1
|
Shields GE, Clarkson P, Bullement A, Stevens W, Wilberforce M, Farragher T, Verma A, Davies LM. Advances in Addressing Patient Heterogeneity in Economic Evaluation: A Review of the Methods Literature. Pharmacoeconomics 2024:10.1007/s40273-024-01377-9. [PMID: 38676871 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01377-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
Cost-effectiveness analyses commonly use population or sample averages, which can mask key differences across subgroups and may lead to suboptimal resource allocation. Despite there being several new methods developed over the last decade, there is no recent summary of what methods are available to researchers. This review sought to identify advances in methods for addressing patient heterogeneity in economic evaluations and to provide an overview of these methods. A literature search was conducted using the Econlit, Embase and MEDLINE databases to identify studies published after 2011 (date of a previous review on this topic). Eligible studies needed to have an explicit methodological focus, related to how patient heterogeneity can be accounted for within a full economic evaluation. Sixteen studies were included in the review. Methodologies were varied and included regression techniques, model design and value of information analysis. Recent publications have applied methodologies more commonly used in other fields, such as machine learning and causal forests. Commonly noted challenges associated with considering patient heterogeneity included data availability (e.g., sample size), statistical issues (e.g., risk of false positives) and practical factors (e.g., computation time). A range of methods are available to address patient heterogeneity in economic evaluation, with relevant methods differing according to research question, scope of the economic evaluation and data availability. Researchers need to be aware of the challenges associated with addressing patient heterogeneity (e.g., data availability) to ensure findings are meaningful and robust. Future research is needed to assess whether and how methods are being applied in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma E Shields
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research, and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Paul Clarkson
- Social Care and Society, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research, and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ash Bullement
- Delta Hat Ltd, Nottingham, UK
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Mark Wilberforce
- Social Policy Research Unit, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, York, UK
| | - Tracey Farragher
- Centre for Biostatistics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research, and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Arpana Verma
- The Epidemiology and Public Health Group (EPHG), Division of Population Health, Health Services Research, and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Linda M Davies
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research, and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vadgama S, Maziarz RT, Pasquini MC, Hu ZH, Ray MD, Smith H, Bullement A, Edmondson-Jones M, Sullivan W, Cartron G. Don't keep me waiting: estimating the lifetime impact of reduced vein-to-vein time for CAR-T treated patients with LBCL. Blood Adv 2024:bloodadvances.2023012240. [PMID: 38662645 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have revolutionized the treatment of hematological cancers. Production requires a complex logistical process from leukapheresis to patient infusion, the vein-to-vein time (V2VT), during which a patients clinical condition may deteriorate. This study was designed to estimate the benefits of reduced V2VT for third-line+ (3L+) relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL) patients treated with CAR T. A mathematical model was developed to estimate the lifetime outcomes of a hypothetical cohort of patients who had either a 'long' or 'short' V2VT. Life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs were estimated. Scenario analyses were performed to assess the robustness of results to key assumptions. The results of the model show that reducing V2VT from 54 days (tisa-cel median V2VT; JULIET) to 24 days (axi-cel median V2VT; ZUMA-1) led to a 3.2-year gain in life expectancy (4.2 vs 7.7 LYs), and 2.4 additional QALYs (3.2 vs 5.6) per patient. Furthermore, a shorter V2VT was shown to be cost-effective under conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds in the United States. Results are driven by a higher infusion rate and and a better efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy for those infused. Scenario analyses using a smaller difference in V2VT (24 vs 36 days) produced consistent results. Our study is the first to quantify lifetime V2VT-related outcomes for 3L+ r/r LBCL patients treated with CAR T utilizing currently available evidence. Shorter V2VTs led to improved outcomes, demonstrating the importance of timely infusion achievable by faster manufacturing times and optimization of hospital delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Vadgama
- Kite, A Gilead Company, Santa Monica, California, United States
| | | | | | - Zhen-Huan Hu
- Kite, a Gilead Company, Santa Monica, California, United States
| | - Markqayne D Ray
- Kite, A Gilead Company, Santa Monica, California, United States
| | - Harry Smith
- Kite, A Gilead Company, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Critchlow S, Bullement A, Crabb S, Jones R, Christoforou K, Amin A, Xiao Y, Kapetanakis V, Benedict Á, Chang J, Kearney M, Eccleston A. Cost-effectiveness analysis for avelumab first-line maintenance treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma in Scotland. Future Oncol 2024; 20:459-470. [PMID: 37529943 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: The cost-effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Scotland was assessed. Materials & methods: A partitioned survival model was developed comparing avelumab plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone, incorporating JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial data, costs from national databases and published literature and clinical expert validation of assumptions. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated using lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Results: Avelumab plus BSC had incremental costs of £9446 and a QALY gain of 0.63, leading to a base-case (deterministic) ICER of £15,046 per QALY gained, supported by robust sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Avelumab first-line maintenance is likely to be a cost-effective treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Scotland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Simon Crabb
- University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Robert Jones
- University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
| | | | - Amerah Amin
- Merck Serono Ltd. 5 New Square, Feltham, TW14 8HA, UK, an affiliate of Merck KGaA
| | - Ying Xiao
- Evidera, 201 Talgarth Road, London, W6 8BJ, UK
| | | | | | - Jane Chang
- Pfizer, 235 E 42nd Street, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Mairead Kearney
- Merck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, Darmstadt, 64293, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gal P, Feldmajer G, Augusto M, Gani R, Hook E, Bullement A, Philips Z, Smith I. De Novo Cost-Effectiveness Model Framework for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis-Modeling Approach and Validation. Pharmacoeconomics 2023; 41:1629-1639. [PMID: 37505423 PMCID: PMC10635953 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01298-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic liver disease associated with hepatic morbidity and mortality and extra-hepatic comorbidities. Published NASH cost-effectiveness models (CEMs) are heterogeneous and consistently omit comorbid conditions that frequently co-exist alongside NASH. We aimed to develop a de novo CEM framework that incorporates extra-hepatic disease states and outcomes alongside hepatic components to enable future estimation of the cost-effectiveness of NASH interventions. METHODS Patient-level simulation and cohort-level Markov models were implemented in the same framework. Model inputs included fibrosis progression; late-stage liver disease outcomes; comorbidity outcomes for cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and obesity; mortality; health-related quality of life; and direct medical costs. The prototype analysis assessed the cost-effectiveness of obeticholic acid versus standard of care from a US payer perspective over a lifetime horizon with costs and effects discounted at 3% per annum. However, the CEM was designed for easy adaptation to other countries, time horizons, and other considerations. Efficacy and adverse event parameters were obtained from the 18-month interim analysis of the REGENERATE trial. Outputs include total and incremental costs, total life years, and quality-adjusted life years. RESULTS In this model, total costs, total life years, and quality-adjusted life years were all higher with obeticholic acid compared with standard of care. Cross-validation of this model with the 2016 and 2020 Institute for Clinical and Economic Review models revealed marked differences, mainly driven by mortality inputs, transition probability estimates, and incorporation of the effect of treatment and comorbidities. CONCLUSION This is the first CEM in NASH to incorporate the clinical consequences of several comorbidities. The flexible yet standardized framework permits estimation of the cost-effectiveness of NASH interventions in a variety of settings. The model currently includes several assumptions and will be further developed as more relevant data become available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Inger Smith
- White Box Health Economics Ltd, Amelia House, Crescent Road, Worthing, West Sussex, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cranmer HL, Shields GE, Bullement A. An Investigation into the Relationship Between Choice of Model Structure and How to Adjust for Subsequent Therapies Using a Case Study in Oncology. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2023; 21:385-394. [PMID: 36849703 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00792-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A common challenge in health technology assessments (HTAs) of cancer treatments is how subsequent therapy use within the trial follow-up may influence cost-effectiveness model outcomes. Although overall survival (OS) is often a key driver of model results, there are no guidelines to advise how to adjust for this potential confounding, with different approaches available dependent on the model structure. OBJECTIVE We compared a partitioned survival analysis (PartSA) with a semi-Markov multi-state model (MSM) structure, with and without attempts to adjust for the impact of subsequent therapies on OS using a case study describing outcomes for people with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. METHODS Both model structures included three health states: pre-progression, progressed disease and death. Three traditional crossover methods were considered within the context of the PartSA, whereas for the MSM, the probability of post-progression death was pooled across arms. Impacts on the model incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were recorded. RESULTS The unadjusted PartSA produced an ICER of £623,563, and after adjustment yielded an ICER range of £381,340-£386,907. The unadjusted MSM produced an ICER of £1,283,780. Adjusting OS in the MSM resulted in an ICER of £345,486. CONCLUSIONS The simplicity of the PartSA is lost when the decision problem becomes more complex (for example, when OS data are confounded by subsequent therapies). In this setting, the MSM structure may be considered more flexible, with fewer and less restrictive assumptions required versus the PartSA. Researchers should consider important study design features that may influence the generalisability of data when undertaking model conceptualisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gemma E Shields
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research, and Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ash Bullement
- Delta Hat, Nottingham, UK
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hamerton L, Gomes K, Fougeray R, Hook ES, Gomes MV, Hauch O, Bullement A. A UK cost-effectiveness analysis of trifluridine/tipiracil for heavily pretreated metastatic gastroesophageal cancers. Future Oncol 2023; 19:643-650. [PMID: 37115022 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The current work was designed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (T/T) versus best supportive care (BSC) for patients with advanced stage or metastatic gastroesophageal cancer (mGC) from a UK perspective. Materials & methods: A partitioned survival analysis was undertaken using data from the phase III TAGS trial. A jointly fitted lognormal model was selected for overall survival and individual generalized gamma models were chosen for progression-free survival and time to treatment discontinuation. The primary outcome was the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to investigate uncertainty. Results: Compared with BSC, T/T was associated with a cost per QALY gained of £37,907. Conclusion: T/T provides a cost-effective treatment option for mGC in the UK setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Hamerton
- Servier Laboratories Limited, Sefton House, Sefton Park, Bells Hill, Stoke Poges, Slough, SL2 4JS, UK
| | - K Gomes
- Servier Laboratories Limited, Sefton House, Sefton Park, Bells Hill, Stoke Poges, Slough, SL2 4JS, UK
| | - R Fougeray
- Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, 92210 Suresnes, France
| | - E S Hook
- Delta Hat Limited, Nottingham, NG10 3SX, UK
| | | | - O Hauch
- Les Laboratoires Servier, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bullement A, Stevenson MD, Baio G, Shields GE, Latimer NR. A Systematic Review of Methods to Incorporate External Evidence into Trial-Based Survival Extrapolations for Health Technology Assessment. Med Decis Making 2023:272989X231168618. [PMID: 37125724 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x231168618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND External evidence is commonly used to inform survival modeling for health technology assessment (HTA). While there are a range of methodological approaches that have been proposed, it is unclear which methods could be used and how they compare. PURPOSE This review aims to identify, describe, and categorize established methods to incorporate external evidence into survival extrapolation for HTA. DATA SOURCES Embase, MEDLINE, EconLit, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify published methodological studies, supplemented by hand searching and citation tracking. STUDY SELECTION Eligible studies were required to present a novel extrapolation approach incorporating external evidence (i.e., data or information) within survival model estimation. DATA EXTRACTION Studies were classified according to how the external evidence was integrated as a part of model fitting. Information was extracted concerning the model-fitting process, key requirements, assumptions, software, application contexts, and presentation of comparisons with, or validation against, other methods. DATA SYNTHESIS Across 18 methods identified from 22 studies, themes included use of informative prior(s) (n = 5), piecewise (n = 7), and general population adjustment (n = 9), plus a variety of "other" (n = 8) approaches. Most methods were applied in cancer populations (n = 13). No studies compared or validated their method against another method that also incorporated external evidence. LIMITATIONS As only studies with a specific methodological objective were included, methods proposed as part of another study type (e.g., an economic evaluation) were excluded from this review. CONCLUSIONS Several methods were identified in this review, with common themes based on typical data sources and analytical approaches. Of note, no evidence was found comparing the identified methods to one another, and so an assessment of different methods would be a useful area for further research.HighlightsThis review aims to identify methods that have been used to incorporate external evidence into survival extrapolations, focusing on those that may be used to inform health technology assessment.We found a range of different approaches, including piecewise methods, Bayesian methods using informative priors, and general population adjustment methods, as well as a variety of "other" approaches.No studies attempted to compare the performance of alternative methods for incorporating external evidence with respect to the accuracy of survival predictions. Further research investigating this would be valuable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ash Bullement
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
- Delta Hat Limited, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Gianluca Baio
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vadgama S, Mann J, Bashir Z, Spooner C, Collins GP, Bullement A. Predicting Survival for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: A Validation of Survival Models Using Follow-Up Data From ZUMA-1. Value Health 2022; 25:1010-1017. [PMID: 35667774 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Survival extrapolation for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies is challenging, owing to their unique mechanistic properties that translate to complex hazard functions. Axicabtagene ciloleucel is indicated for the treatment of relapse or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after 2 or more lines of therapy based on the ZUMA-1 trial. Four data snapshots are available, with minimum follow-up of 12, 24, 36, and 48 months. This analysis explores how survival extrapolations for axicabtagene ciloleucel using ZUMA-1 data can be validated and compared. METHODS Three different parametric modeling approaches were applied: standard parametric, spline-based, and cure-based models. Models were compared using a range of metrics, across the 4 data snapshot, including visual fit, plausibility of long-term estimates, statistical goodness of fit, inspection of hazard plots, point-estimate accuracy, and conditional survival estimates. RESULTS Standard and spline-based parametric extrapolations were generally incapable of fitting the ZUMA-1 data well. Cure-based models provided the best fit based on the earliest data snapshot, with extrapolations remaining consistent as data matured. At 48 months, the maximum survival overestimate was 8.3% (Gompertz mixture-cure model) versus the maximum underestimate of 33.5% (Weibull standard parametric model). CONCLUSIONS Where a plateau in the survival curve is clinically plausible, cure-based models may be helpful in making accurate predictions based on immature data. The ability to reliably extrapolate from maturing data may reduce delays in patient access to potentially lifesaving treatments. Additional research is required to understand how models compare in broader contexts, including different treatments and therapeutic areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Vadgama
- Kite, a Gilead Company, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, England, UK; Department of Medicine, University College London, England, UK.
| | - Jess Mann
- Delta Hat Ltd, Nottingham, England, UK
| | - Zahid Bashir
- Kite, a Gilead Company, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, England, UK
| | - Clare Spooner
- Kite, a Gilead Company, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, England, UK
| | - Graham P Collins
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Ash Bullement
- Delta Hat Ltd, Nottingham, England, UK; School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shields GE, Pennington B, Bullement A, Wright S, Elvidge J. Out of Date or Best Before? A Commentary on the Relevance of Economic Evaluations Over Time. Pharmacoeconomics 2022; 40:249-256. [PMID: 34866171 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01116-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
The impact of time on the applicability and relevance of historical economic evaluations can be considerable. Ignoring this may lead to the use of weak or invalid evidence to inform important research questions or resource allocation decisions, as historical economic evaluations may have reached different conclusions compared to if a similar study had been conducted more recently. There are multiple factors that contribute towards evidence becoming outdated including changes to the relevant decision problem (e.g. comparators), changes to parameters (such as costs, utilities and resource use) and methodological updates (e.g. recommendations on uncertainty analysis). Researchers reviewing economic evaluations need to consider whether changes over time would influence the study design and results if the evaluation were repeated, to the extent that it is no longer helpful or informative. In this paper, we summarise these key issues and make recommendations about how and whether researchers can future proof their economic evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma E Shields
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research, and Primary Care, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Becky Pennington
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ash Bullement
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Delta Hat Ltd, Nottingham, UK
| | - Stuart Wright
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research, and Primary Care, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jamie Elvidge
- Science, Evidence and Analytics Directorate, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bullement A, Kearns B. Incorporating external trial data to improve survival extrapolations: a pilot study of the COU-AA-301 trial. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s10742-021-00264-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
AbstractSurvival extrapolation plays a key role within cost effectiveness analysis and is often subject to substantial uncertainty. Use of external data to improve extrapolations has been identified as a key research priority. We present findings from a pilot study using data from the COU-AA-301 trial of abiraterone acetate for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, to explore how external trial data may be incorporated into survival extrapolations. External trial data were identified via a targeted search of technology assessment reports. Four methods using external data were compared to simple parametric models (SPMs): informal reference to external data to select appropriate SPMs, piecewise models with, and without, hazard ratio adjustment, and Bayesian models fitted with a prior on the shape parameter(s). Survival and hazard plots were compared, and summary metrics (point estimate accuracy and restricted mean survival time) were calculated. Without consideration of external data, several SPMs may have been selected as the ‘best-fitting’ model. The range of survival probability estimates was generally reduced when external data were included in model estimation, and external hazard plots aided model selection. Different methods yielded varied results, even with the same data source, highlighting potential issues when integrating external trial data within model estimation. By using external trial data, the most (in)appropriate models may be more easily identified. However, benefits of using external data are contingent upon their applicability to the research question, and the choice of method can have a large impact on extrapolations.
Collapse
|
11
|
Bullement A, Knowles ES, DasMahapatra P, Ali T, Preblick R. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of rFVIIIFc Versus Contemporary rFVIII Treatments for Patients with Severe Hemophilia A Without Inhibitors in the United States. Pharmacoecon Open 2021; 5:625-633. [PMID: 34268704 PMCID: PMC8611150 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-021-00283-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A range of treatments for patients with severe hemophilia A (HA) have been developed over the last decade, allowing for reduced frequency of administration and improved outcomes (joint health and breakthrough bleeding rates). While clinically effective, the cost effectiveness of these treatments has not been established. OBJECTIVE This study presents a cost-effectiveness analysis of contemporary rFVIII treatments for severe HA patients without inhibitors. METHODS A published semi-Markov model was used to compare three different prophylaxis regimens: (1) extended half-life (EHL) recombinant Factor VIII (rFVIII) Fc-fusion protein (rFVIIIFc, Eloctate®, Sanofi), (2) EHL PEGylated rFVIII (PEG-rFVIII, Adynovate®, Takeda), and (3) standard half-life (SHL) rFVIII (antihemophilic factor [recombinant], Advate®, Takeda), used as a proxy for all SHL rFVIII treatments. Acquisition costs were included based on published dosing and weight data. Benefits were incorporated through published annualized bleeding rates, rates of target joint development/resolution, and improvements in the modified hemophilia joint health score. Results were presented as total, discounted costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS rFVIIIFc was shown to provide the most QALYs (27.922) compared with both PEG-rFVIII (27.454) and SHL rFVIII (27.071), at lower costs. Discounted lifetime costs were estimated at US$18.235m (rFVIIIFc), US$20.198m (PEG-rFVIII), and US$18.285m (SHL rFVIII), and were predominantly affected by model settings related to acquisition costs, patient weight, and dosing. CONCLUSIONS rFVIIIFc may offer a cost-effective option for severe HA patients. Uncertainties owing to the limited evidence base is the main limitation of the study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Talaha Ali
- Sanofi Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, USA
- uniQure, Lexington, MA, USA
| | - Ron Preblick
- Sanofi Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Sanofi Genzyme, Bridgewater, NJ, 08807-5925, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bullement A, Knowles ES, Langenfeld M, Diogo GR, Nazir J, Eriksson D. An Economic Comparison of Treatment Strategies with Anakinra in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA). Open Access Rheumatol 2021; 13:257-266. [PMID: 34531691 PMCID: PMC8439981 DOI: 10.2147/oarrr.s325400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a rare, complex autoinflammatory disease with substantial morbidity, often characterized by fever, rash, and muscle pain, amongst other symptoms. Biologic agents, such as anakinra, have been successfully used to treat patients internationally, but their usage in some regions is limited to patients that have failed to achieve clinically inactive disease with corticosteroids and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Use of anakinra early in the disease course leads to better clinical outcomes; however, longer-term costs for this treatment strategy have not been established. This study compares the economic implications of first-line versus later-line availability of anakinra for patients with sJIA. Methods Data for patients treated with first-line anakinra were identified from a single-center, prospective study and compared to a combination of published trial and economic evaluation information to facilitate a comparison to later-line anakinra (ie, following corticosteroids + csDMARDs). Costs were estimated for product acquisition and medical resource utilization (MRU), including planned outpatient visits and unplanned hospital admissions. Total costs over a 5-year horizon were compared. Results Total 5-year product acquisition cost for the first-line anakinra strategy was €24,021, and for later-line anakinra was €20,471. The corresponding MRU costs were €19,197 (first-line) versus €25,425 (later-line). Overall 5-year costs (product acquisition and MRU) were lower for the first-line strategy (€43,218 versus €45,896). Conclusion The use of anakinra for patients with sJIA in the first-line setting is efficacious to induce and sustain inactive disease, and the findings of this study show that this treatment strategy leads to cost savings through reduced medical expenditure.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hatswell AJ, Bullement A, Schlichting M, Bharmal M. What is the Impact of the Analysis Method Used for Health State Utility Values on QALYs in Oncology? A Simulation Study Comparing Progression-Based and Time-to-Death Approaches. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2021; 19:389-401. [PMID: 33314001 PMCID: PMC8060240 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00620-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health state utility values ('utilities') are an integral part of health technology assessment. Though traditionally categorised by disease status in oncology (i.e. progression), several recent assessments have adopted values calculated according to the time that measures were recorded before death. We conducted a simulation study to understand the limitations of each approach, with a focus on mismatches between the way utilities are generated, and analysed. METHODS Survival times were simulated based on published literature, with permutations of three utility generation mechanisms (UGMs) and utility analysis methods (UAMs): (1) progression based, (2) time-to-death based, and (3) a 'combination approach'. For each analysis quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated. Goodness of fit was assessed via percentage mean error (%ME) and mean absolute error (%MAE). Scenario analyses were performed varying individual parameters, with complex scenarios mimicking published studies. The statistical code is provided for transparency and to aid future work in the area. RESULTS %ME and %MAE were lowest when the correct analysis form was specified (i.e. UGM and UAM aligned). Underestimates were produced when a time-to-death element was present in the UGM but not included in the UAM, while the 'combined' UAM produced overestimates irrespective of the UGM. Scenario analysis demonstrated the importance of the volume of available data beyond the initial time period, for example follow-up. CONCLUSIONS We show that the use of an incorrectly or over-specified UAM can result in substantial bias in the estimation of utilities. We present a flowchart to highlight the issues that may be faced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Murtuza Bharmal
- EMD Serono, Inc. (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Rockland, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Farmer C, Bullement A, Packman D, Long L, Robinson S, Nikram E, Hatswell AJ, Melendez-Torres GJ, Crathorne L. Voretigene Neparvovec for Treating Inherited Retinal Dystrophies Caused by RPE65 Gene Mutations: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Highly Specialised Technology Appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2020; 38:1309-1318. [PMID: 32875526 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00953-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) considered evidence for voretigene neparvovec (VN; Luxturna®) for the treatment of RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD) within its highly specialised technology programme. This paper summarises the evidence provided by the company; the appraisal of the evidence by the Peninsula Technology Appraisal Group, who were commissioned to act as the independent evidence review group (ERG); and the development of the NICE guidance by the appraisal committee. The evidence presented by the company highlighted the significant lifelong burden of IRD for patients and carers. Evidence to support the effectiveness of VN was lacking, but the available evidence showed a modest, sustained improvement across a variety of vision-related outcomes. While patients would remain visually impaired, the committee considered that VN would prevent further deterioration in vision. The modelling approach used by the company had a number of limitations and relied heavily upon a large volume of clinical expert input to produce cost-effectiveness estimates with large uncertainty around long-term effectiveness. The ERG's main concerns revolved around these long-term outcomes and the plausibility of utility values. The NICE committee were convinced that the clinical benefits of VN were important and an appropriate use of national health service resources within a specialised service. The committee concluded that a high unmet need existed in patients with RPE65-mediated IRD and that VN represents a step change in the management of this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Farmer
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
| | - Ash Bullement
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
- Delta Hat, Ltd., Nottingham, UK
| | - David Packman
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Linda Long
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Sophie Robinson
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Elham Nikram
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Anthony J Hatswell
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
- Delta Hat, Ltd., Nottingham, UK
| | - G J Melendez-Torres
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Louise Crathorne
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
AIMS To construct and compare a partitioned-survival analysis (PartSA) and a semi-Markov multi-state model (MSM) to investigate differences in estimated cost effectiveness of a novel cancer treatment from a UK perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from a cohort of late-stage cancer patients (N > 700) enrolled within a randomized, controlled trial were used to populate both modelling approaches. The statistical software R was used to fit parametric survival models to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) data to inform the PartSA (package "flexsurv"). The package "mstate" was used to estimate the MSM transitions (permitted transitions: (T1) "progression-free" to "dead", (T2) "post-progression" to "death", and (T3) "pre-progression" to "post-progression"). Key costs included were treatment-related (initial, subsequent, and concomitant), adverse events, hospitalizations and monitoring. Utilities were stratified by progression. Outcomes were discounted at 3.5% per annum over a 15-year time horizon. RESULTS The PartSA and MSM approaches estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of £342,474 and £411,574, respectively. Scenario analyses exploring alternative parametric forms provided incremental discounted life-year estimates that ranged from +0.15 to +0.33 for the PartSA approach, compared with -0.13 to +0.23 for the MSM approach. This variation was reflected in the range of ICERs. The PartSA produced ICERs between £234,829 and £522,963, whereas MSM results were more variable and included instances where the intervention was dominated and ICERs above £7 million (caused by very small incremental QALYs). LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS Structural uncertainty in economic modelling is rarely explored due to time and resource limitations. This comparison of structural approaches indicates that the choice of structure may have a profound impact on cost-effectiveness results. This highlights the importance of carefully considered model conceptualization, and the need for further research to ascertain when it may be most appropriate to use each approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Cranmer
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., London, UK
| | - Gemma E Shields
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research, and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ash Bullement
- Delta Hat Limited, Nottingham, UK
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bullement A, Podkonjak T, Robinson MJ, Benson E, Selby R, Hatswell AJ, Shields GE. Real-world evidence use in assessments of cancer drugs by NICE. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2020; 36:1-7. [PMID: 32646531 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462320000434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish how real-world evidence (RWE) has been used to inform single technology appraisals (STAs) of cancer drugs conducted by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). METHODS STAs published by NICE from April 2011 to October 2018 that evaluated cancer treatments were reviewed. Information regarding the use of RWE to directly inform the company-submitted cost-effectiveness analysis was extracted and categorized by topic. Summary statistics were used to describe emergent themes, and a narrative summary was provided for key case studies. RESULTS Materials for a total of 113 relevant STAs were identified and analyzed, of which nearly all (96 percent) included some form of RWE within the company-submitted cost-effectiveness analysis. The most common categories of RWE use concerned the health-related quality of life of patients (71 percent), costs (46 percent), and medical resource utilization (40 percent). While sources of RWE were routinely criticized as part of the appraisal process, we identified only two cases where the use of RWE was overtly rejected; hence, in the majority of cases, RWE was accepted in cancer drug submissions to NICE. DISCUSSION RWE has been used extensively in cancer submissions to NICE. Key criticisms of RWE in submissions to NICE are seldom regarding the use of RWE in general; instead, these are typically concerned with specific data sources and the applicability of these to the decision problem. Within an appropriate context, RWE constitutes an extremely valuable source of information to inform decision making; yet the development of best practice guidelines may improve current reporting standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ross Selby
- Global Oncology Business Unit, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., London, UK
| | - Anthony J Hatswell
- Delta Hat, Nottingham, UK
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gemma E Shields
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Azurite Research Ltd, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bullement A, Willis A, Amin A, Schlichting M, Hatswell AJ, Bharmal M. Evaluation of survival extrapolation in immuno-oncology using multiple pre-planned data cuts: learnings to aid in model selection. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20:103. [PMID: 32375680 PMCID: PMC7204248 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-00997-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to limited duration of follow up in clinical trials of cancer treatments, estimates of lifetime survival benefits are typically derived using statistical extrapolation methods. To justify the method used, a range of approaches have been proposed including statistical goodness-of-fit tests and comparing estimates against a previous data cut (i.e. interim data collected). In this study, we extend these approaches by presenting a range of extrapolations fitted to four pre-planned data cuts from the JAVELIN Merkel 200 (JM200) trial. By comparing different estimates of survival and goodness-of-fit as JM200 data mature, we undertook an iterative process of fitting and re-fitting survival models to retrospectively identify early indications of likely long-term survival. METHODS Standard and spline-based parametric models were fitted to overall survival data from each JM200 data cut. Goodness-of-fit was determined using an assessment of the estimated hazard function, information theory-based methods and objective comparisons of estimation accuracy. Best-fitting extrapolations were compared to establish which one provided the most accurate estimation, and how statistical goodness-of-fit differed. RESULTS Spline-based models provided the closest fit to the final JM200 data cut, though all extrapolation methods based on the earliest data cut underestimated the 'true' long-term survival (difference in restricted mean survival time [RMST] at 36 months: - 1.1 to - 0.5 months). Goodness-of-fit scores illustrated that an increasingly flexible model was favored as data matured. Given an early data cut, a more flexible model better aligned with clinical expectations could be reasonably justified using a range of metrics, including RMST and goodness-of-fit scores (which were typically within a 2-point range of the statistically 'best-fitting' model). CONCLUSIONS Survival estimates from the spline-based models are more aligned with clinical expectation and provided a better fit to the JM200 data, despite not exhibiting the definitively 'best' statistical goodness-of-fit. Longer-term data are required to further validate extrapolations, though this study illustrates the importance of clinical plausibility when selecting the most appropriate model. In addition, hazard-based plots and goodness-of-fit tests from multiple data cuts present useful approaches to identify when a more flexible model may be advantageous. TRIAL REGISTRATION JAVELIN Merkel 200 was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02155647 on June 4, 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Anthony James Hatswell
- Delta Hat, Nottingham, UK
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Murtuza Bharmal
- Oncology Brands & Life Cycle Management, Global Evidence & Value Development, EMD Serono, Inc, One Technology Place, Rockland, MA, 02370, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bullement A, McMordie ST, Hatswell AJ, Li N, Wilson K. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Recombinant Factor VIII Fc-Fusion Protein (rFVIIIFc) for the Treatment of Severe Hemophilia A in Italy Incorporating Real-World Dosing and Joint Health Data. Pharmacoecon Open 2020; 4:133-142. [PMID: 31280415 PMCID: PMC7018914 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-019-0158-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with severe hemophilia A (SHA) in Italy are routinely treated with standard half-life recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products. rFVIII Fc-fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) is an extended half-life rFVIII product that enables less frequent administration than rFVIII, which may support improved adherence. Available data indicate low breakthrough bleed rates and potentially improved long-term joint health for patients treated with rFVIIIFc prophylaxis. OBJECTIVE This study assessed the cost effectiveness of rFVIIIFc versus rFVIII from an Italian healthcare perspective. METHODS A Semi-Markov model was constructed to assess the lifetime costs and benefits of rFVIII and rFVIIIFc prophylaxis. rFVIII product acquisition costs from a published Italian database were included for both prophylaxis and the resolution of breakthrough bleeding. Clinical outcomes within the model were determined based on published annualized bleeding rates and literature regarding the development of target joints (TJs) as the incidence of bleeds and TJs is associated with impaired health-related quality of life. Cost effectiveness was assessed using cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. RESULTS Compared with rFVIII, rFVIIIFc was associated with a per-patient cost saving of approximately €1.3 million and QALY gains of 0.39 over a lifetime horizon. Sensitivity analyses considering alternative efficacy, dosing, and structural assumptions each showed that rFVIIIFc dominated rFVIII (i.e., provided more QALYs at a reduced cost). CONCLUSIONS This cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated that rFVIIIFc may offer a cost-effective treatment option for patients with SHA in Italy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nanxin Li
- Bioverativ, a Sanofi Company, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Koo Wilson
- Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB (publ), 112 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gladwell D, Bullement A, Cowell W, Patterson K, Strong M. "Stick or Twist?" Negotiating Price and Data in an Era of Conditional Approval. Value Health 2020; 23:191-199. [PMID: 32113624 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Revised: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Changes in the regulatory context enable faster approval of transformative medicines. They also lead to health technology assessment (HTA) agencies having to make decisions with less evidence. In response, HTA agencies have also initiated forms of conditional approval. When the evidence base for a new oncology treatment leaves substantial uncertainty, the new Cancer Drugs Fund allows the National Institute for Heath and Care Excellence to give the manufacturer two options: (1) offer a low price based on conservative assumptions and obtain immediate approval ("stick") or (2) wait until the evidence base has further matured before finalizing a potentially higher agreed price ("twist"). OBJECTIVES The purpose of this article is to explain how, using the theoretical framework of the expected value of sample information, simulation methods can help inform a manufacturer's decisions when faced with the option to stick or twist. METHODS We first summarize a general model to help frame the manufacturer's negotiating strategy. We then use a motivating case study, based on a hypothetical immunotherapy, to illustrate how manufacturers can use simulation methods to robustly characterize the uncertainty inherent to further data collection and incorporate this uncertainty within their decision making. RESULTS Our approach allows us to estimate the commercial value of generating additional data (the difference between the estimated net present value of stick and twist). We test the sensitivity of the results to different assumptions via scenario analyses. CONCLUSIONS This article shows that simulation methods can be used to help pharmaceutical managers make informed strategic decisions in contexts of uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Mark Strong
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bullement A, Cranmer HL, Shields GE. A Review of Recent Decision-Analytic Models Used to Evaluate the Economic Value of Cancer Treatments. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2019; 17:771-780. [PMID: 31485867 PMCID: PMC6885507 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-019-00513-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
Cost-effectiveness analysis provides information on the potential value of new cancer treatments, which is particularly pertinent for decision makers as demand for treatment grows while healthcare budgets remain fixed. A range of decision-analytic modelling approaches can be used to estimate cost effectiveness. This study summarises the key modelling approaches considered in oncology, alongside their advantages and limitations. A review was conducted to identify single technology appraisals (STAs) submitted to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and published papers reporting full economic evaluations of cancer treatments published within the last 5 years. The review was supplemented with the existing methods literature discussing cancer modelling. In total, 100 NICE STAs and 124 published studies were included. Partitioned-survival analysis (n = 54) and discrete-time state transition structures (n = 41) were the main structures submitted to NICE. Conversely, the published studies reported greater use of discrete-time state transition models (n = 102). Limited justification of model structure was provided by authors, despite an awareness in the existing literature that the model structure should be considered thoroughly and can greatly influence cost-effectiveness results. Justification for the choice of model structure was limited and studies would be improved with a thorough rationale for this choice. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach should be considered by future researchers. Alternative methods (such as multi-state modelling) are likely to be utilised more frequently in the future, and so justification of these more advanced methods is paramount to their acceptability to inform healthcare decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ash Bullement
- Delta Hat Limited, 212 Tamworth Road, Nottingham, NG10 3GS, UK.
| | - Holly L Cranmer
- Takeda UK Limited, Building 3, Glory Park, Woodburn Green, Buckinghamshire, HP10 0DF, UK
| | - Gemma E Shields
- Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bullement A, Taylor M, McMordie ST, Waters E, Hatswell AJ. NICE, in Confidence: An Assessment of Redaction to Obscure Confidential Information in Single Technology Appraisals by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Pharmacoeconomics 2019; 37:1383-1390. [PMID: 31250397 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00818-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health technology assessment (HTA) aims to provide a transparent framework within which normative judgements can be applied for decision making. Such transparency enables the public to understand the rationale for decision making, but conflicts with companies being able to offer commercially sensitive discounts. We investigated how to balance these conflicting ideals. METHODS National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) submissions were reviewed for products with an approved, simple Patient Access Scheme (PAS) discount. The approach to censoring was noted (e.g. total cost and clinical outcomes redacted). Submissions were then assessed for transparency (i.e. whether the decision appeared justifiable given the available information) and confidentiality (i.e. whether the PAS discount could be 'back calculated'). RESULTS One hundred and eighteen products have an approved commercial arrangement, of which 110 have simple PAS discounts considered within the NICE Single Technology Appraisal programme. A definitive incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was presented within final NICE guidance in only 20 appraisals. Documentation for seven appraisals allowed for the straightforward 'back calculation' of PAS discounts. Furthermore, a large amount of information was censored as academic-in-confidence and remains so many years later. CONCLUSION Appropriate redaction ensures discounts remain confidential, yet maintains the transparency of the HTA decisions made. Complete redaction does not allow for transparent, justifiable decision making. However, redacting 'enough' information to preclude direct estimation of discounts provides a means of maintaining both transparency and confidentiality. This study demonstrates a lack of consensus regarding presentation of results, and the importance of appropriate redaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ash Bullement
- Delta Hat, 212 Tamworth Road, Nottingham, NG10 3GS, UK
| | - Matthew Taylor
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Errol Waters
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK
| | - Anthony James Hatswell
- Delta Hat, 212 Tamworth Road, Nottingham, NG10 3GS, UK.
- University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bullement A, Nathan P, Willis A, Amin A, Lilley C, Stapelkamp C, Hatswell A, Pescott C, Bharmal M. Cost Effectiveness of Avelumab for Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma. Pharmacoecon Open 2019; 3:377-390. [PMID: 30680676 PMCID: PMC6710317 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-018-0115-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) is a rare and aggressive skin cancer. Until recently, there were no licensed treatment options for patients with mMCC, and prognosis was poor. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted for avelumab, a newly available treatment option for mMCC, versus standard care (SC), from a UK National Health Service perspective. METHODS A partitioned survival model was developed to assess the lifetime costs and effects of avelumab versus SC. Data from the JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial (NCT02155647) were used to inform estimates of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Unit costs and associated frequencies of use were informed by published literature and clinical expert opinion. Results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs, i.e. the cost per QALY gained) for treatment-experienced (TE) and treatment-naïve (TN) patients. Uncertainty was explored through a range of sensitivity analyses. RESULTS Discounting costs and QALYs at 3.5% per annum, avelumab was associated with ICERs of £35,274 (TE)/£39,178 (TN) per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results demonstrated that avelumab was associated with an 88.3% (TE)/69.3% (TN) probability of being cost effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold for end-of-life treatments of £50,000 per QALY gained. Results were most sensitive to alternative survival extrapolations and dosing assumptions. CONCLUSIONS The analysis results suggest that avelumab is likely to be a cost-effective treatment option for UK mMCC patients. The results for TN patients are subject to some uncertainty, and a confirmatory analysis will be conducted with more mature data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anthony Hatswell
- Delta Hat, Nottingham, UK
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bullement A, Latimer NR, Bell Gorrod H. Survival Extrapolation in Cancer Immunotherapy: A Validation-Based Case Study. Value Health 2019; 22:276-283. [PMID: 30832965 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2018] [Revised: 10/09/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune-checkpoint inhibitors may provide long-term survival benefits via a cured proportion, yet data are usually insufficient to prove this upon submission to health technology assessment bodies. OBJECTIVE We revisited the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence assessment of ipilimumab in melanoma (TA319). We used updated data from the pivotal trial to assess the accuracy of the extrapolation methods used and compared these to previously unused techniques to establish whether an alternative extrapolation may have provided more accurate survival projections. METHODS We compared projections from the piecewise survival model used in TA319 and those produced by alternative models (fit to trial data with minimum follow-up of 3 years) to a longer-term data cut (5-year follow-up). We also compared projections to external data to help assess validity. Alternative approaches considered were parametric, spline-based, mixture, and mixture-cure models. RESULTS Only the survival model used in TA319 and a mixture-cure model provided 5-year survival predictions close to those observed in the 5-year follow-up data set. Standard parametric, spline, and non-curative-mixture models substantially underestimated 5-year survival. Survival estimates from the TA319 model and the mixture-cure model diverge considerably after 5 years and remain unvalidated. CONCLUSIONS In our case study, only models that incorporated an element of external information (through a cure fraction combined with background mortality rates or using registry data) provided accurate estimates of 5-year survival. Flexible models that were able to capture the complex hazard functions observed during the trial, but which did not incorporate external information, extrapolated poorly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ash Bullement
- BresMed Health Solutions, Sheffield, UK; Delta Hat, Nottingham, UK.
| | - Nicholas R Latimer
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helen Bell Gorrod
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bullement A, Meng Y, Cooper M, Lee D, Harding TL, O'Regan C, Aguiar-Ibanez R. A review and validation of overall survival extrapolation in health technology assessments of cancer immunotherapy by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: how did the initial best estimate compare to trial data subsequently made available? J Med Econ 2019; 22:205-214. [PMID: 30422080 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1547303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Validation of overall survival (OS) extrapolations of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) during the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Single Technology Assessment (STA) process is limited due to data still maturing at the time of submission. Inaccurate extrapolation may lead to inappropriate decision-making. The availability of more mature trial data facilitates a retrospective analysis of the plausibility and validity of initial extrapolations. This study compares these extrapolations to subsequently available longer-term data. METHODS A systematic search of completed NICE appraisals of ICIs from March 2000 to December 2017 was performed. A targeted search was also undertaken to procure published OS data from the pivotal clinical trials for each identified STA made available post-submission to NICE. Initial Kaplan-Meier curves and associated extrapolations from NICE documentation were extracted to compare the accuracy of OS projections versus the most mature data. RESULTS The review identified 11 STAs, of which 10 provided OS data upon submission to NICE. The extrapolations undertaken considered parametric or piecewise survival models. Additional data cut-offs provided a mean of 18 months of OS beyond the end of the original data. Initial extrapolations typically under-estimated OS from the most mature data cut-off by 0.4-2.7%, depending on the choice of assessment method and use of the manufacturer- or ERG-preferred extrapolation. CONCLUSION Long-term extrapolation of OS is required for NICE STAs based on initial immature OS data. The results of this study demonstrate that the initial OS extrapolations employed by manufacturers and ERGs generally predicted OS reasonably well when compared to more mature data (when available), although on average they appeared to underestimate OS. This review and validation shows that, while the choice of OS extrapolation is uncertain, the methods adopted are generally aligned with later-published follow-up data and appear appropriate for informing HTA decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yang Meng
- a BresMed Health Solutions , Sheffield , UK
| | | | - Dawn Lee
- a BresMed Health Solutions , Sheffield , UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hatswell AJ, Bullement A, Briggs A, Paulden M, Stevenson MD. Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis in Cost-Effectiveness Models: Determining Model Convergence in Cohort Models. Pharmacoeconomics 2018; 36:1421-1426. [PMID: 30051268 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0697-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) demonstrates the parameter uncertainty in a decision problem. The technique involves sampling parameters from their respective distributions (rather than simply using mean/median parameter values). Guidance in the literature, and from health technology assessment bodies, on the number of simulations that should be performed suggests a 'sufficient number', or until 'convergence', which is seldom defined. The objective of this tutorial is to describe possible outcomes from PSA, discuss appropriate levels of accuracy, and present guidance by which an analyst can determine if a sufficient number of simulations have been conducted, such that results are considered to have converged. The proposed approach considers the variance of the outcomes of interest in cost-effectiveness analysis as a function of the number of simulations. A worked example of the technique is presented using results from a published model, with recommendations made on best practice. While the technique presented remains essentially arbitrary, it does give a mechanism for assessing the level of simulation error, and thus represents an advance over current practice of a round number of simulations with no assessment of model convergence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony J Hatswell
- University College London, London, UK.
- Delta Hat Limited, Nottingham, UK.
| | - Ash Bullement
- Delta Hat Limited, Nottingham, UK
- BresMed Health Solutions, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew Briggs
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bharmal M, Amin A, Stapelkamp C, Pescott C, Hatswell A, Lilley C, Bullement A, Willis A. Cost-effectiveness (CE) of avelumab vs standard care (SC) for the treatment of patients (pts) with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC). Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy289.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
27
|
Bullement A, D'Angelo SP, Amin A, Stapelkamp C, Willis A, Lilley C, Hatswell A, Bharmal M. Predicting overall survival in patients (pts) with treatment-naive metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) treated with avelumab. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e21620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sandra P. D'Angelo
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Anna Willis
- BresMed Health Solutions, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anthony Hatswell
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London and Delta Hat Limited, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Elvidge J, Bullement A, Hatswell AJ. Cost Effectiveness of Characterised Chondrocyte Implantation for Treatment of Cartilage Defects of the Knee in the UK. Pharmacoeconomics 2016; 34:1145-1159. [PMID: 27318837 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-016-0423-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Until recently, treatment options for damage to cartilage in the knee were limited to the use of microfracture or, occasionally, mosaicplasty. The developments of autologous and characterised chondrocyte implantation have provided new treatment options but have large upfront costs. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost effectiveness of characterised chondrocyte implantation in the UK National Health Service. METHODS An economic model was constructed in Microsoft Excel®, with patients undergoing either microfracture or chondrocyte implantation. Following treatment failure, patients can undergo a series of interventions, ultimately ending in knee replacement. Effectiveness and utility were modelled using clinical trial data, which were supplemented with synthesised registry data, and costs were taken from published sources. Results were expressed in clinical events, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and British pounds. Both costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5 % per year. RESULTS Chondrocyte implantation is estimated to reduce the lifetime probability of knee replacement by 50 % in comparison with microfracture, and to increase QALYs by 0.72 (16.57 vs. 15.85). Costs were estimated to be £23,307 for chondrocyte implantation, and £8008 for microfracture, with the incremental cost of £15,299 for chondrocyte implantation reflecting reduced resource use offsetting some of the procedure cost. These values gave a cost per QALY gained of £21,245. CONCLUSION Chondrocyte implantation is estimated to provide substantial patient benefits over a lifetime horizon, with a considerable increase in QALYs. Despite the increase in costs, the procedure is cost effective at standard thresholds used in the UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anthony J Hatswell
- BresMed, 84 Queen Street, Sheffield, S1 2DW, UK.
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|