The Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 scale is superior to the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Score Index in predicting 3-month postdischarge mortality in elderly survivors of acute pulmonary embolism

INTRODUCTION

Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is the most serious manifestation of venous thromboembolism. The simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) is employed for prediction of 30-day mortality in APE. The Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) is used to identify participants at a risk of health impairment.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the VES-13 and sPESI scales for prediction of 3-month mortality inelderly patients hospitalized for APE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients with APE were managed according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines and followed up for at least 3 months after discharge. Clinical evaluation of all patients involved the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and biochemical tests. The patients with VES-13 score equal to or above 3 (VES-13≥3) were evaluated with comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA).

RESULTS

A total of 164 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were significantly fewer men in the VES-13≥3 than the VES-13<3 group (34% vs 54.5%; P <0.01). The patients in the VES-13≥3 group had lower median (interquartile range [IQR]) body mass index and higher sPESI score than those in the VES-13<3 group (25.6 [21.8-28.4] kg/m2 vs 28 [25.3-31] kg/m2; P = 0.001 and 2 [1-2] points vs 1 [0-1] point; P <0.001, respectively). There were no differences in APE severity according to the ESC stratification and CCI. Logistic regression analysis identified the VES-13 score as a significant independent risk factor for 3-month mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The VES-13 score is a better tool than sPESI for predicting 3-month mortality. Geriatric survivors of APE characterized with VES-13≥3 points should be closely monitored after discharge. The Norton Scale Score in a combination with the VES-13 may be useful in predicting 3-month mortality among numerous tests used in the CGA.

Predicting Acute Cardiovascular Complications in COVID-19: Insights from a Specialized Cardiac Referral Department

BACKGROUND COVID-19 increases the risk of acute cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), including acute coronary syndrome (ACS), acute pulmonary embolism (APE), and acute myocarditis (AMyo). The actual impact of CVDs on mortality of patients with COVID-19 remains unknown. This study aimed to determine whether CVDs influence the course of COVID-19 pneumonia and if they can be easily detected by using common tests and examinations. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data of 249 consecutive patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in a dedicated cardiology department were analyzed. On admission, clinical status, biomarkers, computed tomography, and bedside echocardiography were performed. RESULTS D-dimer level predicted APE (AUC=0.850 95% CI [0.765; 0.935], P<0.001) with sensitivity of 69.4% and specificity of 96.2% for a level of 4968.0 ng/mL, and NT-proBNP predicted AMyo (AUC=0.692 95% CI [0.502; 0.883], P=0.004) and showed sensitivity of 54.5%, with specificity of 86.5% for the cut-off point of 8970 pg/mL. Troponin T levels were not useful for diagnostic differentiation between CVDs. An extent of lung involvement predicted mortality (OR=1.03 95% CI [1.01;1.04] for 1% increase, P<0.001). After adjusting for lung involvement, ACS increased mortality, compared with COVID-19 pneumonia only (OR=5.27 95% CI [1.76; 16.38] P=0.003), while APE and AMyo did not affect risk for death. CONCLUSIONS D-dimer and NT-proBNP, but not troponin T, are useful in differentiating CVDs in patients with COVID-19. ACS with COVID-19 increased in-hospital mortality independently from extent of lung involvement, while coexisting APE or AMyo did not.

Mortality in patients with septic cardiomyopathy identified by longitudinal strain by speckle tracking echocardiography: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Septic cardiomyopathy is associated with poor outcomes but its definition remains unclear. In a previous meta-analysis, left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain (LS) showed significant prognostic value in septic patients, but findings were not robust due to a limited number of studies, differences in effect size and no adjustment for confounders.

METHODS

We conducted an updated systematic review (PubMed and Scopus up to 14.02.2023) and meta-analysis to investigate the association between LS and survival in septic patients. We included studies reporting global (from three apical views) or regional LS (one or two apical windows). A secondary analysis evaluated the association between LV ejection fraction (EF) and survival using data from the selected studies.

RESULTS

We included fourteen studies (1678 patients, survival 69.6%) and demonstrated an association between better performance (more negative LS) and survival with a mean difference (MD) of -1.45%[-2.10, -0.80] (p < 0.0001;I2 = 42%). No subgroup differences were found stratifying studies according to number of views used to calculate LS (p = 0.31;I2 = 16%), severity of sepsis (p = 0.42;I2 = 0%), and sepsis criteria (p = 0.59;I2 = 0%). Trial sequential analysis and sensitivity analyses confirmed the primary findings. Grade of evidence was low. In the included studies, thirteen reported LVEF and we found an association between higher LVEF and survival (MD = 2.44% [0.44,4.45]; p = 0.02;I2 = 42%).

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed that more negative LS values are associated with higher survival in septic patients. The clinical relevance of this difference and whether the use of LS may improve understanding of septic cardiomyopathy and prognostication deserve further investigation. The association found between LVEF and survival is of unlikely clinical meaning.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO number CRD42023432354.