1
|
Langerak AJ, Regterschot GRH, Selles RW, Meskers CGM, Evers M, Ribbers GM, van Beijnum BJF, Bussmann JBJ. Requirements for home-based upper extremity rehabilitation using wearable motion sensors for stroke patients: a user-centred approach. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2024; 19:1392-1404. [PMID: 36905631 PMCID: PMC11073044 DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2183993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Telerehabilitation systems have the potential to enable therapists to monitor and assist stroke patients in achieving high-intensity upper extremity exercise in the home environment. We adopted an iterative user-centred approach, including multiple data sources and meetings with end-users and stakeholders to define the user requirements for home-based upper extremity rehabilitation using wearable motion sensors for subacute stroke patients. METHODS We performed a requirement analysis consisting of the following steps: 1) context & groundwork; 2) eliciting requirements; 3) modelling & analysis; 4) agreeing requirements. During these steps, a pragmatic literature search, interviews and focus groups with stroke patients, physiotherapists and occupational therapists were performed. The results were systematically analysed and prioritised into "must-haves", "should-haves", and "could-haves". RESULTS We formulated 33 functional requirements: eighteen must-have requirements related to blended care (2), exercise principles (7), exercise delivery (3), exercise evaluation (4), and usability (2); ten should-haves; and five could-haves. Six movement components, including twelve exercises and five combination exercises, are required. For each exercise, appropriate exercise measures were defined. CONCLUSION This study provides an overview of functional requirements, required exercises, and required exercise measures for home-based upper extremity rehabilitation using wearable motion sensors for stroke patients, which can be used to develop home-based upper extremity rehabilitation interventions. Moreover, the comprehensive and systematic requirement analysis used in this study can be applied by other researchers and developers when extracting requirements for designing a system or intervention in a medical context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. J. Langerak
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G. R. H. Regterschot
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - R. W. Selles
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C. G. M. Meskers
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience and Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. Evers
- Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G. M. Ribbers
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B. J. F. van Beijnum
- Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - J. B. J. Bussmann
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saes M, Mohamed Refai MI, van Beijnum BJF, Bussmann JBJ, Jansma EP, Veltink PH, Buurke JH, van Wegen EEH, Meskers CGM, Krakauer JW, Kwakkel G. Quantifying Quality of Reaching Movements Longitudinally Post-Stroke: A Systematic Review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2022; 36:183-207. [PMID: 35100897 PMCID: PMC8902693 DOI: 10.1177/15459683211062890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Background Disambiguation of behavioral restitution from compensation is important to better understand recovery of upper limb motor control post-stroke and subsequently design better interventions. Measuring quality of movement (QoM) during standardized performance assays and functional tasks using kinematic and kinetic metrics potentially allows for this disambiguation. Objectives To identify longitudinal studies that used kinematic and/or kinetic metrics to investigate post-stroke recovery of reaching and assess whether these studies distinguish behavioral restitution from compensation. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using the databases PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Wiley/Cochrane Library up to July 1st, 2020. Studies were identified if they performed longitudinal kinematic and/or kinetic measurements during reaching, starting within the first 6 months post-stroke. Results Thirty-two longitudinal studies were identified, which reported a total of forty-six different kinematic metrics. Although the majority investigated improvements in kinetics or kinematics to quantify recovery of QoM, none of these studies explicitly addressed the distinction between behavioral restitution and compensation. One study obtained kinematic metrics for both performance assays and a functional task. Conclusions Despite the growing number of kinematic and kinetic studies on post-stroke recovery, longitudinal studies that explicitly seek to delineate between behavioral restitution and compensation are still lacking in the literature. To rectify this situation, future studies should measure kinematics and/or kinetics during performance assays to isolate restitution and during a standardized functional task to determine the contributions of restitution and compensation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Saes
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1209Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - M I Mohamed Refai
- Department of Biomedical Signals & Systems, Technical Medical Centre, 214825University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - B J F van Beijnum
- Department of Biomedical Signals & Systems, Technical Medical Centre, 214825University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - J B J Bussmann
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - E P Jansma
- Medical Library, 1190Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmcAmsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P H Veltink
- Department of Biomedical Signals & Systems, Technical Medical Centre, 214825University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - J H Buurke
- Department of Biomedical Signals & Systems, Technical Medical Centre, 214825University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.,Rehabilitation Technology, Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, Netherlands.,Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, 12244Northwestern University, Chicago, Il, USA
| | - E E H van Wegen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1209Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - C G M Meskers
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1209Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, 12244Northwestern University, Chicago, Il, USA
| | - J W Krakauer
- Departments of Neurology, Neuroscience and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1500Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - G Kwakkel
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1209Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, 12244Northwestern University, Chicago, Il, USA.,Department of Neurorehabilitation, 522567Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Klaassen B, van Beijnum BJF, Hermens HJ. Usability in telemedicine systems-A literature survey. Int J Med Inform 2016; 93:57-69. [PMID: 27435948 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2015] [Revised: 04/30/2016] [Accepted: 06/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The rapid development of sensors and communication technologies enable the growth of new innovative services in healthcare, such as Telemedicine. An essential ingredient in the development of a telemedicine system and its final acceptance by end users are usability studies. The principles of usability engineering, evaluations and telemedicine are well established, and it may contribute to the adoption and eventually deployment of such systems and services. An in-depth usability analysis, including performance and attitude measures, requires knowledge about available usability techniques, and is depending on the amount of resources. Therefore it is worth investigating how usability methods are applied in developing telemedicine systems. Our hypothesis is: with increasing research and development of telemedicine systems, we expect that various usability methods are more equally employed for different end-user groups and applications. METHOD A literature survey was conducted to find telemedicine systems that have been evaluated for usability or ease of use. The elements of the PICO framework were used as a basis for the selection criteria in the literature search. The search was not limited by year. Two independent reviewers screened all search results first by title, and then by abstract for inclusion. Articles were included up to May 2015. RESULTS In total, 127 publications were included in this survey. The number of publications on telemedicine systems significantly increased after 2008. Older adults and end-users with cardiovascular conditions were among largest target end-user groups. Remote monitoring systems were found the most, in 90 publications. Questionnaires are the most common means for evaluating telemedicine systems, and were found in 88 publications. Questionnaires are used frequently in studies focusing on cardiovascular diseases, Parkinson's disease and older adult conditions. Interviews are found the most in publications related to stroke. In total 71% of the publications were trial-orientated and the remaining process orientated. An increase in telemedicine research, development and applications is found worldwide, with the majority of publications conducted in America. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Monitoring patients in their homes can lead to better healthcare at lower costs which implies an increased demand of new healthcare strategies like telemedicine. We expected that with the increase in telemedicine research and development, a greater range of usability methods would also be employed in the included publications. This is not the case. Researchers employed questionnaires as a preferred usability method for each type of telemedicine system and most end-users. However, in process-orientated studies a greater range of usability evaluations were applied, with fewer differences found in the amount of publications for each evaluation method. Questionnaires enable researchers to evaluate a system quickly on end users, as it requires less expertise on the evaluation method compared to the other methods. They are easily distributed and are customizable. The use of questionnaires is therefore an evaluation method of choice for a variety of telemedicine systems and end-users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Klaassen
- Biomedical Signals And Systems group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands; Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
| | - B J F van Beijnum
- Biomedical Signals And Systems group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands; Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, University of Twente, The Netherlands
| | - H J Hermens
- Biomedical Signals And Systems group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands; Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, University of Twente, The Netherlands; Roessingh Research and Development, Roessingh Rehabilitation Hospital, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|