1
|
Mahil S, Yates M, Langan S, Yiu Z, Tsakok T, Dand N, Mason K, McAteer H, Meynell F, Coker B, Vincent A, Urmston D, Vesty A, Kelly J, Lancelot C, Moorhead L, Bachelez H, Bruce I, Capon F, Contreras C, Cope A, De La Cruz C, Di Meglio P, Gisondi P, Hyrich K, Jullien D, Lambert J, Marzo‐Ortega H, McInnes I, Naldi L, Norton S, Puig L, Sengupta R, Spuls P, Torres T, Warren R, Waweru H, Weinman J, Griffiths C, Barker J, Brown M, Galloway J, Smith C. Risk-mitigating behaviours in people with inflammatory skin and joint disease during the COVID-19 pandemic differ by treatment type: a cross-sectional patient survey. Br J Dermatol 2021; 185:80-90. [PMID: 33368145 PMCID: PMC9214088 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.19755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Registry data suggest that people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) receiving targeted systemic therapies have fewer adverse coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes compared with patients receiving no systemic treatments. OBJECTIVES We used international patient survey data to explore the hypothesis that greater risk-mitigating behaviour in those receiving targeted therapies may account, at least in part, for this observation. METHODS Online surveys were completed by individuals with psoriasis (globally) or rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) (UK only) between 4 May and 7 September 2020. We used multiple logistic regression to assess the association between treatment type and risk-mitigating behaviour, adjusting for clinical and demographic characteristics. We characterized international variation in a mixed-effects model. RESULTS Of 3720 participants (2869 psoriasis, 851 RMDs) from 74 countries, 2262 (60·8%) reported the most stringent risk-mitigating behaviour (classified here under the umbrella term 'shielding'). A greater proportion of those receiving targeted therapies (biologics and Janus Kinase inhibitors) reported shielding compared with those receiving no systemic therapy [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1·63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·35-1·97]. The association between targeted therapy and shielding was preserved when standard systemic therapy was used as the reference group (OR 1·39, 95% CI 1·23-1·56). Shielding was associated with established risk factors for severe COVID-19 [male sex (OR 1·14, 95% CI 1·05-1·24), obesity (OR 1·37, 95% CI 1·23-1·54), comorbidity burden (OR 1·43, 95% CI 1·15-1·78)], a primary indication of RMDs (OR 1·37, 95% CI 1·27-1·48) and a positive anxiety or depression screen (OR 1·57, 95% CI 1·36-1·80). Modest differences in the proportion shielding were observed across nations. CONCLUSIONS Greater risk-mitigating behaviour among people with IMIDs receiving targeted therapies may contribute to the reported lower risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes. The behaviour variation across treatment groups, IMIDs and nations reinforces the need for clear evidence-based patient communication on risk-mitigation strategies and may help inform updated public health guidelines as the pandemic continues.
Collapse
|
2
|
Mahil SK, Yates M, Yiu ZZN, Langan SM, Tsakok T, Dand N, Mason KJ, McAteer H, Meynell F, Coker B, Vincent A, Urmston D, Vesty A, Kelly J, Lancelot C, Moorhead L, Bachelez H, Capon F, Contreras CR, De La Cruz C, Di Meglio P, Gisondi P, Jullien D, Lambert J, Naldi L, Norton S, Puig L, Spuls P, Torres T, Warren RB, Waweru H, Weinman J, Brown MA, Galloway JB, Griffiths CM, Barker JN, Smith CH. Describing the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic in people with psoriasis: findings from a global cross-sectional study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021; 35:e636-e640. [PMID: 34145643 PMCID: PMC8447018 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S K Mahil
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - M Yates
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.,Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Z Z N Yiu
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - S M Langan
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.,Faculty of Epidemiology, and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - T Tsakok
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - N Dand
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.,Health Data Research UK, London, UK
| | - K J Mason
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK.,School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - H McAteer
- The Psoriasis Association, Northampton, UK
| | - F Meynell
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - B Coker
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - A Vincent
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - D Urmston
- The Psoriasis Association, Northampton, UK
| | - A Vesty
- The Psoriasis Association, Northampton, UK
| | - J Kelly
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - C Lancelot
- International Federation of Psoriasis Associations (IFPA), Bromma, Sweden
| | - L Moorhead
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - H Bachelez
- Department of Dermatology, AP-HP Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.,INSERM U1163, Imagine Institute for Human Genetic Diseases, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - F Capon
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - C R Contreras
- Catedra de Dermatologia, Hospital de Clinicas, Facultad de Ciencias Medicas, Universidad Nacional de Asuncion, San Lorenzo, Paraguay
| | | | - P Di Meglio
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.,St John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - P Gisondi
- Section of Dermatology and Venereology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - D Jullien
- Department of Dermatology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.,Groupe de Recherche sur le Psoriasis (GrPso) de la Société Française de Dermatologie, Paris, France
| | - J Lambert
- Department of Dermatology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - L Naldi
- Centro Studi GISED, Bergamo, Italy
| | - S Norton
- Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - L Puig
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Spuls
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health/Infection and Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T Torres
- Department of Dermatology, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - R B Warren
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - H Waweru
- International Federation of Psoriasis Associations (IFPA), Bromma, Sweden
| | - J Weinman
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M A Brown
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.,Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J B Galloway
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, UK.,Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - C M Griffiths
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - J N Barker
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.,St John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - C H Smith
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jin H, Chalkidou A, Hawkins M, Summers J, Eddy S, Peacock JL, Coker B, Kartha MR, Good J, Pennington M. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy Compared With Surgery and Radiofrequency Ablation in Two Patient Cohorts: Metastatic Liver Cancer and Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 33:e143-e154. [PMID: 32951952 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To compare the cost-effectiveness of stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) with radiofrequency ablation and surgery in adult patients with metastatic liver cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Two patient cohorts were assessed: liver oligometastases and HCC. For each patient cohort, a decision analytic model was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of interventions over a 5-year horizon. A Markov process was embedded in the decision model to simulate the possible prognosis of cancer. Data on transition probabilities, survival, side-effects, quality of life and costs were obtained from published sources and the SABR Commissioning through Evaluation (CtE) scheme. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio with respect to quality-adjusted life-years. The robustness of the results was examined in a sensitivity analysis. Analyses were conducted from a National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective. RESULTS In the base case analysis, which assumed that all three interventions were associated with the same cancer progression rates and mortality rates, SABR was the most cost-effective intervention for both patient cohorts. This conclusion was sensitive to the cancer progression rate, mortality rate and cost of interventions. Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the probability that SABR is cost-effective was 57% and 50% in liver oligometastases and HCC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate a potential for SABR to be cost-effective for patients with liver oligometastases and HCC. This finding supports further investigation in clinical trials directly comparing SABR with surgery and radiofrequency ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Jin
- King's Health Economics (KHE), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK.
| | - A Chalkidou
- King's Technology Evaluation Centre (KiTEC), London, UK
| | - M Hawkins
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - J Summers
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - S Eddy
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J L Peacock
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - B Coker
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M R Kartha
- King's Health Economics (KHE), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK; King's Technology Evaluation Centre (KiTEC), London, UK
| | - J Good
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Pennington
- King's Health Economics (KHE), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mahil SK, Yiu ZZN, Mason KJ, Dand N, Coker B, Wall D, Fletcher G, Bosma A, Capon F, Iversen L, Langan SM, Di Meglio P, Musters AH, Prieto-Merino D, Tsakok T, Warren RB, Flohr C, Spuls PI, Griffiths CEM, Barker J, Irvine AD, Smith CH. Global reporting of cases of COVID-19 in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis: an opportunity to inform care during a pandemic. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:404-406. [PMID: 32348554 PMCID: PMC7267275 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.19161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- S K Mahil
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Z Z N Yiu
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - K J Mason
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - N Dand
- St John's Institute of Dermatology within the, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - B Coker
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D Wall
- Hair Restoration Blackrock, Dublin, Ireland.,National and International Skin Registry Solutions (NISR), Charles Institute of Dermatology, Dublin, Ireland
| | - G Fletcher
- National and International Skin Registry Solutions (NISR), Charles Institute of Dermatology, Dublin, Ireland
| | - A Bosma
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F Capon
- St John's Institute of Dermatology within the, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - L Iversen
- Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - S M Langan
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK.,Faculty of Epidemiology, and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - P Di Meglio
- St John's Institute of Dermatology within the, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A H Musters
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D Prieto-Merino
- Faculty of Epidemiology, and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - T Tsakok
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - R B Warren
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - C Flohr
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - P I Spuls
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C E M Griffiths
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - J Barker
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - A D Irvine
- Clinical Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C H Smith
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ozuguz U, Oruc S, Ulu MS, Demirbas H, Acay A, Coker B, Beyazıt B, Yaman M, Koken T. Does vitamin D have any role in the improvement of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in type 1 diabetic patients? J Endocrinol Invest 2016; 39:1411-1417. [PMID: 27436228 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-016-0509-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2016] [Accepted: 07/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and vitamin D, nerve growth factor (NGF) and oxidative stress markers in patients with type 1 diabetes. METHODS Ninety-six patients with type 1 diabetes were included in the study. All patients were evaluated for DPN with Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument. Fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, lipid parameters, 25 (OH) D3, NGF, total oxidant status, total antioxidant status and oxidative stress index were measured. RESULTS Twenty-six patients (27 %) had DPN (group 1) and 70 patients did not have neuropathy (group 2). When the groups were evaluated with respect to general demographic characteristics, no differences were detected. Mean age, duration of diabetes and retinopathy were found significantly higher in patients who had neuropathy. Glomerular filtration rate levels were significantly lower in the neuropathy group. Between the groups, 25 (OH) vitamin D levels were significantly lower in the neuropathy group, while there were no differences in NGF levels or in oxidative stress markers. Michigan neuropathy examination score was positively correlated with age, and diabetes duration was negatively correlated with 25 (OH) vitamin D levels. In addition, 25 (OH) vitamin D was positively correlated with NGF. In the logistic regression analysis to determine the independent variables that will affect the development of neuropathy, duration of diabetes was detected as the only factor (p = 0.039, OR = 1.071). CONCLUSION It seems that the most important risk factor for the development of neuropathy in type 1 diabetic patients is disease duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Ozuguz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
| | - S Oruc
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - M S Ulu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - H Demirbas
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - A Acay
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - B Coker
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - B Beyazıt
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - M Yaman
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - T Koken
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Khan MS, Challacombe B, Elhage O, Rimington P, Coker B, Murphy D, Grieve A, Dasgupta P. A dual-centre, cohort comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. Int J Clin Pract 2012; 66:656-62. [PMID: 22507234 DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02888.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The role of minimally invasive radical cystectomy as opposed to open surgery for bladder cancer is not yet established. We present comparative outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy MATERIAL AND METHODS Prospective cohort comparison of 158 patients from 2003-2008 undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC) (n = 52), laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) (n =58) or robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) (n = 48) performed by a team of three surgeons at two hospitals. Peri-operative data, complication rates, length of hospital stay, oncological outcome (including lymph node status) and survival were recorded. Statistical analyses were adjusted to account for potential confounding factors such as ASA grade, gender, age, diversion type and final histology. RESULTS RARC took longer than LRC and ORC. Patients were about 30 times more likely to have a transfusion if they had ORC than if they had RARC (p < 0.0001) and about eight times more likely to have a transfusion if they had LRC compared with RARC (p < 0.006). Patients were four times more likely to have a transfusion if they had ORC as compared with LRC (p < 0.007). Patients were four times more likely to have complications if they had ORC than RARC (p = 0.006) and about three times more likely to have complications with LRC than with RARC (p = 0.02). Hospital stay was mean 19 days after ORC, 16 days after LRC and 10 days after RARC. CONCLUSIONS Despite study limitations, RARC had the lowest transfusion and complication rates and the shortest length of stay, although taking the longest to perform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Khan
- Urology Centre, Guy's & Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Coker B, Sawicka E. Factitious surgical emphysema. Case Reports 2009; 2009:bcr07.2008.0409. [DOI: 10.1136/bcr.07.2008.0409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|