Label-free nLC-MS/MS proteomic analysis reveals significant differences in the proteome between colorectal cancer tissues and normal colon mucosa

Despite the discovery of numerous driving and passenger genes that play key roles in cancer characteristics, progress in cancer treatment has not been satisfactory. This is mainly because conventional therapies are neither selective nor targeted. Another important reason is that cancer cells rapidly develop resistance to chemotherapeutic agents due to excessive accumulation of mutations and/or epigenetic changes. In light of this, we believe that the discovery of new targets and key genes/proteins could improve treatment options. In this study, tissue samples (tumor and normal mucosa) were first collected from the colon or rectum by right or left hemicolectomy. Proteomic analysis was then performed using the label-free nLC-MS/MS method. We determined 77 proteins with statistically significant differences in expression levels between cancerous and normal mucosa. While the expression of 76 proteins was decreased in cancer tissues, only one protein (RNA-binding motif protein_X chromosome-RBMX) was increased in colorectal cancer tissues. The bioinformatics portal Metascape was used to determine the biological processes involved. 77 proteins with significantly different expression between cancerous and normal tissues were compared with the UALCAN platform using data from the Clinical Proteomics Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC). The results for 45 of the 77 proteins clearly matched the CPTAC dataset. Western blot studies confirmed that RBMX protein (critical for gene transcription and alternative splicing of various pre-mRNAs) was increased 2.04-fold, while decorin protein (a matrix proteoglycan with tumor suppressor functions) was dramatically decreased by about 6.04-fold in tumor samples compared with normal mucosa.

Molecular Pathways, Targeted Therapies, and Proteomic Investigations of Colorectal Cancer

According to the GLOBOCAN 2020 data, colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. The risk factors for colorectal cancer include a diet abundant with fat, refined carbohydrates, animal protein, low fiber content, alcoholism, obesity, long-term cigarette smoking, low physical activity, and aging. Colorectal carcinomas are classified as adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine, squamous cell, adenosquamous, spindle cell, and undifferentiated carcinomas. In addition, many variants of colorectal carcinomas have been recently distinguished based on histological, immunological, and molecular characteristics. Recently developed targeted molecules in conjunction with standard chemotherapeutics or immune checkpoint inhibitors provide promising treatment protocols for colorectal cancer. However, the benefit of targeted therapies is strictly dependent on the mutational status of signaling molecules (e.g., KRAS) or mismatch repair systems. Here it is aimed to provide a comprehensive view of colorectal cancer types, molecular pathways associated, recently developed targeted therapies, as well as proteomic investigations applied to colorectal cancer for the discovery of novel biomarkers and new targets for treatment protocols.

Heme-regulated inhibitor: an overlooked eIF2α kinase in cancer investigations

Heme-regulated inhibitor (HRI) kinase is a serine-threonine kinase, controlling the initiation of protein synthesis via phosphorylating α subunit of eIF2 on serine 51 residue, mainly in response to heme deprivation in erythroid cells. However, recent studies showed that HRI is also activated by several diverse signals, causing dysregulations in intracellular homeostatic mechanisms in non-erythroid cells. For instance, it was reported that the decrease in protein synthesis upon the 26S proteasomal inhibition by MG132 or bortezomib is mediated by increased eIF2α phosphorylation in an HRI-dependent manner in mouse embryonic fibroblast cells. The increase in eIF2α phosphorylation level through the activation of HRI upon 26S proteasomal inhibition is believed to protect cells against the buildup of misfolded and ubiquitinated proteins, having the potential to trigger the apoptotic response. In contrast, prolonged and sustained HRI-mediated eIF2α phosphorylation can induce cell death, which may involve ATF4 and CHOP expression. Altogether, these studies suggest that HRI-mediated eIF2α phosphorylation may be cytoprotective or cytotoxic depending on the cells, type, and duration of pharmacological agents used. It is thus hypothesized that both HRI activators, inducing eIF2α phosphorylation or HRI inhibitors causing disturbances in eIF2α phosphorylation, may be effective as novel strategies in cancer treatment if the balance in eIF2α phosphorylation is shifted in favor of autophagic or apoptotic response in cancer cells. It is here aimed to review the role of HRI in various biological mechanisms as well as the therapeutic potentials of recently developed HRI activators and inhibitors, targeting eIF2α phosphorylation in cancer cells.

The Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway and Resistance Mechanisms Developed Against the Proteasomal Inhibitors in Cancer Cells

BACKGROUND

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is crucial for all cellular processes and is, therefore, a critical target for the investigation and development of novel strategies for cancer treatment. In addition, approximately 30% of newly synthesized proteins never attain their final conformations due to translational errors or defects in post-translational modifications; therefore, they are also rapidly eliminated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.

OBJECTIVE

Here, an effort was made to outline the recent findings deciphering the new molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of ubiquitin-proteasome pathway as well as the resistance mechanisms developed against proteasome inhibitors in cell culture experiments and in the clinical trials.

RESULTS

Since cancer cells have higher proliferation rates and are more prone to translational errors, they require the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway for selective advantage and sustained proliferation. Therefore, drugs targeting the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway are promising agents for the treatment of both hematological and solid cancers.

CONCLUSION

A number of proteasome inhibitors are approved and used for the treatment of advanced and relapsed multiple myeloma. Unfortunately, drug resistance mechanisms may develop very fast within days of the start of the proteasome inhibitor-treatment either due to the inherent or acquired resistance mechanisms under selective drug pressure. However, a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms leading to the proteasome inhibitor-resistance will eventually help the design and development of novel strategies involving new drugs and/or drug combinations for the treatment of a number of cancers.

The Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway and Epigenetic Modifications in Cancer

BACKGROUND

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is involved in almost all cellular processes (cell cycle, gene transcription and translation, cell survival and apoptosis, cell metabolism and protein quality control) mainly through the specific degradation of the majority of intracellular proteins (>80%) or partial processing of transcription factors (e.g., NF-κB). A growing amount of evidence now indicates that epigenetic changes are also regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Recent studies indicate that epigenetic regulations are equally crucial for almost all biological processes as well as for pathological conditions such as tumorigenesis, as compared to non-epigenetic control mechanisms (i.e., genetic alterations or classical signal transduction pathways).

OBJECTIVE

Here, we reviewed the recent work highlighting the interaction of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway components (e.g., ubiquitin, E1, E2 and E3 enzymes and 26S proteasome) with epigenetic regulators (histone deacetylases, histone acetyltransferases and DNA methyltransferases).

RESULTS

Alterations in the regulation of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway have been discovered in many pathological conditions. For example, a 2- to 32-fold increase in proteasomal activity and/or subunits has been noted in primary breast cancer cells. Although proteasome inhibitors have been successfully applied in the treatment of hematological malignancies (e.g., multiple myeloma), the clinical efficacy of the proteasomal inhibition is limited in solid cancers. Interestingly, recent studies show that the ubiquitin-proteasome and epigenetic pathways intersect in a number of ways through the regulation of epigenetic marks (i.e., acetylation, methylation and ubiquitylation).

CONCLUSION

It is therefore believed that novel treatment strategies involving new generation ubiquitinproteasome pathway inhibitors combined with DNA methyltransferase, histone deacetylase or histone acetyltransferase inhibitors may produce more effective results with fewer adverse effects in cancer treatment as compared to standard chemotherapeutics in hematological as well as solid cancers.

An investigation of the mechanisms underlying the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib resistance in PC3 prostate cancer cell line

The phenomenon of acquired resistance to chemotherapeutic agents is a long-standing conundrum in cancer treatment. To help delineate drug resistance mechanisms and pave the way for the development of novel strategies, we generated a PC3 prostate cancer cell line resistant to proteasome inhibitor bortezomib for the first time. The resistant cells were found to have an IC₅₀ value of 359.6 nM, whereas the IC₅₀ value of parental cells was 82.6 nM after 24 h of treatment with varying doses of bortezomib. The resistant cells were also partly cross-resistant to the novel proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib; however, they were not resistant to widely used chemotherapeutic agent vincristine sulfate, indicating that enhanced cellular drug efflux via the multidrug resistance (MDR) transporters is not the molecular basis of the resistance. Since both bortezomib and carfilzomib target and inhibit the chymotrypsin-related activity residing in the β5 subunit of the proteasome (PSMB5), we next examined its expression and found surprisingly no significant alteration in the expression profile of the mature form. However, a significant increase in the accumulation of the precursor form of PSMB5 in response to 100 nM bortezomib was observed in the parental cells without a significant accumulation in the resistant cells. The results presented here thus suggest that the molecular mechanisms causing resistance to proteasome inhibitors need to be examined in-depth to overcome the resistance to ubiquitin-proteasome pathway inhibitors in cancer treatment.

A novel and effective inhibitor combination involving bortezomib and OTSSP167 for breast cancer cells in light of label-free proteomic analysis

PURPOSE

The 26S proteasome plays important roles in many intracellular processes and is therefore a critical intracellular cellular target for anticancer treatments. The primary aim of the current study was to identify critical proteins that may play roles in opposing the antisurvival effect of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib together with the calcium-chelator BAPTA-AM in cancer cells using label-free LC-MS/MS. In addition, based on the results of the proteomic technique, a novel and more effective inhibitor combination involving bortezomib as well as OTSSP167 was developed for breast cancer cells.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using label-free LC-MS/MS, it was found that expressions of 1266 proteins were significantly changed between the experimental groups. Among these proteins were cell division cycle 5-like (Cdc5L) and drebrin-like (DBNL). We then hypothesized that inhibition of the activities of these two proteins may lead to more effective anticancer inhibitor combinations in the presence of proteasomal inhibition. In fact, as presented in the current study, Cdc5L phosphorylation inhibitor CVT-313 and DBNL phosphorylation inhibitor OTSSP167 were highly cytotoxic in 4T1 breast cancer cells and their IC₅₀ values were 20.1 and 43 nM, respectively. Under the same experimental conditions, the IC₅₀ value of BAPTA-AM was found 19.9 μM. Using WST 1 cytotoxicity assay, it was determined that 10 nM bortezomib + 10 nM CVT-313 was more effective than the control, the single treatments, or than 5 nM bortezomib + 5 nM CVT-313. Similarly, 10 nM bortezomib + 10 nM OTSSP167 was more cytotoxic than the control, the monotherapies, 5 nM bortezomib + 5 nM OTSSP167, or than 5 nM bortezomib + 10 nM OTSSP167, indicating that bortezomib + OTSSP167 was also more effective than bortezomib + CVT-313 in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the 3D spheroid model proved that bortezomib + OTSSP167 was more effective than the monotherapies as well as bortezomib + CVT-313 and bortezomib + BAPTA-AM combinations. Finally, the effect of bortezomib + OTSSP167 combination was tested on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, and it similarly determined that 20 nM bortezomib +40 nM OTSSP167 combination completely blocked the formation of 3D spheroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Altogether, the results presented here indicate that bortezomib + OTSSP167 is a novel and effective combination and may be tested further for cancer treatment in vivo and in clinical settings.

Secretomes reveal several novel proteins as well as TGF-β1 as the top upstream regulator of metastatic process in breast cancer

PURPOSE

Metastatic breast cancer is resistant to many conventional treatments and novel therapeutic targets are needed. We previously isolated subsets of 4T1 murine breast cancer cells which metastasized to liver (4TLM), brain (4TBM), and heart (4THM). Among these cells, 4TLM is the most aggressive one, demonstrating mesenchymal phenotype. Here we compared secreted proteins from 4TLM, 4TBM, and 4THM cells and compared with that of hardly metastatic 67NR cells to detect differentially secreted factors involved in organ-specific metastasis.

METHOD AND RESULTS

Label-free LC-MS/MS proteomic technique was used to detect the differentially secreted proteins. Eighty-five of over 500 secreted proteins were significantly altered in metastatic breast cancer cells. Differential expression of several proteins such as fibulin-4, Bone Morphogenetic Protein 1, TGF-β1 MMP-3, MMP-9, and Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin were further verified using ELISA or Western blotting. Many of these identified proteins were also present in human metastatic breast carcinomas. Annexin A1 and A5, laminin beta 1, Neutral alpha-glucosidase AB were commonly found at least in three out of six studies examined here. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis showed that proteins differentially secreted from metastatic cells are involved primarily in carcinogenesis and TGF-β1 is the top upstream regulator in all metastatic cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Cells metastasized to different organs displayed significant differences in several of secreted proteins. Proteins differentially altered were fibronectin, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7, and Procollagen-lysine, 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 1. On the other hand, many exosomal proteins were also common to all metastatic cells, demonstrating involvement of key universal factors in distant metastatic process.

Bortezomib and etoposide combinations exert synergistic effects on the human prostate cancer cell line PC-3

Novel treatment modalities are urgently required for androgen-independent prostate cancer. In order to develop an alternative treatment for prostate cancer, the cytotoxic effects of the 26S proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, either alone or in combination with the two commonly used chemotherapeutic agents irinotecan and etoposide, on the human prostate cancer cell line PC-3 were evaluated in the present study. The PC-3 cell line was maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and treated with various doses of bortezomib, irinotecan, etoposide or their combinations. The growth inhibitory and cytotoxic effects were determined by water-soluble tetrazolium (WST)-1 assay, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay or iCELLigence system. The combination index values were determined by the Chou-Talalay method. The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of bortezomib on the PC-3 cell line was determined to be 53.4 nM by WST-1 assay, whereas the IC50 values of irinotecan and etoposide were determined to be 2.1 and 26.5 µM, respectively. These results suggest that the 26S proteasome inhibitor bortezomib is more potent, compared with irinotecan and etoposide, in the androgen-insensitive and tumor protein p53-null cell line PC-3. The combined effects of bortezomib+irinotecan and bortezomib+etoposide were also tested on PC-3 cells. The effect of bortezomib+irinotecan combination was not significantly different than that produced by either monotherapy, according to the results of iCELLigence system and MTT assay. However, 40 nM bortezomib+5 µM etoposide or 40 nM bortezomib+20 µM etoposide combinations were observed to be more effective than each drug tested alone. The results of the current study suggest that bortezomib and etoposide combination may be additionally evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Data for a proteomic analysis of p53-independent induction of apoptosis by bortezomib

This data article contains data related to the research article entitled, “A proteomic analysis of p53-independent induction of apoptosis by bortezomib in 4T1 breast cancer cell line” by Yerlikaya et al. [1]. The research article presented 2-DE and nLC-MS/MS based proteomic analysis of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib-induced changes in the expression of cellular proteins. The report showed that GRP78 and TCEB2 were over-expressed in response to treatment with bortezomib for 24 h. In addition, the report demonstrated that Hsp70, the 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14 and sequestosome 1 were increased at least 2 fold in p53-deficient 4T1 cells. The data here show for the first time the increased expressions of Card10, Dffb, Traf3 and Trp53bp2 in response to inhibition of the 26S proteasome. The information presented here also shows that both Traf1 and Xiap (a member of IAPs) are also downregulated simultaneously upon proteasomal inhibition. The increases in the level of Card10 and Trp53bp2 proteins were verified by Western blot analysis in response to varying concentrations of bortezomib for 24 h.

Evaluation of whether the ACE gene I/D polymorphism constitutes a risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the Turkish population

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by progressive airflow obstruction that occurs as a result of the normal inflammatory process to protect against harmful irritants and chemicals. Another physiological regulatory process, the renin angiotensin system (RAS), plays an important role in the pathology of many diseases. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) is a key enzyme of RAS. We investigated the frequency of the ACE gene I/D polymorphism in patients with COPD in Turkey. This study was performed on 47 unrelated patients with COPD and 64 healthy subjects. DNA samples were isolated from peripheral blood, and ACE DNA was amplified by polymerase chain reaction. The frequencies of ACE genotypes were 27.7, 55.3, and 17% for DD, ID, and II in the COPD group, respectively, and 43.8, 43.8, and 12.4% in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference between groups (X(2) = 3.078; df = 2; P = 0.220). The distributions of ACE gene D alleles were 38.2% (N = 52) in the COPD group and 61.8% (N = 84) in the control group; and those of I alleles were 48.8% (N = 42) in the COPD group and 51.2% (N = 44) in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference between groups for allele frequency (X(2) = 2.419; df = 2; P = 0.120). We believe these results can be useful for large-scale population genetic research considering the frequency of the ACE gene variation in COPD patients in the Turkish population.

A proteomic analysis of p53-independent induction of apoptosis by bortezomib in 4T1 breast cancer cell line

The 26S proteasome is a proteolytic enzyme found in both cytoplasm and nucleus. In this study, we examined the differential expression of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib-induced proteins in p53-deficient 4T1 cells. It was found that GRP78 and TCEB2 were over-expressed in response to treatment with bortezomib for 24h. Next, we analyzed the expression of intracellular proteins in response to treatment with 100nM bortezomib for 24h by label-free LC-MS/MS. These analyses showed that Hsp70, the 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14 and sequestosome 1 were increased at least 2 fold in p53-deficient 4T1 cells. The proteins identified by label-free LC-MS/MS were then analyzed by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) Tool to determine biological networks affected by inhibition of the 26S proteasome. The analysis results showed that post-translational modifications, protein folding, DNA replication, energy production and nucleic acid metabolism were found to be among the top functions affected by the 26S proteasome inhibition. The biological network analysis indicated that ubiquitin may be the central regulator of the pathways modulated after bortezomib-treatment. Further investigation of the mechanism of the proteins modulated in response to the proteasomal inhibition may lead to the design of more effective and novel therapeutic strategies for cancer.

BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Although the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib is approved and used for the treatment of human cancer (multiple myeloma), the mechanism of action is not entirely understood. A number of studies showed that proteasome inhibitors induced apoptosis through upregulation of tumor suppressor protein p53. However, the role of tumor suppressor protein p53 in bortezomib-induced apoptosis is controversial and not well-understood. The tumor suppressor p53 is mutated in at least 50% of human cancers and is strongly induced by proteasomal inhibition. Some also reported that the proteasome inhibitor can induce apoptosis in a p53-independent manner. Also, it is reported that Noxa, a target of p53, is induced in response to proteasomal inhibition in a p53-independent manner. However, we have also previously reported that neither Puma nor Noxa are induced by proteasomal inhibition in p53-null 4T1 breast cancer cells, which is commonly used for in vivo breast cancer tumor models. The current results provided additional targets of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and may therefore help in understanding the p53-independent mechanism of apoptosis induction by proteasome inhibitors. In addition, the results presented in this current study report for the first time that proteasomal subunit Psmd14, anti-apoptotic GRP78, anti apoptotic protein Card10, Dffb, Traf3 and Trp53bp2 are regulated and overexpressed in response to proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in p53-deficient 4T1 cells. Therefore, novel therapeutic strategies targeting these anti-apoptotic or pro-apoptotic proteins as well as inhibiting the proteasome simultaneously may be more effective against cancer cells. The proteins identified here present new avenues for the development of anti-cancer drugs.

The significance of ubiquitin proteasome pathway in cancer development

The ubiquitin proteasome pathway is the most significant intracellular proteolytic pathway. The target proteins are usually ubiquitinated prior to degradation by the proteasome; however, ubiquitin-independent targeting mechanisms have also been reported (e.g., the antizyme-mediated degradation of ornithine decarboxylase). Aberrations in the components of the ubiquitin proteasome pathway are commonly observed in many cancers, and uncontrolled growth of cancer cells can result either from stabilization of oncoproteins (e.g., c-jun) or increased degradation of tumor suppressor proteins (e.g., p53). In addition, due to the pleiotropic functions of the ubiquitin proteasome pathway in cells, there is great interest in developing inhibitors to specifically block this pathway for cancer treatment. This review summarizes the recent literature and several patented inventions on the ubiquitin proteasome pathway with respect to its role in cancer development and treatment.

Combined effects of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and Hsp70 inhibitors on the B16F10 melanoma cell line

Studies have shown that the 26S proteasome is involved in cell cycle control, transcription, DNA repair, immune response and protein synthesis. In the present study, we investigated the antiproliferative effects of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and heat shock protein (Hsp)70 inhibitors on the B16F10 melanoma cell line. The IC50 value of bortezomib was found to be 2.46 nM, while that of the Hsp70 inhibitor quercetin was 45 µM in the B16F10 cells. This indicates that bortezomib is more effective than quercetin in inhibiting cell growth. In response to treatment with 10 nM bortezomib for 24 h, cells underwent rounding, shrinkage and detachment. Unexpectedly, such morphological changes were not observed in cells treated with 20 µM quercetin alone, nor in cells treated with bortezomib + quercetin, indicating that quercetin inhibited the cytotoxic effects of bortezomib. Quantitation of cell viability also indicated that quercetin interfered with the cytotoxic effects of bortezomib. However, the combination of quercetin with another proteasome inhibitor, MG132, caused significant cell death as compared to single-agent treatment. A DNA ladder assay also confirmed the inhibitory effect of quercetin on the apoptosis-inducing effect of bortezomib. However, quercetin did not prevent the induction of apoptosis by MG132; on the contrary, it potentiated the apoptosis-inducing effect of MG132. These results suggest that the combination of quercetin with clinically beneficial proteasome inhibitors (except bortezomib) may have increased efficacy in the treatment of cancer. We also tested the combination of two other Hsp70 inhibitors, KNK-437 and schisandrin-B, in combination with bortezomib. Neither of these combinations was more effective than single-agent treatment.

Anticancer agent ukrain and bortezomib combination is synergistic in 4T1 breast cancer cells

The identification and in-depth understanding of intracellular signalling pathways led to the synthesis and discovery of many agents targeting cancer cells. In this study, we investigated for the first time the effect of anticancer agent ukrain as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin, etoposide, 5-fluorouracil, quercetin and bortezomib in 4T1 breast cancer and B16F10 melanoma cells. It was found that ukrain is cytotoxic and apoptotic in 4T1 breast carcinoma and B16F10 melanoma cells when given alone. The IC50 value of ukrain in 4T1 cells was found as 40 ± 6.8 μM and that in B16F10 cells as 76 ± 10 μM. It was then found that apoptosis can be induced in 4T1 breast cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner in response to ukrain treatment, based on DNA fragmentation evidence. The induction of apoptosis was corroborated by the analysis of cleavage products of caspase-3 in 4T1 cells using Western blot technique. When ukrain was tested in combination with cisplatin and etoposide, no significant enhancement of cytotoxicity was detected as compared with single agent treatments. Similarly, 5-fluorouracil and quercetin also did not potentiate the cytotoxic effects of ukrain in 4T1 cells. Finally, we examined the effect of various concentrations of ukrain in combination with 10 nM bortezomib in 4T1 cells. Determination of combination index values showed that bortezomib potentiated the effect of ukrain. And the combination was found to cause synergistic cell death. The lowest combination index detected was 0.57 which was obtained when the cells were treated with 10 nM bortezomib + 100 μM ukrain. Likewise, when cells were treated with different doses of bortezomib in the presence of 25 μM ukrain, synergism was similarly detected between the two drugs in a dose-dependent manner. Altogether, the results presented here suggest that the combination of ukrain + bortezomib may be further evaluated and tested in clinical settings.

Effect of bortezomib in combination with cisplatin and 5‑fluorouracil on 4T1 breast cancer cells

Bortezomib is a highly selective and reversible inhibitor of the 26S proteasome. It has been approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. A number of studies have been conducted to evaluate the activity and safety of bortezomib either alone or in combination with several cytotoxic agents and radiation. In the current study, the efficacy of bortezomib alone or in combination with cisplatin and 5‑fluorouracil was evaluated in 4T1 breast cancer cells, a highly metastatic murine cancer cell line. Using MTT assay, IC50 values of cisplatin and 5‑fluorouracil were determined to be 14.2 and 8.9 µM for cisplatin and 5‑fluorouracil, respectively. The effects of different concentrations of cisplatin and 5‑fluorouracil in combination with two different concentrations of bortezomib were examined in the 4T1 cells. Statistically significant differences were found when 1 or 5 µM cisplatin was combined with 10 or 50 nM bortezomib. Similarly, 1 µM 5‑fluorouracil or 5 µM 5‑fluorouracil in combination with 10 nM bortezomib caused significant cell death as compared to treatment with single agents. However, 1 or 5 µM 5‑fluorouracil did not potentiate the effects of higher concentrations of bortezomib (50 nM). The effect of the combination of cisplatin, 5‑fluorouracil and bortezomib was determined by soft agar assay. It was confirmed that a combination of cisplatin and bortezomib was more effective than each drug as a monotherapy. Therefore, the combination of cisplatin and bortezomib should be tested further in clinical settings.

The p53-independent induction of apoptosis in breast cancer cells in response to proteasome inhibitor bortezomib

An important hallmark of cancer cells is acquired resistance toward apoptosis. The apoptotic pathway is the most well-defined cell death program and is characterized by several morphological and biochemical features. The tumor suppressor protein p53 is a critical regulator of apoptosis in many cell types. p53 stimulates a wide network of signals that act through either extrinsic or intrinsic pathways of apoptosis. However, a number of studies have shown that apoptosis can be induced in a p53-independent manner as well. In this study, we examined the mechanism of apoptosis in p53-null breast cancer cells in response to the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Initially, we determined the p53 status of 4T1 breast carcinoma and 4THMpc (a highly mestatic derivative of 4T1) cells and verified that both cells are p53 deficient. It was subsequently shown that apoptosis can be induced in both cells in a dose-dependent manner in response to bortezomib treatment, based on DNA fragmentation evidence. Western blot analyses of ubiquitin-protein conjugates additionally showed that the proteasome is potently inhibited by bortezomib in p53-null 4T1 and 4THMpc cells. The results presented in the current study also show that caspase-3 is significantly activated in response to the treatment with bortezomib, implying that induction of apoptosis in these p53-deficient cells is occurring via caspase-3. The additional results presented here suggest that the pro-apoptotic proteins Bad, Noxa, and Puma are not critical regulators of apoptosis induction in p53-null 4T1 and 4THMpc cells. Similarly, there was no difference in the expression level of Mcl-1 in treated cells, suggesting that this anti-apoptotic protein is also uninvolved in the apoptotic response resulting from bortezomib treatment. In contrast, a very significant upregulation of the anti-apoptotic protein Hsp25/27 was detected in these p53-deficient cells after treatment with bortezomib. If the increased expression of Hsp25/27 protein levels are muting the apoptotic effects of the bortezomib treatment, then the apoptosis-inducing effects of such proteasome inhibitors might be increased with approaches simultaneously inhibiting Hsp25/27 protein in p53-deficient cells.

Combined effects of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and Hsp70 inhibitors on the B16F10 melanoma cell line

Studies have shown that the 26S proteasome is involved in cell cycle control, transcription, DNA repair, immune response and protein synthesis. In the present study, we investigated the antiproliferative effects of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and heat shock protein (Hsp)70 inhibitors on the B16F10 melanoma cell line. The IC50 value of bortezomib was found to be 2.46 nM, while that of the Hsp70 inhibitor quercetin was 45 µM in the B16F10 cells. This indicates that bortezomib is more effective than quercetin in inhibiting cell growth. In response to treatment with 10 nM bortezomib for 24 h, cells underwent rounding, shrinkage and detachment. Unexpectedly, such morphological changes were not observed in cells treated with 20 µM quercetin alone, nor in cells treated with bortezomib + quercetin, indicating that quercetin inhibited the cytotoxic effects of bortezomib. Quantitation of cell viability also indicated that quercetin interfered with the cytotoxic effects of bortezomib. However, the combination of quercetin with another proteasome inhibitor, MG132, caused significant cell death as compared to single-agent treatment. A DNA ladder assay also confirmed the inhibitory effect of quercetin on the apoptosis-inducing effect of bortezomib. However, quercetin did not prevent the induction of apoptosis by MG132; on the contrary, it potentiated the apoptosis-inducing effect of MG132. These results suggest that the combination of quercetin with clinically beneficial proteasome inhibitors (except bortezomib) may have increased efficacy in the treatment of cancer. We also tested the combination of two other Hsp70 inhibitors, KNK-437 and schisandrin-B, in combination with bortezomib. Neither of these combinations was more effective than single-agent treatment.

Investigation of the eIF2alpha phosphorylation mechanism in response to proteasome inhibition in melanoma and breast cancer cells

The 26S proteasome is an ATP-dependent proteolytic complex found in all eukaryotes, archaebacteria, and some eubacteria. Inhibition of the 26S proteasome causes pleiotropic effects in cells, including cellular apoptosis, a fact that has led to the use of the 26S proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, for treatment of the multiple myeloma cancer. We previously showed that in addition to the effects of proteolysis, inhibition of the 26S proteasome causes a rapid decrease in the protein synthesis rate due to phosphorylating alfa subunit of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2alpha) by the heme-regulated inhibitor kinase (HRI). In order to test whether inhibition of the 26S proteasome causes the same effect in cancer cells, we have investigated the influence of two commonly used proteasome inhibitors, bortezomib and MG132, on the phosphorylation status of eIF2alpha in B16F10 melanoma and 4T1 breast cancer cells. It was found that both of the inhibitors caused rapid phosphorylation of eIF2alpha. Taking into account that the Hsp70 is a critical component needed for the HRI activation and enzymatic activity, we have tested a possible participation of this protein in the eIF2alpha phosphorylation event. However, treatment of the cells with two structurally different Hsp70 inhibitors, quercetin and KNK437, in the presence of the proteasome inhibitors did not affect the eIF2alpha phosphorylation. In addition, neither protein kinase C (PKC) nor p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) was required for the proteasome inhibitor-induced eIF2alpha phosphorylation; futhermore, both the PKC inhibitor staurosporine and the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 caused enchanced phosphorylation of eLF2alpha. Zinc (II) protoporphyrine IX (ZnPP), an inhibitor of the heme-oxygenase-1 (HO-1), which has also been previously reported to be involved in HRI activation, also failed to prevent the induction of eIF2alpha phosphorylation in the presence of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib or MG132.

Differential sensitivity of breast cancer and melanoma cells to proteasome inhibitor Velcade

Velcade (also known as PS-341 or Bortezomib) is a highly selective and reversible inhibitor of the 26S proteasome and is approved for the treatment of patients with advanced multiple myeloma. Here we investigated the anti-proliferative effect of Velcade on 4T1 breast cancer and B16F10 melanoma cells and evaluated the mechanism of action. It was found that two cell lines are differentially sensitive to proteasome inhibitor Velcade. The IC50 concentrations for B16F10 and 4T1 were 2.5 nM and 71 nM, respectively, indicating that B16F10 cells are more sensitive to proteasomal inhibition. Velcade was equally potent in inhibiting the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome in both cell lines. It was determined that B16F10 cells proliferate more rapidly than 4T1 cells; doubling time (Td) =14.2 h versus Td =22.9 h, suggesting that a rapid proliferation rate may be an important factor in cellular resistance towards proteasomal inhibition. We observed for the first time that p53 and p21 proteins were increased in B16F10 cells but not in 4T1 following Velcade-treatment, demonstrating that p53 and p21 may enhance Velcade sensitivity. Furthermore, it was observed that caspase-3 proenzyme was reduced by approximately 20% in B16F10 melanoma cells, but not in 4T1 cells in response to 26S proteasomal inhibition by Velcade. Altogether, we concluded that p53 protein plays a central role in higher sensitivity of B16F10 cells to Velcade by inducing the accumulation of p21, a cell cycle inhibitor, as well as by stimulating the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis through caspase-3 activation.

Structural basis for the inactivation of AdoMetDC K12R mutant

S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (AdoMetDC) is a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of the polyamines spermidine and spermine. Polyamines are ubiquitous organic cations that are absolutely required for normal cell proliferation and differentiation. AdoMetDC catalyzes decarboxylation of S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) which provides aminopropyl groups for spermidine and spermine synthesis. Mammalian AdoMetDC is produced as a proenzyme (38 kDa) which is cleaved to form the alpha (30.7 kDa) and beta (7.7 kDa) subunits of the mature enzyme. It is here shown that the catalytic activity of the enzyme was completely eliminated when lysine 12 was mutated to an arginine residue in the small subunit; however, the proenzyme processing was not affected. On the other hand, mutations of other lysine residues (Lys45-->Arg and Lys56-->Arg) did not affect either the enzyme activity or the proenzyme processing. Structure analysis using Swiss Deep Viewer v3.7 has indicated that Arg in place of Lys12 may eliminate AdoMetDC activity by restricting the mobility of Thr85 through hydrogen bonding. Sequence alignment of various AdoMetDC sequences indicated that Thr85 is in a highly conserved region, suggesting that Thr85 is critical for the decarboxylation reaction.

Influence of dietary oils on liver and blood lipid peroxidation

OBJECTIVE

Diets high in unsaturated fatty acids have been recommended to lower the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, these lipids are more susceptible to lipid peroxidation than saturated fatty acids. The aim of the present study described herein was to investigate the effects of dietary oils (differing in their degree of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids) on liver and blood lipid peroxidation in chicks.

METHODS

The experiments were conducted at the laboratories of University of Dumlupinar, Kutahya, Turkey and Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey between November 2002 and December 2003. The animals were randomly divided into 5 groups of 30 and fed dietary butter, margarine, olive oil, sunflower oil or corn oil for 7 weeks. Liver malondialdehyde level, blood superoxide dismutase activity (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase activity (GPx), serum vitamin E, and total antioxidant (AOA) levels were measured to determine the effects of the dietary oils on lipid peroxidation.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in SOD and GPx activities, or vitamin E and AOA levels between the experimental groups. However, the results indicated that the corn oil feeding caused significant increases in liver malondialdehyde (a genotoxic byproduct of lipid peroxidation) level as compared with the other oils.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that corn oil feeding increases lipid peroxidation significantly and thus may raise the susceptibility of tissues to free radical oxidative damage.

S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase degradation by the 26 S proteasome is accelerated by substrate-mediated transamination

The short-lived enzyme S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase uses a covalently bound pyruvoyl cofactor to catalyze the formation of decarboxylated S-adenosylmethionine, which then donates an aminopropyl group for polyamine biosynthesis. Here we demonstrate that S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase is ubiquitinated and degraded by the 26 S proteasome in vivo, a process that is accelerated by inactivation of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase by substrate-mediated transamination of its pyruvoyl cofactor. Proteasome inhibition in COS-7 cells prevents the degradation of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase antigen; however, even brief inhibition of the 26 S proteasome caused substantial losses of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase activity despite accumulation of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase antigen. Levels of the enzyme's substrate (S-adenosylmethionine) increased rapidly after 26 S proteasome inhibition, and this increase in substrate level is consistent with the observed loss of activity arising from an increased rate of inactivation by substrate-mediated transamination. Evidence is also presented that this substrate-mediated transamination accelerates normal degradation of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase, as the rate of degradation of the enzyme was increased in the presence of AbeAdo (5'-([(Z)-4-amino-2-butenyl]methylamino]-5'-deoxyadenosine) (a substrate analogue that transaminates the enzyme); conversely, when the intracellular substrate level was reduced by methionine deprivation, the rate of degradation of the enzyme was decreased. Ubiquitination of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase is demonstrated by isolation of His-tagged AdoMetDC (S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase) from COS-7 cells co-transfected with hemagglutinin-tagged ubiquitin and showing bands that were immunoreactive to both anti-AdoMetDC antibody and anti-hemagglutinin antibody. This is the first study to demonstrate that AdoMetDC is ubiquitinated and degraded by the 26 S proteasome, and substrate-mediated acceleration of degradation is a unique finding.