1
|
Mendelsohn RB, Hahn AI, Palmaira RL, Saxena AR, Mukthinuthalapati PK, Schattner MA, Markowitz AJ, Ludwig E, Shah P, Calo D, Gerdes H, Yaeger R, Stadler Z, Zauber AG, Cercek A. Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Patients Do Not Require Shorter Intervals for Post-Surgical Surveillance Colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:S1542-3565(24)00436-1. [PMID: 38729386 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC), diagnosed before age 50, is rising in incidence worldwide. Although post-surgical colonoscopy surveillance strategies exist, appropriate intervals in EO-CRC remain elusive, as long-term surveillance outcomes remain scant. We sought to compare findings of surveillance colonoscopies of EO-CRC to average onset colorectal cancer (AO-CRC) patients to help define surveillance outcomes in these groups. METHODS Single institution retrospective chart review identified EO-CRC and AO-CRC patients with colonoscopy and no evidence of disease. Surveillance intervals and time to development of advanced neoplasia (CRC and advanced polyps (adenoma/sessile serrated)) were examined. For each group, three serial surveillance colonoscopies were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed utilizing log-ranked Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS A total of 1259 CRC patients were identified, with 612 and 647 patients in the EO-CRC and AO-CRC groups, respectively. Compared to AO-CRC patients, EO-CRC patients had a 29% decreased risk of developing advanced neoplasia from time of initial surgery to first surveillance colonoscopy (HR=0.71, 95% CI 0.52 - 1.0). Average follow-up time from surgical resection to first surveillance colonoscopy was 12.6 months for both cohorts. Overall surveillance findings differed between cohorts (p=0.003), and EO-CRC were found to have less advanced neoplasia compared to AO-CRC counterparts (12.4% vs 16.0%, respectively). Subsequent colonoscopies found that while EO-CRC patients returned for follow-up surveillance colonoscopy earlier than AO-CRC patients, the EO-CRC cohort did not have more advanced neoplasia nor non-advanced adenomas. CONCLUSIONS EO-CRC patients do not have an increased risk of advanced neoplasia compared to AO-CRC patients and therefore do not require more frequent colonoscopy surveillance than current guidelines recommend.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin B Mendelsohn
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Anne I Hahn
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Randze Lerie Palmaira
- Collaborative Research Centers Department, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Asha R Saxena
- Solid Tumor Gastrointestinal Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Pavan Kedar Mukthinuthalapati
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA; Division of Gastroenterology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA
| | - Mark A Schattner
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emmy Ludwig
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pari Shah
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Delia Calo
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hans Gerdes
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rona Yaeger
- Solid Tumor Gastrointestinal Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Zsofia Stadler
- Solid Tumor Gastrointestinal Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Ann G Zauber
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Solid Tumor Gastrointestinal Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bucobo JC, Kassim O, Konijeti GG, Abraham BP, Abegunde AT, Farraye FA, Guha S, Kowalski T, Kumar A, Markowitz AJ, Schoeppner HL, Tierney WM. Role of the industry representative in the practice of gastroenterology and GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:307-313. [PMID: 38260918 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.10.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Carlos Bucobo
- Division of Gastroenterology, North Shore University Hospital, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - Olufemi Kassim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Gauree G Konijeti
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Bincy P Abraham
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ayokunle T Abegunde
- Division of Gastroenterology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Sushovan Guha
- Section of Endoluminal Surgery and Interventional Gastroenterology, McGovern Medical School and UT Health Science Center at UTHealth, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Thomas Kowalski
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anand Kumar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - William M Tierney
- Section of Digestive Diseases, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Byun AJ, Grosser RA, Choe JK, Rizk NP, Tang LH, Molena D, Tan KS, Restle D, Cheema W, Zhu A, Gerdes H, Markowitz AJ, Bains MS, Rusch VW, Jones DR, Adusumilli PS. A Prospective Clinical Trial to Evaluate Mesothelin as a Biomarker for the Clinical Management of Patients With Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e1003-e1010. [PMID: 37185875 PMCID: PMC10593105 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the utility of serum soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP) and tumor mesothelin expression in the management of esophageal adenocarcinoma (ADC). BACKGROUND Clinical management of esophageal ADC is limited by a lack of accurate evaluation of tumor burden, treatment response, and disease recurrence. Our retrospective data showed that tumor mesothelin and its serum correlate, SMRP, are overexpressed and associated with poor outcomes in patients with esophageal ADC. METHODS Serum SMRP and tumoral mesothelin expression from 101 patients with locally advanced esophageal ADC were analyzed before induction chemoradiation (pretreatment) and at the time of resection (posttreatment), as a biomarker for treatment response, disease recurrence, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Pre and posttreatment serum SMRP was ≥1 nM in 49% and 53%, and pre and post-treatment tumor mesothelin expression was >25% in 35% and 46% of patients, respectively. Pretreatment serum SMRP was not significantly associated with tumor stage ( P = 0.9), treatment response (radiologic response, P = 0.4; pathologic response, P = 0.7), or recurrence ( P =0.229). Pretreatment tumor mesothelin expression was associated with OS (hazard ratio: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.14-3.79; P = 0.017) but had no statistically significant association with recurrence ( P = 0.9). Three-year OS of patients with pretreatment tumor mesothelin expression of ≤25% was 78% (95% CI: 68%-89%), compared with 49% (95% CI: 35%-70%) among those with >25%. CONCLUSIONS Pretreatment tumor mesothelin expression is prognostic of OS for patients with locally advanced esophageal ADC, whereas serum SMRP is not a reliable biomarker for monitoring treatment response or recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J. Byun
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel A. Grosser
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennie K. Choe
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nabil P. Rizk
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Laura H. Tang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniela Molena
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kay See Tan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Restle
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Waseem Cheema
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy Zhu
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hans Gerdes
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnold J. Markowitz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Manjit S. Bains
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Valerie W. Rusch
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David R. Jones
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Prasad S. Adusumilli
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harrold EC, Foote MB, Rousseau B, Walch H, Kemel Y, Richards AL, Keane F, Cercek A, Yaeger R, Rathkopf D, Segal NH, Patel Z, Maio A, Borio M, O'Reilly EM, Reidy D, Desai A, Janjigian YY, Murciano-Goroff YR, Carlo MI, Latham A, Liu YL, Walsh MF, Ilson D, Rosenberg JE, Markowitz AJ, Weiser MR, Rossi AM, Vanderbilt C, Mandelker D, Bandlamudi C, Offit K, Berger MF, Solit DB, Saltz L, Shia J, Diaz LA, Stadler ZK. Neoplasia risk in patients with Lynch syndrome treated with immune checkpoint blockade. Nat Med 2023; 29:2458-2463. [PMID: 37845474 PMCID: PMC10870255 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02544-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic and localized mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors are exquisitely sensitive to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). The ability of ICB to prevent dMMR malignant or pre-malignant neoplasia development in patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) is unknown. Of 172 cancer-affected patients with LS who had received ≥1 ICB cycles, 21 (12%) developed subsequent malignancies after ICB exposure, 91% (29/32) of which were dMMR, with median time to development of 21 months (interquartile range, 6-38). Twenty-four of 61 (39%) ICB-treated patients who subsequently underwent surveillance colonoscopy had premalignant polyps. Within matched pre-ICB and post-ICB follow-up periods, the overall rate of tumor development was unchanged; however, on subgroup analysis, a decreased incidence of post-ICB visceral tumors was observed. These data suggest that ICB treatment of LS-associated tumors does not eliminate risk of new neoplasia development, and LS-specific surveillance strategies should continue. These data have implications for immunopreventative strategies and provide insight into the immunobiology of dMMR tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C Harrold
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael B Foote
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Benoit Rousseau
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Henry Walch
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yelena Kemel
- Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Allison L Richards
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fergus Keane
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rona Yaeger
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dana Rathkopf
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neil H Segal
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zalak Patel
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Maio
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matilde Borio
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Diane Reidy
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Avni Desai
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yelena Y Janjigian
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yonina R Murciano-Goroff
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria I Carlo
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alicia Latham
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ying L Liu
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael F Walsh
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Ilson
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan E Rosenberg
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin R Weiser
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anthony M Rossi
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chad Vanderbilt
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Diana Mandelker
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chaitanya Bandlamudi
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael F Berger
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David B Solit
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Leonard Saltz
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jinru Shia
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luis A Diaz
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zsofia K Stadler
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Laszkowska M, Tang L, Vos E, King S, Salo-Mullen E, Magahis PT, Abate M, Catchings A, Zauber AG, Hahn AI, Schattner M, Coit D, Stadler ZK, Strong VE, Markowitz AJ. Factors associated with detection of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer on endoscopy in individuals with germline CDH1 mutations. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:326-336.e3. [PMID: 37094689 PMCID: PMC10524178 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.04.2071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Individuals with germline pathogenic CDH1 variants have a high risk of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. The sensitivity of EGD in detecting signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) in this population is low. We aimed to identify endoscopic findings and biopsy practices associated with detection of SRCC. METHODS This retrospective cohort included individuals with a germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic CDH1 variant undergoing at least 1 EGD at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between January 1, 2006, and March 25, 2022. The primary outcome was detection of SRCC on EGD. Findings on gastrectomy were also assessed. The study included periods before and after implementation of the Cambridge protocol for endoscopic surveillance, allowing for assessment of a spectrum of biopsy practices. RESULTS Ninety-eight CDH1 patients underwent at least 1 EGD at our institution. SRCC was detected in 20 (20%) individuals on EGD overall and in 50 (86%) of the 58 patients undergoing gastrectomy. Most SRCC foci were detected in the gastric cardia/fundus (EGD, 50%; gastrectomy, 62%) and body/transition zone (EGD, 60%; gastrectomy, 62%). Biopsy results of gastric pale mucosal areas were associated with detection of SRCC (P < .01). The total number of biopsy samples taken on EGD was associated with increased detection of SRCC (P = .01), with 43% detected when ≥40 samples were taken. CONCLUSIONS Targeted biopsy sampling of gastric pale mucosal areas and increasing number of biopsy samples taken on EGD were associated with detection of SRCC. SRCC foci were mostly detected in the proximal stomach, supporting updated endoscopic surveillance guidelines. Further studies are needed to refine endoscopic protocols to improve SRCC detection in this high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Laszkowska
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine
| | - Laura Tang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
| | - Elvira Vos
- Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery
| | - Stephanie King
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine
| | | | - Patrick T Magahis
- Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Miseker Abate
- Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery
| | | | - Ann G Zauber
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anne I Hahn
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mark Schattner
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine
| | - Daniel Coit
- Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery
| | | | | | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ranganathan M, Sacca RE, Trottier M, Maio A, Kemel Y, Salo-Mullen E, Catchings A, Kane S, Wang C, Ravichandran V, Ptashkin R, Mehta N, Garcia-Aguilar J, Weiser MR, Donoghue MTA, Berger MF, Mandelker D, Walsh MF, Carlo M, Liu YL, Cercek A, Yaeger R, Saltz L, Segal NH, Mendelsohn RB, Markowitz AJ, Offit K, Shia J, Stadler ZK, Latham A. Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Mismatch Repair-Proficient Colorectal Cancer in Patients With Lynch Syndrome. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2200675. [PMID: 37262391 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated colorectal cancer (CRC) is characterized by mismatch repair-deficiency (MMR-D) and/or microsatellite instability (MSI). However, with increasing utilization of germline testing, MMR-proficient (MMR-P) and/or microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC has also been observed. We sought to characterize MMR-P/MSS CRC among patients with LS. METHODS Patients with solid tumors with germline MMR pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants were identified on a prospective matched tumor-normal next-generation sequencing (NGS) protocol. CRCs were evaluated for MMR-D via immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and/or MSI via NGS. Clinical variables were correlated with MMR status using nonparametric tests. RESULTS Among 17,617 patients with solid tumors, 1.4% (n = 242) had LS. A total of 36% (86 of 242) of patients with LS had at least one CRC that underwent NGS profiling, amounting to 99 pooled CRCs assessed. A total of 10% (10 of 99) of CRCs were MMR-P, with 100% concordance between MSS status and retained MMR protein staining. A total of 89% (8 of 9) of patients in the MMR-P group had MSH6 or PMS2 variants, compared with 30% (23 of 77) in the MMR-D group (P = .001). A total of 46% (6 of 13) of PMS2+ patients had MMR-P CRC. The median age of onset was 58 and 43 years for MMR-P and MMR-D CRC, respectively (P = .07). Despite the later median age of onset, 40% (4 of 10) of MMR-P CRCs were diagnosed <50. A total of 60% (6 of 10) of MMR-P CRCs were metastatic compared with 13% (12 of 89) of MMR-D CRCs (P = .002). A total of 33% (3 of 9) of patients with MMR-P CRC did not meet LS testing criteria. CONCLUSION Patients with LS remained at risk for MMR-P CRC, which was more prevalent among patients with MSH6 and PMS2 variants. MMR-P CRC was later onset and more commonly metastatic compared with MMR-D CRC. Confirmation of tumor MMR/MSI status is critical for patient management and familial risk estimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megha Ranganathan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Rosalba E Sacca
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Magan Trottier
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anna Maio
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Yelena Kemel
- Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Erin Salo-Mullen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Amanda Catchings
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sarah Kane
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Chiyun Wang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Vignesh Ravichandran
- Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ryan Ptashkin
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nikita Mehta
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Martin R Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Mark T A Donoghue
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael F Berger
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Diana Mandelker
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael F Walsh
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Maria Carlo
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Ying L Liu
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Rona Yaeger
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Leonard Saltz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Neil H Segal
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Robin B Mendelsohn
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Zsofia K Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Alicia Latham
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Park L, O'Connell K, Herzog K, Chatila W, Walch H, Palmaira RLD, Cercek A, Shia J, Shike M, Markowitz AJ, Garcia-Aguilar J, Schattner MA, Kantor ED, Du M, Mendelsohn RB. Clinical features of young onset colorectal cancer patients from a large cohort at a single cancer center. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:2511-2516. [PMID: 36441197 PMCID: PMC10007691 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04286-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to describe the demographics and clinical features of patients with young onset (YO) CRC. METHODS A retrospective review of patients with CRC diagnosed between ages 20 and 49 years was evaluated at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 1/2004 to 6/2019. We excluded those with a hereditary CRC syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, or prior CRC diagnosis. Patient demographics; presenting symptoms; medical, surgical, and smoking history; family history of cancer; tumor characteristics; and pathology were obtained from the electronic medical record. RESULTS We identified 3856 YO CRC patients (median age CRC diagnosis 43; 52.5% male). A total of 59.1% were overweight or obese (32.2% and 26.9%, respectively). Most (90.1%) had no family history of CRC in a first-degree relative; 56.3% of patients reported being never smokers; 5.2% had diabetes. The most common presenting symptoms were rectal bleeding (47.7%), abdominal pain/bloating (33.1%), and change in bowel habits (24.7%). The majority presented with left-sided cancers (77.3%), at late-stage disease (68.4% at stages 3 or 4). CONCLUSION Most YO CRC patients presented with rectal bleeding or abdominal pain, left-sided cancers, and later-stage disease and had no family history of CRC in a first-degree relative. Over half were overweight and obese and were more likely to have never smoked. More data are needed to better understand YO CRC risk factors and to help identify high-risk populations who may benefit from earlier screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kelli O'Connell
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Keri Herzog
- Digestive Disease Associates, Brandford, CT, USA
| | - Walid Chatila
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Tri-Institutional Program in Computational Biology and Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Henry Walch
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Moshe Shike
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark A Schattner
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth D Kantor
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mengmeng Du
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robin B Mendelsohn
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu YL, Cadoo KA, Maio A, Patel Z, Kemel Y, Salo-Mullen E, Catchings A, Ranganathan M, Kane S, Soslow R, Ceyhan-Birsoy O, Mandelker D, Carlo MI, Walsh MF, Shia J, Markowitz AJ, Offit K, Stadler ZK, Latham A. Early age of onset and broad cancer spectrum persist in MSH6- and PMS2-associated Lynch syndrome. Genet Med 2022; 24:1187-1195. [PMID: 35346574 PMCID: PMC9942243 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to characterize MSH6/PMS2-associated mismatch repair-deficient (MMR-D)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, given revised guidelines suggesting more modest phenotypes. METHODS Patients who consented to Institutional Review Board-approved protocols of tumor/germline sequencing or Lynch syndrome registry at a single institution from February 2005 to January 2021 with germline, heterozygous MSH6/PMS2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were identified. Clinical data were abstracted and correlated with MMR/microsatellite instability status using nonparametric tests. RESULTS We identified 243 patients (133 sequencing, 110 registry) with germline MSH6/PMS2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants; 186 (77%) had >1 cancer. Of 261 pooled tumors, colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC) comprised 55% and 43% of cancers in MSH6 and PMS2, respectively; 192 tumors underwent molecular assessments and 122 (64%) were MMR-D/MSI-H (77 in MSH6, 45 in PMS2). MMR-D/MSI-H cancers included CRC (n = 56), EC (n = 35), small bowel cancer (n = 6), ovarian cancer (n = 6), urothelial cancer (n = 5), pancreas/biliary cancer (n = 4), gastric/esophageal cancer (n = 3), nonmelanoma skin tumors (n = 3), prostate cancer (n = 2), breast cancer (n = 1), and central nervous system/brain cancer (n = 1). Among MMR-D/MSI-H CRC and EC, median age of diagnosis was 51.5 (range = 27-80) and 55 (range = 39-74) years, respectively; 9 of 56 (16%) MMR-D/MSI-H CRCs were diagnosed at age <35 years. CONCLUSION MSH6/PMS2 heterozygotes remain at risk for a broad spectrum of cancers, with 16% of MMR-D/MSI-H CRCs presenting before upper threshold of initiation of colonoscopy per guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying L. Liu
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | - Anna Maio
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Zalak Patel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Yelena Kemel
- Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering New York, NY
| | - Erin Salo-Mullen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Amanda Catchings
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Megha Ranganathan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sarah Kane
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert Soslow
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Diana Mandelker
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Maria I. Carlo
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Michael F. Walsh
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Arnold J. Markowitz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Zsofia K. Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Alicia Latham
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ceravolo AH, Yang JJ, Latham A, Markowitz AJ, Shia J, Mermelstein J, Calo D, Gerdes H, Ludwig E, Schattner MA, Stadler ZK, Kantor E, Du M, Mendelsohn RB. Effectiveness of a surveillance program of upper endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal cancers in Lynch syndrome patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:231-238. [PMID: 34698909 PMCID: PMC8760159 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-04053-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common cause of hereditary colorectal cancer and is associated with an increased lifetime risk of gastric and duodenal cancers of 8-16% and 7%, respectively; therefore, we aim to describe an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) surveillance program for upper gastrointestinal (GI) precursor lesions and cancer in LS patients. METHODS Patients who either had positive genetic testing or met clinical criteria for LS who had a surveillance EGD at our institution from 1996 to 2017 were identified. Patients were included if they had at least two EGDs or an upper GI cancer detected on the first surveillance EGD. EGD and pathology reports were extracted manually. RESULTS Our cohort included 247 patients with a mean age of 47.1 years (SD 12.6) at first EGD. Patients had a mean of 3.5 EGDs (range 1-16). Mean duration of follow-up was 5.7 years. Average interval between EGDs was 2.3 years. Surveillance EGD detected precursor lesions in 8 (3.2%) patients, two (0.8%) gastric cancers and two (0.8%) duodenal cancers. Two interval cancers were diagnosed: a duodenal adenocarcinoma was detected 2 years, 8 months after prior EGD and a jejunal adenocarcinoma was detected 1 year, 9 months after prior EGD. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that surveillance EGD is a useful tool to help detect precancerous and cancerous upper GI lesions in LS patients. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine a program of surveillance EGDs in LS patients. More data are needed to determine the appropriate surveillance interval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda H Ceravolo
- Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Janie J Yang
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alicia Latham
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joe Mermelstein
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Delia Calo
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hans Gerdes
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emmy Ludwig
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark A Schattner
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zsofia K Stadler
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth Kantor
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mengmeng Du
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robin B Mendelsohn
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Weiser MR, Chou JF, Keshinro A, Chapman WC, Bauer PS, Mutch MG, Parikh PJ, Cercek A, Saltz LB, Gollub MJ, Romesser PB, Crane CH, Shia J, Markowitz AJ, Garcia-Aguilar J, Gönen M. Development and Assessment of a Clinical Calculator for Estimating the Likelihood of Recurrence and Survival Among Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, and Surgery. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2133457. [PMID: 34748003 PMCID: PMC8576585 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Predicting outcomes in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer is challenging because of tumor downstaging. Validated clinical calculators that can estimate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with rectal cancer who have received multimodal therapy are needed. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate clinical calculators providing estimates of rectal cancer recurrence and survival that are better for individualized decision-making than the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system or the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prognostic study developed risk models, graphically represented as nomograms, for patients with incomplete pathological response using Cox proportional hazards and multivariable regression analyses with restricted cubic splines. Because patients with complete pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy had uniformly favorable outcomes, their predictions were obtained separately. The study included 1400 patients with stage II or III rectal cancer who received treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery at 2 comprehensive cancer centers (Memorial Sloan Kettering [MSK] Cancer Center and Siteman Cancer Center [SCC]) between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2017. Patients from the MSK cohort received chemoradiation, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2014; these patients were randomly assigned to either a model training group or an internal validation group. Models were externally validated using data from the SCC cohort, who received either chemoradiation, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (chemoradiotherapy group) or short-course radiotherapy, consolidation chemotherapy, and surgery (total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy group) from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2017. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2020, to January 10, 2021. EXPOSURES Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Recurrence-free survival and OS were the outcome measures, and the discriminatory performance of the clinical calculators was measured with concordance index and calibration plots. The ability of the clinical calculators to predict RFS and OS was compared with that of the AJCC staging system and the NAR score. The models for RFS and OS among patients with incomplete pathological response included postoperative pathological tumor category, number of positive lymph nodes, tumor distance from anal verge, and large- and small-vessel venous and perineural invasion; age was included in the risk model for OS. The final clinical calculators provided RFS and OS estimates derived from Kaplan-Meier curves for patients with complete pathological response and from risk models for patients with incomplete pathological response. RESULTS Among 1400 total patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, the median age was 57.8 years (range, 18.0-91.9 years), and 863 patients (61.6%) were male, with tumors at a median distance of 6.7 cm (range, 0-15.0 cm) from the anal verge. The MSK cohort comprised 1069 patients; of those, 710 were assigned to the model training group and 359 were assigned to the internal validation group. The SCC cohort comprised 331 patients; of those, 200 were assigned to the chemoradiotherapy group and 131 were assigned to the total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy group. The concordance indices in the MSK validation data set were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65-0.76) for RFS and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.65-0.80) for OS. In the external SCC data set, the concordance indices in the chemoradiotherapy group were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.62-0.81) for RFS and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.59-0.85) for OS; the concordance indices in the total neoadjuvant therapy with short-course radiotherapy group were 0.62 (95% CI, 0.49-0.75) for RFS and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.46-0.84) for OS. Calibration plots confirmed good agreement between predicted and observed events. These results compared favorably with predictions based on the AJCC staging system (concordance indices for MSK validation: RFS = 0.69 [95% CI, 0.64-0.74]; OS = 0.67 [95% CI, 0.58-0.75]) and the NAR score (concordance indices for MSK validation: RFS = 0.56 [95% CI, 0.50-0.63]; OS = 0.56 [95% CI, 0.46-0.66]). Furthermore, the clinical calculators provided more individualized outcome estimates compared with the categorical schemas (eg, estimated RFS for patients with AJCC stage IIIB disease ranged from 7% to 68%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this prognostic study, clinical calculators were developed and validated; these calculators provided more individualized estimates of the likelihood of RFS and OS than the AJCC staging system or the NAR score among patients with rectal cancer who received multimodal treatment. The calculators were easy to use and applicable to both short- and long-course radiotherapy regimens, and they may be used to inform surveillance strategies and facilitate future clinical trials and statistical power calculations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin R. Weiser
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joanne F. Chou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ajaratu Keshinro
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - William C. Chapman
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Philip S. Bauer
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Matthew G. Mutch
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Parag J. Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Leonard B. Saltz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc J. Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul B. Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christopher H. Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, New York
| | - Arnold J. Markowitz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mithat Gönen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Weiss JM, Gupta S, Burke CA, Axell L, Chen LM, Chung DC, Clayback KM, Dallas S, Felder S, Gbolahan O, Giardiello FM, Grady W, Hall MJ, Hampel H, Hodan R, Idos G, Kanth P, Katona B, Lamps L, Llor X, Lynch PM, Markowitz AJ, Pirzadeh-Miller S, Samadder NJ, Shibata D, Swanson BJ, Szymaniak BM, Wiesner GL, Wolf A, Yurgelun MB, Zakhour M, Darlow SD, Dwyer MA, Campbell M. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Version 1.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:1122-1132. [PMID: 34666312 DOI: 10.1164/jnccn.2021.0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Identifying individuals with hereditary syndromes allows for timely cancer surveillance, opportunities for risk reduction, and syndrome-specific management. Establishing criteria for hereditary cancer risk assessment allows for the identification of individuals who are carriers of pathogenic genetic variants. The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal provides recommendations for the assessment and management of patients at risk for or diagnosed with high-risk colorectal cancer syndromes. The NCCN Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal panel meets annually to evaluate and update their recommendations based on their clinical expertise and new scientific data. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)/attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (AFAP) syndrome and considerations for management of duodenal neoplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Carol A Burke
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | - Lee-May Chen
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - William Grady
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | - Heather Hampel
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | | | - Bryson Katona
- Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David Shibata
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mae Zakhour
- UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; and
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Golia Pernicka JS, Bates DDB, Fuqua JL, Knezevic A, Yoon J, Nardo L, Petkovska I, Paroder V, Nash GM, Markowitz AJ, Gollub MJ. Meaningful words in rectal MRI synoptic reports: How "polypoid" may be prognostic. Clin Imaging 2021; 80:371-376. [PMID: 34517303 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study explored the clinicopathologic outcomes of rectal tumor morphological descriptors used in a synoptic rectal MRI reporting template and determined that prognostic differences were observed. METHODS This retrospective study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center. Fifty patients with rectal tumors for whom the synoptic descriptor "polypoid" was chosen by three experienced radiologists were compared with ninety comparator patients with "partially circumferential" and "circumferential" rectal tumors. Two radiologists re-evaluated all cases. The outcome measures were agreement among two re-interpreting radiologists, clinical T staging with MRI (mrT) and descriptive nodal features, and degrees of wall attachment of tumors (on MRI) compared with pathological (p) T and N stage when available. RESULTS Re-evaluation by two radiologists showed moderate to excellent agreement in tumor morphology, presence of a pedicle, and degree of wall attachment (k = 0.41-0.76) and excellent agreement on lymph node presence and size (ICC = 0.83-0.91). Statistically significant lower mrT stage was noted for polypoid morphology, wherein 98% were mrT1/2, while only 7% and 2% of partially circumferential and circumferential tumors respectively were mrT1/2. Pathologic T and N stages among the three morphologies also differed significantly, with only 14% of polypoid cases higher than stage pT2 compared to 48% of partially circumferential cases and 60% of circumferential cases. CONCLUSION Using a "polypoid" morphology in rectal cancer MRI synoptic reports revealed a seemingly distinct phenotype with lower clinical and pathologic T and N stages when compared with alternative available descriptors. PRECIS "Polypoid" morphology in rectal cancer confers a lower clinical and pathologic T and N stage and may be useful in determining whether to proceed with surgery versus neoadjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S Golia Pernicka
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | - David D B Bates
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - James L Fuqua
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Andrea Knezevic
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Joongchul Yoon
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Saint-Eustache, 520 Boulevard Arthur-Sauvé, Saint-Eustache, QC J7R 5B1, Canada
| | - Lorenzo Nardo
- Department of Radiology, University of California-Davis, 4860 Y Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Iva Petkovska
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 East 74th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Salo-Mullen EE, Maio A, Mukherjee S, Bandlamudi C, Shia J, Kemel Y, Cadoo KA, Liu Y, Carlo M, Ranganathan M, Kane S, Srinivasan P, Chavan SS, Donoghue MTA, Bourque C, Sheehan M, Tejada PR, Patel Z, Arnold AG, Kennedy JA, Amoroso K, Breen K, Catchings A, Sacca R, Marcell V, Markowitz AJ, Latham A, Walsh M, Misyura M, Ceyhan-Birsoy O, Solit DB, Berger MF, Robson ME, Taylor BS, Offit K, Mandelker D, Stadler ZK. Prevalence and Characterization of Biallelic and Monoallelic NTHL1 and MSH3 Variant Carriers From a Pan-Cancer Patient Population. JCO Precis Oncol 2021; 5:PO.20.00443. [PMID: 34250384 PMCID: PMC8232072 DOI: 10.1200/po.20.00443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
NTHL1 and MSH3 have been implicated as autosomal recessive cancer predisposition genes. Although individuals with biallelic NTHL1 and MSH3 pathogenic variants (PVs) have increased cancer and polyposis risk, risks for monoallelic carriers are uncertain. We sought to assess the prevalence and characterize NTHL1 and MSH3 from a large pan-cancer patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with pan-cancer (n = 11,081) underwent matched tumor-normal sequencing with consent for germline analysis. Medical records and tumors were reviewed and analyzed. Prevalence of PVs was compared with reference controls (Genome Aggregation Database). RESULTS NTHL1-PVs were identified in 40 patients including 39 monoallelic carriers (39/11,081 = 0.35%) and one with biallelic variants (1/11,081 = 0.009%) and a diagnosis of isolated early-onset breast cancer. NTHL1-associated mutational signature 30 was identified in the tumors of the biallelic patient and two carriers. Colonic polyposis was not identified in any NTHL1 patient. MSH3-PVs were identified in 13 patients, including 12 monoallelic carriers (12/11,081 = 0.11%) and one with biallelic MSH3 variants (1/11,081 = 0.009%) and diagnoses of later-onset cancers, attenuated polyposis, and abnormal MSH3-protein expression. Of the 12 MSH3 carriers, two had early-onset cancer diagnoses with tumor loss of heterozygosity of the wild-type MSH3 allele. Ancestry-specific burden tests demonstrated that NTHL1 and MSH3 prevalence was not significantly different in this pan-cancer population versus controls. CONCLUSION NTHL1 and MSH3 germline alterations were not enriched in this pan-cancer patient population. However, tumor-specific findings, such as mutational signature 30 and loss of heterozygosity of the wild-type allele, suggest the potential contribution of monoallelic variants to tumorigenesis in a subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E. Salo-Mullen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anna Maio
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Semanti Mukherjee
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Chaitanya Bandlamudi
- Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Yelena Kemel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Karen A. Cadoo
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ying Liu
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Maria Carlo
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Megha Ranganathan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sarah Kane
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Preethi Srinivasan
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Shweta S. Chavan
- Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mark T. A. Donoghue
- Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Caitlin Bourque
- Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Margaret Sheehan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Zalak Patel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Angela G. Arnold
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jennifer A. Kennedy
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kimberly Amoroso
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kelsey Breen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Amanda Catchings
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Rosalba Sacca
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Vanessa Marcell
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Arnold J. Markowitz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Alicia Latham
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael Walsh
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Maksym Misyura
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David B. Solit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael F. Berger
- Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mark E. Robson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Barry S. Taylor
- Marie-Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Diana Mandelker
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Zsofia K. Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vos EL, Salo-Mullen EE, Tang LH, Schattner M, Yoon SS, Gerdes H, Markowitz AJ, Mandelker D, Janjigian Y, Offitt K, Coit DG, Stadler ZK, Strong VE. Indications for Total Gastrectomy in CDH1 Mutation Carriers and Outcomes of Risk-Reducing Minimally Invasive and Open Gastrectomies. JAMA Surg 2021; 155:1050-1057. [PMID: 32997132 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Importance CDH1 variants are increasingly identified on commercially available multigene panel tests, calling for data to inform counseling of individuals without a family history of gastric cancer. Objectives To assess association between CDH1 variant pathogenicity or family history of gastric or lobular breast cancer and identification of signet ring cell cancer and to describe outcomes of risk-reducing minimally invasive and open total gastrectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study was performed from January 1, 2006, to January 1, 2020, in 181 patients with CDH1 germline variants from a single institution. Interventions Genetic counseling, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and possible total gastrectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures CDH1 variant classification, family cancer history, findings of signet ring cell carcinoma at esophagogastroduodenoscopy and surgery, postoperative events and weight changes, and follow-up. Results Of 181 individuals with CDH1 germline variants (mean [SD] age at time of testing, 44 [15] years; 126 [70%] female), 165 harbored a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant. Of these patients, 101 underwent open (n = 58) or minimally invasive (n = 43) total gastrectomy. Anastomotic leaks that required drainage were infrequent (n = 3), and median long-term weight loss was 20% (interquartile range [IQR], 10%-23%). In those undergoing minimally invasive operations, more lymph nodes were retrieved (median, 28 [IQR, 20-34] vs 15 [IQR, 9-19]; P < .001) and the hospital stay was 1 day shorter (median, 6 [IQR, 5-7] vs 7 [IQR, 6-7] days; P = .04). Signet ring cell cancer was identified in the surgical specimens of 85 of 95 patients (89%) with a family history of gastric cancer and 4 of 6 patients (67%) who lacked a family history. Among the latter 6 patients, 4 had a personal or family history of lobular breast cancer, including 2 with signet ring cell cancer. Of the 16 patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic CDH1 variants who presented with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, 3 (19%) had no family history of gastric cancer or personal or family history of lobular breast cancer. Conclusions and Relevance Total gastrectomy may be warranted for patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic CDH1 variants and a family history of gastric or lobular breast cancer and may be appropriate for those without a family history. A minimally invasive approach is feasible and may be preferred for selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elvira L Vos
- Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Erin E Salo-Mullen
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Laura H Tang
- Experimental and Gastrointestinal Pathology Services, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mark Schattner
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sam S Yoon
- Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hans Gerdes
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Diana Mandelker
- Molecular Genetic Pathology Service, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yelena Janjigian
- Gastrointestinal Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth Offitt
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel G Coit
- Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zsofia K Stadler
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Vivian E Strong
- Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Latham A, Shia J, Patel Z, Reidy-Lagunes DL, Segal NH, Yaeger R, Ganesh K, Connell L, Kemeny NE, Kelsen DP, Hechtman JF, Nash GM, Paty PB, Zehir A, Tkachuk KA, Sheikh R, Markowitz AJ, Mandelker D, Offit K, Berger MF, Cercek A, Garcia-Aguilar J, Saltz LB, Weiser MR, Stadler ZK. Characterization and Clinical Outcomes of DNA Mismatch Repair-deficient Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 27:1429-1437. [PMID: 33199489 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-2892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The prevalence and clinical characteristics of small bowel adenocarcinomas (SBA) in the setting of Lynch syndrome have not been well studied. We characterized SBA according to DNA mismatch repair and/or microsatellite instability (MMR/MSI) and germline mutation status and compared clinical outcomes. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN A single-institution review identified 100 SBAs. Tumors were evaluated for MSI via MSIsensor and/or corresponding MMR protein expression via IHC staining. Germline DNA was analyzed for mutations in known cancer predisposition genes, including MMR (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM). Clinical variables were correlated with MMR/MSI status. RESULTS Twenty-six percent (26/100; 95% confidence interval, 18.4-35.4) of SBAs exhibited MMR deficiency (MMR-D). Lynch syndrome prevalence was 10% overall and 38.5% among MMR-D SBAs. Median age at SBA diagnosis was similar in non-Lynch syndrome MMR-D versus MMR-proficient (MMR-P) SBAs (65 vs. 61; P = 0.75), but significantly younger in Lynch syndrome (47.5 vs. 61; P = 0.03). The prevalence of synchronous/metachronous cancers was 9% (6/67) in MMR-P versus 34.6% (9/26) in MMR-D SBA, with 66.7% (6/9) of these in Lynch syndrome (P = 0.0002). In the MMR-P group, 52.2% (35/67) of patients presented with metastatic disease, compared with 23.1% (6/26) in the MMR-D group (P = 0.008). In MMR-P stage I/II patients, 88.2% (15/17) recurred, compared with 18.2% (2/11) in the MMR-D group (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS When compared with MMR-P SBA, MMR-D SBA was associated with earlier stage disease and lower recurrence rates, similar to observations in colorectal cancer. With a 38.5% prevalence in MMR-D SBA, germline Lynch syndrome testing in MMR-D SBA is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Latham
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.,Robert and Kate Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zalak Patel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Diane L Reidy-Lagunes
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Neil H Segal
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Rona Yaeger
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Karuna Ganesh
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Louise Connell
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Nancy E Kemeny
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - David P Kelsen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Jaclyn F Hechtman
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.,Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Philip B Paty
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.,Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ahmet Zehir
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaitlin A Tkachuk
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rania Sheikh
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Diana Mandelker
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.,Robert and Kate Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michael F Berger
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.,Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Marie Josee and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.,Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Leonard B Saltz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Martin R Weiser
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.,Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zsofia K Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. .,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.,Robert and Kate Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vyas M, Firat C, Hechtman JF, Weiser MR, Yaeger R, Vanderbilt C, Benhamida JK, Keshinro A, Zhang L, Ntiamoah P, Gonzalez M, Andrade R, El Dika I, Markowitz AJ, Smith JJ, Garcia-Aguilar J, Vakiani E, Klimstra DS, Stadler ZK, Shia J. Discordant DNA mismatch repair protein status between synchronous or metachronous gastrointestinal carcinomas: frequency, patterns, and molecular etiologies. Fam Cancer 2020; 20:201-213. [PMID: 33033905 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-020-00210-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The widespread use of tumor DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry in gastrointestinal tract (GIT) carcinomas has unveiled cases where the MMR protein status differs between synchronous/metachronous tumors from the same patients. This study aims at examining the frequency, patterns and molecular etiologies of such inter-tumoral MMR discordances. We analyzed a cohort of 2159 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients collected over a 5-year period and found that 1.3% of the patients (27/2159) had ≥ 2 primary CRCs, and 25.9% of the patients with ≥ 2 primary CRCs (7/27) exhibited inter-tumoral MMR discordance. We then combined the seven MMR-discordant CRC patients with three additional MMR-discordant GIT carcinoma patients and evaluated their discordant patterns and associated molecular abnormalities. The 10 patients consisted of 3 patients with Lynch syndrome (LS), 1 with polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis (PAPP), 1 with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), and 5 deemed to have no cancer disposing hereditary syndromes. Their MMR discordances were associated with the following etiologies: (1) PMS2-LS manifesting PMS2-deficient cancer at an old age when a co-incidental sporadic MMR-proficient cancer also occurred; (2) microsatellite instability-driven secondary somatic MSH6-inactivation occurring in only one-and not all-PMS2-LS associated MMR-deficient carcinomas; (3) "compound LS" with germline mutations in two MMR genes manifesting different tumors with deficiencies in different MMR proteins; (4) PAPP or FAP syndrome-associated MMR-proficient cancer co-occurring metachronously with a somatic MMR-deficient cancer; and (5) non-syndromic patients with sporadic MMR-proficient cancers co-occurring synchronously/metachronously with sporadic MMR-deficient cancers. Our study thus suggests that inter-tumoral MMR discordance is not uncommon among patients with multiple primary GIT carcinomas (25.9% in patients with ≥ 2 CRCs), and may be associated with widely varied molecular etiologies. Awareness of these patterns is essential in ensuring the most effective strategies in both LS detection and treatment decision-making. When selecting patients for immunotherapy, MMR testing should be performed on the tumor or tumors that are being treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Vyas
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Canan Firat
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jaclyn F Hechtman
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin R Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rona Yaeger
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chad Vanderbilt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamal K Benhamida
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ajaratu Keshinro
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Liying Zhang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Peter Ntiamoah
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marco Gonzalez
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rebecca Andrade
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Imane El Dika
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Efsevia Vakiani
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zsofia K Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Provenzale D, Ness RM, Llor X, Weiss JM, Abbadessa B, Cooper G, Early DS, Friedman M, Giardiello FM, Glaser K, Gurudu S, Halverson AL, Issaka R, Jain R, Kanth P, Kidambi T, Lazenby AJ, Maguire L, Markowitz AJ, May FP, Mayer RJ, Mehta S, Patel S, Peter S, Stanich PP, Terdiman J, Keller J, Dwyer MA, Ogba N. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Colorectal Cancer Screening, Version 2.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 18:1312-1320. [PMID: 33022639 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening describe various colorectal screening modalities as well as recommended screening schedules for patients at average or increased risk of developing sporadic CRC. They are intended to aid physicians with clinical decision-making regarding CRC screening for patients without defined genetic syndromes. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on select recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines, including a section on primary and secondary CRC prevention, and provide context for the panel's recommendations regarding the age to initiate screening in average risk individuals and follow-up for low-risk adenomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Gregory Cooper
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - Dayna S Early
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | - Amy L Halverson
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - Rachel Issaka
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert J Mayer
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
| | - Shivan Mehta
- Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Peter P Stanich
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Provenzale D, Gupta S, Ahnen DJ, Markowitz AJ, Chung DC, Mayer RJ, Regenbogen SE, Blanco AM, Bray T, Cooper G, Early DS, Ford JM, Giardiello FM, Grady W, Hall MJ, Halverson AL, Hamilton SR, Hampel H, Klapman JB, Larson DW, Lazenby AJ, Llor X, Lynch PM, Mikkelson J, Ness RM, Slavin TP, Sugandha S, Weiss JM, Dwyer MA, Ogba N. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Colorectal Cancer Screening, Version 1.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 16:939-949. [PMID: 30099370 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening outline various screening modalities as well as recommended screening strategies for individuals at average or increased-risk of developing sporadic CRC. The NCCN panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant data, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize 2018 updates to the NCCN Guidelines, with a primary focus on modalities used to screen individuals at average-risk for CRC.
Collapse
|
19
|
Gupta S, Provenzale D, Llor X, Halverson AL, Grady W, Chung DC, Haraldsdottir S, Markowitz AJ, Slavin Jr TP, Hampel H, Ness RM, Weiss JM, Ahnen DJ, Chen LM, Cooper G, Early DS, Giardiello FM, Hall MJ, Hamilton SR, Kanth P, Klapman JB, Lazenby AJ, Lynch PM, Mayer RJ, Mikkelson J, Peter S, Regenbogen SE, Dwyer MA, Ogba N. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Version 2.2019. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 17:1032-1041. [DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Identifying individuals with hereditary syndromes allows for improved cancer surveillance, risk reduction, and optimized management. Establishing criteria for assessment allows for the identification of individuals who are carriers of pathogenic genetic variants. The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal provide recommendations for the assessment and management of patients with high-risk colorectal cancer syndromes. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on criteria for the evaluation of Lynch syndrome and considerations for use of multigene testing in the assessment of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Amy L. Halverson
- 4Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - William Grady
- 5Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lee-may Chen
- 14UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Gregory Cooper
- 15Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - Dayna S. Early
- 16Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Liu S, Gӧnen M, Stadler ZK, Weiser MR, Hechtman JF, Vakiani E, Wang T, Vyas M, Joneja U, Al-Bayati M, Segal NH, Smith JJ, King S, Guercio S, Ntiamoah P, Markowitz AJ, Zhang L, Cercek A, Garcia-Aguilar J, Saltz LB, Diaz LA, Klimstra DS, Shia J. Cellular localization of PD-L1 expression in mismatch-repair-deficient and proficient colorectal carcinomas. Mod Pathol 2019; 32:110-121. [PMID: 30166615 PMCID: PMC6309293 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0114-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2018] [Revised: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Blockade of the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands PD-L1 has shown clinical efficacy across several tumor types, especially in mismatch-repair-deficient colorectal carcinoma. The aim of this study was to examine the pattern and cellular localization of PD-L1 expression in the different molecular subtypes of mismatch-repair-deficient colorectal cancers vs. their mismatch-repair-proficient counterparts. PD-L1/SATB2 double-antibody-immunohistochemistry was utilized to distinguish tumor cell from immune cell staining. We observed in our series of 129 colorectal adenocarcinomas that PD-L1 expression occurred primarily in tumor-associated-immune cells and most prominently at the tumor-stroma-interface of the invasive front. The level of invasive front immune cell staining was significantly higher in mismatch-repair-deficient tumors compared to mismatch-repair-proficient tumors (p < 0.001), but no difference was observed among the different subtypes of mismatch-repair-deficient tumors: Lynch syndrome-associated vs. MLH1-methylated vs. unexplained. While selected mismatch-repair-proficient tumors exhibited unusually high tumor-infiltrating-lymphocytes and had high level immune cell PD-L1 expression, a positive correlation between PD-L1 expression and high lymphocyte count was detected only in mismatch-repair-deficient tumors (r = 0.39, p < 0.001) and not in mismatch-repair-proficient tumors. Notably, true tumor cell PD-L1 expression in colorectal carcinoma was rare, present in only 3 of 129 tumors (2.3%): 2 MLH1-methylated and 1 mismatch-repair-proficient with high tumor-infiltrating-lymphocytes; and the staining in the tumor cells in all 3 was diffuse (>=50% of the tumor). These findings may serve to inform further efforts aiming to evaluate PD-L1 immunohistochemistry vis-à-vis molecular sub-classification as predictive biomarkers in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandy Liu
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Mithat Gӧnen
- Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering
Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Zsofia K. Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Martin R. Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Jaclyn F. Hechtman
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Efsevia Vakiani
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Tao Wang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Monika Vyas
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Upasana Joneja
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Moataz Al-Bayati
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Neil H. Segal
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - J. Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Sarah King
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Shanna Guercio
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Peter Ntiamoah
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Arnold J. Markowitz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Liying Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Leonard B. Saltz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Luis A. Diaz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gupta S, Provenzale D, Regenbogen SE, Hampel H, Slavin TP, Hall MJ, Llor X, Chung DC, Ahnen DJ, Bray T, Cooper G, Early DS, Ford JM, Giardiello FM, Grady W, Halverson AL, Hamilton SR, Klapman JB, Larson DW, Lazenby AJ, Lynch PM, Markowitz AJ, Mayer RJ, Ness RM, Samadder NJ, Shike M, Sugandha S, Weiss JM, Dwyer MA, Ogba N. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Version 3.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018; 15:1465-1475. [PMID: 29223984 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal provide recommendations for the management of patients with high-risk syndromes associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). The NCCN Panel for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal meets at least annually to assess comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant data, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on genes newly associated with CRC risk on multigene panels, the associated evidence, and currently recommended management strategies.
Collapse
|
22
|
Weinberg DS, Pickhardt PJ, Bruining DH, Edwards K, Fletcher J, Gollub MJ, Keenan EM, Kupfer SS, Li T, Lubner SJ, Markowitz AJ, Ross EA. Computed Tomography Colonography vs Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Surveillance After Surgery. Gastroenterology 2018; 154:927-934.e4. [PMID: 29174927 PMCID: PMC5847443 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2017] [Revised: 11/07/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Recommendations for surveillance after curative surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) include a 1-year post-resection abdominal-pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan and optical colonoscopy (OC). CT colonography (CTC), when used in CRC screening, effectively identifies colorectal polyps ≥10 mm and cancers. We performed a prospective study to determine whether CTC, concurrent with CT, could substitute for OC in CRC surveillance. METHODS Our study enrolled 231 patients with resected stage 0-III CRC, identified at 5 tertiary care academic centers. Approximately 1 year after surgery, participants underwent outpatient CTC plus CT, followed by same-day OC. CTC results were revealed after endoscopic visualization of sequential colonic segments, which were re-examined for discordant findings. The primary outcome was performance of CTC in the detection of colorectal adenomas and cancers using endoscopy as the reference standard. RESULTS Of the 231 participants, 116 (50.2%) had polyps of any size or histology identified by OC, and 15.6% had conventional adenomas and/or serrated polyps ≥6 mm. No intra-luminal cancers were detected. CTC detected patients with polyps of ≥6 mm with 44.0% sensitivity (95% CI, 30.2-57.8) and 93.4% specificity (95% CI, 89.7-97.0). CTC detected polyps ≥10 mm with 76.9% sensitivity (95% CI, 54.0-99.8) and 89.0% specificity (95% CI, 84.8-93.1). Similar values were found when only adenomatous polyps were considered. The negative predictive value of CTC for adenomas ≥6 mm was 90.7% (95% CI, 86.7-94.5) and for adenomas ≥10 mm the negative predictive value was 98.6% (95% CI, 97.0-100). CONCLUSIONS In a CRC surveillance population 1 year following resection, CTC was inferior to OC for detecting patients with polyps ≥6 mm. Clinical Trials.gov Registration Number: NCT02143115.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tianyu Li
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Simoes PK, Woo KM, Shike M, Mendelsohn RB, Gerdes H, Markowitz AJ, Ludwig E, Shah PM, Schattner MA. Direct Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy: Procedural and Nutrition Outcomes in a Large Patient Cohort. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2017; 42:898-906. [DOI: 10.1002/jpen.1023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Priya K. Simoes
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; New York USA
| | - Kaitlin M. Woo
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; New York USA
| | - Moshe Shike
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; New York USA
| | - Robin B. Mendelsohn
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; New York USA
| | - Hans Gerdes
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; New York USA
| | - Arnold J. Markowitz
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; New York USA
| | - Emmy Ludwig
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; New York USA
| | - Pari M. Shah
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; New York USA
| | - Mark A. Schattner
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; New York USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Merkow RP, Herrera G, Goldman DA, Gerdes H, Schattner MA, Markowitz AJ, Strong VE, Brennan MF, Coit DG. Endoscopic Ultrasound as a Pretreatment Clinical Staging Tool for Gastric Cancer: Association with Pathology and Outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24:3658-3666. [PMID: 28815443 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6050-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a guideline-recommended diagnostic test to estimate pretreatment clinical stage in gastric cancer. The impact of EUS to discriminate long-term outcomes has not been established. OBJECTIVES The objectives of our study were to (1) evaluate the association between EUS and pathologic stage; (2) evaluate the ability of EUS to predict disease-specific survival (DSS); and (3) determine how neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) affects these relationships. METHODS A prospective gastric cancer database at a tertiary care cancer center identified 734 patients who underwent curative intent resection. Patients were separated into EUS low-risk (T1-2, N0) and EUS high-risk (T3-4 Nany, or Tany N+) groups. Agreement statistics and 5-year DSS were estimated stratified by NCT. RESULTS Between 1987 and 2015, 68% (502/734) of patients were not treated with NCT. Among these patients, percentage agreement between EUS and pathology was moderate (individual T stage: 52%; N stage: 70%; risk group: 73%). EUS accurately estimated pathologic risk group in 73% (365/502) of patients, whereas it overestimated pathologic risk group in 19% (93/502) of patients and underestimated risk in 8% (41/502) of patients. EUS in non-NCT staging was able to discriminate DSS for T stage (hazard ratio [HR] 5.07, p < 0.05), N stage (HR 3.58, p < 0.05), and risk group (HR 6.35, p < 0.05). Among patients treated with NCT, EUS was unable to discriminate DSS for T stage (HR 0.94, p > 0.05), N stage (HR 1.46, p > 0.05) and risk group (HR 0.50, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Pretreatment clinical staging based on EUS alone could lead to over- or under treatment in 27% of patients and can discriminate DSS in NCT-naive patients. EUS should be used in the context of other validated clinical risk tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan P Merkow
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gabriel Herrera
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Debra A Goldman
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hans Gerdes
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark A Schattner
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vivian E Strong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Murray F Brennan
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel G Coit
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Portlock CS, Hamlin PA, Gerecitano JF, Noy A, Palomba ML, Walkley J, Corcoran S, Migliacci J, Schoder H, Papanicolaou G, Markowitz AJ. A Positive Prospective Trial of Antibiotic Therapy in Advanced Stage, Non-Bulky Indolent Lymphoma. Tumor Microenviron Ther 2016; 2:14-18. [PMID: 26798624 DOI: 10.1515/tumor-2015-0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have prospectively studied a three month course of clarithromycin (substituted by Prevpac®, lansoprazole/ amoxicillin/ clarithromycin, in the first two wks when stool H pylori+) for non-bulky, advanced stage indolent lymphoma. These patients are often candidates for expectant monitoring and it is during this period that a window of opportunity may exist to identify and treat associated infections. METHODS All previously untreated patients with a new diagnosis of indolent lymphoma (FL and non-FL) meeting GELF criteria were treated with 12 weeks of clarithromycin. There were 32 evaluable patients, 4 of whom had stool H pylori. RESULTS At one month post-antibiotic therapy, we have observed lymphoma responses in 7 of 32 patients (21.9%). Two additional patients had objective response during followup (28.1% overall response). The median treatment free survival for antibiotic responders is 69.9 months and for non-responders, 30.6 months (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION Three response patterns have been noted, perhaps suggestive of an immune-mediated response -- prompt PET negative; flair with delayed PET negative response; and gradual continuous improvement. This prospective study appears promising, may be a step toward developing a lymphoma prevention strategy by reducing "antigen drive," and deserves further clinical/biological study. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00461084.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol S Portlock
- Department of Medicine, Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Paul A Hamlin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, 1275 York Avenue New York, NY, 10065 USA
| | - John F Gerecitano
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, 1275 York Avenue New York, NY, 10065 USA
| | - Ariela Noy
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, 1275 York Avenue New York, NY, 10065 USA
| | - Maria Lia Palomba
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, 1275 York Avenue New York, NY, 10065 USA
| | - Janelle Walkley
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, 1275 York Avenue New York, NY, 10065 USA
| | - Stacie Corcoran
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Office of Physician-in-Chief, 1275 York Avenue New York, NY, 10065 USA
| | - Jocelyn Migliacci
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, 1275 York Avenue New York, NY, 10065 USA
| | - Heiko Schoder
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, 1275 York Avenue New York, NY, 10065 USA
| | - Genovefa Papanicolaou
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, 1275 York Avenue New York, NY, 10065 USA
| | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, 1275 York Avenue New York, NY, 10065 USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Salo-Mullen EE, Shia J, Brownell I, Allen P, Girotra M, Robson ME, Offit K, Guillem JG, Markowitz AJ, Stadler ZK. Mosaic partial deletion of the PTEN gene in a patient with Cowden syndrome. Fam Cancer 2015; 13:459-67. [PMID: 24609522 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-014-9709-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Cowden syndrome is an autosomal dominant condition caused by pathogenic mutations in the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) gene. Only a small proportion of identified pathogenic mutations have been reported to be large deletions and rearrangements. We report on a female patient with a previous history of breast ductal carcinoma in situ who presented to our institution for management of gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyposis. Although several neoplastic predisposition syndromes were considered, genetic evaluation determined that the patient met clinical diagnostic criteria for Cowden syndrome. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization was performed and revealed a mosaic partial deletion of the PTEN gene. Follow-up clinical history including bilateral thyroid nodules, dermatological findings, and a new primary "triple-negative" adenocarcinoma of the contralateral breast are discussed. We highlight the need for recognition and awareness of mosaicism as it may provide an explanation for variable phenotypic presentations and may alter the genetic counseling risk assessment of affected individuals and family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E Salo-Mullen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box 295, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Steinhagen E, Hui VW, Levy RA, Markowitz AJ, Fish S, Wong RJ, Sood R, Ochman SM, Guillem JG. Results of a prospective thyroid ultrasound screening program in adenomatous polyposis patients. Am J Surg 2014; 208:764-769. [PMID: 25073656 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2013] [Revised: 03/23/2014] [Accepted: 03/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with adenomatous polyposis may be at increased risk for developing thyroid cancer (TC). However, screening guidelines for TC in these patients are not well established. METHODS Patients with a diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis, attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis, and gene mutation-negative adenomatous polyposis enrolled in our Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Family Registry were eligible for a screening thyroid ultrasound (US). Findings were reviewed by the study endocrinologist and intervention and/or follow-up determined. RESULTS Fifty patients underwent screening thyroid US. Thirty-four (68%) patients had abnormal findings on US, including 27 (79%) with thyroid nodules. In 7 patients, US-detected thyroid nodules met established criteria for fine-needle aspiration. Of the 6 patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration, 2 (4%) were diagnosed with papillary TC. Both of these patients were female. CONCLUSIONS A large proportion of adenomatous polyposis patients will have abnormal results on thyroid US, including suspicious-appearing thyroid nodules that when biopsied are malignant. Female patients have an apparently greater risk of developing TC. Polyposis patients, especially women, should be offered participation in a thyroid US screening program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Steinhagen
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Vanessa W Hui
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Rachel A Levy
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Stephanie Fish
- Department of Medicine, Endocrinology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Richard J Wong
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Rupa Sood
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Stephanie M Ochman
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - José G Guillem
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Folkert MR, Cohen GN, Wu AJ, Gerdes H, Schattner MA, Markowitz AJ, Ludwig E, Ilson DH, Bains MS, Zelefsky MJ, Goodman KA. Endoluminal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for early stage and recurrent esophageal cancer in medically inoperable patients. Brachytherapy 2013; 12:463-70. [PMID: 23434221 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2012.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2012] [Revised: 12/21/2012] [Accepted: 12/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The management of superficial primary and recurrent esophageal cancer (EC) in medically inoperable patients is complex. Endoluminal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy has shown mixed results in terms of toxicity and local control. In this study, we examined the outcomes and toxicities in a set of patients with superficial primary and recurrent EC treated with a consistent HDR technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 8/2008 and 7/2011, 14 patients were treated with HDR intraluminal brachytherapy, 10 (71.4%) with recurrent disease, and 4 (28.6%) with previously unirradiated lesions. Patients received three weekly fractions to a median dose of 12 Gy (range, 10-15 Gy); dose was prescribed to 7-mm median depth with mucosal dose limited to 8-10 Gy using a 12-14-mm applicator. RESULTS Median followup was 15.4 months. Overall freedom from failure (OFFF) and overall survival (OS) at 18 months were 30.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.2, 56.4) and 72.7% (95% CI: 45.3, 100), respectively. For patients with recurrent disease, OFFF and OS at 18 months were 11.1% (95% CI: 0, 32.1) and 55.6% (95% CI: 15.4, 95.8), respectively. For patients with previously unirradiated disease, OFFF and OS at 18 months were 75.0% (95% CI: 31.6, 100) and 100.0%, respectively. Eight (57.1%) patients had Grade 1 acute adverse effects; 6 (42.9%) patients had chronic Grade 1 adverse effects; 1 (7.1%) patient developed Grade 2 stricture. Grade 3 tracheoesophageal fistula occurred in 1 (7.1%) patient. One patient died before completion of treatment of unrelated causes. CONCLUSIONS HDR endoluminal brachytherapy is a well-tolerated treatment for superficial primary and recurrent EC in medically inoperable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Folkert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Steinhagen E, Guillem JG, Chang G, Salo-Mullen EE, Shia J, Fish S, Stadler ZK, Markowitz AJ. The Prevalence of Thyroid Cancer and Benign Thyroid Disease in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis May Be Higher Than Previously Recognized. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2012; 11:304-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2012.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2011] [Revised: 01/25/2012] [Accepted: 01/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
30
|
Steinhagen E, Moore HG, Lee-Kong SA, Shia J, Eaton A, Markowitz AJ, Russo P, Guillem JG. Patients with colorectal and renal cell carcinoma diagnoses appear to be at risk for additional malignancies. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2012; 12:23-7. [PMID: 23026110 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2012.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2012] [Revised: 06/08/2012] [Accepted: 07/09/2012] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may be at risk for additional primary malignancies. A review of 101 patients with these concurrent diagnoses was performed. Forty-two percent of patients had 1 or more additional malignancies; none appeared to be associated with Lynch syndrome (LS). This suggests the need for careful follow-up in these patients and further study. BACKGROUND Small studies have demonstrated that patients who have both colorectal and renal cell carcinoma may be at increased risk for the development of additional malignancies. A possible genetic basis has been suggested. Our study describes the clinicopathologic features of these patients and clarifies the relationship of this cohort with Lynch syndrome (LS). METHODS Patients with primary CRC and RCC treated at our institution were identified. Medical records were reviewed for demographic and clinical information. Immunohistochemical staining for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins was performed on tumor tissue when possible. RESULTS During the study period, 24,642 patients were treated for CRC and 7,366 were treated for RCC at our institution. One hundred seventy-nine patients had both diagnoses, with 101 patients eligible for inclusion in our cohort. Tumors were typically early stage. The 2 cancers presented as synchronous lesions in 42% of patients. Thirty-two patients had 1 additional primary malignancy, 7 patients had 2 additional primary malignancies, and 3 patients had 3 additional primary malignancies. No patient had a family history that met the Amsterdam II criteria (AC) for LS, but 50% had family members with 1 malignancy. One of 10 colorectal tumors analyzed for the absence of MMR protein expression demonstrated the absence of MSH6, but the corresponding RCC demonstrated intact expression of all 4 MMR proteins. CONCLUSION It is rare for patients to be diagnosed with both CRC and RCC. The clinicopathologic features of this cohort and the results of immunohistochemical analysis performed on a sample of these patients do not suggest LS. However, the high rate of additional carcinomas suggests a need for careful follow-up. Multicenter longitudinal studies are warranted to further understand the natural history and possible genetic basis for this entity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Steinhagen
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
DiMaio CJ, Dorfman MP, Gardner GJ, Nash GM, Schattner MA, Markowitz AJ, Chi DS, Gerdes H. Covered esophageal self-expandable metal stents in the nonoperative management of postoperative colorectal anastomotic leaks. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76:431-5. [PMID: 22817797 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.1393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2011] [Accepted: 03/20/2012] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J DiMaio
- Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York 10029, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Grossman EB, Schattner MA, Dimaio CJ, Gerdes H, Wong DW, Markowitz AJ. Endoscopic management of complete colonic obstruction. J Interv Gastroenterol 2012; 1:179-181. [PMID: 22586533 DOI: 10.4161/jig.1.4.19969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2011] [Accepted: 12/16/2011] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
A patient with metastatic rectal cancer underwent a diverting transverse loop colostomy due to rectal obstruction. 16 months later, he underwent a low anterior resection to resect his rectal cancer along with reversal of his transverse colostomy, and creation of a temporary loop ileostomy. Six months later, he was brought to the operating room for closure of his ileostomy. Post-operatively, the patient developed nausea, vomiting, and abdominal distention and imaging revealed a large bowel obstruction, confirmed by colonoscopy. The patient refused surgical diversion and a cecostomy tube was placed for decompression. After maturation of the cecostomy fistula, a rendezvous colonoscopy was performed, retrograde through the rectum and antegrade through the cecostomy fistula. The obstructing mucosa was traversed and the site of obstruction was balloon dilated, relieving the obstruction endoscopically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan B Grossman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Steinhagen E, Shia J, Markowitz AJ, Stadler ZK, Salo-Mullen EE, Zheng J, Lee-Kong SA, Nash GM, Offit K, Guillem JG. Systematic immunohistochemistry screening for Lynch syndrome in early age-of-onset colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical resection. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 214:61-7. [PMID: 22192923 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2011] [Revised: 10/08/2011] [Accepted: 10/10/2011] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome (LS), defined by a deleterious (pathogenic) germline mutation in a mismatch repair (MMR) gene, is characterized by early age-of-onset colorectal cancer (CRC). Because clinical criteria for LS, such as the Amsterdam II Criteria, may miss cases, reflex tumor tissue testing of all CRC patients for LS has been proposed. Our study describes the impact of routine immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis of tumor tissue for loss of MMR protein expression in early age-of-onset CRC patients undergoing resection. STUDY DESIGN A prospective institutional program was established to perform IHC analysis on all early age-of-onset (≤50 years) CRC patients undergoing resection. Patients with abnormal IHC analysis were referred to the Clinical Genetics Service for further evaluation. The study cohort excluded patients with other polyposis syndromes and inflammatory bowel disease. RESULTS IHC was performed on 198 patients from July 2006 to June 2010. The median age was 42.8 years (range 23.1 to 50.6 years). Abnormal IHC was reported in 38 (19.1%) patients, and 22 (57.8%) with abnormal IHC analysis had germline genetic testing. Seventeen (77.2%) had an alteration detected in an MMR gene: 10 were known to be deleterious mutations and 7 were variants of uncertain significance. Overall, LS was detected in 5.1% of patients. Only 2 of the 10 (20%) with a deleterious mutation actually met the Amsterdam II Criteria. CONCLUSIONS Reflex IHC testing for LS on early age-of-onset CRC patients undergoing resection is feasible at the institutional level. This strategy identifies a substantial number of LS patients who would have been missed if genetic testing was based on the Amsterdam II Criteria alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Steinhagen
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a commonly transmitted infection that has both hepatic and extrahepatic repercussions. These range from the inflammatory to the oncologic with an undisputed link to hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Its role in the development of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) is becoming better understood, leading to opportunities for research, therapy, and even prevention. Research in the field has progressed significantly over the last decade, with the number of patients diagnosed with HCV and B-NHL rising incrementally. It is therefore becoming crucial to fully understand the pathobiologic link of HCV in B cell lymphomagenesis and its optimal management in the oncologic setting.
Collapse
|
35
|
Grossman EB, Schattner MA, DiMaio CJ, Gerdes H, Wong WD, Markowitz AJ. Endoscopic management of complete colonic obstruction. jig 2011. [DOI: 10.4161/jig.19969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
36
|
Mendelsohn RB, Gerdes H, Markowitz AJ, DiMaio CJ, Schattner MA. Carcinomatosis is not a contraindication to enteral stenting in selected patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73:1135-40. [PMID: 21470604 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2010] [Accepted: 01/01/2011] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopically inserted self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are used to palliate malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Peritoneal disease is considered a relative contraindication to SEMS placement given the risk of multifocal obstruction. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the success of SEMSs placed in patients with GOO with carcinomatosis. DESIGN Retrospective review of patients who underwent SEMS placement for malignant GOO. SETTING Large, urban cancer center. PATIENTS A total of 215 patients who were scheduled for SEMS placement for GOO. INTERVENTIONS SEMS placement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Technical success, clinical success, early and late SEMS failure, and complications. RESULTS Technical success was achieved in 192 of 201 patients (95.5%). Of the 9 patients who did not achieve technical success, 6 had carcinomatosis. Among the 116 patients (60%) with carcinomatosis, clinical success was achieved 94 of them (81%). Of these 94 patients, 17 (18%) required reinterventions: 4 for early SEMS failure and 13 for late SEMS failure. Among the 76 patients (40%) without carcinomatosis, clinical success was achieved in 64 of them (84%). Of these 64 patients, 17 (27%) required reinterventions: 4 for early SEMS failure and 13 for late SEMS failure. Complication rates were similar for both groups. LIMITATIONS This was a retrospective review with experienced clinicians selecting patients whom they thought would benefit from SEMS placement. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to evaluate the effect of carcinomatosis on the technical and clinical success of SEMSs in the palliation of malignant GOO. We found clinical outcomes comparable to those without peritoneal disease. Carcinomatosis should not be considered a contraindication to SEMS placement in selected patients with malignant GOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin B Mendelsohn
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Adenomatous polyps are found on screening colonoscopy in 22.5% to 58.2% of the adult population and therefore represent a common problem. Patients with multiple adenomatous polyps are of unique interest because a proportion of these patients have an inheritable form of colorectal cancer. This article discusses the history and clinical features, genetic testing, surveillance, and treatments for the condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Steinhagen
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, The Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Family Registry, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Markowitz AJ, Chang G, Cortina L, Salo-Mullen EE, Guillem JG. Thyroid cancer and benign thyroid disease in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) registry experience. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2011. [PMCID: PMC3288929 DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-9-s1-p24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
39
|
Lee-Kong SA, Markowitz AJ, Glogowski E, Papadopoulos C, Stadler Z, Weiser MR, Temple LK, Guillem JG. Prospective Immunohistochemical Analysis of Primary Colorectal Cancers for Loss of Mismatch Repair Protein Expression. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2010; 9:255-9. [DOI: 10.3816/ccc.2010.n.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
40
|
Nagula S, Ishill N, Nash C, Markowitz AJ, Schattner MA, Temple L, Weiser MR, Thaler HT, Zauber A, Gerdes H. Quality of Life and Symptom Control after Stent Placement or Surgical Palliation of Malignant Colorectal Obstruction. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210:45-53. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2009] [Revised: 09/23/2009] [Accepted: 09/29/2009] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
41
|
Power DG, Schattner MA, Gerdes H, Brenner B, Markowitz AJ, Capanu M, Coit DG, Brennan M, Kelsen DP, Shah MA. Endoscopic ultrasound can improve the selection for laparoscopy in patients with localized gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 208:173-8. [PMID: 19228527 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2008] [Revised: 10/20/2008] [Accepted: 10/27/2008] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The majority of newly diagnosed patients with gastric cancer have disease that is not resectable because of local extension or metastatic (M1) disease. Laparoscopy is a recommended staging evaluation to identify occult peritoneal metastatic disease. We determined if endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) could improve the selection of patients for laparoscopy. STUDY DESIGN Gastric cancer patients being screened for a preoperative chemotherapy clinical trial were prospectively examined. Patients underwent standard preoperative assessment. Those without obvious metastatic disease were referred for EUS and laparoscopy. EUS divided patients into risk categories for metastatic disease: low risk (T1-2, N0) and high risk (T3-4, N+, or both). Laparoscopy categories were M1 and M0. The ability of EUS to predict subradiographic peritoneal metastatic disease was evaluated. RESULTS Ninety-four patients were studied. The majority were EUS high risk (72%). Occult metastatic disease was identified in 19 patients, 18 of whom had high-risk EUS stage. The yields of identifying M1 disease by laparoscopy in EUS high- and low-risk patients were 25% (95% CI, 15% to 37%) and 4% (95% CI, 0.1% to 20%), respectively. The negative predictive value of low-risk EUS for laparoscopy and pathologic M0 was 96% (exact 95% CI, 80% to 100%). CONCLUSIONS This study suggested that laparoscopy can be avoided in patients with EUS early-stage gastric cancer. Patients with more advanced disease are at higher risk of occult peritoneal disease and require laparoscopy. Validation with greater numbers is warranted, but, based on these data, we propose a new staging algorithm allowing EUS low-risk patients to proceed directly to resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek G Power
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, and the Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Nahas CSR, Akhurst T, Yeung H, Leibold T, Riedel E, Markowitz AJ, Minsky BD, Paty PB, Weiser MR, Temple LK, Wong WD, Larson SM, Guillem JG. Positron Emission Tomography Detection of Distant Metastatic or Synchronous Disease in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Receiving Preoperative Chemoradiation. Ann Surg Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9710-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
43
|
Nahas CSR, Akhurst T, Yeung H, Leibold T, Riedel E, Markowitz AJ, Minsky BD, Paty PB, Weiser MR, Temple LK, Wong WD, Larson SM, Guillem JG. Positron Emission Tomography Detection of Distant Metastatic or Synchronous Disease in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Receiving Preoperative Chemoradiation. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 15:704-11. [PMID: 17882490 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9626-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2007] [Revised: 08/13/2007] [Accepted: 08/14/2007] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer may present with synchronous distant metastases. Choice of optimal treatment--neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus systemic chemotherapy alone--depends on accurate assessment of distant disease. We prospectively evaluated the ability of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) to detect distant disease in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who were otherwise eligible for combined modality therapy (CMT). METHODS Ninety-three patients with locally advanced rectal cancer underwent whole-body [18F]FDG PET scanning 2-3 weeks before starting CMT. Sites other than the rectum, mesorectum, or the area along the inferior mesenteric artery were considered distant and were divided into nine groups: neck, lung, mediastinal lymph node (LN), abdomen, liver, colon, pelvis, peripheral LN, and soft tissue. Two nuclear medicine physicians blinded to clinical information used PET images and a five-point scale (0-4) to determine certainty of disease. A score greater than 3 was considered malignant. Confirmation was based on tissue diagnosis, surgical exploration, and subsequent imaging. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 34 months, the overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of PET in detecting distant disease were 93.7%, 77.8%, and 98.7% respectively. Greatest accuracy was demonstrated in detection of liver (accuracy = 99.9%, sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 98.8%) and lung (accuracy = 99.9%, sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 100%) disease; PET detected 11/12 confirmed malignant sites in liver and lung. A total of 10 patients were confirmed to have M1 stage disease. All 10 were correctly staged by pre-CMT PET; abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scans accurately detected nine of them. CONCLUSION Baseline PET in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer reliably detects metastatic disease in liver and lung. PET may play a significant role in defining extent of distant disease in selected cases, thus impacting the choice of neoadjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caio S R Nahas
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Guillem JG, Glogowski E, Moore HG, Nafa K, Markowitz AJ, Shia J, Offit K, Ellis NA. Single-amplicon MSH2 A636P mutation testing in Ashkenazi Jewish patients with colorectal cancer: role in presurgical management. Ann Surg 2007; 245:560-5. [PMID: 17414604 PMCID: PMC1877028 DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000252589.26244.d4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study summarizes our initial experience with prospective, single-amplicon (mutation-specific) A636P testing in Ashkenazi Jewish patients at risk for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA We previously described a founder mutation, MSH2*1906G >C (A636P) that causes HNPCC in 8/1345 (0.59%) of Ashkenazim with colorectal cancer. The mutation was more common in Ashkenazim diagnosed at <or=40 years (7%). METHODS Twenty-seven Ashkenazi probands at risk for HNPCC were ascertained. Single-amplicon A636P testing was performed on 21 by polymerase chain reaction of exon 12 of MSH2, followed by direct DNA sequencing. Mutational analysis of the entire open reading frame of MLH1 and MSH2 was performed on 7 by PCR of each exon, followed by heteroduplex analysis using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and direct sequencing of exons with variant chromatographs. One patient received both studies, RESULTS The A636P mutation was detected in 3/21 (14%) prospectively evaluated patients using single amplicon testing. In 6 patients, the entire open reading frame of MLH1 and MSH2 was analyzed, and 1 additional A636P carrier and 2 carriers of previously unrecognized mutations were identified. The A636P mutation was present in 2 patients who met Amsterdam criteria and in 2 patients who did not. CONCLUSIONS Although rare in the general population, A636P mutations are found at increased frequency in Ashkenazim with a personal or family history of colorectal or other HNPCC-associated cancers. This inexpensive and rapid approach may be useful preoperatively in helping determine the extent of colon resection for a subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose G Guillem
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Gollub MJ, Akhurst T, Markowitz AJ, Weiser MR, Guillem JG, Smith LM, Larson SM, Margulis AR. Combined CT colonography and 18F-FDG PET of colon polyps: potential technique for selective detection of cancer and precancerous lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188:130-8. [PMID: 17179355 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.05.1458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of imaging the colon with fused CT colonography (CTC) and 18F-FDG PET and to correlate the findings with the histologic features of polyps. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Eighteen patients with suspected colorectal polyps enrolled in this prospective study. Before colonoscopy, 17 of the patients underwent a combination of FDG PET and CTC. CTC consisted of 4-MDCT merged with PET. PET of the abdomen and pelvis was performed after each CTC scan. One radiologist and one nuclear medicine physician in consensus analyzed PET and CTC fusion data. PET standard uptake value was correlated with the findings at histologic examination of polyps. Patient feasibility was defined as the ability to tolerate prolonged scanning with good colonic distention. Technical feasibility was determined by how closely anatomically matched polyps overlapped on fusion images. RESULTS Seventeen of 18 patients tolerated scanning. Eighty-five percent of colon segments were optimally distended. Twenty-three of 27 FDG-avid polyps measuring 10 mm or more had excellent overlap at fusion imaging. PET depicted 23 of 39 premalignant polyps and even showed increased tracer activity associated with four small tubular adenomas (4-6 mm). Sixteen benign polyps (10-25 mm) were not depicted on PET. All nine cases of cancer (tumors measuring 11-60 mm) were detected with both PET and CTC. The standard uptake value of malignant tumors ranged from 4 to 20 (mean, 9). However, six benign flat polyps did not exhibit FDG avidity. CONCLUSION The novel combination of CTC and PET was feasible in 17 of 18 patients and allowed excellent image correlation in 23 of 27 proven polyps measuring 10 mm or more on PET-CTC fusion. This technique shows promise in accurate anatomic correlation of both malignant and premalignant lesions evaluated with FDG PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., Rm. C276F, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Gollub MJ, Jhaveri S, Schwartz E, Felderman H, Cooper C, Markowitz AJ, Kurtz RC, Thaler H. CT colonography features of sigmoid diverticular disease. Clin Imaging 2006; 29:200-6. [PMID: 15855066 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2004.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2004] [Revised: 05/10/2004] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to assess the sigmoid distensibility during CT colonography (CTC) in patients with diverticular disease. METHODS Consecutive patients without a history of pelvic radiation or neoplasms underwent 150 CTC. Three radiologists in consensus evaluated axial images for colonic distention, luminal diameters (mm), diverticula, and muscular thickening. RESULTS The minimum colon diameter in patients with muscular thickening was significantly smaller, irrespective of the presence of diverticula (P=.009). CONCLUSION Muscular thickening with diverticular disease was associated with significantly less sigmoid colon distension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominantly inherited colorectal cancer syndrome attributable to mutations in one of several DNA mismatch repair genes, most commonly MLH1 and MSH2 . In certain populations, founder mutations account for a substantial portion of HNPCC. In this report we summarize the literature and our personal experience testing for a specific founder mutation in the Ashkenazi Jewish population, MSH2*1906G > C , also known as A636P. Although rare in the general population, the A636P mutation is detected in up to 7% of Ashkenazi Jewish patients with early age-of-onset colorectal cancer, and may account for up to one third of HNPCC in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. In addition, we summarize our initial experience with a prospective A636P testing protocol aimed at Ashkenazi Jewish patients at high or intermediate risk for harboring the A636P mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose G Guillem
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Shia J, Klimstra DS, Nafa K, Offit K, Guillem JG, Markowitz AJ, Gerald WL, Ellis NA. Value of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair proteins in predicting germline mutation in hereditary colorectal neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29:96-104. [PMID: 15613860 DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000146009.85309.3b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
The utility of immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a screening method for the identification of persons with mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) remains to be defined. In this study, we analyzed the value of IHC versus that of microsatellite instability (MSI) testing in predicting mutation status of the MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes in colorectal carcinomas and adenomas, and explored the frequency and significance of immunohistochemical staining variability. The study samples included 83 carcinomas and 29 adenomas derived from 110 patients who had strong family histories of colorectal cancer. Our results showed that IHC correctly predicted MSI status in 76% of the cases with a specificity of 100%. The overall sensitivity of IHC in predicting a germline mutation was 79% (30 of 38) with a specificity of 89% (48 of 54), whereas that of MSI testing was 97% (30 of 31) with a specificity of 83% (35 of 42). Six of 31 analyzable cases that had a disease-causing mutation and exhibited MSI showed normal IHC. The lower sensitivity of IHC was caused mainly by its low sensitivity in detecting MLH1 gene mutation (4 of 9). Coexisting adenomas and carcinomas observed in the same slide (n=12) showed a similar or identical staining pattern for all three proteins. No significant difference was detected in the sensitivity of IHC or MSI in detecting a germline mutation between isolated adenomas and carcinomas. In IHC-positive cases, heterogeneous staining was noted in 30% to 40% of the cases with the three different antibodies, and cytoplasmic staining in 5% to 13%. Weak IHC (defined as positive staining in <10% of the tumor with weak intensity) was noted in 14 tumors: 5 for the MLH1 antibody, 1 for MSH2, and 8 for MSH6. One of the 5 MLH1 cases exhibited MSI and had an MLH1 germline mutation. Five of the 8 MSH6 cases exhibited MSI and had MSH2 germline mutations. In conclusion, our study shows that 1) IHC identifies a significant portion of colorectal tumors derived from MMR gene germline mutation carriers and can be used as an adjunct measure in the identification of HNPCC families, but IHC cannot replace MSI testing; 2) adenomas have similar MMR protein expression patterns as carcinomas and may serve as an adequate sample for screening purposes in the identification of patients with MMR mutations; 3) not all IHC-positive cases show uniform positivity throughout the tumor; and 4) weak and focal staining of an MMR protein may be associated with MSI or gene mutation or both, suggesting the need to incorporate staining intensity in further IHC studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering, Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Shia J, Ellis NA, Paty PB, Nash GM, Qin J, Offit K, Zhang XM, Markowitz AJ, Nafa K, Guillem JG, Wong WD, Gerald WL, Klimstra DS. Value of histopathology in predicting microsatellite instability in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and sporadic colorectal cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27:1407-17. [PMID: 14576473 DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200311000-00002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 175] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Identification of colorectal carcinomas with high levels of DNA microsatellite instability (MSI-H) is important because of the suggested prognostic and therapeutic significance associated with MSI. The role of histology in identifying MSI-H colorectal carcinomas has been suggested by some studies but not confirmed by others. Furthermore, previous studies assumed that hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)-associated MSI-H tumors and sporadic MSI-H tumors have similar histology. This assumption, however, has been challenged by more recent studies. In this report, we first analyzed the value of various histologic features in predicting MSI-H in a series of 218 colorectal carcinomas containing mixed HNPCC and sporadic cases [77 tumors (35%) were MSI-H by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method]. Then, we evaluated the various histologic features comparatively in two groups extracted from the 218 cases. Group A was composed of 84 tumors from 82 patients obtained based on a strong family history (HNPCC/HNPCC-like group) (male to female ratio, 42:40; age range, 23-80 years, median, 53.5 years). Thirty-one of the 84 tumors (41.7%) were MSI-H by PCR, and all 31 cases were HNPCC by Amsterdam criteria. Group B was composed of 109 patients with no family history of colorectal cancer or HNPCC-associated cancer, obtained from surgical clinics (sporadic group) (male to female ratio, 65:69; age range, 31-84 years, median, 65 years). Thirty-five of the 109 tumors (32.1%) were MSI-H by PCR. Our results showed that, overall, poor tumor differentiation, medullary type, mucinous type, signet-ring cell component, histologic heterogeneity, and increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were features more commonly seen in MSI-H tumors than in non-MSI-H tumors. Comparative analyses showed that the overall TIL count was significantly higher in HNPCC/HNPCC-like group, and mucinous type appeared to be more frequent in HNPCC MSI-H tumors than in sporadic MSI-H tumors. However, there was no significant difference in the odds ratio for predicting MSI-H status for any of the analyzed histologic features between HNPCC/HNPCC-like group and sporadic group, indicating that differences between HNPCC and sporadic MSI-H tumors did not significantly impact on the informative value of histology in predicting MSI in the two different clinical settings. TIL counts followed by histologic heterogeneity provided the greatest sensitivity and specificity in predicting MSI status in both HNPCC/HNPCC-like and sporadic cases. Using a stepwise logistic regression model, a formula was generated that could be used to calculate the probability of a colorectal carcinoma being MSI-H based on morphologic features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10002, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Peterlongo P, Nafa K, Lerman GS, Glogowski E, Shia J, Ye TZ, Markowitz AJ, Guillem JG, Kolachana P, Boyd JA, Offit K, Ellis NA. MSH6 germline mutations are rare in colorectal cancer families. Int J Cancer 2003; 107:571-9. [PMID: 14520694 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.11415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Germline mutations in MSH6 can cause HNPCC, which is associated with a tumor phenotype featuring MSI. However, tumors arising in persons with disease-causing mutations of MSH6 may or may not exhibit MSI. We used D-HPLC to screen for germline mutations in the promoter region, the coding region and the 3'-UTR of MSH6. Eighty-four families, enrolled on the basis of Amsterdam I and II criteria (HNPCC families) and less stringent criteria (HNPCC-like families), were tested for MMR gene mutations; 27 families had a disease-causing mutation in MLH1 or MSH2, and the remaining 57 families were tested for mutations in MSH6. Two protein-truncating mutations were identified in each of 2 families fulfilling the Amsterdam I criteria, being present in persons affected with early-onset colorectal cancers exhibiting MSI. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that expression of both MSH2 and MSH6 proteins was lost in the cancer cells of the 2 mutation carriers but only MSH6 protein expression was lost in 2 adenomatous polyps. A third possibly disease-causing mutation was found in a person affected with a tumor that did not exhibit MSI. In addition, we found 4 new polymorphisms and determined that neither of the 2 studied by association analysis conferred susceptibility to colorectal or endometrial cancer. Altogether, our results indicate that disease-causing germline mutations of MSH6 are rare in HNPCC and HNPCC-like families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Peterlongo
- Cell Biology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|