structure (N = 176), in ABI. Both subscales had high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] of .75 and .86) and were significantly associated with mood disorder symptoms. The two-factor model was superior to a one-factor IU model fit. Some fit statistics were less than optimal (standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = 0.06, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.09); hence, exploration of other factor structures in other ABI samples may be warranted. Nonetheless, the IUS-12 appears suitable in ABI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Kusec
- University of Cambridge, UK
- University of Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kusec A, Murphy FC, Peers PV, Lawrence C, Cameron E, Morton C, Bateman A, Watson P, Manly T. Mood, Activity Participation, and Leisure Engagement Satisfaction (MAPLES): a randomised controlled pilot feasibility trial for low mood in acquired brain injury. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2020; 6:135. [PMID: 32974044 PMCID: PMC7507282 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00660-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Acquired brain injury (ABI) affects approximately 79.3 million individuals annually and is linked with elevated rates of depression and low mood. Existing methods for treating depression in ABI have shown mixed efficacy. Behavioural activation (BA) is a potentially promising intervention. Its premise is that individuals with low mood avoid planning and engaging in activities due to low expectations of a positive outcome. Consequently, their exposure to positive reinforcement is reduced, exacerbating low mood. BA aims to break this cycle by encouraging activity planning and engagement. It is unknown whether cognitive demands of traditional BA may undermine efficacy in ABI. Here, we assess the feasibility and acceptability of two groups designed to increase activity engagement. In the activity planning group (traditional BA), the importance of meaningful and positive activity will be discussed and participants encouraged to plan/engage in activities in everyday life. The activity engagement group (experiential BA) instead focuses on engagement in positive experiences (crafts, games, discussion) within the group. The primary aims are to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the two groups in ABI. A secondary aim is to explore relative efficacy of the groups compared to an equivalent period of waitlist controls. Method This study outlines a parallel-arm pilot feasibility trial for individuals with low mood and ABI that compares a traditional vs experiential BA group vs waitlist controls. Adults (≥ 18 years) will be recruited from local ABI services and randomised to condition. Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed via recruitment, retention, attendance and participant feedback. Groups will be compared (pre- and post-intervention and 1 month follow-up) by assessing self-reported activity engagement. Secondary outcomes include self-report measures of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic distress related to the ABI, motivation, participation and sense of control over one’s life. Ethics and dissemination The trial has been approved by the Health Research Authority of the NHS in the UK (East of England—Cambridge Central, REF 18/EE/0305). Results will inform future research on interventions for mood in ABI and be disseminated broadly via peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and social media. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03874650 pre-results. Protocol version 2.1, March 5, 2019
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Kusec
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF UK
| | - Fionnuala C Murphy
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF UK
| | - Polly V Peers
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF UK
| | - Cara Lawrence
- Evelyn Community Head Injury Services, Cambridgeshire Community Services, Dynamic Health Building, Brookfields Hospital, 351 Mill Road, Cambridge, CB1 3DF UK
| | - Emma Cameron
- The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, Post Box 113, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG UK
| | - Claire Morton
- Evelyn Community Head Injury Services, Cambridgeshire Community Services, Dynamic Health Building, Brookfields Hospital, 351 Mill Road, Cambridge, CB1 3DF UK
| | - Andrew Bateman
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ UK
| | - Peter Watson
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF UK
| | - Tom Manly
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kusec A, Panday J, Froese A, Albright H, Harris JE. Getting motivated: long-term perspectives on engaging in community-based programs after acquired brain injury. Brain Inj 2020; 34:1331-1338. [PMID: 32780592 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1802657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low motivation is a common problem after acquired brain injury (ABI) and can persist for years after injury. Little is known, however, about perspectives of motivation with respect to engaging in the community, many years after ABI. PURPOSE To explore the client with ABI perspective of motivation and engagement in individuals based in community ABI programs. METHOD Interpretive description methods were utilized. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 individuals with an ABI. FINDINGS Participants felt that both internal factors, such as feelings of hope, and external factors, such as social support, influence levels of motivation to engage. When positive internal and external motivators were enhanced, and negative internal and external motivators reduced, this gave rise to a sense of choice and control, which led to increased engagement. IMPLICATIONS Fostering positive aspects of rehabilitation and increasing choice and control may promote engagement. External motivators, such as reducing repetitiveness and promoting peer support, are motivators that community and clinical settings can implement relatively easily, whilst internal motivators such as attitudes toward therapy may need to be addressed continuously to enhance motivation and engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Kusec
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge , Cambridge, UK
| | - Janelle Panday
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Institute for Applied Health Sciences Room 403 , Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amanda Froese
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Institute for Applied Health Sciences Room 403 , Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hailey Albright
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Institute for Applied Health Sciences Room 403 , Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jocelyn E Harris
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Institute for Applied Health Sciences Room 403 , Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Malivoire BL, Marcos M, Pawluk EJ, Tallon K, Kusec A, Koerner N. Look before you leap: the role of negative urgency in appraisals of ambiguous and unambiguous scenarios in individuals high in generalized anxiety disorder symptoms. Cogn Behav Ther 2018; 48:217-240. [PMID: 30230425 DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2018.1508247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Negative interpretation bias, the propensity to make threatening interpretations of ambiguous information, is associated with symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Apart from its relationship with intolerance of uncertainty (IU), little is known about what explains the presence of this cognitive bias in GAD. One factor may be negative urgency (NU), the tendency to take rash action when distressed, which is related to GAD symptoms and to cognitive biases in nonclinical populations. The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between NU and interpretation bias in individuals high in GAD symptoms (N = 111). IU, trait anxiety, and other forms of impulsivity were examined concurrently as competing correlates of interpretation bias. Greater NU and IU were found to be unique correlates of greater threatening interpretations of ambiguous scenarios. Greater NU was also a unique correlate of greater threatening interpretations of negative and positive scenarios. No other forms of impulsivity were uniquely related to interpretation bias. The findings suggest that greater NU may have a role in the tendency for individuals high in GAD symptoms to make threatening interpretations in response to ambiguous scenarios, overtly threatening situations, and situations without indication of threat or danger. Theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle Marcos
- a Department of Psychology , Ryerson University , Toronto , Canada
| | | | - Kathleen Tallon
- a Department of Psychology , Ryerson University , Toronto , Canada
| | - Andrea Kusec
- a Department of Psychology , Ryerson University , Toronto , Canada
| | - Naomi Koerner
- a Department of Psychology , Ryerson University , Toronto , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Background: In acquired brain injury (ABI) populations, low motivation to engage in rehabilitation is associated with poor rehabilitation outcomes. Motivation in ABI is thought to be influenced by internal and external factors. This is consistent with Self-determination Theory, which posits that motivation is intrinsic and extrinsic. This paper discusses the benefit of using Self-determination Theory to guide measurement of motivation in ABI. Methods: Using a narrative review of the Self-determination Theory literature and clinical rehabilitation research, this paper discusses the unique role intrinsic and extrinsic motivation has in healthcare settings and the importance of understanding both when providing rehabilitation in ABI. Results: Based on the extant literature, it is possible that two independently developed measures of motivation for ABI populations, the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Motivation Questionnaire-Self and the Motivation for Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Questionnaire, may assess intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, respectively. Conclusion: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in ABI may be two equally important but independent factors that could provide a comprehensive understanding of motivation in individuals with ABI. This increased understanding could help facilitate behavioural approaches in rehabilitation. Implications for Rehabilitation Conceptualization of motivation in ABI would benefit from drawing upon Self-determination Theory. External factors of motivation such as the therapeutic environment or social support should be carefully considered in rehabilitation in order to increase engagement. Assessing motivation as a dual rather than a global construct may provide more precise information about the extent to which a patient is motivated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Kusec
- a School of Rehabilitation Science, Institute for Applied Health Sciences , McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada
| | - Diana Velikonja
- b Hamilton Health Sciences , Acquired Brain Injury Program , Hamilton , Canada.,c Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, DeGroote School of Medicine , McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada
| | - Carol DeMatteo
- a School of Rehabilitation Science, Institute for Applied Health Sciences , McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada
| | - Jocelyn E Harris
- a School of Rehabilitation Science, Institute for Applied Health Sciences , McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kusec A, DeMatteo C, Velikonja D, Harris JE. Psychometric properties of measures of motivation and engagement after acquired brain injury. Rehabil Psychol 2018; 63:92-103. [DOI: 10.1037/rep0000186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
11
|
Safar K, Kusec A, Moulson MC. Face Experience and the Attentional Bias for Fearful Expressions in 6- and 9-Month-Old Infants. Front Psychol 2017; 8:1575. [PMID: 28979221 PMCID: PMC5611515 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 08/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Infants demonstrate an attentional bias toward fearful facial expressions that emerges in the first year of life. The current study investigated whether this attentional bias is influenced by experience with particular face types. Six-month-old (n = 33) and 9-month-old (n = 31) Caucasian infants' spontaneous preference for fearful facial expressions when expressed by own-race (Caucasian) or other-race (East Asian) faces was examined. Six-month-old infants showed a preference for fearful expressions when expressed by own-race faces, but not when expressed by other-race faces. Nine-month-old infants showed a preference for fearful expressions when expressed by both own-race faces and other-race faces. These results suggest that how infants deploy their attention to different emotional expressions is shaped by experience: Attentional biases might initially be restricted to faces with which infants have the most experience, and later be extended to faces with which they have less experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Safar
- Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital for Sick ChildrenToronto, ON, Canada.,Neurosciences and Mental Health Program, Research Institute, Hospital for Sick ChildrenToronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Kusec
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of CambridgeCambridge, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Koerner N, Mejia T, Kusec A. What's in a name? Intolerance of uncertainty, other uncertainty-relevant constructs, and their differential relations to worry and generalized anxiety disorder. Cogn Behav Ther 2016; 46:141-161. [PMID: 27684470 DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2016.1211172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
A number of studies have examined the association of intolerance of uncertainty (IU) to trait worry and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). However, few studies have examined the extent of overlap between IU and other psychological constructs that bear conceptual resemblance to IU, despite the fact that IU-type constructs have been discussed and examined extensively within psychology and other disciplines. The present study investigated (1) the associations of IU, trait worry, and GAD status to a negative risk orientation, trait curiosity, indecisiveness, perceived constraints, self-oriented and socially prescribed perfectionism, intolerance of ambiguity, the need for predictability, and the need for order and structure and (2) whether IU is a unique correlate of trait worry and of the presence versus absence of Probable GAD, when overlap with other uncertainty-relevant constructs is accounted for. N = 255 adults completed self-report measures of the aforementioned constructs. Each of the constructs was significantly associated with IU. Only IU, and a subset of the other uncertainty-relevant constructs were correlated with trait worry or distinguished the Probable GAD group from the Non-GAD group. IU was the strongest unique correlate of trait worry and of the presence versus absence of Probable GAD. Indecisiveness, self-oriented perfectionism and the need for predictability were also unique correlates of trait worry or GAD status. Implications of the findings are discussed, in particular as they pertain to the definition, conceptualization, and cognitive-behavioral treatment of IU in GAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Koerner
- a Department of Psychology , Ryerson University , Toronto , M5B 2K3 , Canada
| | - Teresa Mejia
- a Department of Psychology , Ryerson University , Toronto , M5B 2K3 , Canada
| | - Andrea Kusec
- a Department of Psychology , Ryerson University , Toronto , M5B 2K3 , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kusec A, Tallon K, Koerner N. Intolerance of uncertainty, causal uncertainty, causal importance, self-concept clarity and their relations to generalized anxiety disorder. Cogn Behav Ther 2016; 45:307-23. [DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2016.1171391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
14
|
|
15
|
Sugden N, Wei L, Kusec A, Moulson M. Face, the final frontier: An ERP study probing processing of human and alien faces in Trekkies and non-Trekkies. J Vis 2014. [DOI: 10.1167/14.10.1259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|