Pregnancy outcomes in 1869 pregnancies in a large cohort from the Spanish Society of Rheumatology Lupus Register (RELESSER)

INTRODUCTION

Obstetric complications are more common in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) than in the general population.

OBJECTIVE

To assess pregnancy outcomes in women with SLE from the RELESSER cohort after 12 years of follow-up.

METHODS

A multicentre retrospective observational study was conducted. In addition to data from the RELESSER register, data were collected on obstetric/gynaecological variables and treatments received. The number of term pregnancies was compared between women with pregnancies before and after the diagnosis of SLE. Further, clinical and laboratory characteristics were compared between women with pregnancies before and after the diagnosis, on the one hand, and with and without complications during pregnancy, on the other. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to identify factors potentially associated with complications during pregnancy.

RESULTS

A total of 809 women were included, with 1869 pregnancies, of which 1395 reached term. Women with pregnancies before the diagnosis of SLE had more pregnancies (2.37 vs 1.87) and a higher rate of term pregnancies (76.8% vs 69.8%, p < 0.001) compared to those with pregnancies after the diagnosis. Women with pregnancies before the diagnosis were diagnosed at an older age (43.4 vs 34.1 years) and had more comorbidities. No differences were observed between the groups with pregnancies before and after diagnosis in antibody profile, including anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm, anti-Ro, anti-La, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin or anti-beta-2-glycoprotein. Overall, 114 out of the 809 women included in the study experienced complications during pregnancy, including miscarriage, preeclampsia/eclampsia, foetal death, and/or preterm birth. Women with complications had higher rates of antiphospholipid syndrome (40.5% vs 9.9%, p < 0.001) and higher rates of positivity for IgG anticardiolipin (33.9% vs 21.3%, p = 0.005), IgG anti-beta 2 glycoprotein (26.1% vs 14%, p = 0.007), and IgM anti-beta 2 glycoprotein (26.1% vs 16%, p = 0.032) antibodies, although no differences were found regarding lupus anticoagulant. Among the treatments received, only heparin was more commonly used by women with pregnancy complications. We did not find differences in corticosteroid or hydroxychloroquine use.

CONCLUSIONS

The likelihood of term pregnancy is higher before the diagnosis of SLE. In our cohort, positivity for anticardiolipin IgG and anti-beta-2- glycoprotein IgG/IgM, but not lupus anticoagulant, was associated with a higher risk of poorer pregnancy outcomes.

AB0907 BONE METABOLISM ASSESSMENT IN PATIENTS WITH RECENT DIAGNOSIS OF GIANT CELL ARTERITIS

Background:

There are several studies assessing bone mass and osteoporosis (OP) development of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) during glucocorticoid treatment, however data at time of diagnosis is scarce.

Objectives:

To analyze bone metabolism, bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular microarchitecture by measuring trabecular bone score (TBS) in patients with recent diagnosis of GCA.

Methods:

Retrospective observational study in which we included all patients with GCA and bone metabolism assessment at diagnosis. We recorded: risk factors for OP (previous fractures and anti-OP treatments), bone metabolism (calcium, phosphate, PTH, 25-vitaminD [25-OHD]) and the DXA results (Lunar, DPX) at the time of diagnosis and during the follow-up. The statistic analysis was made with SPSS.

Results:

36 patients (27 W: 9M) with a mean age of 76±9 years were included. The clinical characteristics of the GCA at diagnoses were: headache (81%), constitutional syndrome (58%), allodynia (42%), visual loss (42%, binocular in 2 patients), jaw claudication (39%), polymyalgic syndrome (28%), amaurosis fugax (25%) and lingular necrosis (n=1, 3%). Additional diagnosis tests included: temporal biopsy (86%, being pathologic in 55%), temporal ultrasound (97%, pathologic 34%), extra-cranial arteries ultrasound (81%, pathologic 7%) and PET/CT (19%, pathologic 86%). Up to 61% received three metilprednisolone bolus (mean dose 1700mg). 7 patients (19%) had previous OP and 3 had already suffered a fragility fracture (Colles, vertebral and femur). Only 4 patients were receiving anti-OP treatment (2 oral bisphosphonate, 2 zoledronate).

At time of diagnosis of GCA, the mean of 25OHD was 17±13ng/mL (88%, <30). BMD showed low bone mass in 80% of patients (47% with OP, 33% osteopenia). The mean TBS was 1.026±0.098 and up to 38% showed poor bone microarchitecture [values <1.23]). No significant differences were observed between patients with or without TBS <1.23. Up to 94% of patients received anti-OP treatment (26 zoledronate, 6 oral bisphosphonate, 1 denosumab, 1 teriparatide). 3 patients had incidental fractures during the follow-up, however no relation was found with BMD or TBS.

Conclusion:

Low bone mass and vitamin D insufficiency are frequent in patients with recent diagnoses of GCA and up to 38% have poor bone microarchitecture at baseline. Thus, it’s important to perform a bone mass assessment in all patients with recent diagnose of ACG and initiate therapeutic or preventive anti-OP treatment if required.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

AB0738 SAPHO OR PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS?: EVALUATION OF CASPAR CRITERIA IN A COHORT WITH SAPHO

Background:

SAPHO syndrome (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis and osteitis) is an acronym created with the aim of encompassing within the same entity the findings present in a heterogeneous group of patients with various osteoarticular and cutaneous disorders. For years it has been debated whether it is an entity itself or if, on the contrary, it is a specific phenotype of psoriatic arthritis.

Objectives:

Determine the relationship between SAPHO syndrome and psoriatic arthritis by comparing the classic criteria of SAPHO with CASPAR in patients previously diagnosed with SAPHO.

Methods:

A retrospective study where patients with a diagnosis of SAPHO in the same center (1984-2018) were reviewed. Of a total of 95 patients that met the criteria of Benhamou et al., 46 were excluded due to lack of information to complete the minimum necessary data, so 39 patients were finally included in the study. Demographic data were registered, age at diagnosis, CASPAR criteria (active psoriasis, history of own or familial psoriasis, nail psoriasis, negative RF, dactylitis and new formation/juxta-articular bone proliferation), classical criteria of SAPHO and HLAB27. For the statistical analysis, a Chi-square is applied to determine the differences between the groups with / without CASPAR criteria.

Results:

Of the sample of 39 subjects diagnosed with SAPHO, 15 patients (38%) met CASPAR criteria (4M/11W), with a median age at diagnosis of 42 years (range 21-50). Of them, 8 (60%) had active cutaneous psoriasis, 10 (73%) had a family or personal history of psoriasis, 6 (40%) had psoriatic nail dystrophy, 14 (93%) had negative FR, 3 (20%) had presented some episode of dactylitis and 10 (73%) had juxta-articular new bone formation. Of the 15 patients who met CASPAR criteria, 9 (67%) had synovitis, 2 (13%) acne, 4 (26%) pustulosis, 13 (87%) hyperostosis and 12 (80%) osteitis. HLAB27 was positive in 1 patient (2.5%) of the group that met CASPAR criteria. Of the patients who did not fulfill CASPAR criteria (9M/15W), the median age at diagnosis was 44.5 years (range 10-70). None of them had active cutaneous psoriasis, psoriatic nail distrophy or dactylitis, 1 (4%) had a family or personal history of psoriasis, all had RF- and 3 (12.5%) had juxta-articular bone new formation (Table 1). Synovitis was observed more frequently in patients who met CASPAR criteria than in those who did not (67% vs 25%, p 0.01). In contrast, osteitis was present more frequently in patients who did not meet CASPAR criteria (80% vs 96% p 0.05) and pustulosis, although it was not statistically significant (50% vs 26%, p 0.07). Among patients who did not meet CASPAR criteria only 1 met the 5 classic SAPHO criteria and another 3 met 4.

Table 1.

Conclusion:

Approximately one third (38%) of patients diagnosed with SAPHO meet criteria for psoriatic arthritis, the most notable variables being active psoriasis or a history of psoriasis. Synovitis manifests more frequently in patients with CASPAR criteria and osteitis more present in patients who did not meet them.

Acknowledgments:

Rheumatology Service of the Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared