Antiplatelet Treatment Preferences of a Group of Cardiologists from Türkiye: A Survey Research Study

OBJECTIVE

Deciding on the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) remains a complex decision. This survey aims to explore the preferences for antiplatelet therapy and the daily routine regarding DAPT duration in coronary artery disease among a group of cardiologists in Türkiye.

METHOD

Using an online questionnaire with 38 questions, the preferences of 314 cardiologists were collected. Qualitative descriptive characteristics of the answers received from the participants were examined.

RESULTS

Participating cardiologists mostly worked in training and research hospitals (51.59%) and university hospitals (21.66%). Participants primarily favored ticagrelor in patients undergoing PCI with a diagnosis of STEMI and NSTE-ACS (69.75% and 55.73% respectively). Clopidogrel was the most preferred P2Y12 treatment in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) after PCI (94.90%). Pre-treatment with a loading dose of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor was administered to 57.01% of patients with NSTE-ACS, irrespective of the planned treatment strategy. In NSTE-ACS patients with low bleeding risk treated with PCI, 83.12% of participants recommended DAPT for 12 months and 14.65% for >12 months. In high-bleeding-risk NSTE-ACS patients treated with PCI, DAPT durations of six months (74.52%), three months (19.75%), and one month (5.73%) were chosen. Among CCS patients treated with PCI without an increased risk of bleeding, 12 months of DAPT was preferred by 68.15% of participants. Most participants (70.70%) were switching to a more potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitor therapy in emergency department clopidogrel-loaded patients with ACS.

CONCLUSION

The aim of this survey to capture a snapshot of the preferences of a group of cardiologists in Türkiye regarding DAPT treatment and duration. The responses were both in accordance and in conflict with the current guidelines.

Awareness and Knowledge of Pneumococcal Vaccination in Cardiology Outpatient Clinics and the Impact of Physicians’ Recommendations on Vaccination Rates

Aim: We aimed to evaluate the awareness of pneumococcal vaccination (PCV13, PPSV23) in general cardiology outpatient clinics and impact of physicians’ recommendations on vaccination rates. Methods: This was a multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study. Patients over the age of 18 from 40 hospitals in different regions of Turkey who applied to the cardiology outpatient clinic between September 2022 and August 2021 participated. The vaccination rates were calculated within three months of follow-up from the admitting of the patient to cardiology clinics. Results: The 403 (18.2%) patients with previous pneumococcal vaccination were excluded from the study. The mean age of study population (n = 1808) was 61.9 ± 12.1 years and 55.4% were male. The 58.7% had coronary artery disease, hypertension (74.1%) was the most common risk factor, and 32.7% of the patients had never been vaccinated although they had information about vaccination before. The main differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients were related to education level and ejection fraction. The physicians’ recommendations were positively correlated with vaccination intention and behavior in our participants. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant correlation between vaccination and female sex [OR = 1.55 (95% CI = 1.25–1.92), p < 0.001], higher education level [OR = 1.49 (95% CI = 1.15–1.92), p = 0.002] patients’ knowledge [OR = 1.93 (95% CI = 1.56–2.40), p < 0.001], and their physician’s recommendation [OR = 5.12 (95% CI = 1.92–13.68), p = 0.001]. Conclusion: To increase adult immunization rates, especially among those with or at risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), it is essential to understand each of these factors. Even if during COVID-19 pandemic, there is an increased awareness about vaccination, the vaccine acceptance level is not enough, still. Further studies and interventions are needed to improve public vaccination rates.

Does MicroRNA Profile Differ in Early Onset Coronary Artery Disease?

OBJECTIVE

MicroRNAs have been explored as potential biomarkers for many pathological processes including coronary artery disease. In this study, we aimed to compare the circulating levels of selected atherosclerosis-associated miRNAs in patients with a history of early-onset coronary artery disease with that of age- and sex-matched healthy controls and older patients with late-onset coronary artery disease.

METHODS

Study population consisted of 30 patients with early onset coronary artery disease, 31 age- and sex-matched healthy controls, and 30 patients with late-onset coronary artery disease. Plasma levels of 13 microRNAs (endothelial cell-related miR-126, -92a/b; vascular smooth muscle cell-related miR-145; inflammation-related miR-16, -21, -125b, -146a/b, -147b, -150, -155; lipometabolism-related miR-27b, -122, -370) were evaluated by using real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

In patients with early onset coronary artery disease, plasma expressions of the lipometabolism-related miR-27b, miR-122; inflammation-related miR-125b, miR-146a/b, miR-147b, miR-150, miR-155; and VSMC-related miR-145 were significantly downregulated and endothelial cell-related miR-126 was significantly upregulated compared to age- and sexmatched healthy controls. Circulating microRNA profile of patients with early onset coronary artery disease was also different from that of older patients with late-onset coronary artery disease. Plasma levels of miR-21, miR-27b, miR-122, miR-125b, miR-146b, miR-147b, and miR-155 were lower and plasma levels of miR-16 and miR-92a were higher in patients with early onset coronary artery disease compared to older patients with late-onset coronary artery disease.

CONCLUSION

MicroRNAs are promising biomarkers for early onset coronary artery disease.

Telemedicine-based early rule out and followup ECG algorithm for COVID-19 patients

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Drugs with the potential to prolong QT are used in the treatment of coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) pneumonia. We have developed a telemedicine-based corrected QT (QTc) follow-up algorithm that allows early rule out for follow up.

Aims

In this study, we investigated the availability and safety of the algorithm.

Study design

Retrospective cohort

Methods

Consecutive patients; administered hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for COVID-19 pneumonia were enrolled into digital ECG recording program which includes QTc follow-up algorithm.

Results

Patients were classified into three groups as those, excluded promptly from the QTc follow-up based on two consecutive ECG findings (early rule out, n = 92) and those, for whom the follow-up was continued (n = 12) and usual care group (n = 68). Of note, 237 ECG tracings were performed in our algorithm population contrary to standard practice of daily recommended ECG monitoring which could have yielded 975 ECG tracings along with accompanied risks of exposure. This way; we ended in 738 (75.7%) fewer ECG tracings. Sustained ventricular arrhythmia or sudden cardiac death was not observed in the entire patient population.

Conclusions

It is safe to rely on telemedicine-based early rule out algorithm in COVID-19 patients, receiving hydroxychloroquine treatment. This algorithm abolished the need for further ECG in majority of patients without increased risk during follow up. These algorithms can significantly reduce the healthcare worker exposures by eliminating the need for ECG follow-up promptly.

Comparison of existing syncope rules and newly proposed anatolian syncope rule to predict short-term serious outcomes after syncope in the Turkish population

Background

We wished to compare the San Francisco Syncope Rule (SFSR), Evaluation of Guidelines in Syncope Study (EGSYS) and the Osservatorio Epidemiologico sulla Sincope nel Lazio (OESIL) risk scores and to assess their efficacy in recognising patients with syncope at high risk for short-term adverse events (death, the need for major therapeutic procedures, and early readmission to the hospital). We also wanted to test those variables to designate a local risk score, the Anatolian Syncope Rule (ASR).

Methods

This prospective, cohort study was conducted at the emergency department of a tertiary care centre. Between December 1 2009 and December 31 2010, we prospectively collected data on patients of ages 18 and over who presented to the emergency department with syncope.

Results

We enrolled 231 patients to the study. A univariate analysis found 23 variables that predicted syncope with adverse events. Dyspnoea, orthostatic hypotension, precipitating cause of syncope, age over 58 years, congestive heart failure, and electrocardiogram abnormality (termed DO-PACE) were found to predict short-term serious outcomes by logistic regression analysis and these were used to compose the ASR. The sensitivity of ASR, OESIL, EGSYS and SFSR for mortality were 100% (0.66 to 1.00); 90% (0.54 to 0.99), 80% (0.44 to 0.97) and 100% (0.66 to 1.00), respectively. The specificity of ASR, OESIL, EGSYS and SFSR for mortality were 78% (0.72 to 0.83); 76% (0.70 to 0.82); 80% (0.74 to 0.85) and 70% (0.63 to 0.76). The sensitivity of ASR, OESIL, EGSYS and SFSR for any adverse event were 97% (0.85 to 1.00); 70% (0.52 to 0.82); 56% (0.40 to 0.72) and 87% (0.72 to 0.95). The specificity of ASR, OESIL, EGSYS and SFSR for any adverse event were 72% (0.64 to 0.78); 82% (0.76 to 0.87); 84% (0.78 to 0.89); 78% (0.71 to 0.83), respectively.

Conclusion

The newly proposed ASR appears to be highly sensitive for identifying patients at risk for short-term serious outcomes, with scores at least as good as those provided by existing diagnostic rules, and it is easier to perform at the bedside within the Turkish population. If prospectively validated, it may offer a tool to aid physicians' decision-making.