Diagnostic Utility of Cerebrospinal Fluid White Blood Cell Components for the Identification of Bacterial Meningitis in Infants

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the diagnostic and predictive utility of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white blood cell (WBC) components in the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis in infants discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

METHODS

We identified a cohort of infants discharged from a Pediatrix NICU between 1997 and 2020 who did not have an immunodeficiency, had at least 1 CSF culture collected within the first 120 days of life, and at least 1 CSF laboratory specimen obtained on the day of culture collection. We only included an infant's first CSF culture and excluded cultures from CSF reservoirs and those growing contaminants or nonbacterial organisms. We examined the utility of CSF WBC components to diagnose or predict bacterial meningitis by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) at different cutoff values for each parameter. We performed subgroup analysis excluding infants treated with antibiotics the day before CSF culture collection.

RESULTS

Of the 20 756 infants that met the study inclusion criteria, 320 (2%) were diagnosed with bacterial meningitis. We found (AUC [95% CI]) CSF WBC count (0.76 [0.73-0.79]), CSF neutrophil count (0.74 [0.70-0.78]), and CSF neutrophil percent (0.71 [0.67-0.75]) had the highest predictive values for bacterial meningitis, even when excluding infants with early antibiotic administration.

CONCLUSIONS

No single clinical prediction rule had the optimal discriminatory power for predicting culture-proven bacterial meningitis, and clinicians should be cautious when interpreting CSF WBC parameters in infants with suspected meningitis.

Prophylactic laser treatment appears to promote choroidal neovascularisation in high-risk ARM: results of an interim analysis

PURPOSE

The Drusen Laser Study (DLS) of high-risk age-related maculopathy (ARM) is a randomised, controlled clinical trial designed to answer two questions: (1). Do drusen resolve after macular laser photocoagulation (2). Does macular laser photocoagulation prevent choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) in high-risk eyes? In this report, we present the results of the interim, pooled analysis of CNV prophylaxis for patients in the Unilateral Group of the DLS.

METHODS

The DLS is a randomised controlled clinical trial of prophylactic macular photocoagulation for high-risk ARM. Patients in the Unilateral Group had a neovascular complication in the first eye; their fellow eye (Study Eye) had visual acuity of 6/12 or better and drusen. Following informed consent, patients were randomised to the Treatment Group or the No Treatment Group. Patients randomised to treatment received 12 light spots of argon laser photocoagulation to their Study Eye: four burns were placed 750 microm from the centre of the fovea at 12, 3, 6, and 9 o'clock, and the eight remaining burns were placed 1500 microm from the centre of the fovea at 12, 1:30, 3, 4:30, 6, 7:30, 9, and 10:30 o'clock. Drusen were treated directly only if they were present at the protocol treatment locations. All patients were followed in an identical fashion at regular intervals. Best-corrected visual acuity was measured and recorded by a masked observer. Fluorescein angiography was performed at baseline and yearly review, as well as nonprotocol visits if symptoms suggested CNV. Five clinical centres utilised and conformed to a common DLS protocol. Patient care and data collection methodologies were deemed sufficiently similar to permit a pooled data analysis.

RESULTS

There were 156 patients included in the interim analysis, and timed information was available on 153. CNV occurred in 21 of 81 (26%) patients in the Treatment Group and in 13 of 75 (17%) patients in the No Treatment Group (P=0.19). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed earlier onset of CNV in the Treatment Group compared to patients in the No Treatment Group (statistical significance not calculated). Visual acuity loss at 2 years occurred in nine of 54 (17%) patients in the Treatment Group compared to the two of 48 (4%) patients in the No Treatment Group (P=0.056).

CONCLUSIONS

We are only the second group to identify possible laser-induced CNV despite other similar studies in progress. Equipoise of the DLS investigators was lost, and recruitment was halted. We feel ethically bound to notify the ophthalmic community of this finding.