Analysis of Clinical Success and Molecular Mechanisms of Action of Novel Anti-glioblastoma Drugs: A Review

BACKGROUND

Gliomas and glioblastomas (GBM) are common primary malignant brain tumors, which are highly malignant and have a poor prognosis. The presence of cancer stem cells with unrestricted proliferative capacity and ability to generate glial neoplastic cells, the diffuse nature of GBM, and other specific factors of GBM contribute to poor results of drug therapy in patients with GBM. Despite the worldwide efforts to improve the treatment, many novel anti-GBM drugs are active just in vitro, in silico, and in preclinical trials, and they sometimes demonstrate poor or no activity in clinical trials. In this paper, we have casually selected and analyzed the most promising evidence-based results related to glioblastoma treatment at FDA and Clinical Trials.gov databases. It was observed that the most prospective trend in the development of anti-GBM drugs is combination therapy vs. monotherapy. Our analysis of clinical trials has allowed us to predict that the most promising combination therapy that has shown the best results in patient's surveillance should include drugs that block different growth-promoting signals in glioblastoma cells and that are activated by the V600E BRAF mutation. One drug should inhibit signals from the BRAF protein, whereas the second drug in combination should inhibit signals from the MEK protein Methods: The content of this review is based on information obtained from PubMed, ClinicalTrials. gov, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (https://www.fda.gov/). In ClinicalTrials.gov, we retrieved studies published from January 1, 2015. In the data search, "Glioblastoma" was used as the keyword. A study was deleted if it studied remedies for concomitant tumor diseases, as well as if it did not include descriptions of treatment methods and/or if GBM was not mentioned. The analysis of the effectiveness of treatment was carried out according to the increasing overall survival in GBM patients, compared to the gold standard for this cancer.

RESULTS

GBM patients treated with novel immunotherapy agents and drugs acting on epigenetic factors and receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown encouraging potential for future development in clinic. However, combinations of drugs have led to more significant improvements in the results and an increase in life expectancy of patients. For example, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab showed a 72% increase in life expectancy compared to using nivolumab alone (9.8 vs. 16.85).

CONCLUSION

Combining anti-GBM drugs appears to be a key direction for increasing treatment effectiveness and overall survival. Radiotherapy of GBM can increase the effect of combination drug therapy.

Interplay of Environmental, Individual and Genetic Factors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Provocation

In this review, we explore systemization of knowledge about the triggering effects of non-genetic factors in pathogenic mechanisms that contribute to the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Possible mechanisms involving environmental and individual factors in RA pathogenesis were analyzed, namely, infections, mental stress, sleep deprivation ecology, age, perinatal and gender factors, eating habits, obesity and smoking. The non-genetic factors modulate basic processes in the body with the impact of these factors being non-specific, but these common challenges may be decisive for advancement of the disease in the predisposed body at risk for RA. The provocation of this particular disease is associated with the presence of congenital loci minoris resistentia. The more frequent non-genetic factors form tangles of interdependent relationships and, thereby, several interdependent external factors hit one vulnerable basic process at once, either provoking or reinforcing each other. Understanding the specific mechanisms by which environmental and individual factors impact an individual under RA risk in the preclinical stages can contribute to early disease diagnosis and, if the factor is modifiable, might be useful for the prevention or delay of its development.

SARS-Cov2 acute and post-active infection in the context of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases

The clinical and immunological spectrum of acute and post-active COVID-19 syndrome overlaps with criteria used to characterize autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Indeed, following SARS-Cov2 infection, the innate immune response is altered with an initial delayed production of interferon type I (IFN-I), while the NF-kappa B and inflammasome pathways are activated. In lung and digestive tissues, an alternative and extrafollicular immune response against SARS-Cov2 takes place with, consequently, an altered humoral and memory T cell response leading to breakdown of tolerance with the emergence of autoantibodies. However, the risk of developing severe COVID-19 among SLE and RA patients did not exceed the general population except in those having pre-existing neutralizing autoantibodies against IFN-I. Treatment discontinuation rather than COVID-19 infection or vaccination increases the risk of developing flares. Last but not least, a limited number of case reports of individuals having developed SLE or RA following COVID-19 infection/vaccination have been reported. Altogether, the SARS-Cov2 pandemic represents an unique opportunity to investigate the dangerous interplay between the immune response against infectious agents and autoimmunity, and to better understand the triggering role of infection as a risk factor in autoimmune and chronic inflammatory disease development.

Causal risk and protective factors in rheumatoid arthritis: A genetic update

The characterization of risk and protective factors in complex diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved from epidemiological studies, which test association, to the use of Mendelian randomization approaches, which test direct relationships. Indeed, direct associations with the mucosal origin of RA are retrieved with periodontal disease (Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans predominantly), interstitial lung involvement, tobacco smoking and air pollutants. Next, factors directly associated with an acquired immune response include genetic factors (HLA DRB1, PTPN22), capacity to produce anti-modified protein antibodies (AMPA), and relatives with a history of autoimmune diseases. Finally, factors can be also classified according to their direct capacity to interfere with the IL-6/CRP/sIL-IL6R proinflammatory pathway as risk factor (body fat, cardiometabolic factors, type 2 diabetes, depressive syndrome) or either as protective factors by controlling of sIL-6R levels (higher education level, and intelligence). Although some co-founders have been characterized (e.g. vitamin D, physical activity, cancer) the direct association with sex-discrepancy, pregnancy, and infections among other factors remains to be better explored.