Tolerability of Narrow-band Ultraviolet-B Phototherapy for Different Dermatological Diseases in Relation to Co-medications

Phototherapy is an efficient therapy for a variety of skin diseases. Various drugs can cause photosensitivity and impact tolerability of phototherapy. The tolerability was investigated of narrowband ultraviolet-B 311 nm therapy in dependence on the underlying disease and long-term co-medication. A total of 534 narrowband ultraviolet-B therapy courses were examined. Compared with psoriasis, adverse events were observed more frequently in eczematous diseases and, in some cases, other indications. About two-thirds of all courses were carried out in patients taking at least one photosensitising drug, according to the summaries of product characteristics. Phototherapy was more frequently associated with adverse events when medication was taken concomitantly. When considering the tolerability of phototherapy in dependence on individual substances or drug classes, no statistically significant result was shown after adjustment.

Preferences of German and Swiss melanoma patients for toxicities versus melanoma recurrence during adjuvant treatment (GERMELATOX-A-trial)

PURPOSE

Adjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors like PD1-antibodies (ICI) ± CTLA4-antibodies (cICI) or targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (TT) in high-risk melanoma patients demonstrate a significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS). Due to specific side effects, the choice of treatment is very often driven by the risk for toxicity. This study addressed for the first time in a multicenter setting the attitudes and preferences of melanoma patients for adjuvant treatment with (c)ICI and TT.

METHODS

In this study ("GERMELATOX-A"), 136 low-risk melanoma patients from 11 skin cancer centers were asked to rate side effect scenarios typical for each (c)ICI and TT with mild-to-moderate or severe toxicity and melanoma recurrence leading to cancer death. We asked patients about the reduction in melanoma relapse and the survival increase at 5 years they would require to tolerate defined side-effects.

RESULTS

By VAS, patients on average valued melanoma relapse worse than all scenarios of side-effects during treatment with (c)ICI or TT. In case of severe side effects, patients required a 15% higher rate of DFS at 5 years for (c)ICI (80%) compared to TT (65%). For survival, patients required an increase of 5-10% for melanoma survival during (c)ICI (85%/80%) compared to TT (75%).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated a pronounced variation of patient preferences for toxicity and outcomes and a clear preference for TT. As adjuvant melanoma treatment with (c)ICI and TT will be increasingly implemented in earlier stages, precise knowledge of the patient perspective can be helpful for decision making.

Rheumatoid neutrophilic dermatosis under treatment with the interleukin-6-receptor-antagonist sarilumab in a patient with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis

Skin manifestations may arise as adverse events following the use of novel drugs. We report a case of a patient with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis who developed a rheumatoid neutrophilic dermatosis (RND) under treatment with the interleukin-6-receptor-antagonist sarilumab. The skin lesions developed 2-3 days after the first injection. RND presents with asymptomatic, symmetrical fixed urticarial-like papules, plaques, and nodules, localized typically on the extensor surfaces of the forearms and hands. After discontinuing the medication, the nodules in our patient disappeared within a month.

[DMARD treatment and skin cancer : Recognition, state of knowledge and prevention]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Epithelial tumors differ in cellular origin, risk factors, incidence, and treatment. This article discusses the extent to which the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) is associated with an increased risk for the development of skin tumors and for which substances the risk may be increased. In addition, some practical dermatological recommendations for rheumatologists are presented.

METHODS

The most frequent tumors of the skin are classified according to their cellular origin into malignant melanoma (MM) and so-called keratinocyte cancer (KC). The clinical presentation of these tumors differs and also the risk for the development of these epithelial skin tumors under DMARD treatment varies depending on the drug and tumor entity. As rheumatologists frequently see these patients for follow-up, it is essential to know the clinical findings as well as the corresponding risk factors of the specific tumor entities.

RESULTS

A generally valid and reliable estimation of the risk for the development of epithelial skin tumors under DMARD treatment can only be formulated in the form of tendencies at the present time due to the lack of data. The relevant literature shows that regular intensive dermatological screening is recommended.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing immunosuppressive or immune-modulating treatment should be instructed in self-inspection of the skin, receive regular dermatological check-ups and be instructed in strict UV protection methods. Lesions that do not heal or recurrently bleed should be referred for a punch biopsy to rule out or diagnose an epithelial skin tumor, as should atypical inflammatory lesions that do not heal with the use of topical glucocorticoids. An interdisciplinary approach in patient management is the key to success in ensuring the maximum quality of life with the lowest possible risk of developing epithelial skin tumors for these patients.

The GERMELATOX-A (Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group): Study attitude of German melanoma patients towards toxicity during adjuvant treatment

e21597

Background: Trials of adjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors like PD1-antibodies (ICI) or targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (TT) in high-risk melanoma patients demonstrate a significant improvement in recurrence-free survival (RFS) with a very similar relative risk reduction. Both treatment modalities are characterized by specific side effects. Therefore the decision for or against a treatment modality is very often driven by the risk for toxicity. This study addressed for the first time the attitudes and preferences of German and Swiss patients and physicians for adjuvant treatment with ICI and TT. Methods: In this multicenter study („GERMELATOX-A“) patients with low-risk melanoma (pT1a, AJCC stage I, familiar with cancer diagnosis but no adjuvant treatment planned), and dermatooncologists from 11 German and 1 Swiss skin cancer centers were asked to fill out a questionnaire. Here, side effect scenarios typical for each ICI and TT with mild-to-moderate or severe toxicity and also melanoma recurrence leading to cancer death were described. We asked patients and physicians about the reduction in melanoma relapse (relapse-free survival, RFS) and the survival increase (overall survival, OS) at 5 yrs they would expect to tolerate defined side-effects. Results: Data were obtained from 136/107 patients/physicians, respectively (median age: 59 yrs/32 yrs, 56.2%/67.6% female).Overall, by visual analog scale, patients valued a melanoma relapse worse than all scenarios of side-effects during adjuvant treatment with ICI or TT. In general patients required higher risk reductions for DFS and OS for both ICI and TT and their drug related side effects compared to physicians to accept this treatment. In case of severe side effects, patients needed a 20% higher reduction of relapse rate at 5 yrs for ICI compared to TT (71.4%/50.0%). Physicians required identical relapse reduction rates for ICI and TT in case of severe side effects (42.9%). Conclusions: This study demonstrated a pronounced variation of German and Swiss patient preferences on adjuvant treatment related to drug class specific side effects and outcomes and a clear difference between patients' and physicians' attitudes. This difference might influence decision making for adjuvant treatment options and should therefore also be investigated in further trials for current adjuvant treatment modalities. As adjuvant melanoma treatment with ICI and TT will possibly be implemented in earlier stages soon, precise knowledge of the patient perspective can be helpful for the process of decision making.

Update aktinische Keratosen – Neuigkeiten und Relevanz für den Alltag

Ziel der Arbeit Die im März 2020 zuletzt überarbeitete Leitlinie „Aktinische Keratosen und Plattenepithelkarzinome der Haut“ hat aufgrund der Zunahme der klinischen Studien zum Thema aktinische Keratosen den höchsten Grad für Methodik (S3) erreicht, da diese nicht nur konsensbasiert sondern auch evidenzbasiert verfasst wurde. Diesen Entwicklungen gerecht zu werden und den klinisch relevanten Teil des aktuellen Stands des Wissens zu vermitteln, ist Ziel dieses Artikels.

Methodik Anhand der aktuellen epidemiologischen Lage wird der dramatisch wachsende Bedarf für das bessere Verständnis der Ätiologie aktinischer Keratosen deutlich. Ebenso gilt es, Patienten mit aktinischen Keratosen und therapiebedürftigen Ko-Morbiditäten vor einem therapiebedingten, erhöhten Risiko für die Entwicklung weiterer aktinischer Keratosen oder Plattenepithelkarzinomen zu bewahren. Die Möglichkeit der Spontanremission aktinischer Keratosen sollte ebenso wenig vernachlässigt werden wie eine mögliche Progredienz in ein Plattenepithelkarzinom. Die kontroverse Diskussion der fortwährend postulierten, sequenziellen Abfolge der histologischen Grade aktinischer Keratosen zum Plattenepithelkarzinom beinhaltet klinische und histologische Fallstricke. Diese sollten bei der Therapieentscheidung ebenso bedacht werden wie die Wünsche und Erwartungen der Patienten an ein Therapieregime. Eine bleibende Schwierigkeit ist die fehlende Standardisierung erhobener Daten zu den zahlreichen zur Verfügung stehenden Therapieoptionen. Das Potenzial dieses Forschungsgebietes für neue Therapiealternativen und präventive Maßnahmen lässt nach wie vor auf weitere, interessante Entwicklungen hoffen.

Ergebnisse Der gut etablierte kausale Zusammenhang zwischen kumulativer UV-Strahlung in der Entwicklung von Plattenepithelkarzinomen und aktinischer Keratosen hat zur Anerkennung berufsbedingter UV-Exposition als Berufserkrankung geführt, die auch die Anerkennung multipler aktinischer Keratosen als Berufserkrankung beinhaltet. Das therapeutische Handeln sollte durch die Gesamtanzahl der aktinischen Keratosen, das Ausmaß der betroffenen Fläche, die Dynamik des Krankheitsgeschehens und den Wunsch des Patienten bestimmt werden. Ein besonderes Augenmerk sollte auf den Patienten liegen, denen die Krankheitseinsicht fehlt oder die nur wenig motiviert zur Therapie sind. Es könnte der Schlüssel zur Verbesserung der Therapieadhärenz und Akzeptanz sein, diese Patienten zu erkennen und ihre Bedürfnisse in das Arzt-Patienten-Gespräch zu integrieren. Die Differenzierung zwischen lokalisierten aktinischen Keratosen und einer Feldkanzerisierung stellt ein wichtiges Entscheidungskriterium für die Wahl der empfohlenen Therapie dar. Die Rücknahme der Zulassung von Ingenolmebutat in der EU durch die EMA im Jahr 2020 hat das Spektrum der lokaltherapeutischen Optionen eingeschränkt. Der periinterventionelle Schmerz ist nach wie vor der limitierende Faktor für die konventionelle photodynamische Therapie, jedoch schreitet die Entwicklung für schmerzärmere Varianten weiter voran. Es ist zu erwarten, dass sich in den kommenden Jahren durch eine bessere Evidenzlage für weitere systemische oder lokaltherapeutische Optionen neue Behandlungsstrategien ergeben werden. Besonders im Fokus wird sicherlich nach wie vor die Präventionsforschung stehen, die v. a. den Erhalt einer erzielten Remission beinhaltet.

Schlussfolgerung Die aktuellen Forschungsergebnisse und -bestrebungen zur Thematik der aktinischen Keratosen sind aufgrund des zukünftig gesteigerten Bedarfes zum einen notwendig und zum anderen sehr ermutigend. Das Ende des therapeutischen Horizonts ist gegenwärtig noch nicht erreicht.

Early Exanthema Upon Vemurafenib Plus Cobimetinib Is Associated With a Favorable Treatment Outcome in Metastatic Melanoma: A Retrospective Multicenter DeCOG Study

Background

The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors has become standard of care in the treatment of metastatic BRAF V600-mutated melanoma. Clinical factors for an early prediction of tumor response are rare. The present study investigated the association between the development of an early exanthema induced by vemurafenib or vemurafenib plus cobimetinib and therapy outcome.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective study included patients with BRAF V600-mutated irresectable AJCC-v8 stage IIIC/D to IV metastatic melanoma who received treatment with vemurafenib (VEM) or vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (COBIVEM). The development of an early exanthema within six weeks after therapy start and its grading according to CTCAEv4.0 criteria was correlated to therapy outcome in terms of best overall response, progression-free (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 422 patients from 16 centers were included (VEM, n=299; COBIVEM, n=123). 20.4% of VEM and 43.1% of COBIVEM patients developed an early exanthema. In the VEM cohort, objective responders (CR/PR) more frequently presented with an early exanthema than non-responders (SD/PD); 59.0% versus 38.7%; p=0.0027. However, median PFS and OS did not differ between VEM patients with or without an early exanthema (PFS, 6.9 versus 6.0 months, p=0.65; OS, 11.0 versus 12.4 months, p=0.69). In the COBIVEM cohort, 66.0% of objective responders had an early exanthema compared to 54.3% of non-responders (p=0.031). Median survival times were significantly longer for patients who developed an early exanthema compared to patients who did not (PFS, 9.7 versus 5.6 months, p=0.013; OS, not reached versus 11.6 months, p=0.0061). COBIVEM patients with a mild early exanthema (CTCAEv4.0 grade 1-2) had a superior survival outcome as compared to COBIVEM patients with a severe (CTCAEv4.0 grade 3-4) or non early exanthema, respectively (p=0.047). This might be caused by the fact that 23.6% of patients with severe exanthema underwent a dose reduction or discontinuation of COBIVEM compared to only 8.9% of patients with mild exanthema.

Conclusions

The development of an early exanthema within 6 weeks after treatment start indicates a favorable therapy outcome upon vemurafenib plus cobimetinib. Patients presenting with an early exanthema should therefore be treated with adequate supportive measures to provide that patients can stay on treatment.

Varying Mutational Alterations in Multiple Primary Melanomas

In melanoma, the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway plays a crucial oncogenic role. Recent studies identified additional genetic alterations, eg, TERT-promoter mutations. Up to 8% of melanoma patients present with multiple primary melanomas (MPMs). The pathogenesis is not fully understood, and data on the genetic diversity of MPMs are limited. To identify putative diagnostic and therapeutic consequences, we assessed the mutational status of the BRAF and NRAS genes and TERT promoter in patients with MPMs. The study cohort consisted of 96 patients with 237 malignant melanomas. The BRAF, NRAS, and TERT-promoter genotypes were assessed in all MPMs and were correlated with patients' clinicopathological characteristics. BRAF mutations were found in 84 melanomas (35.4%), NRAS mutations, in 33 (14.0%); and TERT-promoter mutations, in 112 (47.3%). Mutation patterns were concordant between first and subsequent primary tumors in 23.9% of patients and were discordant in 61.4% of patients. The genetic alterations were partially different in 14.7% of patients. By Cox regression analysis, only the NRAS mutation had a significant negative prognostic impact on time to progression to stage III (P = 0.016) and on distant metastasis-free survival (P = 0.032). In the majority of primary melanomas in patients with MPMs, BRAF, NRAS, and TERT-promoter genotypes were discordant. Thus, molecular testing for targeted therapy should be performed on metastatic tissue and not on primary tumors.