Seasonal variation of eosinophil counts in histologically normal colonic mucosal biopsies

INTRODUCTION

The eosinophil counts in colonic biopsies are affected by geographical and possibly seasonal variations. This study aims to investigate the significance of seasonal variations of eosinophil counts in histologically normal colonic mucosal biopsies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, cross sectional study that included 337 cases of normal colonic biopsies. The number of eosinophils per high power field was counted in the most densely populated area. The eosinophilic counts were compared among genders, age groups, biopsy sites and in various months and seasons. Two tailed T-test was used to compare means and a p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

173 (51%) of cases were from males. The age range was between 18-82 with the mean being 51.7 years (SD= 17.5). 181 (54%) biopsies were from the right colon and 156 (46%) from the left colon. There was a statistically significant difference between eosinophil counts in the right colon (mean 20.2, SD 13.2) and left colon (mean 13.8, SD10.1); p value <0.001. The mean eosinophil counts was highest in autumn (21.1) followed by spring (18.3). The counts in winter and summer were close (15.2 and 15.1 respectively). There was a statistically significant difference between counts in autumn and summer (p=0.013) and between autumn and winter (p=0.008). However, there was no statistically significant differences between autumn and spring counts (p=0.183). When stratified according to site, this pattern of statistical significance was observed in the right colon but not the left colonic mucosal biopsies.

CONCLUSION

There are significant seasonal variations of eosinophil counts in normal colonic biopsies which are more pronounced in the right colon. Pathologists and gastroenterologists need to be aware of these variations and to take them into account when determining if a patient has tissue eosinophilia.

Catastrophic Thromboembolic Syndrome During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Since March 2020, the SARS-CoV-2 virus known to cause COVID-19 has presented in many ways and it seems to affect almost all organ systems. One of its detrimental effects is on the coagulation system. Disruption of the coagulation pathway or hypercoagulability has been reported extensively in many articles and studies. It seems there is no specific pattern or location of the coagulopathy. The coagulopathy can present as part of the respiratory disease process or as an isolated phenomenon. Many articles had reported that the thrombus can be a venous thromboembolic phenomenon such as deep venous thrombosis (DVT), portal vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), or as arterial thrombosis, for instance, coronary artery thrombosis, cerebrovascular thromboembolic disease (i.e., stroke), or an aortic thrombus. One of the disastrous presentations is what is called “catastrophic thrombosis syndrome.” This syndrome is characterized by multiple thromboses that take place in different parts of the vascular system at different parts of the body at the same time. In many studies, D-dimer levels have been shown to predict the risk of increased thromboembolism in SARS-CoV-2. However, an appropriate anticoagulation agent, dosage, and duration are yet to be determined. We are presenting an interesting case of a female who suffered catastrophic thrombosis syndrome despite being on prophylactic anticoagulation. She presented with leg pain and was found to have extensive multiple thrombi starting from the ascending/descending aorta and extending to the distal peroneal arteries.

Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole-Induced Aseptic Meningitis: A New Approach

Inflammation of the meningeal linings of the central nervous system (CNS), also known as meningitis, is one of the serious presentations in the emergency because it carries high morbidity and mortality. The most common cause is pus-producing organisms. However, non-suppurative meningitis, termed aseptic meningitis, is another cause of meningeal inflammation. Many etiologies stand behind aseptic meningitis. Those etiologies include viral and non-viral, drug-induced, malignancy, and systemic inflammation. Drug-induced aseptic meningitis is a rare type of meningitis. Although it is easily treated, it can be a challenging disease if not present in the differential diagnosis. It is commonly associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Nonetheless, other medications have been also reported to cause aseptic meningitis, including antibiotics. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is one of the most prescribed antibiotics as a prophylactic and therapeutic drug due to its effectiveness and low cost. Although immunocompromised patients are at a higher risk to develop aseptic meningitis, immunocompetent patients are also at risk. Unrelated to the source of the infection, TMP-SMX carries a risk of aseptic meningitis and should be considered as an etiology in patients presenting with meningeal signs and symptoms. Hereby, we report a young immunocompetent patient who developed aseptic meningitis eight days after being prescribed TMP-SMX. Like all drug-induced aseptic meningitis, all his symptoms resolved two days after stopping the medication.

Why Do Patients Leave against Medical Advice? Reasons, Consequences, Prevention, and Interventions

Background: A patient decides to leave the hospital against medical advice. Is this an erratic eccentric behavior of the patient, or a gap in the quality of care provided by the hospital? With a significant and increasing prevalence of up to 1–2% of all hospital admissions, leaving against medical advice affects both the patient and the healthcare provider. We hereby explore this persistent problem in the healthcare system. We searched Medline and PubMed within the last 10 years, using the keywords “discharge against medical advice,” “DAMA,” “leave against medical advice,” and “AMA.” We retrospectively reviewed 49 articles in our project. Ishikawa fishbone root cause analysis (RCA) was employed to explore reasons for leaving against medical advice (AMA). This report presents the results of the RCA and highlights the consequences of discharge against medical advice (DAMA). In addition, the article explores preventive strategies, as well as interventions to ameliorate leaving AMA.

Successful Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in COVID-19 Pregnant Women: An Institutional Approach

BACKGROUND Novel Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has been defined as a pandemic infecting millions of individuals with a significantly high mortality and morbidity rate. Treatment and management for pregnant patients infected with COVID-19 has been poorly described in the literature. Furthermore, vertical transmission of COVID-19 to the fetus has been poorly described. The purpose of this case series is to present 3 patients in their trimester who underwent emergent cesarean sections and were successfully managed in the intensive care unit. CASE REPORT We present the cases of 3 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 via RT-PCR in their third trimester of pregnancy. All patients underwent emergent cesarean sections and were managed on mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit and eventually discharged in stable condition. CONCLUSIONS Early cesarean section and aggressive management with mechanical ventilation has been shown to be very beneficial for mothers diagnosed with COVID-19 and their infants. All 3 patients were successfully extubated, and all 3 infants tested negative for COVID-19, suggesting no vertical transmission; although, further studies are needed to confirm this finding.

An abbreviated MLVA identifies Escherichia coli ST131 as the major extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing lineage in the Copenhagen area

Rapid bacterial typing is a valuable and necessary tool in the prevention and detection of outbreaks. The purpose of this study was to adapt a multilocus variable number of tandem repeats analysis (MLVA) for analysis on a benchtop capillary electrophoresis instrument and compare the modified assay with multilocus sequence typing (MLST) for typing cefpodoxime-resistant Escherichia coli (E. coli). Further, we identified the causative resistance mechanisms and epidemiological type of infection for isolates producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs). A collection of E. coli resistant to cefpodoxime was typed by MLST and a modified MLVA assay using a benchtop capillary electrophoresis instrument. Resistance mechanisms were identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing. Patient history was examined to establish the epidemiological type of infection for ESBL-producing E. coli. MLVA yielded typing results homologous with MLST and it correctly identified E. coli sequence type (ST) 131 that was accounting for 45 % of all ESBL-producing isolates in the sample collection. The majority (76.7 %) of ESBL-producing isolates was healthcare-related and only 23.3 % of the ESBL-producing isolates were community-onset infections (COI), regardless of the ST. Patients with COI were significantly more often of female gender and younger age compared to healthcare-associated infections (HCAI) and hospital-onset infections (HOI). In conclusion, the modified MLVA is a useful tool for the rapid typing of E. coli and it identified ST131 as the predominating ESBL-producing lineage in Copenhagen. Healthcare-related infections were the predominant infection setting of ESBL-producing E. coli and the demographic characteristics differed between patients with COI and healthcare-related infections.