1
|
Campanella B, Poggialini F, Legnaioli S, Cocciaro B, Lorenzetti G, Raneri S, Palleschi V. Commentary: Comments on: "Accuracy improvement of quantitative analysis for major elements in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy using single-sample calibration" by Rui Yuan et al. [Anal. Chim. Acta 1064 (2019) 11-16]. Anal Chim Acta 2023; 1259:341180. [PMID: 37100475 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2023.341180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- B Campanella
- Applied and Laser Spectroscopy Laboratory, Institute of Chemistry of Organometallic Compounds, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
| | - F Poggialini
- Applied and Laser Spectroscopy Laboratory, Institute of Chemistry of Organometallic Compounds, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
| | - S Legnaioli
- Applied and Laser Spectroscopy Laboratory, Institute of Chemistry of Organometallic Compounds, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
| | - B Cocciaro
- Applied and Laser Spectroscopy Laboratory, Institute of Chemistry of Organometallic Compounds, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
| | - G Lorenzetti
- Applied and Laser Spectroscopy Laboratory, Institute of Chemistry of Organometallic Compounds, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
| | - S Raneri
- Applied and Laser Spectroscopy Laboratory, Institute of Chemistry of Organometallic Compounds, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
| | - V Palleschi
- Applied and Laser Spectroscopy Laboratory, Institute of Chemistry of Organometallic Compounds, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Angelicone I, Priore A, Perrone Congedi F, de Giacomo F, Campanella B, Osti M, Valeriani M. PO-1404 Adjuvant, Early Salvage and Salvage Radiotherapy after surgery in prostate cancer: survival outcomes. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)03368-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
3
|
De Matteis S, Facondo G, Valeriani M, Vullo G, De Sanctis V, Ascolese AM, Campanella B, Scalabrino G, Osti MF. Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy (HFRT) of Breast/Chest Wall and Regional Nodes in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Toxicity Profile and Survival Outcomes in Retrospective Monoistitutional Study. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 22:e332-e340. [PMID: 34670727 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) of the breast/chest wall and regional nodes in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and positive lymph nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred and twenty-two patients treated between October 2016 and March 2020 with HFRT were retrospectively reviewed. A total dose of 42.4 Gy was delivered to the chest wall and lymph nodes in 16 fractions of 2.65 Gy each, using the IMRT technique. Patients treated with breast-conserving surgery received an overdose (concomitant boost of 3 Gy daily) with the SIB (Simultaneous Integrated Boost) technique. RESULTS Median age at diagnosis was 58 years (range 34-86 years) and median follow-up was 22 months (range 6-48 months). Overall survival (OS) at 1, 2 and 3 years was 100%, 97.3% and 90%, respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) at 1, 2, and 3 years was 91.4%, 87%, and 84.8%, respectively. Distant metastasis-free survival (MFS) at 1, 2 and 3 years was 93.1%, 88% and 85.7%, respectively. Two patients (1.6%) experienced local recurrence on the chest wall during FUP. Twenty-one patients (17%) showed a grade 2 dermal toxicity, no grade 3 acute skin toxicity was found. Sixteen patients (13%) showed early-stage arm lymphedema (grade ≤ 2). Twenty-three patients (19%) showed a grade 2 late skin toxicity. Twenty patients (16%) had grade ≤ 2 late arm lymphedema. CONCLUSION Given the excellent local control, survival rates and the low toxicity profile demonstrated, HFRT could be considered a valid therapeutic option in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara De Matteis
- Department of Medicine and Surgery and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Radiotherapy Oncology, St. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Facondo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Radiotherapy Oncology, St. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Valeriani
- Department of Medicine and Surgery and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Radiotherapy Oncology, St. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Vullo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Radiotherapy Oncology, St. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | - Vitaliana De Sanctis
- Department of Medicine and Surgery and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Radiotherapy Oncology, St. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Ascolese
- Department of Medicine and Surgery and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Radiotherapy Oncology, St. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Campanella
- Department of Medicine and Surgery and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Radiotherapy Oncology, St. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanna Scalabrino
- Department of Medicine and Surgery and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Radiotherapy Oncology, St. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Falchetto Osti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Radiotherapy Oncology, St. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Anzellini D, Scalabrino G, Campanella B, Perrone F, Ascolese A, Valeriani M, Osti M. PO-1169 30 Gy single dose stereotactic radiation therapy in a series of patients with lung oligometastasis. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)07620-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
5
|
De Sanctis V, Alfò M, Vitiello C, Vullo G, Facondo G, Marinelli L, Burocchi S, Gallo G, Valeriani M, Campanella B, Scalabrino G, Russo I, Salerno G, Cardelli P, Osti M, De Biase L. Markers of Cardiotoxicity in Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated With a Hypofractionated Schedule: A Prospective Study. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 21:e141-e149. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
6
|
|
7
|
Germani A, Petrucci S, De Marchis L, Libi F, Savio C, Amanti C, Bonifacino A, Campanella B, Capalbo C, Lombardi A, Maggi S, Mattei M, Osti MF, Pellegrini P, Speranza A, Stanzani G, Vitale V, Pizzuti A, Torrisi MR, Piane M. Beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2: Deleterious Variants in DNA Repair Pathway Genes in Italian Families with Breast/Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancers. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9093003. [PMID: 32957588 PMCID: PMC7563793 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9093003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The 5–10% of breast/ovarian cancers (BC and OC) are inherited, and germline pathogenic (P) variants in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 explain only 10–20% of these cases. Currently, new DDR genes have been related to BC/OC and to pancreatic (PC) cancers, but the prevalence of P variants remains to be explored. The purpose of this study was to investigate the spectrum and the prevalence of pathogenic variants in DDR pathway genes other than BRCA1/2 and to correlate the genotype with the clinical phenotype. A cohort of 113 non-BRCA patients was analyzed by next-generation sequencing using a multigene panel of the 25 DDR pathways genes related to BC, OC, and PC. We found 43 unique variants in 18 of 25 analyzed genes, 14 classified as P/likely pathogenic (LP) and 28 as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Deleterious variants were identified in 14% of index cases, whereas a VUS was identified in 20% of the probands. We observed a high incidence of deleterious variants in the CHEK2 gene, and a new pathogenic variant was detected in the RECQL gene. These results supported the clinical utility of multigene panel to increase the detection of P/LP carriers and to identify new actionable pathogenic gene variants useful for preventive and therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Germani
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy; (A.G.); (S.P.); (P.P.); (M.R.T.)
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
| | - Simona Petrucci
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy; (A.G.); (S.P.); (P.P.); (M.R.T.)
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
| | - Laura De Marchis
- Department of Radiological Anatomopathological, Oncological Science, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy;
- Umberto I University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Libi
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
| | - Camilla Savio
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
| | - Claudio Amanti
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy
| | - Adriana Bonifacino
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Campanella
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy;
| | - Carlo Capalbo
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
- Department of Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00100 Roma, Italy
| | - Augusto Lombardi
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Maggi
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Mattei
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
| | - Mattia Falchetto Osti
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy;
| | - Patrizia Pellegrini
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy; (A.G.); (S.P.); (P.P.); (M.R.T.)
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
| | - Annarita Speranza
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
| | - Gianluca Stanzani
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
| | - Valeria Vitale
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
| | - Antonio Pizzuti
- Department of Experimental Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy;
- Clinical Genomics Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Maria Rosaria Torrisi
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy; (A.G.); (S.P.); (P.P.); (M.R.T.)
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
| | - Maria Piane
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00100 Rome, Italy; (A.G.); (S.P.); (P.P.); (M.R.T.)
- Sant’Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy; (F.L.); (C.S.); (C.A.); (A.B.); (C.C.); (A.L.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (M.F.O.); (A.S.); (G.S.); (V.V.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Poggialini F, Campanella B, Legnaioli S, Pagnotta S, Raneri S, Palleschi V. Improvement of the performances of a commercial hand-held laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy instrument for steel analysis using multiple artificial neural networks. Rev Sci Instrum 2020; 91:073111. [PMID: 32752860 DOI: 10.1063/5.0012669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
In this article, we present a study on the optimization of the analytical performance of a commercial hand-held laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy instrument for steel analysis. We show how the performances of the instrument can be substantially improved using a non-linear calibration approach based on a set of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), one optimized for the determination of the major elements of the alloy, and the others specialized for the analysis of minor components. Tests of the instrument on steel samples used for instrument internal calibration demonstrate a comparable accuracy with the results of the ANNs, while the latter are considerably more accurate when unknown samples, not used for calibration/training, are tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Poggialini
- Applied and Laser Spectroscopy Laboratory, Institute of Chemistry of Organometallic Compounds, Area della Ricerca del CNR, Via G. Moruzzi, 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - B Campanella
- Applied and Laser Spectroscopy Laboratory, Institute of Chemistry of Organometallic Compounds, Area della Ricerca del CNR, Via G. Moruzzi, 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - S Legnaioli
- Applied and Laser Spectroscopy Laboratory, Institute of Chemistry of Organometallic Compounds, Area della Ricerca del CNR, Via G. Moruzzi, 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - S Pagnotta
- Earth Science Department, University of Pisa, Via S. Maria, 53, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - S Raneri
- Applied and Laser Spectroscopy Laboratory, Institute of Chemistry of Organometallic Compounds, Area della Ricerca del CNR, Via G. Moruzzi, 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - V Palleschi
- Applied and Laser Spectroscopy Laboratory, Institute of Chemistry of Organometallic Compounds, Area della Ricerca del CNR, Via G. Moruzzi, 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Carnevale A, Scaringi C, Scalabrino G, Campanella B, Osti MF, De Sanctis V, Valeriani M, Minniti G, Amanti C, Santanelli F, Enrici RM. Radiation therapy after breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction. Radiol Med 2013; 118:1240-50. [PMID: 23801395 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-013-0947-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2012] [Accepted: 07/12/2012] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment-related complications, outcomes, and patient satisfaction in women with locally advanced breast cancer who received post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) after breast reconstruction (BR). MATERIALS AND METHODS Between October 2007 and November 2010, 46 patients with locally advanced breast cancer who underwent mastectomy followed by BR received PMRT at our Department. Radiotherapy was delivered to the chest wall with a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. RESULTS The median follow-up was 19 months. Skin erythema grade 1 and 2 was seen in 44 (96%) and two (4%) patients, respectively. Major complications, requiring additional corrective surgical procedure, occurred in three (7%) patients (one patient with prosthesis, one patient with tissue expander and one patient with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap). At univariate analysis, smoking, chemotherapy, hormone therapy with tamoxifen and reconstruction with implant were associated with overall complications (capsular contracture and reconstruction failure). Forty (86%) patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the cosmetic outcome of reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy can be safely delivered after BR, with a low complication rate and good patient satisfaction. Further randomised studies are needed to better define the optimal timing of breast reconstruction and post-mastectomy radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Carnevale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, S. Andrea Hospital, University "Sapienza", Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|