Case Report-Traumatic L5-S1 Instability: Are Upright Radiographs Potentially Dangerous?

BACKGROUND

Traumatic lumbosacral instability is a rare but potentially devastating injury. These injuries are frequently associated with neurologic injury and often result in long-term disability. Despite their severity, radiographic findings can be subtle, and multiple reports exist in which these injuries were not recognized on initial imaging. Transverse process fractures, high-energy mechanisms, and other injury features have been suggested as indications for advanced imaging, which has a high degree of sensitivity in detecting unstable injuries.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 21-year-old man presented to our level I trauma center after being ejected in a rollover motor vehicle collision. He sustained multiple injuries, including multiple lumbar transverse process fractures and a unilateral superior articular facet fracture of S1.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

Initial supine computed tomography (CT) images showed no displacement of the fracture and no listhesis or instability. Subsequent upright imaging in a brace, however, demonstrated significant displacement of the fracture with dislocation of the contralateral L5-S1 facet joint and significant anterolisthesis. The patient underwent open posterior reduction and stabilization of L4-S1 followed by L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion. The patient demonstrated excellent alignment on postoperative imaging. At 3 months postoperatively, he had returned to work, was ambulating without assistance, and reported minimal back discomfort and no lower extremity pain, numbness, or weakness.

CONCLUSION

This case serves as a warning that supine CT imaging alone may not be sufficient to rule out unstable lumbar spine injuries, such as traumatic L5-S1 instability, and that upright radiographs in these potentially unstable injuries may represent a hazard to patients. Fractures involving the pedicle, pars, or facet joints as well as multiple transverse process fractures and/or a high-energy mechanism of injury should all raise suspicion of instability and warrant additional imaging.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This article provides guidance on approaching treatment for patients with potential traumatic lumbosacral instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Pediatric Elbow Fractures: Marked Change in Management and Resource Utilization, Without a Change in Incidence

BACKGROUND

Elbow fractures are the most common pediatric fractures requiring operative treatment. Although recent reports have suggested that the COVID-19 pandemic has markedly reduced the incidence of pediatric fractures, no study has specifically evaluated the impact on pediatric elbow fractures. This study aimed to evaluate changes in the incidence, severity, and resource utilization for managing pediatric elbow fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with prepandemic years.

METHODS

A prepandemic (2007 to 2017) cohort and a COVID-19 pandemic period (March 2020 to March 2021) cohort of pediatric elbow injuries from a single tertiary hospital were retrospectively examined and compared. Exclusion criteria included outside treatment or lack of diagnosis by an orthopedist. Presentation information, injury patterns, transport, and treatment requirements were collected.

RESULTS

Although the incidence of pediatric elbow fractures and rate of neurovascular injury were comparable, seasonal patterns were not sustained and the rate of fracture displacement was found to be significantly elevated in the COVID-19 period compared with nonpandemic years. Likewise, marked changes to where patients first presented (emergency department vs. Clinic), how the patients were transported, and the distance traveled for care were observed. Specifically, patients were more likely to present to the clinic, were more likely to self-transport instead of using emergency medical service transportation, and traveled a greater distance for care, on average. Aligning with these changes, the resources utilized for the treatment of pediatric elbow fracture markedly changed during the COVID-19 period. This study found that there was an increase in the overall number of surgeries performed, the total operative time required to treat elbow fractures, and the number of patients requiring admission during the COVID-19 period.

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide a contrasting viewpoint to prior reports, illustrating that the incidence of elbow fractures remained consistent during the COVID-19 period, whereas the operative volume and need for hospital admission increased compared with years prior. Furthermore, this study demonstrated how the COVID-19 pandemic altered the interface between pediatric patients with elbow fractures and our institution regarding the location of presentation and transportation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective cohort study.

Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis: A Review of the Noninfectious Inflammatory Bone Disease and Lessons for More Timely Diagnosis

Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) is an idiopathic autoinflammatory disease of the bone that typically occurs in children and adolescents. CRMO is characterized by recurrent periods of exacerbation and remission of symptomatic, osteolytic/sclerotic sterile bone lesions and is often a diagnosis of exclusion. Treatment consists of multimodal anti-inflammatory medication management by rheumatology and rarely involves surgery. This review summarizes the clinical presentation, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of this disease and highlights the role of the orthopedic surgeon. With increased familiarity with CRMO, clinicians will be able to diagnose and treat the condition in a more timely manner. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].

Nonaccidental Trauma in Pediatric Elbow Fractures: When You Should Be Worried

BACKGROUND

Nonaccidental trauma (NAT) is a rising source of morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population. Fractures are often the first cause for presentation to health care providers in the case of NAT but can be misidentified as accidental. Given that elbow fractures are the most common accidental injuries among pediatric patients, they are not traditionally associated with NAT. This study aims to determine the prevalence of NAT among elbow fractures and identify common features in nonaccidental elbow fractures.

METHODS

Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to retrospectively identify all pediatric (0 to 17) elbow fractures at a single, tertiary children's hospital between 2007 and 2017. Among these, all fractures for which an institutional child abuse evaluation team was consulted were identified. The medical record was then used to determine which of these fractures were due to NAT. Standard injury radiographs of all victims of NAT as well as all patients under 1 year of age were blinded and radiographically evaluated for fracture type by a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon.

RESULTS

The prevalence of nonaccidental elbow fractures across the 10-year study period was 0.4% (N=18). However, the prevalence of nonaccidental elbow fractures in those patients below 1 year of age was markedly higher at 30.3% (10/33). Among all elbow fractures in patients below 1 year of age, supracondylar humerus fractures were the most common fracture type (19/33, 57.6%), yet transphyseal fractures (6/33, 18.1%) were most commonly the result of NAT (5/6, 83.3%). In children over 1 year of age, fracture type was not an indicator of NAT.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of pediatric elbow fractures (99.6%) are accidental. However, certain factors, namely age below 1 year and transphyseal fractures increase the likelihood that these fractures may be a result of NAT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV: retrospective case series.

Location of Initial Closed Reduction Attempt Significantly Increases Cost and Length of Stay in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Prosthetic hip dislocation remains one of the most frequent complications following total hip replacement. Dislocations are predominantly managed by a closed reduction in the emergency department (ED) or the operating room (OR). This study aimed to evaluate how the location of an initial closed reduction attempt impacts a patient's course of care including length of stay (LOS) and cost of care.

Material and methods

A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients presenting to a single ED with a unilateral prosthetic hip dislocation from 2009 to 2019. A total of 108 patients were identified. Data collected included patient demographics, ED/hospital course, and hospital charges.

Results

Seventy-four patients (69%) had initial reduction attempted in the ED (65/74, 88% were successful), while 34 patients (31%) went directly to OR (100% successful with closed reduction). Failed closed reduction in ED or direct to OR resulted in a greater LOS and rate of placement to a skilled nursing facility following discharge. Median hospital charges for successful ED reduction were $6,837, while failed ED closed reduction or direct to OR resulted in median charges of $27,317 and $20,481, respectively.

Conclusion

Many patients successfully underwent closed reduction in the ED, and there was no difference in complications, independent of where the reduction was first performed. Patients undergoing reduction in the OR had greater LOS and cost of care, independent of whether a reduction attempt was performed and failed in the ED, than those successfully reduced in the ED.

Bruise Location in Supracondylar Humerus Fractures Predicts Specific Neurovascular Injuries

PURPOSE

The presence of soft tissue injury in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHFs) has been shown to be an independent predictor of any neurovascular injury. Potentially expanding this concept, the specific neurovascular structure injured around the elbow is thought to be dependent upon the direction and magnitude of fracture displacement and subsequent soft tissue injury. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the bruise location following SCHF is indicative of the anatomic location of maximal soft tissue injury and therefore is a specific prognosticator of which neurovascular structure may be injured.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all SCHFs treated at a tertiary pediatric hospital from 2007 to 2017 collected information on bruise location, neurovascular injury patterns, and outcomes. Bruise location was classified as anterior, anterolateral, anteromedial, or posterior. Injury radiographs were reviewed by a blinded pediatric orthopaedic surgeon to neurovascular structure injured.

RESULTS

Of 2845 SCHFs identified, 267 (9.4%) had concomitant neurovascular injury-of which 128 (47.9%) met inclusion criteria. Among the vascular injuries, all bruising was anteromedial (28/45, 62.2%, P<0.05) or anterior (17/45, 37.8%, P>0.05). Fractures with anteromedial bruising correlated with median nerve injury (24/27, 88.9%, P<0.05), whereas fractures with anterolateral bruising correlated with radial nerve injuries (24/25, 96.0%, P<0.05). Bruising or radiographic evaluation correctly identified 60.2% and 64.1% of neurovascular injuries, respectively, whereas the combination identified 82.0% of neurovascular injuries correctly. Bruise location identified 23 neurovascular injuries not predicted by radiographic evaluation alone.

CONCLUSION

Bruise location is an important physical examination finding that can be used as an adjunct to improve the diagnostic accuracy of neurovascular injury in SCHFs in conjunction with neurovascular physical examination and radiographic evaluation. SCHFs with anterior or anteromedial bruising should raise concern for vascular injury. In addition, anteromedial bruising is predictive of a median nerve injury and anterolateral bruising is predictive of radial nerve injury. This adjunct diagnostic is particularly helpful in a noncooperative child or if performed by a clinician with limited experience in diagnosing neurovascular injuries or interpreting pediatric elbow radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

A Mini-Open Approach to Medial Pinning in Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures May Be Safer Than Previously Thought

BACKGROUND

Displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures (SCHFs) are stabilized after reduction by smooth pins. Although some SCHFs are biomechanically stable after lateral-only entry pinning (lateral pinning), an additional medial entry pin (cross-pinning) confers superior stabilization in some SCHFs. There is a recognized risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury with medial entry pinning. The best existing evidence has estimated an iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury rate of approximately 3.4% in cross-pinning. In similar studies, the rate of iatrogenic nerve injury (all nerves) in lateral pinning is estimated at 1.9%. This study aimed to use a large, single-center, single-technique (mini-open) retrospective case series to determine the rate of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury in cross-pinning.

METHODS

Patients undergoing percutaneous cross-pinning via the mini-open technique for SCHFs from 2007 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Injury characteristics, operative variables, fixation technique, and complications, such as iatrogenic nerve injury, were recorded. Patients who underwent operative treatment at another hospital, had no postoperative follow-up, or died due to polytrauma were excluded.

RESULTS

In this study, 698 patients undergoing cross-pinning during the study period were identified. Patients treated with cross-pinning had severe fractures, including a total of 198 preoperative neurovascular injuries (28.4%), 32 patients (4.6%) with skin tenting, and 19 patients (2.7%) with open fractures. Iatrogenic nerve injury was reported in 3 cases (0.43%), all of which affected the ulnar nerve. In 2 of 3 cases of iatrogenic nerve injury, the ulnar nerve symptoms resolved at a mean follow-up of 15 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The mini-open approach for medial pin insertion is safer than previous estimates. Here, in the largest single-center study of cross-pinning for SCHFs, the iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury rate of 0.43% was nearly 10 times lower than estimated rates from recent meta-analyses. Considering all nerves, the iatrogenic injury rate for this cross-pinning cohort was also lower than the estimated iatrogenic nerve injury rate for lateral pinning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Academic Global Surgery Curricula: Current Status and a Call for a More Equitable Approach

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to search the literature for global surgical curricula, assess if published resources align with existing competency frameworks in global health and surgical education, and determine if there is consensus around a fundamental set of competencies for the developing field of academic global surgery.

METHODS

We reviewed SciVerse SCOPUS, PubMed, African Medicus Index, African Journals Online (AJOL), SciELO, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) and Bioline for manuscripts on global surgery curricula and evaluated the results using existing competency frameworks in global health and surgical education from Consortium of the Universities for Global Health (CUGH) and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) professional competencies.

RESULTS

Our search generated 250 publications, of which 18 were eligible: (1) a total of 10 reported existing competency-based curricula that were concurrent with international experiences, (2) two reported existing pre-departure competency-based curricula, (3) six proposed theoretical competency-based curricula for future global surgery education. All, but one, were based in high-income countries (HICs) and focused on the needs of HIC trainees. None met all 17 competencies, none cited the CUGH competency on "Health Equity and Social Justice" and only one mentioned "Social and Environmental Determinants of Health." Only 22% (n = 4) were available as open-access.

CONCLUSION

Currently, there is no universally accepted set of competencies on the fundamentals of academic global surgery. Existing literature are predominantly by and for HIC institutions and trainees. Current frameworks are inadequate for this emerging academic field. The field needs competencies with explicit input from LMIC experts to ensure creation of educational resources that are accessible and relevant to trainees from around the world.

Factors That Drive Annual Variation in Pediatric Elbow Fracture Occurrence, Severity, and Resource Utilization

BACKGROUND

Elbow fractures are the most common pediatric fractures requiring operative treatment. To date, few studies have examined what annual factors drive pediatric elbow fracture incidence and no studies have examined which annual factors drive elbow fracture severity or resource utilization. The goal of this study was to not only document the annual patterns of pediatric elbow fracture incidence and severity but also the impact of these patterns on resource utilization in the emergency department, emergency medical service transportation, and the operating room (OR).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 4414 pediatric elbow fractures from a single tertiary hospital (2007 to 2017). Exclusion criteria included outside treatment or lack of diagnosis by an orthopaedist. Presentation information, injury patterns, transport, and treatment requirements were collected. Pearson correlations were used to analyze factors influencing fracture incidence, severity, and resource utilization.

RESULTS

Pediatric elbow fracture incidence positively correlated with monthly daylight hours, but significantly fewer elbow fractures occurred during summer vacation from school compared with surrounding in school months. While fewer overall fractures occurred during summer break, the fractures sustained were greater in severity, conferring higher rates of displacement, higher risk of neurovascular injury, and greater needs for emergency transportation and operative treatment. Yearly, elbow fractures required 320.6 OR hours (7.7% of all pediatric orthopaedic OR time and 12.3% of all pediatric orthopaedic operative procedures), 203.4 hospital admissions, and a total of 4753.7 miles traveled by emergency medical service transportation to manage. All-cause emergency department visits were negatively correlated with daylight hours, inversing the pattern seen in elbow fractures.

CONCLUSION

Increased daylight, while school was in session, was a major driver of the incidence of pediatric elbow fractures. While summer vacation conferred fewer fractures, these were of higher severity. As such, increased daylight correlated strongly with monthly resource utilization, including the need for emergency transportation and operative treatment. This study provides objective data by which providers and administrators can more accurately allocate resources.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-Retrospective comparative study.

Internal Rotation Stress Test Reduces Cross-Pinning and Improves Outcomes in Displaced Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures

Stabilization of the medial column is vital in preventing the loss of fixation and malunion in displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures (SCHFs). The preferred percutaneous pin configuration for medial column fixation remains controversial between medial pinning (cross-pinning) and additional lateral-based pinning. The intraoperative internal rotation stress test (IRST) has been proposed to reliably determine the optimal fixation strategy for each unique fracture. This study evaluated the impact of implementing the IRST on both the choice of pin configuration and institution-wide complications in pediatric patients treated operatively for SCHFs.

Methods

Pediatric patients undergoing percutaneous pinning for SCHFs between 2007 and 2017 at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. The IRST was made a universal institutional practice in 2013. Patients were divided into 2 groups for analysis: (1) patients who underwent treatment before the IRST was implemented in 2013 (the pre-IRST group), and (2) patients who were treated after the IRST was implemented in 2013 (the IRST group). Subgroup analysis was completed for patients in the IRST group who were treated with cross-pinning or 3 lateral-based pins.

Results

In this study, 820 patients in the pre-IRST group and 636 patients in the IRST group were included. After the IRST implementation, the rate of loss of fixation fell from 1.2% to 0% (p = 0.003), and the reoperation rate fell from 3.3% to 0.2% (p < 0.001). No cases resulted in a loss of fixation after the adoption of the IRST. The number of patients treated with cross-pinning decreased significantly from 53.2% to 31.6% (p < 0.001) after the IRST implementation, yet cross-pinning continued to be used for more severe fractures. Complication rates within the IRST group were not significantly different (p > 0.05) between cross-pinning and 3 lateral-based pins.

Conclusions

In the largest cohort reported on to date, to our knowledge, institutional implementation of the IRST resulted in a significant reduction in the use of cross-pinning. Although the usage of cross-pinning decreased, cross-pinning was still used frequently in the most severe fractures. The IRST use also resulted in significantly fewer complications such as loss of fixation after institution-wide implementation of the IRST for treating pediatric SCHFs.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Multi-Institutional Analysis of Outcomes in Supraglottic Jet Ventilation with a Team-Based Approach

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate the safety and complications of endoscopic airway surgery using supraglottic jet ventilation with a team-based approach.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Subjects at two academic institutions diagnosed with laryngotracheal stenosis who underwent endoscopic airway surgery with jet ventilation between January 2008 and December 2018 were identified. Patient characteristics (age, gender, race, follow-up duration) and comorbidities were extracted from the electronic health record. Records were reviewed for treatment approach, intraoperative data, and complications (intraoperative, acute postoperative, and delayed postoperative).

RESULTS

Eight hundred and ninety-four patient encounters from 371 patients were identified. Intraoperative complications (unplanned tracheotomy, profound or severe hypoxic events, barotrauma, laryngospasm) occurred in fewer than 1% of patient encounters. Acute postoperative complications (postoperative recovery unit [PACU] rapid response, PACU intubation, return to the emergency department [ED] within 24 hours of surgery) were rare, occurring in fewer than 3% of patient encounters. Delayed postoperative complications (return to the ED or admission for respiratory complaints within 30 days of surgery) occurred in fewer than 1% of patient encounters. Diabetes mellitus, active smoking, and history of previous tracheotomy were independently associated with intraoperative, acute, and delayed complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Employing a team-based approach, jet ventilation during endoscopic airway surgery demonstrates a low rate of complications and provides for safe and successful surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4 Laryngoscope, 2021.

Adult Aortotracheal Fistula as Sequela of Double Aortic Arch Repair in Infancy: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Double aortic arch is a rare congenital malformation of the aortic arch that most frequently presents in childhood. Early surgical intervention typically yields excellent outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To describe aortotracheal fistula as a rare, yet serious complication of vascular ring and subsequent aortic aneurysm in an adult patient.

METHODS

Clinical history, as well as radiographic and endoscopic imaging were obtained to describe the development, diagnosis, and clinical course of this patient's aortotracheal fistula. Additionally, follow up data was obtained to document the healing of this fistula after surgical repair.

RESULTS

We describe a case of a 46-year-old male with DiGeorge Syndrome and a double aortic arch, repaired in childhood, which developed into an aortotracheal fistula after tracheostomy placement as an adult.

CONCLUSIONS

This case demonstrates that dangerous complications of a double aortic arch can persist into adulthood, even after surgical repair in infancy. Each patient's unique anatomy must be considered when thinking about airway management and prevention of complications of this rare congenital anomaly.