Clazakizumab for desensitization in highly sensitized patients awaiting transplantation

Alloantibodies are a significant barrier to successful transplantation. While desensitization has emerged, efficacy is limited. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is an important mediator of inflammation and immune cell activation. Persistent IL-6 production increases the risk for alloantibody production. Here we report our experience with clazakizumab (anti-IL-6) for desensitization of highly HLA-sensitized patients (HS). From March 2018 to September 2020, 20 HS patients were enrolled in an open label pilot study to assess safety and limited efficacy of clazakizumab desensitization. Patients received PLEX, IVIg, and clazakizumab 25 mg monthly X6. If transplanted, graft function, pathology, HLA antibodies and regulatory immune cells were monitored. Transplanted patients received standard immunosuppression and clazakizumab 25 mg monthly posttransplant. Clazakizumab was well tolerated and associated with significant reductions in class I and class II antibodies allowing 18 of 20 patients to receive transplants with no DSA rebound in most. Significant increases in T_reg and B_reg cells were seen posttransplant. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in three patients. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months was 58 ± 29 ml/min/1.73 m² . Clazakizumab was generally safe and associated with significant reductions in HLA alloantibodies and high transplant rates for highly-sensitized patients. However, confirmation of efficacy for desensitization requires assessment in randomized controlled trials.

Outcomes at 3 years posttransplant in imlifidase-desensitized kidney transplant patients

Imlifidase is a cysteine proteinase which specifically cleaves IgG, inhibiting Fc-mediated effector function within hours of administration. Imlifidase converts a positive crossmatch to a potential donor (T cell, B cell, or both), to negative, enabling transplantation to occur between previously HLA incompatible donor-recipient pairs. To date, 39 crossmatch positive patients received imlifidase prior to a kidney transplant in four single-arm, open-label, phase 2 studies. At 3 years, for patients who were AMR+ compared to AMR-, death-censored allograft survival was 93% vs 77%, patient survival was 85% vs 94%, and mean eGFR was 49 ml/min/1.73 m² vs 61 ml/min/1.73 m² , respectively. The incidence of AMR was 38% with most episodes occurring within the first month post-transplantation. Sub-analysis of patients deemed highly sensitized with cPRA ≥ 99.9%, and unlikely to be transplanted who received crossmatch-positive, deceased donor transplants had similar rates of patient survival, graft survival, and eGFR but a higher rate of AMR. These data demonstrate that outcomes and safety up to 3 years in recipients of imlifidase-enabled allografts is comparable to outcomes in other highly sensitized patients undergoing HLA-incompatible transplantation. Thus, imlifidase is a potent option to facilitate transplantation among patients who have a significant immunologic barrier to successful kidney transplantation. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02790437), EudraCT Number: 2016-002064-13.

Imlifidase Desensitization in Crossmatch-positive, Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results of an International Phase 2 Trial (Highdes)

BACKGROUND

Highly HLA sensitized patients have limited access to life-saving kidney transplantation because of a paucity of immunologically suitable donors. Imlifidase is a cysteine protease that cleaves IgG leading to a rapid decrease in antibody level and inhibition of IgG-mediated injury. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of imlifidase in converting a positive crossmatch test to negative, allowing highly sensitized patients to be transplanted with a living or deceased donor kidney.

METHODS

This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial conducted at 5 transplant centers, evaluated the ability of imlifidase to create a negative crossmatch test within 24 h. Secondary endpoints included postimlifidase donor-specific antibody levels compared with predose levels, renal function, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles. Safety endpoints included adverse events and immunogenicity profile.

RESULTS

Of the transplanted patients, 89.5% demonstrated conversion of baseline positive crossmatch to negative within 24 h after imlifidase treatment. Donor-specific antibodies most often rebounded 3-14 d postimlifidase dose, with substantial interpatient variability. Patient survival was 100% with graft survival of 88.9% at 6 mo. With this, 38.9% had early biopsy proven antibody-mediated rejection with onset 2-19 d posttransplantation. Serum IgG levels began to normalize after ~3-7 d posttransplantation. Antidrug antibody levels were consistent with previous studies. Seven adverse events in 6 patients were classified as possibly or probably related to treatment and were mild-moderate in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Imlifidase was well tolerated, converted positive crossmatches to negative, and enabled patients with a median calculated panel-reactive antibody of 99.83% to undergo kidney transplantation resulting in good kidney function and graft survival at 6 mo.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic activity of obinutuzumab, a type 2 anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody for the desensitization of candidates for renal transplant

The limited effectiveness of rituximab plus intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in desensitization may be due to incomplete B cell depletion. Obinutuzumab is a type 2 anti-CD20 antibody that induces increased B cell depletion relative to rituximab and may therefore be more effective for desensitization. This open-label phase 1b study assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of obinutuzumab in highly sensitized patients with end-stage renal disease. Patients received 1 (day 1, n = 5) or 2 (days 1 and 15; n = 20) infusions of 1000-mg obinutuzumab followed by 2 doses of IVIG on days 22 and 43. Eleven patients received additional obinutuzumab doses at the time of transplant and/or at week 24. The median follow-up duration was 9.4 months. Obinutuzumab was well tolerated, and most adverse events were grade 1-2 in severity. There were 11 serious adverse events (SAEs) in 9 patients (36%); 10 of these SAEs were infections and 4 occurred after kidney transplant. Obinutuzumab plus IVIG resulted in profound peripheral B cell depletion and appeared to reduce B cells in retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Reductions in anti-HLA antibodies, number of unacceptable antigens, and the calculated panel reactive antibody score as centrally assessed using single-antigen bead assay were limited and not clinically meaningful for most patients (NCT02586051).

Prognostic tools to assess candidacy for and efficacy of antibody-removal therapy

Currently, the ability to predict or monitor the efficacy of HLA antibody-removal therapies is deficient. We previously reported that titration studies are a consistent and accurate means of assessing antibody strength. To test whether titration studies can also predict which patients are better candidates for desensitization, we studied 38 patients from 3 centers (29 receiving plasmapheresis/low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIg]; 9 patients receiving high-dose IVIg). For patients undergoing plasmapheresis/low-dose IVIg, antibody titer reduction correlated with number of treatment cycles for both class I and II antibodies but only up to approximately 4 cycles. Reduction in titer slowed with additional cycles, suggesting a limit to the efficacy of this approach. Furthermore, initial titer (predesensitization) can guide the selection of candidates for successful antibody-removal treatment. In our experience, patients with antibodies at an initial titer >1:512 could not be reduced to the goal of a negative lymphocyte crossmatch, corresponding to a 1:16 titer, despite a significant increase in the number of treatment cycles. Change in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) value did not correlate with success of treatment if initial MFI values were >10 000, likely due to single antigen bead saturation. Overall, we present a potential prognostic tool to predict candidacy and a monitoring tool to assess efficacy of desensitization treatment.

Update on the use of immunoglobulin in human disease: A review of evidence

Human immunoglobulin preparations for intravenous or subcutaneous administration are the cornerstone of treatment in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases affecting the humoral immune system. Intravenous preparations have a number of important uses in the treatment of other diseases in humans as well, some for which acceptable treatment alternatives do not exist. We provide an update of the evidence-based guideline on immunoglobulin therapy, last published in 2006. Given the potential risks and inherent scarcity of human immunoglobulin, careful consideration of its indications and administration is warranted.

Donor-specific antibodies in allograft recipients: etiology, impact and therapeutic approaches

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Kidney transplantation remains the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal failure. However, despite significant advancements in detection of donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies, improved immunosuppression and patient management, the durability of this life-saving therapy has not improved. This results in increased morbidity and mortality as well as increased cost to the healthcare system.

RECENT FINDINGS

The identification of immune-pathogenic pathways responsible for allograft failure coupled with targeted interventions will represent one of the most important future objectives of transplant immunologist and physicians. The development of sensitive donor-specific antibody (DSA) detection techniques and advancements in renal allograft pathology assessments have revealed the importance of humoral immunity in mediating allograft failure. This is especially true for complement activating DSAs (C1q+).

SUMMARY

Our current understanding suggests that reduction of immunosuppressive medications or medication nonadherence is now the major causes of DSA development and attendant pathology. Other important factors in initiation of de-novo DSA production include viral infections, human leukocyte antigen-DR/DQ mismatches and autoimmune diseases. Therapies aimed at antibody reduction, B-cell depletion and modification of the complement system will likely usher in new therapeutic approaches for prevention and treatment of DSA-mediated allograft dysfunction.

Regulation of immunity and inflammation by intravenous immunoglobulin: relevance to solid organ transplantation

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) products are derived from pooled human plasma from thousands of donors and have been used for the treatment of primary immunodeficiency disorders for more than 30 years. IVIg products are also effective in the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, however, the precise mechanism(s) of action are not known. Recent data suggest that IVIg has a much broader ability to regulate cellular immunity, including innate and adaptive components. IVIg-induced upregulation of Fcγ receptor IIB on B cells appears to be an important mode of action in suppression of antigen-presenting cell activity and antibody production. IVIg is also a recently recognized modifier of complement activation and injury. Analysis of clinical studies examining the use of IVIg in desensitization protocols and for treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in transplant recipients are supportive. Here, we discuss these important advancements and their relevance to transplant medicine.

ABO blood group incompatibility: a diminishing barrier to successful kidney transplantation?

Blood type-incompatible transplantation has gained wide acceptance over the last decade. This is largely the result of B-cell-directed therapies aimed at modulating anti-blood group antibodies, which were the cause of the poor outcomes originally seen. Now rituximab (anti-CD20 and anti-B cell) has largely replaced splenectomy in preconditioning protocols, allowing for the wider implementation of ABO-incompatible transplants. Plasma exchange followed by intravenous immunoglobulin is also critical for the success of ABO-incompatible transplants. In this article, we describe the important contributions immunomodulatory drugs and antibody reduction therapies have made in achieving excellent outcomes in what was once an impenetrable barrier to transplantation.

Clinical aspects of intravenous immunoglobulin use in solid organ transplant recipients

Intravenous immunoglobulin products (IVIG) are derived from pooled human plasma from thousands of donors and have been used for the treatment of primary immunodeficiency disorders for nearly 30 years. IVIG products are also effective in the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, however the precise mechanism(s) of immune modulation are unknown. Recent data suggests that IVIG has a much broader ability to regulate cellular immunity, including innate and adaptive components. IVIG is also a recently recognized modifier of complement activation and injury. These attributes suggests IVIG would have clinical applications in solid organ transplantation. Analysis of clinical studies examining the use of IVIG in desensitization protocols and for treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are supportive for kidney transplant recipients, although no clinical trials using IVIG in sensitized patients were performed seeking an Federal Drug Administration indication. Data regarding the use of IVIG for desensitization and treatment of AMR in cardiac and lung allograft recipients is not conclusive. IVIG is useful in the treatment and prevention of posttransplant infectious complications including cytomegalovirus, parvovirus B19 and polyoma BK virus. In addition, we address the risk of adverse events associated with IVIG use in sensitized end-stage renal disease and transplant patients.

Resolution of clinical and pathologic features of C1q nephropathy after rituximab therapy

C1q nephropathy is a rare idiopathic glomerulopathy characterized by mesangial deposition of immunoglobulin and complement with C1q dominance or co-dominance, and the absence of clinical and laboratory evidence of systemic lupus erythematosus. Its clinical course is unpredictable and the response to corticosteroid or cytotoxic treatment is variable. Here, we report two cases of C1q nephropathy, one in a child and one in an adult, both presenting with impaired renal function and massive proteinuria. Both patients failed to respond to immunosuppressive medications; however, rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, was effective in preserving renal function in one patient and eliminating the need for hemodialysis in the other. In one patient, histologic regression of abnormalities was documented over 3 years post-treatment. Both patients have remained off other immunosuppressive medication for a prolonged period with stable renal function. These cases are, to our knowledge, the first reported successful treatment of C1q nephropathy with rituximab.

Advances in diagnosing and managing antibody-mediated rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a unique, significant, and often severe form of allograft rejection that is not amenable to treatment with standard immunosuppressive medications. Significant advances have occurred in our ability to predict patients at risk for, and to diagnose, AMR. These advances include the development of newer anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-antibody detection techniques and assays for non-HLA antibodies associated with AMR. The pathophysiology of AMR suggests a prime role for antibodies, B cells and plasma cells, but other effector molecules, especially the complement system, point to potential targets that could modify the AMR process. An emerging and potentially larger problem is the development of chronic AMR (CAMR) resulting from de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) that emerge more than 100 days posttransplantation. Therapeutic options include: (1) High-dose intravenously administered immunoglobulin (IVIG), which has many potential benefits. (2) The use of IVIG+rituximab (anti-CD20, anti-B cell). (3) The combination of plasmapheresis (PP)+low-dose IVIG with or without rituximab. Data support the efficacy of all of the above approaches. Newer approaches to treating AMR include using the proteosome inhibitor (bortezomib), which induces apoptosis in plasma cells, and eculizumab (anti-C5, anticomplement monoclonal antibody).

Therapeutic plasma exchange for desensitization prior to transplantation in ABO-incompatible renal allografts

BACKGROUND

Although there have been desensitization protocols used for ABO-incompatible (ABOi) renal transplants, there are a lack of studied protocols. Our center developed a preconditioning protocol that involved mycophenolic acid, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) that allowed for ABOi renal transplantation.

METHODS

Ten patients in our institution with end-stage renal disease who were unable to procure ABO-compatible donor kidneys underwent treatment with this protocol (which included a uniform 5 TPE sessions) prior to an ABOi renal transplant. A retrospective chart review was performed on these patients and clinical endpoints including ABO antibody titers, serum creatinine, clinical complications, and graft performance were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median ABO antibody titers at presentation, after completion of the protocol, and after transplant for the patients were 32 (range, 2-128), 8 (range, 1-64), and 4 (range, 2-32), respectively. The mean serum creatinine at study conclusion was 1.45 +/- 1.04 mg/dl at an average of 262.20 days from transplant. There were four incidents of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and two incidents of delayed graft function (DGF). There was one incident of graft failure and no patient deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The desensitization protocol used by our institution allowed for successful ABOi renal transplantation. Although there were incidents of AMR and DGF, the majority of the transplants resulted in viable grafts. A larger patient study group may be needed to fully evaluate the efficacy and safety of this protocol.

Acute hemolysis after high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in highly HLA sensitized patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Intravenous Ig (IVIG) is used in renal transplantation for desensitization and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The infusion of high-dose IVIG is generally well tolerated, but there are reports of hemolytic anemia induced by anti-blood group antibodies present in IVIG. Here, we report our experience with IVIG-induced hemolytic anemia (IH) in ESRD patients receiving IVIG for desensitization or treatment of AMR.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

All patients receiving IVIG for desensitization or for treatment of AMR were monitored for evidence of acute anemia and hemolysis. Markers of hemolysis, including direct antiglobulin tests, were recorded. Five different IVIG products were tested for isohemagglutinin titers.

RESULTS

There were 18 cases of IH in 16 patients. All identified cases received the IVIG product Gamunex, Gammagard liquid, or Privigen. All patients developing hemolysis were non-O blood types. Isohemagglutinin titers ranged from 1:2 to 1:64 in the various IVIG products, with higher titers noted in the liquid, nonlyophilized products.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute IH is a significant complication of high-dose IVIG infusion. Identified risk factors include non-O blood type of the recipient and administration of liquid IVIG preparations with high titer anti-A/B IgG antibodies. We recommend monitoring hemoglobin 48 to 72 h after IVIG infusion. If the hemoglobin decreases, a hemolytic work-up is recommended. Hemolysis could be avoided in at risk patients by choosing a low titer product. However, other complications such as acute renal failure or thrombosis may be seen because the low titer products are usually hyperosmotic.

Therapeutic strategies in management of the highly HLA-sensitized and ABO-incompatible transplant recipients

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) products are derived from pooled human plasma and have been used for the treatment of primary immunodeficiency disorders for more than 24 years. Shortly after their introduction, IVIG products were found to be effective in the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. Rituximab (anti-CD20, anti-B-cell monoclonal antibody) has also shown efficacy in the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. We have recently described a beneficial effect of the combination of IVIG + rituximab on the reduction of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies with subsequent improvement in rates of transplantation for highly HLA-sensitized patients as well as a potent anti-inflammatory effect that is beneficial in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection. These advancements have enabled patients previously considered poor or unreasonable candidates for transplantation to receive a successful transplant. Alternative approaches to IVIG/rituximab-based desensitization include the addition of plasmapheresis and possible splenectomy. Furthermore, new advancements in detecting donor-specific anti-body and assessment of antibody-mediated injury to allografts (C4d staining) allow for early detection of antibody-mediated rejection and early implementation of IVIG/rituximab therapy to prevent allograft loss.

Rituximab and intravenous immune globulin for desensitization during renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Few options for transplantation currently exist for patients highly sensitized to HLA. This exploratory, open-label, phase 1-2, single-center study examined whether intravenous immune globulin plus rituximab could reduce anti-HLA antibody levels and improve transplantation rates.

METHODS

Between September 2005 and May 2007, a total of 20 highly sensitized patients (with a mean [+/-SD] T-cell panel-reactive antibody level, determined by use of the complement-dependent cytotoxicity assay, of 77+/-19% or with donor-specific antibodies) were enrolled and received treatment with intravenous immune globulin and rituximab. We recorded rates of transplantation, panel-reactive antibody levels, cross-matching results at the time of transplantation, survival of patients and grafts, acute rejection episodes, serum creatinine values, adverse events and serious adverse events, and immunologic factors.

RESULTS

The mean panel-reactive antibody level was 44+/-30% after the second infusion of intravenous immune globulin (P<0.001 for the comparison with the pretreatment level). At study entry, the mean time on dialysis among recipients of a transplant from a deceased donor was 144+/-89 months (range, 60 to 324). However, the time to transplantation after desensitization was 5+/-6 months (range, 2 to 18). Sixteen of the 20 patients (80%) received a transplant. At 12 months, the mean serum creatinine level was 1.5+/-1.1 mg per deciliter (133+/-97 micromol per liter), and the mean survival rates of patients and grafts were 100% and 94%, respectively. There were no infusion-related adverse events or serious adverse events during the study. Long-term monitoring for infectious complications and neurologic problems revealed no unanticipated events.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the combination of intravenous immune globulin and rituximab may prove effective as a desensitization regimen for patients awaiting a transplant from either a living donor or a deceased donor. Larger and longer trials are needed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of this approach. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00642655.)

Analysis of subcutaneous (SQ) alemtuzumab induction therapy in highly sensitized patients desensitized with IVIG and rituximab

Here we report on our experience with subcutaneous (SQ) Alemtuzumab in an uncontrolled study in highly HLA-sensitized patients (HS). From 3/05-4/07, 54 HS patients received Alemtuzumab 30 mg SQ as induction. Patient and graft survival, AR episodes, serum creatinines, absolute lymphocyte counts, monthly PCR monitoring for viruses, AE/SAEs and infectious complications were monitored. No patient to date has developed acute injection-related reactions after SQ Alemtuzumab; however, bone marrow suppression was occasionally seen requiring reduction or elimination of mycophenolate mofetil approximately 1-2 months posttransplant. Patient and graft survival at 12 M was 98%/96%, respectively. AR episodes occurred in 35% with 20% being C4d+ AMR. Mean SCrs at 12 M were 1.4 +/- 0.3 mg/dL. The nadir ALC was 0.17 +/- 0.19 within 24 h and sustained up to 365 days posttransplant. Infections occurred in eight patients (five with polyoma BK viremia [PBK], one CMV/PBK and two CMV viremia). SQ Alemtuzumab was well tolerated and resulted in prolonged lymphocyte depletion. Compared to our previous experience with daclizumab and rabbit ATG induction in HS patients, single-dose SQ Alemtuzumab was more cost effective, showed similar infection rates and did not reduce the AMR rates posttransplant. Although uncontrolled, these observations suggest that induction therapy with Alemtuzumab appears feasible and indeed promising, but awaits more definitive study.

Effect of induction therapy protocols on transplant outcomes in crossmatch positive renal allograft recipients desensitized with IVIG

Here we retrospectively examine the efficacy of two antibody induction regimens using Zenapax or Thymoglobulin in patients with positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatches (CDC-CMXs) desensitized with IVIG (intravenous immunoglobulin). Between January 1999 and March 2005, 97 patients with (+) CDC-CMXs received kidney transplants (43 deceased donors/54 living donors). All patients received at least 2 g/kg IVIG (maximum four doses) until an acceptable CMX was obtained. Patients were divided into two groups: 1. IVIG + Zenapax (n = 58), 2. IVIG + Thymoglobulin (n = 39). A total of 94% of patients in Group 1 and 84% in G2 have at least 2 years of follow up. Patient and graft survival was 96%/84% in Group 1 and 100%/90% in Group 2, p = NS. The number and severity of AR episodes were similar (36% Group 1 vs. 31% Group 2, p = NS) as was the incidence of C4d (+) antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (Banff Grade II/III) (22% Group 1 vs. 21% Group 2). Mean serum creatinines (SCrs) at 24 months were similar (Group 1: 1.4 +/- 0.7 vs. G2: 1.5 +/- 0.7 mg/dL). Induction therapy with Zenapax or Thymoglobulin results in excellent patient, graft survival and graft function at 2 years. There was no increased risk of viral infections or malignancies with either agent. Neither agent was effective in reducing the incidence of AMR.

Safety and Adverse Events Profiles of Intravenous Gammaglobulin Products Used for Immunomodulation: A Single-Center Experience

Intravenous Ig (IVIg) products are used in various medical conditions. Differences in excipients account for most adverse events (AE). Reports of complications including acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute renal failure (ARF) have emerged. Herein is described one institution's experience with IVIg-related complications. This study is a retrospective analysis of infusion-related AE that are associated with various IVIg products. Infusion-related AE were monitored during and after the administration of three IVIg products: Gamimune-N 10% (n = 76), Polygam (n = 105), and Carimune (n = 98). AE segregated to specific IVIg products. No patients who received Gamimune-N experienced AMI or ARF. Five (4.7%) patients (P < 0.01) in the Polygam group experienced AMI. Eight (8.2%) patients (P < 0.0001) in the Carimune group developed ARF. IVIg was safe to give on hemodialysis. IVIg products differ in osmolality, pH, and sugar and sodium content; this results in specific AE. Polygam resulted in no ARF but an increase in AMI. Carimune products at 9% concentration resulted in an increase in ARF. Gamimune-N 10% and other IVIg products were frequently associated with headaches. Administration of IVIg to patients who are on hemodialysis seems to be safe and effective.

Intravenous gammaglobulin (IVIG): a novel approach to improve transplant rates and outcomes in highly HLA-sensitized patients

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) products are derived from pooled human plasma and have been used for the treatment of primary immunodeficiency disorders for more than 24 years. Shortly after their introduction, IVIG products were also found to be effective in the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. Over the past 2 decades, the list of diseases where IVIG has a demonstrable beneficial effect has grown rapidly. These include Kawasaki disease, Guillain-Barre syndrome, myasthenia gravis, dermatomyositis and demyelinating polyneuropathy. Recently, we have described a beneficial effect on the reduction of anti-HLA antibodies with subsequent improvement in transplantation of highly HLA-sensitized patients as well as a potent anti-inflammatory effect that is beneficial in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). These advancements have enabled transplantation of patients previously considered untransplantable. These studies and relevant mechanism(s) of action will be discussed here.

Current approaches to treatment of antibody-mediated rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has recently been recognized as a significant and unique form of rejection that is not amenable to treatment with standard immunosuppressive medications aimed at modification of T-cell function. Recent interest in AMR and the role of B cells in rejection has been aided by the concomitant discovery that C4d staining of renal biopsy tissue is strongly associated with AMR and a poor prognosis, and the emergence of desensitization protocols for treatment of highly human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-sensitized patients. Treatment options include: (i) the use of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) which works by blocking anti-HLA antibody activity and through complement inhibition, (ii) the use of Rituxan (anti-CD20 chimeric antibody) to deplete B cells and interfere with antigen-presenting cell (APC) activity of B cells subsequently decreasing T-cell activation, and (iii) the use of plasmapheresis (PE) + anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) immunoglobulin G (IgG) or IVIG in lower doses. This protocol removes deleterious anti-HLA antibodies and may also allow complexing of anti-HLA with anti-idiotypes in the anti-CMV IgG. Although early, data support the efficacy of all three approaches. Many centers are now designing protocols that utilize a combination of all three agents. In summary, recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of AMR has allowed for significant improvements in outcomes of a condition usually associated with rapid graft failure. However, much work needs to be done to better understand the immunologic processes leading to AMR and how current therapies can be best used to effectively prevent and treat it.

Post-transplant therapy with high-dose intravenous gammaglobulin: Applications to treatment of antibody-mediated rejection

B-cells and their products (antibodies) are now recognized as important mediators of allograft rejection. This represents a significant departure from previous doctrine where the T-cells were felt to be of paramount importance. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has emerged as a significant and common complication of transplantation. The development of donor-specific (anti-HLA class I and class II) antibodies is known to correlate strongly with the development of AMR. Recognition of the unique features of AMR that were often confused with non-specific acute tubular injury is aided considerably by improvements in monitoring of anti-HLA antibodies and the immunopathologic demonstration of C4d staining in affected capillary beds. Although imperfect, the demonstration of C4d (a complement breakdown product) staining in an allograft, especially accompanied by the presence of anti-HLA antibodies in the recipient sera, strongly suggests a diagnosis of AMR. Thus, AMR is a complement-dependent, antibody-mediated disorder. AMR can occur as a de novo complication of transplantation in individuals not previously recognized to be sensitized to HLA antigens, but more often occurs as a complication of desensitization therapies in highly-HLA sensitized patients. AMR may also constitute a significant portion of what is now referred to as chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). The prognosis of C4d (+) AMR is poor as current therapies for treatment of AR are directed primarily at the T-cell. Until recently, no therapeutic options existed to address this problem from a primary etiological standpoint. Here we discuss the use of high dose IVIG as an option for treatment of AMR. We have significant experience with this approach which is outlined here. IVIG has many ideal advantages as a therapy for AMR. First, it can down regulate B-cell activation and antibody production, second, it can induce anti-inflammatory cytokines and contains blocking antiidiotyic antibodies to anti-HLA antibodies and third, IVIG has the unique ability to block complement-mediated injury through inhibition of C3 activation. Further clinical trials are necessary to prove efficacy for treatment of AMR.

Use of high-dose human intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in sensitized patients awaiting transplantation: the Cedars-Sinai experience

Cedars Sinai Medical Center has developed a protocol using high-dose (2 mg/kg) IVIG to desensitize and transplant patients who are broadly sensitized to HLA antigens. Since 2000, we have evaluated and transplanted 57 broadly sensitized patients (19 with deceased donor and 38 with living donor kidneys) following IVIG treatment. The incidence of allograft rejection was 38.5% and 4-year patient and graft survival rates were 96.5% and 82.5%, respectively. We have also used IVIG in combination with pulse steroids to treat antibody-mediated rejection episodes in 18 patients with C4d deposition in rejection biopsies. Thirteen responded to treatment and 5 grafts were lost in this group with severe antibody-mediated rejection. These results suggest that in many cases high-dose IVIG treatment can neutralize or mitigate antibody responses to eliminate positive donor-specific crossmatches and permit transplantation of broadly sensitized patients and offers a means to treat antibody-mediated rejection successfully.